scholarly journals The Dark Side of Managing for the Long Run: Examining When Family Firms Create Value

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 3776
Author(s):  
Kyuho Jin ◽  
Joowon Lee ◽  
Sung Min Hong
Keyword(s):  
Family Involvement ◽  
Stock Price ◽  
Family Firms ◽  
Generalized Method Of Moments ◽  
Chief Executive ◽  
Relative Strength ◽  
Dark Side ◽  
Economic Sustainability ◽  
Economic Activities ◽  
Business Fluctuations

Family firms take a substantial fraction of economic activities and significantly influence a nation’s economic sustainability. Despite the considerable amount of research efforts to determine their performance implications, there is still a lack of consensus. This study aims to address this dissensus in two ways. Theory-wise, we introduce two interdependent contingencies that interactively determine the relative strength of positive and negative effects of family involvement: inside chief executive officers (CEOs) and business fluctuations. Method-wise, we employ an advanced econometric technique, the system generalized method of moments (GMM) estimator, to control for endogeneity. Using panel data of Korean family firms listed on the Korea Composite Stock Price Index (KOSPI) stock market during the periods between 2013 and 2016, we find (1) that family firms underperform non-family firms, (2) that the negative effect of family involvement decreases under the management of inside CEOs, and (3) that this positive moderation effect of inside CEOs decreases in the face of business fluctuations. This study furthers our understanding of how the family influences firm performance and, eventually, economic sustainability.

scholarly journals International entrepreneurship and Mexican listed family firms’ CEO/Board characteristics

2019 ◽  
pp. 361-369
Author(s):  
Karen Watkins-Fassler ◽  
Lázaro Rodríguez-Ariza
Keyword(s):  
Family Involvement ◽  
Chief Executive Officers ◽  
Family Firms ◽  
International Entrepreneurship ◽  
Emerging Market ◽  
Chief Executive ◽  
Probit Model ◽  
Women On Boards ◽  
Executive Officers ◽  
Binary Probit

The objective of this research is to analyze the influence on international entrepreneurship of both Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) and board of directors’ traits. It takes into account 52 listed family firms in Mexico (2001-2015), an emerging market where ownership concentration is particularly high. Results obtained from a binary probit model show that family involvement reduces the odds of pursuing foreign endeavors. However, when the CEO has a business administration academic background, the probability of having subsidiaries or branches abroad rises considerably. Finally, there is evidence that the presence of women on boards reduces the odds of international entrepreneurship.

scholarly journals Impact of Family Ownership on Market Value of a Firm: A Comparative Analysis of Family and Non-Family Companies Listed at Karachi Stock Exchange (Pakistan)

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (12) ◽  
pp. 673-683
Author(s):  
Safdar Husain Tahir ◽  
Hazoor Muhammad Sabir
Keyword(s):  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Family Firms ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Generalized Method Of Moments ◽  
Chief Executive ◽  
Family Ownership ◽  
Young Generation ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Inflection Points ◽  
The Impact

The current study attempts to investigate the impact of family ownership structure on value of firms listed at the Karachi Stock Exchange (KSE) of Pakistan. For the distinction of FOB from Non-FOB, two threshold points (25% & 50%) of ownership structure are used. A sample of 280 listed firms at KSE is collected ranging for the period 2002-13. Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) is applied on panel data to estimate the coefficients of variables. The empirical results indicate that the family firms outperform the non-family ones. The better performance of young generation of family firms over succeeding generation is also revealed but professional chief executive officer (CEO) over family member is preferred. Furthermore, this study discovers inflection points i.e. (62% & 57%) for family and non-family firms under quadratic specification respectively.

Family Firms and Stock Price Crash Risk

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 77-86
Author(s):  
Hae-Young Ryu ◽  
Soo-Joon Chae
Keyword(s):  
Stock Price ◽  
Family Firms ◽  
Crash Risk

MOMENTUM OSCILLATORS - A TOOL TO PREDICT STOCK PRICE BEHAVIOUR

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shishir Kumar Gujrati
Keyword(s):  
Stock Price ◽  
Moving Average ◽  
Technical Analysis ◽  
Relative Strength ◽  
Future Price ◽  
Range Data ◽  
Strength Index ◽  
Price Trends ◽  
Past Data ◽  
Price Movements

Stock markets are always taken as the barometer of the economy. The price movement of their indices reflects every ups and downs of the economy. Although seem to be random, these price movements do follow a certain track which can be identified using appropriate tool over long range data. One such method is of Technical Analysis wherein future price trends are forecasted using past data. Momentum Oscillators are the important tools of technical analysis. The current paper aims to identify the previous price movements of sensex by using Relative Strength Index (RSI) and Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) tools and also aims to check whether these tools are appropriate in forecasting the price trends or not.

