scholarly journals A Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Method with Possibility Degree and Power Aggregation Operators of Single Trapezoidal Neutrosophic Numbers

Symmetry ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaohui Wu ◽  
Jie Qian ◽  
Juanjuan Peng ◽  
Changchun Xue
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Supplier Selection ◽  
Practical Problem ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Information Aggregation ◽  
Aggregation Operators ◽  
Previous Approach ◽  
Complex Information ◽  
Evaluation Information

Single valued trapezoidal neutrosophic numbers (SVTNNs) are very useful tools for describing complex information, because of their advantage in describing the information completely, accurately and comprehensively for decision-making problems. In the paper, a method based on SVTNNs is proposed for dealing with multi-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) problems. Firstly, the new operations SVTNNs are developed for avoiding evaluation information aggregation loss and distortion. Then the possibility degrees and comparison of SVTNNs are proposed from the probability viewpoint for ranking and comparing the single valued trapezoidal neutrosophic information reasonably and accurately. Based on the new operations and possibility degrees of SVTNNs, the single valued trapezoidal neutrosophic power average (SVTNPA) and single valued trapezoidal neutrosophic power geometric (SVTNPG) operators are proposed to aggregate the single valued trapezoidal neutrosophic information. Furthermore, based on the developed aggregation operators, a single valued trapezoidal neutrosophic MCGDM method is developed. Finally, the proposed method is applied to solve the practical problem of the most appropriate green supplier selection and the rank results compared with the previous approach demonstrate the proposed method's effectiveness.

scholarly journals Methods for Multiple-Attribute Group Decision Making with q-Rung Interval-Valued Orthopair Fuzzy Information and Their Applications to the Selection of Green Suppliers

Symmetry ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Wang ◽  
Hui Gao ◽  
Guiwu Wei ◽  
Yu Wei
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Information Aggregation ◽  
Aggregation Operators ◽  
Uncertain Information ◽  
Multiple Attribute ◽  
Green Suppliers ◽  
Interval Valued ◽  
Selection Of

In the practical world, there commonly exist different types of multiple-attribute group decision making (MAGDM) problems with uncertain information. Symmetry among some attributes’ information that is already known and unknown, and symmetry between the pure attribute sets and fuzzy attribute membership sets, can be an effective way to solve this type of MAGDM problem. In this paper, we investigate four forms of information aggregation operators, including the Hamy mean (HM) operator, weighted HM (WHM) operator, dual HM (DHM) operator, and the dual-weighted HM (WDHM) operator with the q-rung interval-valued orthopair fuzzy numbers (q-RIVOFNs). Then, some extended aggregation operators, such as the q-rung interval-valued orthopair fuzzy Hamy mean (q-RIVOFHM) operator; q-rung interval-valued orthopairfuzzy weighted Hamy mean (q-RIVOFWHM) operator; q-rung interval-valued orthopair fuzzy dual Hamy mean (q-RIVOFDHM) operator; and q-rung interval-valued orthopair fuzzy weighted dual Hamy mean (q-RIVOFWDHM) operator are presented, and some of their precious properties are studied in detail. Finally, a real example for green supplier selection in green supply chain management is provided, to demonstrate the proposed approach and to verify its rationality and scientific nature.

scholarly journals Interval-Valued Hesitant Fuzzy Multiattribute Group Decision Making Based on Improved Hamacher Aggregation Operators and Continuous Entropy

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Liu ◽  
Ning Zhou ◽  
Li-Hua Zhuang ◽  
Ning Li ◽  
Fei-Fei Jin
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Information Aggregation ◽  
Aggregation Operators ◽  
Weighted Averaging ◽  
Fuzzy Information ◽  
Ordered Weighted Averaging ◽  
Cowa Operator ◽  
Interval Valued

Under the interval-valued hesitant fuzzy information environment, we investigate a multiattribute group decision making (MAGDM) method with continuous entropy weights and improved Hamacher information aggregation operators. Firstly, we introduce the axiomatic definition of entropy for interval-valued hesitant fuzzy elements (IVHFEs) and construct a continuous entropy formula on the basis of the continuous ordered weighted averaging (COWA) operator. Then, based on the Hamachert-norm andt-conorm, the adjusted operational laws for IVHFEs are defined. In order to aggregate interval-valued hesitant fuzzy information, some new improved interval-valued hesitant fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators are investigated, including the improved interval-valued hesitant fuzzy Hamacher ordered weighted averaging (I-IVHFHOWA) operator and the improved interval-valued hesitant fuzzy Hamacher ordered weighted geometric (I-IVHFHOWG) operator, the desirable properties of which are discussed. In addition, the relationship among these proposed operators is analyzed in detail. Applying the continuous entropy and the proposed operators, an approach to MAGDM is developed. Finally, a numerical example for emergency operating center (EOC) selection is provided, and comparative analyses with existing methods are performed to demonstrate that the proposed approach is both valid and practical to deal with group decision making problems.

