scholarly journals Funding Campus Sustainability through a Green Fee—Estimating Students’ Willingness to Pay

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 2528
Author(s):  
Jimena González-Ramírez ◽  
Heyi Cheng ◽  
Sierra Arral

Many higher education institutions promote sustainability by instilling environmental awareness within college students, the innovators of the future. As higher education institutions face budgetary constraints to achieve greener campuses, green fees have emerged as an alternative method for universities to encourage student participation and overall campus sustainability. A green fee is a mandatory student fee that funds sustainability projects on campus and is typically managed by a group of students and faculty. We are the first to assess students’ support for a mandatory green using a single dichotomous choice, contingent valuation question and estimating the willingness to pay to fund campus sustainability using a discrete choice model. Using results from a survey at a private college in New York City, we found more support for $5 and $10 green fee values. Using both parametric and non-parametric estimation methods, we found that mean and median willingness-to-pay values were between $13 and $15 and between $10 and $18, respectively. We suggest implementing a green fee between $10 and $13 following the lower values of the non-parametric median willingness to pay (WTP) range estimates that do not rely on distributional assumptions. We hope that other academic institutions follow our research steps to assess the support for a green fee and to suggest a green fee value for their institutions.

2001 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Kiderlen

Two non-parametric methods for the estimation of the directional measure of stationary line and fibre processes in d-dimensional space are presented. The input data for both methods are intersection counts with finitely many test windows situated in hyperplanes. The first estimator is a measure valued maximum likelihood estimator, if applied to Poisson line processes. The second estimator uses an approximation of the associated zonoid (the Steiner compact) by zonotopes. Consistency of both estimators is proved (without use of the Poisson assumption). The estimation methods are compared empirically by simulation.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Acshi Haggenmiller ◽  
Maximilian Krogius ◽  
Edwin Olson

ICRA 2019 Paper Submission Code and DatasetsWe propose an ultra-wideband-based (UWB) localization system that achieves high accuracy through non-parametric estimation of measurement probability densities and explicit modeling of antenna delays. This problem is difficult because non-line-of-sight conditions give rise to multimodal errors, which make linear estimation methods ineffective. The primary contribution in this paper is an approach for both characterizing these errors in situ and an optimization framework that recovers both positions and antenna delays. We evaluate our system with a network of 8 nodes based on the DecaWave DWM1000 and achieve accuracies from 3 cm RMSE in line-of-sight conditions to 30 cm RMSE in non-line-of-sight conditions. Collecting measurements and localizing the network in this manner requires less than a minute, after which the realized network may be used for dynamic real-time tracking.


2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronaldo Dias ◽  
Nancy L. Garcia ◽  
Angelo Martarelli

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document