scholarly journals Supplementation of Carbon-Based Conductive Materials and Trace Metals to Improve Biogas Production from Apple Pomace

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (17) ◽  
pp. 9488
Author(s):  
Addam Claes ◽  
Lucy Melchi ◽  
Sibel Uludag-Demirer ◽  
Goksel N. Demirer

Due to its high water and organic contents, management of apple pomace (AP) poses several waste management challenges on the apple juice and cider producing industries. Bioconversion of AP into biogas provides an excellent possibility to reduce the environmental challenge faced in the management of AP waste along with producing renewable energy in the form of methane. This study investigated the effect of carbon-based conductive materials (biochar and graphene) and trace metals supplementation to improve biogas production from AP. The results indicate that supplementation of biochar, trace metals, and graphene significantly improves the biogas production from AP. Trace metal and biochar supplementation at a COD concentration of 6000 mg/L resulted in 7.2% and 13.3% increases in the biogas production, respectively. When trace metals and biochar were supplemented together, the biogas production increased by 22.7%. This synergistic effect was also observed at the COD concentration of 12,000 mg/L. The improvement in the biogas formation was significantly higher for graphene supplemented reactors (27.8%). Moreover, biochar and trace metals supplementation also led to 19.6% and 23.0% increases in the methane yield relative to the reactor fed only with AP, respectively. These results suggest anaerobic digestion supplemented with carbon-based conductive materials and trace metals is a viable option for valorizing apple pomace.

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith González ◽  
Marta Sánchez ◽  
Xiomar Gómez

Anaerobic digestion is a well-known technology which has been extensively studied to improve its performance and yield biogas from substrates. The application of different types of pre-treatments has led to an increase in biogas production but also in global energy demand. However, in recent years the use of carbon conductive materials as supplement for this process has been studied resulting in an interesting way for improving the performance of anaerobic digestion without greatly affecting its energy demand. This review offers an introduction to this interesting approach and covers the different experiences performed on the use of carbon conductive materials proposing it as a feasible alternative for the production of energy from biomass, considering also the integration of anaerobic digestion and thermal valorisation.


Author(s):  
Swati Hegde ◽  
Shwe Sin Win ◽  
Thomas A. Trabold

Anaerobic digestion (AD) is a viable method for conversion of food waste and other organic materials into methane-rich biogas. However, when used at high organic loading rates, using only food waste can lead to an unstable process. Process instability is indicated by frequent changes in pH, and increase in ammonia and hydrogen sulfide concentration. These uncontrolled changes combined with over-production of organic acids can inhibit biogas production and ultimately lead to digester failure. Therefore, certain co-substrates produced as wastes in the regional food sector were tested as stabilizing agents for food waste digestion with an objective of achieving stable non-manure based digestion. The substrates tested were acid whey, bread, manure, caffeinated drink, paper napkins and apple pomace. The biogas production was increased by 12% in reactors containing bread, by 10% with acid whey, and by 12% when the co-substrate was caffeinated drink. The reactors containing paper and manure showed decreased biogas production by 6% and 12% respectively, but these changes are relatively small and thus not considered inhibitory. Co-digestion with apple pomace was found to be inhibitory and resulted in digester failure. This initial study has demonstrated that the stability of AD systems may be improved by strategically combining available food waste feedstocks.


2020 ◽  
Vol 243 ◽  
pp. 118593 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Hijazi ◽  
E. Abdelsalam ◽  
M. Samer ◽  
B.M.A. Amer ◽  
I.H. Yacoub ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 220 ◽  
pp. 516-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Dang ◽  
Dawn E. Holmes ◽  
Zhiqiang Zhao ◽  
Trevor L. Woodard ◽  
Yaobin Zhang ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 580
Author(s):  
Antony P. Pallan ◽  
S. Antony Raja ◽  
C. G. Varma ◽  
Deepak Mathew D.K. ◽  
Anil K. S. ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Damaris Kerubo Oyaro ◽  
Zablon Isaboke Oonge ◽  
Patts Meshack Odira

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document