scholarly journals Physical and Biological Treatment Technologies of Slaughterhouse Wastewater: A Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 4656
Author(s):  
Mohammed Ali Musa ◽  
Syazwani Idrus
Keyword(s):  
Anaerobic Digestion ◽  
Biological Treatment ◽  
Capital Investment ◽  
Treatment Technology ◽  
Large Space ◽  
Slaughterhouse Wastewater ◽  
Trickling Filters ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Electrocoagulation Process ◽  
Physical Treatments

Physical and biological treatment technology are considered a highly feasible and economic way to treat slaughterhouse wastewater. To achieve the desired effluent quality for disposal or reuse, various technological options were reviewed. However, most practical operations are accompanied by several advantages and disadvantages. Nevertheless, due to the presence of biodegradable organic matter in slaughterhouse waste, anaerobic digestion technology is commonly applied for economic gain. In this paper, the common technologies used for slaughterhouse wastewater treatment and their suitability were reviewed. The advantages and disadvantages of the different processes were evaluated. Physical treatments (dissolved air floatation (DAF), coagulation–flocculation and sedimentation, electrocoagulation process and membrane technology) were found to be more effective but required a large space to operate and intensive capital investment. However, some biological treatments such as anaerobic, facultative lagoons, activated sludge process and trickling filters were also effective but required longer start-up periods. This review further explores the various strategies being used in the treatment of other wastewater for the production of valuable by-products through anaerobic digestion.

Will anaerobic digestion of solid waste survive in the future?

2006 ◽  
Vol 53 (8) ◽  
pp. 187-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. De Baere
Keyword(s):  
Anaerobic Digestion ◽  
Municipal Solid Waste ◽  
Solid Waste ◽  
Biological Treatment ◽  
Operating Costs ◽  
Organic Fraction ◽  
Treatment Technology ◽  
Treatment Techniques ◽  
The Future ◽  
Viable Treatment

Anaerobic digestion has captured a significant share of the European market for the biological treatment of the organic fraction in municipal solid waste. Almost 4 million ton per year in digestion capacity has been installed through the construction of more than 120 full-scale plants. Not all plants have been equally successful, due to poor planning, design or bad operation. This, besides higher than expected investment and operating costs, may have slowed down the growth of anaerobic digestion of solid waste. However, an evaluation of the development of anaerobic digestion over the last 15 years shows that there is now a greater diversity in application, a wider range in types of systems and suppliers, and a continued increasing rate of implementation throughout most parts of Europe. New alternative treatment techniques have not seen the same level of success as anaerobic digestion. Anaerobic digestion has been established as a viable treatment technology for the organic fraction of municipal solid waste and will most likely play an even more important role in the future.

Anaerobic Digestion of Slaughterhouse Wastewater: A Kinetics Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-80
Author(s):  
Chinenyenwa Nweke ◽  
◽  
Philomena Igbokwe ◽  
Joseph Nwabanne ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anaerobic Digestion ◽  
Kinetics Study ◽  
Slaughterhouse Wastewater

Research of Treatment Technology for Electroplating Wastewater

2014 ◽  
Vol 487 ◽  
pp. 713-716 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Dan Zhou ◽  
Miao Sun ◽  
Li Juan Wang ◽  
Guan Nan Xi
Keyword(s):  
Waste Water ◽  
Wastewater Treatment ◽  
Electrochemical Method ◽  
Chemical Process ◽  
Biological Treatment ◽  
Chemical Method ◽  
Treatment Technology ◽  
Electroplating Wastewater ◽  
The Common ◽  
Physical And Chemical

The sources and composition of electroplating waste water are summarized. The common wastewater treatment technology, such as physical and chemical method, physic-chemical process, biological treatment and electrochemical method, and so on. Then the vision for the development of electroplating wastewater treatment technology is made.

Using Two-Phase Anaerobic Digestion for Organic Waste

2014 ◽  
Vol 953-954 ◽  
pp. 300-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fang Yin ◽  
Wu Di Zhang ◽  
Jing Liu ◽  
Hong Yang
Keyword(s):  
Anaerobic Digestion ◽  
Biological Treatment ◽  
Organic Waste ◽  
Single Phase ◽  
Treatment Process ◽  
Maximal Activity ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
High Efficient ◽  
Development Direction ◽  
Biological Treatment Process

The essence of the two phase anaerobic biological treatment process is to place acid bacteria and methane-producing bacteria in two reactors respectively, where it can provide the optimal conditions for their growth and metabolism, allowing them to live up to their maximal activity, which greatly improve processing capacity and efficiency compared to a single-phase anaerobic digestion. The paper start with the two phase anaerobic digestion process, in order to discuss the development direction of high efficient anaerobic digestion system.

scholarly journals PyADM1: a Python implementation of Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peyman Sadrimajd ◽  
Patrick Mannion ◽  
Enda Howley ◽  
Piet N. L. Lens
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Operating System ◽  
Mathematical Model ◽  
Renewable Energy ◽  
Anaerobic Digestion ◽  
Waste Treatment ◽  
Treatment Technology ◽  
Software Implementations ◽  
Solid Waste Treatment ◽  
Direct Use

Anaerobic Digestion (AD) is a waste treatment technology widely used for wastewater and solid waste treatment, with the advantage of being a source of renewable energy in the form of biogas. Anaerobic digestion model number 1 (ADM1) is the most common mathematical model available for AD modelling. Commercial software implementations of ADM1 are available but have limited flexibility and availability due to the closed sources and licensing fees. Python is the fastest growing programming language and is open source freely available. Python implementation of ADM1 makes this AD model available to the mass user base of the Python ecosystem and it [prime]s libraries. The open easy to use implementation in PyADM1 makes it more accessible and provides possibilities for flexible direct use of the model linked to other software, e.g. machine learning libraries or Linux operating system on embedded hardware.

