scholarly journals Assessing the Effects of Nitrification Inhibitor DMPP on Acidification and Inorganic N Leaching Loss from Tea (Camellia sinensis L.) Cultivated Soils with Increasing Urea–N Rates

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 994
Author(s):  
Chunlian Qiao ◽  
Shamim Mia ◽  
Yeqin Wang ◽  
Jiajia Hou ◽  
Burenbayin Xu

The effects of nitrification inhibitor in tea gardens with different urea–N rates have rarely been assessed. For eight months, a glasshouse experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of a nitrification inhibitor (3, 4–dimethylpyrazole phosphate, DMPP) on the changes of soil pH and inorganic N loss. Urea (0, 300, 500, and 800 kg N ha−1) with or without DMPP (1% of urea–N applied) were added to pots that hosted six plants that were three years old. Next, three leaching events were conducted with 600 mL of water after 7, 35, and 71 days of intervention while soil samples were collected to determine pH and inorganic N. Averaged across sampling dates, urea–N application at an increasing rate reduced soil pH with the lowest values at 800 kg urea–N ha−1. Adding DMPP increased soil pH up to a rate of 500 kg ha−1. Irrespective of the addition of DMPP, gradient urea–N application increased the leaching loss of inorganic N. On overage, DMPP increased soil pH and decreased leaching losses of total inorganic N, suggesting a higher soil N retention. Therefore, we believe that this increase in soil pH is associated with a relatively lower proton release from the reduced nitrification in the DMPP–receiving pots. This nitrification reduction also contributed to the N loss reduction (NO3−–N). Altogether, our results suggest that DMPP can reduce N leaching loss while maintaining the pH of tea–cultivated soils. Therefore, DMPP application has a significant potential for the sustainable N management of tea gardens.

2016 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. 122-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.F. Drury ◽  
W.D. Reynolds ◽  
G.W. Parkin ◽  
J.D. Lauzon ◽  
J.K. Saso ◽  
...  

Nitrogen (N) leaching from soil into surface and ground waters is a concern in humid areas of Canada. As a result, N management protocols, including the Ontario N Index, are widely used to identify N leaching risk, although field assessment remains limited. Nitrogen fertilizer and chloride (Cl) tracer were fall-applied to five agricultural soils in Ontario with different textures and hydrologic soil groups (HSG) to assess the Ontario N Index and characterize inorganic N movement over 1 yr. The treatments included three N rates (0, 100, and 200 kg N ha−1) plus Cl tracer and 200 kg N ha−1 rate without Cl. After spring thaw, N loss from the crop root zone (top 60 cm) ranged from 68% for Brookston clay loam to 99% for Harrow sandy loam. A strong linear relationship between apparent N recovery and apparent Cl recovery indicated that N loss from the root zone occurred primarily by downward leaching. Leaching was controlled by the minimum measured saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat), and good estimates of N leaching were obtained using a quasi-theoretical relationship between N loss and Ksat. We concluded that Ontario N Index estimates of N leaching risk might be improved by including site-specific measurements of Ksat.


2001 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 10-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
James L. Baker

The primary mode of nitrogen (N) loss from tile-drained row-cropped land is generally nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N) leaching. Although cropping, tillage, and N management practices can be altered to reduce the amount of leaching, there are limits as to how much can be done. Data are given to illustrate the potential reductions for individual practices such as rate, method, and timing of N applications. However, most effects are multiplicative and not additive; thus it is probably not realistic to hope to get overall reductions greater than 25 to 30% with in-field practices alone. If this level of reduction is insufficient to meet water quality goals, additional off-site landscape modifications may be necessary.


2015 ◽  
Vol 154 (4) ◽  
pp. 632-646 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. H. HUANG ◽  
Z. W. LIANG ◽  
D. L. SUAREZ ◽  
Z.C. WANG ◽  
M. M. WANG ◽  
...  

SUMMARYSaline-sodic soils are widely distributed in the western Songnen Plain of Northeast China and planting rice has been found to be an effective and feasible approach for improving saline-sodic soil and increasing food production. Assessment of the effectiveness and sustainability of this method requires monitoring of the changes in soil salinity and nutrient content. The objective of the current study was to investigate the changes of soil salinity and nitrogen (N) contents over 1, 3, 6 and 9 years of cultivation, four application rates of N (N0: no N, N1: 100 kg N/ha, N2: 200 kg N/ha and N3: 300 kg N/ha) and two irrigation water types: ground water irrigation (GWI) and river water irrigation (RWI). Salinity and N contents of soil and water samples were analysed before planting and after harvest throughout the experiments. Soil pH and electrical conductivity (EC), especially in the surface layer of 0–40 cm depth, decreased with years of cultivation with both GWI and RWI, while soil inorganic N and total N contents increased. Moreover, with increasing N application rates, soil inorganic N and total N contents increased significantly in the 0–20 cm soil layer. Increasing N application had little effect on soil pH and EC. Reclaiming and planting rice promoted desalination of the surface and formation of a fertile tillage layer in saline-sodic paddy fields. In terms of irrigation and drainage in saline-sodic paddy fields, both soil salinity and N contents increased. Soil total salinity increased annually by 34 and 12·8 kg/ha, and inorganic N contents increased annually by 9 and 13·5 kg/ha with GWI and RWI, respectively. Therefore, comprehensive agricultural practices should be adopted for improving and cropping rice in saline-sodic paddy fields.


