scholarly journals Towards an Impact Evaluation Framework to Measure Urban Resilience in Food Practices

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 2042 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Dezio ◽  
Davide Marino
Author(s):  
Vanessa Assumma ◽  
Marta Bottero ◽  
Giulia Datola ◽  
Alessandro Pezzoli ◽  
Carlotta Quagliolo

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-38
Author(s):  
Keren Zhu ◽  
Rafiq Dossani ◽  
Jennifer Bouey

Abstract The impact of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) to global development will be unprecedented and significant, and developmental impact evaluation is therefore central to understanding BRI projects and making informed decisions. Compared with evaluations of individual projects and programs, evaluation of large and mega infrastructure projects under the BRI is particularly challenging and complex in integrating stakeholder objectives, accounting for social benefit and costs, and tracking long-term project impact. In this paper, we summarize the key drawbacks of existing BRI evaluation frameworks, propose a systematic evaluation framework elicitation method based on the inputs from BRI subject matter experts and verified through stakeholder participation, and apply an interim evaluation framework in understanding the Mombasa-Nairobi Standard Gauge Railway project in Kenya, as a proof of concept of a comprehensive evaluation framework. In doing so, we seek to provide a tool for BRI decision makers and stakeholders to assess these projects holistically at planning, construction and operation stages.


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
John H. Reed ◽  
Gretchen Jordan ◽  
Edward Vine

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. 78-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuela Colombo ◽  
Francesco Romeo ◽  
Lorenzo Mattarolo ◽  
Jacopo Barbieri ◽  
Mariano Morazzo

Author(s):  
Sarah K Coombs ◽  
Ingeborg Meijer

Abstract Given the mandate of Universities of Applied Sciences (UASs) to create an impact on society, the evaluation of their research impact is of great importance. And yet, the methodology for evaluating this impact appear less explicitly in research literature then other forms of research. The purpose of this article is to present a literature-based analysis to discover from the complex world of existing theories and frameworks what criteria, assumptions and requirements are relevant for evaluating the impact of applied research. This article will also discuss the relevancy of frameworks currently used for research impact evaluation and the potential they have for operationalising, enriching and supporting the current national evaluation framework used by Dutch UASs. Finally, this article will conclude that the recommendations necessitate the creation of a new framework where the context and process of practice-based research and their stakeholders are included.


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
John H. Reed ◽  
Gretchen Jordan ◽  
Edward Vine

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 21-29
Author(s):  
Susan Beaton

BUZZING is a pilot project which introduces a new way of working with disengaged and long-term unemployed young people (aged 15 to 24 years) to support their transition into employment using gamification and online platforms to drive engagement. The project is funded by the Australian Government's Department of Employment under their Empowering YOUth Initiatives, and delivered by not-for-profit organisation United Synergies. This article gives focus to the design considerations that underpin the work of an internal evaluator working on the BUZZING project, and enrolled in an evaluation unit within a postgraduate course. The step-by-step process used to create an evaluation plan inclusive of purpose, context, scope, method and methodology are illustrated, supported by evidence-based justifications. Furthermore, counter-bias design considerations such as a mix of different methodology inquiry, data sources and researchers (triangulation) are discussed and recommendations given for an ethical evaluation framework. The practice of using evidence-based rigour in evaluation is promoted for organisations which seek to demonstrate positive social change within complex environments. The capacity building and professional development of internal evaluators in the not-for-profit sector is therefore recommended to drive accountability, ethical practices and continual improvement for public good from within the organisation. Finally, White's (2009) theory-based impact evaluation is adopted as the evaluation method as it maps out the causal chain from inputs to outcomes and impact, testing the underlying assumptions to understand why a program has, or has not, had an impact.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document