Working Parameters Optimization of Hydrolysis-acidogenesis reactor in two stage anaerobic digestion of slaughterhouse Wastewater for Biogas Production

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dejene Tsegaye Bedane ◽  
Mohammed Mazharuddin Khan ◽  
Seyoum Leta Asfaw
Keyword(s):  
Anaerobic Digestion ◽  
Working Conditions ◽  
Retention Time ◽  
Hydraulic Retention Time ◽  
Loading Rate ◽  
Oxygen Demand ◽  
Organic Loading Rate ◽  
Organic Loading ◽  
Slaughterhouse Wastewater ◽  
Working Parameters

Abstract Background : Wastewater from agro-industries such as slaughterhouse is typical organic wastewater with high value of biochemical oxygen demand, chemical oxygen demand, biological organic nutrients (Nitrogen and phosphate) which are insoluble, slowly biodegradable solids, pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria and viruses, parasite eggs. Moreover it contains high protein and putrefies fast leading to environmental pollution problem. This indicates that slaughterhouses are among the most environmental polluting agro-industries. Anaerobic digestion is a sequence of metabolic steps involving consortiums of several microbial populations to form a complex metabolic interaction network resulting in the conversation of organic matter into methane (CH 4 ), carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and other trace compounds. Separation of the phase permits the optimization of the organic loading rate and HRT based on the requirements of the microbial consortiums of each phase. The purpose of this study was to optimize the working conditions for the hydrolytic - acidogenic stage in two step/phase anaerobic digestion of slaughterhouse wastewater. The setup of the laboratory scale reactor was established at Center for Environmental Science, College of Natural Science with a total volume of 40 liter (36 liter working volume and 4 liter gas space). The working parameters for hydrolytic - acidogenic stage were optimized for six hydraulic retention time 1-6 days and equivalent organic loading rate of 5366.43 – 894.41 mg COD/L day to evaluate the effect of the working parameters on the performance of hydrolytic – acidogenic reactor. Result : The finding revealed that hydraulic retention time of 3 day with organic loading rate of 1,788.81 mg COD/L day was a as an optimal working conditions for the parameters under study for the hydrolytic - acidogenic stage. The degree of hydrolysis and acidification were mainly influenced by lower hydraulic retention time (higher organic loading rate) and highest values recorded were 63.92 % at hydraulic retention time of 3 day and 53.26% at hydraulic retention time of 2 day respectively. Conclusion : The finding of the present study indicated that at steady state the concentration of soluble chemical oxygen demand and total volatile fatty acids increase as hydraulic retention time decreased or organic loading rate increased from 1 day hydraulic retention time to 3 day hydraulic retention time and decreases as hydraulic retention time increase from 4 to 6 day. The lowest concentration of NH 4 + -N and highest degree of acidification was also achieved at hydraulic retention time of 3 day. Therefore, it can be concluded that hydraulic retention time of 3 day/organic loading rate of 1,788.81 mg COD/L .day was selected as an optimal working condition for the high performance and stability during the two stage anaerobic digestion of slaughterhouse wastewater for the hydrolytic-acidogenic stage under mesophilic temperature range selected (37.5℃). Keywords : Slaughterhouse Wastewater, Hydrolytic – Acidogenic, Two Phase Anaerobic Digestion, Optimal Condition, Agro-processing wastewater

scholarly journals Pretreatment of Animal Manure Biomass to Improve Biogas Production: A Review

Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 3573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meneses-Quelal Orlando ◽  
Velázquez-Martí Borja
Keyword(s):  
Anaerobic Digestion ◽  
Methane Production ◽  
Biogas Production ◽  
Poultry Manure ◽  
Animal Manure ◽  
Methane Yield ◽  
Operational Parameters ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Physical Chemical ◽  
Chemical Pretreatments

The objective of this research is to present a review of the current technologies and pretreatments used in the fermentation of cow, pig and poultry manure. Pretreatment techniques were classified into physical, chemical, physicochemical, and biological groups. Various aspects of these different pretreatment approaches are discussed in this review. The advantages and disadvantages of its applicability are highlighted since the effects of pretreatments are complex and generally depend on the characteristics of the animal manure and the operational parameters. Biological pretreatments were shown to improve methane production from animal manure by 74%, chemical pretreatments by 45%, heat pretreatments by 41% and physical pretreatments by 30%. In general, pretreatments improve anaerobic digestion of the lignocellulosic content of animal manure and, therefore, increase methane yield.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document