The effects of goals attainment on CEO-owner satisfaction and the role of family involvement

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-127
Author(s):  
Ondřej Machek ◽  
Jiří Hnilica
Keyword(s):  
Family Involvement ◽  
Family Business ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Family Firms ◽  
Hierarchical Regression ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Business Goals ◽  
Growth Increase ◽  
The Family ◽  
Owner Satisfaction

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine how the satisfaction with economic and non-economic goals achievement is related to the overall satisfaction with the business of the CEO-owner, and whether family involvement moderates this relationship. Design/methodology/approach Based on a survey among 323 CEO-owners of family and non-family businesses operating in the Czech Republic, the authors employ the OLS hierarchical regression analysis and test the moderating effects of family involvement on the relationship between the satisfaction with different goals attainment and the overall satisfaction with the business. Findings The main finding is that family and non-family CEO-owner’s satisfaction does not differ significantly when economic goals (profit maximisation, sales growth, increase in market share or firm value) and firm-oriented non-economic goals (satisfaction of employees, corporate reputation) are being achieved; both classes of goals increase the overall satisfaction with the firm and the family involvement does not strengthen this relationship. However, when it comes to external non-economic goals related to the society or environment, there is a significant and positive moderating effect of family involvement. Originality/value The study contributes to the family business literature. First, to date, most of the studies focused on family business goals have been qualitative, thus not allowing for generalisation of findings. Second, there is a lack of evidence on the ways in which family firms integrate their financial and non-financial goals. Third, the authors contribute to the literature on the determinants of personal satisfaction with the business for CEOs, which has been the focus on a relatively scarce number of studies.

Good times, bad times: the stock market performance of firms that own high value brands

2016 ◽  
Vol 50 (5/6) ◽  
pp. 670-694 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Voss ◽  
Mayoor Mohan
Keyword(s):  
Chief Executive Officers ◽  
Stock Price ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Chief Executive ◽  
Share Price ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Price Performance ◽  
Stock Market Performance ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Executive Officers

Purpose The purpose of the this paper is to correct a deficiency in the published literature by examining the share price performance of firms that own high-value brands in uptrending, downtrending and sideways markets. Design/methodology/approach The authors examined stock price performance for an index of firms that owned brands in the Interbrand list of the “Best Global Brands” from 2001 through 2009 using the Fama-French method. Findings The authors’ index outperformed the Standard & Poor’s 500 when the market was up or downtrending, but not when it moved sideways. Research limitations/implications The authors find that an index of firms that own the produced better returns than the Standard & Poor’s 500 market index. Owning highly valued brands may be a marketplace signal to the investing community regarding the firm’s management acumen. Practical implications Owning high-value brands seems to influence share price performance, a metric used to judge chief executive officers. Thus, brand investments align with the shareholders’ interest. The authors help alleviate the perception (Challagalla et al., 2014) that marketing managers make investments on an ad hoc basis. Originality/value For the first time, the authors evaluate the effect of owning one or more of the world’s most valuable brands on the market value of common stock using data from downtrending, uptrending and no-trend periods. This research is also among the first to introduce volatility into the Fama-French method and it is an important explanatory variable. This paper’s approach has interesting comparisons to other papers taking a similar analytical approach.

scholarly journals Economic micro-systems? Non-market and not-only-for-profit economic activities in eco-communities

Human Affairs ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Blažek
Keyword(s):  
Potential Model ◽  
Economic Sustainability ◽  
Economic Activities ◽  
For Profit ◽  
Community Economy ◽  
Technological Transition ◽  
Micro Systems

AbstractEco-communities are a potential model for the socio-technological transition to a post-carbon society. The debate over their economic sustainability has, however, been limited. This article aims to enhance the discussion by offering a conceptualization of the economic micro-system created in eco-communities. It uses the economic terms households and firms to discuss two ways in which the community economy is positioned and then goes on to explore the principles behind the non-market (non-monetary) activities of households and the not-only-for-profit activities of firms as the basis of the eco-community economy. It concludes by pointing out that both can operate in parallel, with eco-communities producing non-market capital that can be used to develop not-only-for-profit activities which support the economic sustainability of the projects.