scholarly journals Probabilistic Linguistic Aggregation Operators Based on Einstein t-Norm and t-Conorm and Their Application in Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making

Symmetry ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kobina Agbodah ◽  
Adjei Peter Darko
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Information Aggregation ◽  
Aggregation Operators ◽  
Weighted Averaging ◽  
Knowledge Based ◽  
Multiple Attribute ◽  
Linguistic Term ◽  
Probabilistic Linguistic Term Sets

One of the major problems of varied knowledge-based systems has to do with aggregation and fusion. Pang’s probabilistic linguistic term sets denotes aggregation of fuzzy information and it has attracted tremendous interest from researchers recently. The purpose of this article is to deal investigating methods of information aggregation under the probabilistic linguistic environment. In this situation we defined certain Einstein operational laws on probabilistic linguistic term elements (PLTESs) based on Einstein product and Einstein sum. Consequently, we develop some probabilistic linguistic aggregation operators, notably the probabilistic linguistic Einstein average (PLEA) operators, probabilistic linguistic Einstein geometric (PLEG) operators, weighted probabilistic linguistic Einstein average (WPLEA) operators, weighted probabilistic linguistic Einstein geometric (WPLEG) operators. These operators extend the weighted averaging operator and the weighted geometric operator for the purpose of aggregating probabilistic linguistic terms values respectively. Einstein t-norm and Einstein t-conorm constitute effective aggregation tools and they allow input arguments to reinforce each other downwardly and upwardly respectively. We then generate various properties of these operators. With the aid of the WPLEA and WPLEG, we originate the approaches for the application of multiple attribute group decision making (MAGDM) with the probabilistic linguistic term sets (PLTSs). Lastly, we apply an illustrative example to elucidate our proposed methods and also validate their potentials.

scholarly journals A Novel Approach to Multi-Attribute Group Decision-Making based on Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Power Muirhead Mean

Symmetry ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wuhuan Xu ◽  
Xiaopu Shang ◽  
Jun Wang ◽  
Weizi Li
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Information Aggregation ◽  
Aggregation Operators ◽  
Intuitionistic Fuzzy ◽  
Novel Approach ◽  
Maclaurin Symmetric Mean ◽  
Magdm Problems ◽  
Interval Valued

This paper focuses on multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) course in which attributes are evaluated in terms of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy (IVIF) information. More explicitly, this paper introduces new aggregation operators for IVIF information and further proposes a new IVIF MAGDM method. The power average (PA) operator and the Muirhead mean (MM) are two powerful and effective information aggregation technologies. The most attractive advantage of the PA operator is its power to combat the adverse effects of ultra-evaluation values on the information aggregation results. The prominent characteristic of the MM operator is that it is flexible to capture the interrelationship among any numbers of arguments, making it more powerful than Bonferroni mean (BM), Heronian mean (HM), and Maclaurin symmetric mean (MSM). To absorb the virtues of both PA and MM, it is necessary to combine them to aggregate IVIF information and propose IVIF power Muirhead mean (IVIFPMM) operator and the IVIF weighted power Muirhead mean (IVIFWPMM) operator. We investigate their properties to show the strongness and flexibility. Furthermore, a novel approach to MAGDM problems with IVIF decision-making information is introduced. Finally, a numerical example is provided to show the performance of the proposed method.

Vague multi-attribute group decision-making method based on evidence theory with a new aspect to solve weights

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
ChunSheng Cui ◽  
YanLi Cao
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Evidence Theory ◽  
Score Function ◽  
Information Aggregation ◽  
Weight Of Evidence ◽  
Uncertain Environments ◽  
Vague Sets ◽  
Evaluation Information

In order to solve the problems of weight solving and information aggregation in the Vague multi-attribute group decision-making, this paper first solves the weight of Vague evaluation value, and then fuses the information of Vague sets through evidence theory, and obtains an information aggregation algorithm for Vague multi-attribute group decision-making. Firstly, The algorithm draws on the idea of solving the weight of evidence in the improved evidence theory algorithm, and calculates the weight of Vague evaluation value, and revises the original evaluation information after obtaining the weight of each Vague evaluation value. Secondly, this algorithm analyzes the mathematical relationship between the Vague sets and the evidence theory, and uses the evidence theory to fuse the evaluation information to obtain the final Vague evaluation value of each alternative. Finally, this algorithm uses a score function to calculate the score of each alternative to determine the best alternative. The algorithm given in the paper enables decision-makers to make rational decisions in uncertain environments, and then select the best alternative.