2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 731-740
Author(s):  
Dagbegnon Clement Sohoulande Djebou ◽  
Liwang Ma ◽  
Ariel A. Szogi ◽  
Gilbert C. Sigua ◽  
Kenneth C. Stone ◽  
...  

Highlights This study addressed the inclusion of field-scale soil variability in nitrogen (N) management for corn production. RZWQM2 was calibrated for corn yield and N dynamics on four sandy soil series under supplemental irrigation. Multi-year simulations of corn production under high and low N application rates were analyzed. Results showed room to reduce N use and N leaching without affecting corn production on Coastal Plain sandy soils. Abstract. Nitrogen (N) fertilization contributes significantly to maintain high yields in corn (Zea mays L.) production. In the Southeastern Coastal Plain of the U.S. where soils are sandy with poor water and nutrient holding capacity, a fraction of the N applied to corn fields is often leached from the root zone and becomes unavailable to plants. As these soils belong to various taxonomic classes, research has shown significant corn yield differences among soil series. However, few studies have focused on integrating field-scale soil variability, N leaching, and corn production. To address this knowledge gap, this study used the Root Zone Water Quality Model (RZWQM2) to simulate different N management scenarios in corn production for four sandy soil series under supplemental irrigation. The calibrated model was used to simulate nine consecutive years of corn production under four N management scenarios, including two high rates of N application (rate A = 224 kg N ha-1 with 25 kg N ha-1 at preplant; rate A' = 224 kg N ha-1 without preplant N), and two low rates of N application (rate B = 157 kg N ha-1 with 25 kg N ha-1 at preplant; rate B' = 157 kg N ha-1 without preplant N). Simulation results showed that without preplant N application, N leaching was reduced by up to 17% with no significant impact on corn yield, depending on the soil series. Hence, consideration of field-scale soil variability could help improve N management by reducing N use and N leaching without impacting corn production. Keywords: Corn yield components, Growing season, Modeling, Nitrogen dynamics, RZWQM2, Soil variability.


2014 ◽  
Vol 152 (S1) ◽  
pp. 45-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. M. MONAGHAN ◽  
C. A. M. DE KLEIN

SUMMARYThe need for nitrogen (N) efficiency measures for dairy systems is as great as ever if we are to meet the challenge of increasing global production of animal-based protein while reducing N losses to the environment. The present paper provides an overview of current N efficiency and mitigation options for pastoral dairy farm systems and assesses the impact of integrating a range of these options on reactive N loss to the environment from dairy farms located in five regions of New Zealand with contrasting soil, climate and farm management attributes. Specific options evaluated were: (i) eliminating winter applications of fertilizer N, (ii) optimal reuse of farm dairy effluent, (iii) improving animal performance through better feeding and using cows with higher genetic merit, (iv) lowering dietary N concentration, (v) applying the nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide (DCD) and (vi) restricting the duration of pasture grazing during autumn and winter. The Overseer®Nutrient Budgeting model was used to estimate N losses from representative farms that were characterized based on information obtained from detailed farmer surveys conducted in 2001 and 2009. The analysis suggests that (i) milk production increases of 7–30% were associated with increased N leaching and nitrous oxide (N2O) emission losses of 3–30 and 0–25%, respectively; and (ii) integrating a range of strategic and tactical management and mitigation options could offset these increased N losses. The modelling analysis also suggested that the restricted autumn and winter grazing strategy resulted in some degree of pollution swapping, with reductions in N leaching loss being associated with increases in N loss via ammonia volatilization and N2O emissions from effluents captured and stored in the confinement systems. Future research efforts need to include farm systems level experimentation to validate and assess the impacts of region-specific dairy systems redesign on productivity, profit, environmental losses, practical feasibility and un-intended consequences.


HortScience ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 556e-556
Author(s):  
C.A. Sanchez

Nitrogen in a soil that is not immediately taken up by a crop is subject to leaching, denitrification, and other mechanisms of loss. Generally, split applications of N throughout the growing season reduce the potential for N loss compared to a single preplant application. Timing of N application should account for the characteristic N uptake patterns of the crop and the lag time between application of fertilizers and plant availability. N uptake studies allow one to identify total amount of N accumulated by the crop and periods of peak nitrogen demand. This information can then be used to devise management strategies aimed at supplying N preceding anticipated N uptake. Split sidedress N application, fertigation, and the use of controlled-release fertilizers are all viable options, depending on the crop production scenario and available infrastructure.