scholarly journals The Determinants of Tax Aggressiveness in Family Firms: An Investigation of Italian Private Family Firms

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 7654
Author(s):  
Giulia Flamini ◽  
Paola Vola ◽  
Lucrezia Songini ◽  
Luca Gnan
Keyword(s):  
Family Involvement ◽  
Family Business ◽  
Family Firms ◽  
Tax Planning ◽  
Agency Conflicts ◽  
Managerial Control ◽  
Public Companies ◽  
Tax Aggressiveness ◽  
Research Findings ◽  
Antecedents And Consequences

A recent stream of research has focused on tax aggressiveness, the downward management of taxable income through tax planning activities, and has analyzed its antecedents and consequences, mainly on public companies. Only very few studies, however, have been carried out in the context of private family business and have investigated whether some family firms are more tax aggressive than others, considering some specific features of family firms, such as their distinctive agency conflicts and socioemotional wealth. In this paper, we investigate the antecedents of tax aggressiveness in a sample of private Italian family firms. Our research findings show that tax aggressiveness is positively associated with ownership concentration, the presence of independent members in the board, and the adoption of reporting mechanisms. Instead, we found a negative relation between tax aggressiveness and the use of both strategic planning and a combination of managerial control systems (both planning and reporting mechanisms). We did not find any relation between family CEO and tax aggressiveness. In summary, overall, our findings show that family involvement in ownership, an independent board. and managerialization (the use of managerial mechanisms) are relevant antecedents of tax aggressiveness in private family businesses.

CEO vs. COO: shareholder perceptions of M&A announcements based on insider trades

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinh Huy Nguyen ◽  
Carolina Gomez ◽  
Suchi Mishra ◽  
Ali M. Parhizgari
Keyword(s):  
Stock Price ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Economic Recession ◽  
Chief Executive ◽  
Positive Influence ◽  
Past Performance ◽  
Industry Growth ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Chief Operating Officer ◽  
Regression Tests

PurposeWe examine how the net share purchases of top executives of acquiring firms, specifically the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and the Chief Operating Officer (COO), can impact shareholder perceptions of a merger and acquisition (M&A) around the announcement time.Design/methodology/approachRegression tests using the post-announcement cumulative returns as the dependent variables, and CEO and COO net purchases as independent test controlling for the net purchases of all other insiders, COO and CEO ownership, exercised options, unexercised exercisable options, merger type, pre-announcement firm size, past performance, industry growth, industry instability, year and industry fixed effects. The regression tests are used for various sub-samples (i.e. non-contemporaneous events, duality, operational complexity, economic conditions).FindingsWe find that overall shareholders value the COO's net purchases before the announcement but not those of the CEOs. If the COO is also the CEO, then executive buy-ins appear to have a negative reaction from the shareholders. When the firm has many business segments or when the announcement is made in an economic recession, the COO's net purchases do not have a positive influence on the shareholders.Originality/valueWe are the first to provide evidence that investors pay attention to the COO around M&A announcements. In the age of celebrity CEOs, who can instantaneously change the stock price with one press release, having another executive that can shape the opinion of investors can diversify the agency risk.

scholarly journals Extract Or Not Extract? The Effect of Familism on Stock Option Plans

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Arena ◽  
Simona Catuogno ◽  
Alessandro Cirillo ◽  
Luca Pennacchio
Keyword(s):  
Family Involvement ◽  
Family Firms ◽  
Stock Option ◽  
Policy Implications ◽  
Minority Shareholders ◽  
Rent Extraction ◽  
Strike Price ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Market Index ◽  
Managerial Positions

<p>There is an ongoing debate in managerial literature regarding the aim of stock option plans (SOPs). In this paper we analyse whether and to what extent the family involvement in ownership and managerial positions affects the use of SOPs as tools to extract rents. By examining a sample of plans issued by Italian listed firms, we classify the SOPs according to their characteristics (i.e. vesting period, lock-up, strike price, market index) and identify three different clusters namely Rent SOPs, Non-Rent SOPs, Hybrid. After controlling for CEO family, board size, equity owned by minority shareholders, and other firm-specific characteristics, we find that family firms are less likely to adopt SOPs for rent extraction purpose. We also find that SOPs specifically granted to family members are less likely to pursue rent extraction goals. Our findings are robust against different specifications of family firms. This paper offers important theoretical contributions to management research and insightful policy implications for all family owned listed firms.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document