CPT-MABAC method for spherical fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making and its application to green supplier selection

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Huiyuan Zhang ◽  
Guiwu Wei ◽  
Xudong Chen
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Supplier Selection ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Comparison Method ◽  
Entropy Method ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Green Supplier Selection ◽  
Multiple Attribute ◽  
Psychological Perceptions

The green supplier selection is one of the popular multiple attribute group decision making (MAGDM) problems. The spherical fuzzy sets (SFSs) can fully express the complexity and fuzziness of evaluation information for green supplier selection. Furthermore, the classic MABAC (multi-attributive border approximation area comparison) method based on the cumulative prospect theory (CPT-MABAC) is designed, which is an optional method in reflecting the psychological perceptions of decision makers (DMs). Therefore, in this article, we propose a spherical fuzzy CPT-MABAC (SF-CPT-MABAC) method for MAGDM issues. Meanwhile, considering the different preferences of DMs to attribute sets, we obtain the objective weights of attributes through entropy method. Focusing on the current popular problems, this paper applies the proposed method for green supplier selection and proves for green supplier selection based on SF-CPT-MABAC method. Finally, by comparing existing methods, the effectiveness of the proposed method is certified.

scholarly journals A Novel Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Approach Based on Bonferroni and Heronian Mean Operators under Hesitant 2-Tuple Linguistic Environment

Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (13) ◽  
pp. 1489
Author(s):  
Shahzad Faizi ◽  
Wojciech Sałabun ◽  
Nisbha Shaheen ◽  
Atiq ur Rehman ◽  
Jarosław Wątróbski
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Weighted Average ◽  
Aggregation Operators ◽  
Bonferroni Mean ◽  
Operational Laws ◽  
Geometric Bonferroni Mean ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Heronian Mean

Ambiguous and uncertain facts can be handled using a hesitant 2-tuple linguistic set (H2TLS), an important expansion of the 2-tuple linguistic set. The vagueness and uncertainty of data can be grabbed by using aggregation operators. Therefore, aggregation operators play an important role in computational processes to merge the information provided by decision makers (DMs). Furthermore, the aggregation operator is a potential mechanism for merging multisource data which is synonymous with cooperative preference. The aggregation operators need to be studied and analyzed from various perspectives to represent complex choice situations more readily and capture the diverse experiences of DMs. In this manuscript, we propose some valuable operational laws for H2TLS. These new operational laws work through the individual aggregation of linguistic words and the collection of translation parameters. We introduced a hesitant 2-tuple linguistic weighted average (H2TLWA) operator to solve multi-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) problems. We also define hesitant 2-tuple linguistic Bonferroni mean (H2TLBM) operator, hesitant 2-tuple linguistic geometric Bonferroni mean (H2TLGBM) operator, hesitant 2-tuple linguistic Heronian mean (H2TLHM) operator, and a hesitant 2-tuple linguistic geometric Heronian mean (H2TLGHM) operator based on the novel operational laws proposed in this paper. We define the aggregation operators for addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, scalar multiplication, power and complement with their respective properties. An application example and comparison analysis were examined to show the usefulness and practicality of the work.

Heterogeneous multi-attribute case retrieval method based on group decision making using incomplete weight information

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Kai Zhang ◽  
Jing Zheng ◽  
Ying-Ming Wang
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Case Based Reasoning ◽  
Case Retrieval ◽  
Interval Numbers ◽  
Retrieval Method ◽  
Incomplete Weight ◽  
Incomplete Weight Information ◽  
Evaluation Information

Case-based reasoning (CBR) is one of the most popular methods used in emergency decision making (EDM). Case retrieval plays a key role in EDM processes based on CBR and usually functions by retrieving similar historical cases using similarity measurements. Decision makers (DMs), thus, choose the most appropriate historical cases. Although uncertainty and fuzziness are present in the EDM process, in-depth research on these issues is still lacking. In this study, a heterogeneous multi-attribute case retrieval method based on group decision making (GDM) with incomplete weight information is developed. First, the case similarities between historical and target cases are calculated, and a set of similar historical cases is constructed. Six formats of case attributes are considered, namely crisp numbers, interval numbers, linguistic variables, intuitionistic fuzzy numbers, single-valued neutrosophic numbers (NNs) and interval-valued NNs. Next, the evaluation information from the DMs is expressed using single-valued NNs. Additionally, the evaluation utilities of similar historical cases are obtained by aggregating the evaluation information. The comprehensive utilities of similar historical cases are obtained using case similarities and evaluation utilities. In this process, the weights of incomplete information are determined by constructing optimization models. Furthermore, the most appropriate similar historical case is selected according to the comprehensive utilities. Finally, the proposed method is demonstrated using two examples; its performance is then compared with those of other similar methods to demonstrate its validity and efficacy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document