2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhigang Bai ◽  
Jie Huang ◽  
Lianfeng Zhu ◽  
Xiaochuang Cao ◽  
Chunquan Zhu ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 268 (1) ◽  
pp. 357-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shufu Dong ◽  
Denise Neilsen ◽  
Gerry H. Neilsen ◽  
Leslie H. Fuchigami

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 731-740
Author(s):  
Dagbegnon Clement Sohoulande Djebou ◽  
Liwang Ma ◽  
Ariel A. Szogi ◽  
Gilbert C. Sigua ◽  
Kenneth C. Stone ◽  
...  

Highlights This study addressed the inclusion of field-scale soil variability in nitrogen (N) management for corn production. RZWQM2 was calibrated for corn yield and N dynamics on four sandy soil series under supplemental irrigation. Multi-year simulations of corn production under high and low N application rates were analyzed. Results showed room to reduce N use and N leaching without affecting corn production on Coastal Plain sandy soils. Abstract. Nitrogen (N) fertilization contributes significantly to maintain high yields in corn (Zea mays L.) production. In the Southeastern Coastal Plain of the U.S. where soils are sandy with poor water and nutrient holding capacity, a fraction of the N applied to corn fields is often leached from the root zone and becomes unavailable to plants. As these soils belong to various taxonomic classes, research has shown significant corn yield differences among soil series. However, few studies have focused on integrating field-scale soil variability, N leaching, and corn production. To address this knowledge gap, this study used the Root Zone Water Quality Model (RZWQM2) to simulate different N management scenarios in corn production for four sandy soil series under supplemental irrigation. The calibrated model was used to simulate nine consecutive years of corn production under four N management scenarios, including two high rates of N application (rate A = 224 kg N ha-1 with 25 kg N ha-1 at preplant; rate A' = 224 kg N ha-1 without preplant N), and two low rates of N application (rate B = 157 kg N ha-1 with 25 kg N ha-1 at preplant; rate B' = 157 kg N ha-1 without preplant N). Simulation results showed that without preplant N application, N leaching was reduced by up to 17% with no significant impact on corn yield, depending on the soil series. Hence, consideration of field-scale soil variability could help improve N management by reducing N use and N leaching without impacting corn production. Keywords: Corn yield components, Growing season, Modeling, Nitrogen dynamics, RZWQM2, Soil variability.


2000 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 287-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. G. Kowalenko ◽  
S. Bittman

A study was conducted to assess the effect of rates of nitrogen (N) fertilizer, and to compare the effectiveness of single and split applications of N on yield and quality of forage grass and on the potential for nitrate leaching. Three field trials were conducted at different sites in successive years, with plant and soil measurements made at each of four harvests. Extractable inorganic N was measured to 0.6 m in three depth increments prior to spring N application and after each cut in order to evaluate immediate and residual effects of the N fertilizer on plant growth, and the environmental implications of the applications. Response of yield and N uptake to N applications differed in the three trials. In all trials, the effect of N rate was greater than the effect of N distribution during the growing season. Although there were only small, whole-season yield increases associated with distributing the N over the season, the distribution of yield within the season was changed considerably. Soil data showed relatively little leaching of N during the growing season under contrasting weather conditions of the three growing seasons. Retention of N within the soil root zone contributed to residual effects on yield and plant uptake, and these effects frequently lasted to the end of the growing season. Crop response to N applications was apparently influenced by the N supplying capacity of the soil and the effect of weather on crop growth rate. Soil nitrate at harvest did not vary consistently with N application treatments in the three trials, other than having highest concentrations at the highest fertilizer rate. Soil nitrate was greatest after cut 1 and decreased sharply toward the end of the season following the single spring applications, whereas plots receiving equal distributions of N through the season had relatively high concentrations at all sampling times during the season. Soil extractable ammonium concentration was influenced by high rates of N application, but the effect was small and largely confined to the sampling after cut 1. The soil always contained about 10–15 mg kg−1 extractable ammonium in surface 0.3 m depth, with a tendency for slightly greater concentrations in early spring. Soil ammonium appears to be involved in soil and plant processes, but the exact magnitude and significance of its involvement could not be determined from the measurements made. The redistribution of grass yield by splitting the application of fertilizer N within the growing season would be beneficial for grazing systems. Unfortunately, soil inorganic N measurements will not greatly assist in determining the precise rate and distribution of fertilizer for varying field conditions. Key words: N response, N uptake, residual N effect, soil extractable N, N leaching


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document