scholarly journals The Indirect-Utility Criterion for Ranking Opportunity Sets over Time

Symmetry ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 241
Author(s):  
María García-Sanz ◽  
José Alcantud

A preference defined on a set of alternatives can be extended to a preference on the subsets of alternatives (named opportunity sets) in different ways. We specifically consider the application of the indirect-utility (IU) criterion in various stages, when both the alternatives and the preferences can change over time. In other words, we maintain the symmetry over time as far as criteria are concerned, but neither in the preferences, nor in the alternatives. We characterize this criterion by three testable axioms. Our study bears comparison with Krause (Economic Theory, 2008) for the two-period model.

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Garbarini ◽  
Hung-Bin Sheu ◽  
Dana Weber

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sam Nordberg ◽  
Louis G. Castonguay ◽  
Benjamin Locke

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Spano ◽  
P. Toro ◽  
M. Goldstein
Keyword(s):  
The Cost ◽  

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peggy Levitt ◽  
Deepak Lamba-Nieves

This article explores how the conceptualization, management, and measurement of time affect the migration-development nexus. We focus on how social remittances transform the meaning and worth of time, thereby changing how these ideas and practices are accepted and valued and recalibrating the relationship between migration and development. Our data reveal the need to pay closer attention to how migration’s impacts shift over time in response to its changing significance, rhythms, and horizons. How does migrants’ social influence affect and change the needs, values, and mind-frames of non-migrants? How do the ways in which social remittances are constructed, perceived, and accepted change over time for their senders and receivers?


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 2020.5-4
Author(s):  
Nöel Carroll ◽  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document