scholarly journals The Persistent Adivasi Demand for Land Rights and the Forest Rights Act 2006 in Kerala, India

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 158
Author(s):  
Darley Jose Kjosavik ◽  
Nadarajah Shanmugaratnam
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
State Government ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Small Community ◽  
Land Occupation ◽  
Historical Injustice ◽  
High Expectations ◽  
The Government ◽  
Ownership Rights ◽  
Organized Resistance

This paper asks whether the Forest Rights Act (FRA) passed by the Government of India in 2006 could provide effective access and ownership rights to land and forests for the adivasi communities of Kerala, thereby leading to an enhancement of their entitlements. The study was conducted in Wayanad district using qualitative methods of data collection. The FRA, it would seem, raised high expectations in the State Government circles and the Adivasi community. This was at a time when the Government of Kerala was grappling with a stalemate in the implementation of its own laws on adivasi land rights, due to the organized resistance from the settler-farmers and the non-adivasi workers employed in the plantations that were established to provide employment for adivasis. Our analysis shows that due to the inherent problems within the FRA as well as its complex and contested implementation, the FRA could not achieve the promised objectives of correcting historical injustice and provide effective land rights to the adivasis of Wayanad. The role played by the conservation lobby in thwarting the efforts of the Left government is discussed. While granting nominal possession rights (Record of Rights) to the dwelling sites of a small community of adivasis (Kattunaicker, who were traditional forest dwellers), the FRA has failed to provide them with substantive access and ownership rights to land and forests. The adivasis who were able to gain some rights to land have been those who were involved in land occupation struggles. The study reiterates the importance of struggles in gaining effective rights in land.

scholarly journals The Regulation of Ownership of Agricultural Land Rights that Exceeds the Maximum Limit

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 323
Author(s):  
Ana Rubiyani
Keyword(s):  
Agricultural Land ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Area ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Government ◽  
Ownership Rights ◽  
And Control ◽  
Maximum Limit

Land is a form of gift given by God, but human has given brain to think the challenges of live like the land problems, so that the government tries to regulate it properly. The problems in this thesis are: 1) How to regulate ownership of agricultural land rights that exceeds the maximum limit based on Act No. 56 (Prp) of 1960 concerning the Determination of Agricultural Land Areas? 2) How is the action taken by the Land Office towards ownership of agricultural land rights that exceeds the maximum limit? The method used is juridical empirical, with descriptive analytical specifications. The method used in this research is an empirical juridical approach. The results of this study are: (1) The regulation of ownership of agricultural land rights that exceeds the maximum limit is based on Act No. 56 (Prp) of 1960, namely that the provisions regarding land restrictions state that the application for ownership rights as referred to in Article 4 paragraph 1 of Act No. 56 (Prp) 1960 was limited to a maximum land area of 2000 m2. 2) The steps of the Land Office in implementing Act No. 56 (Prp) of 1960, namely the need for a concept of supervision and control over control of land rights, given the various problems that often arise such as in land registration activities.

scholarly journals Status Hak Atas Tanah Penduduk Desa dalam Kawasan Hutan Perum Perhutani

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 48
Author(s):  
Fatimiah Azzahra
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Agrarian Reform ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Colonial Era ◽  
Public Corporation ◽  
The Status ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Ownership Of Land ◽  
Ownership Rights

This article aims to discuss the conflict of tenure rights between Perhutani and the community and the status of land held by the community after the entry into force of Presidential Regulation No. 86 of 2018 concerning Agraria Reform. The study uses a sociological juridical method. The location of the study is in the forest area of   Perhutani Public Corporation, Malang Regency. Data collection techniques using observation, interviews, and documentation. The results of the study show that conflicts over ownership of land rights between Perhutani and the community have been going on for a long time. Physically the land has been controlled by the community since the Dutch colonial era and passed down from generation to generation. The granting of permission to manage the land and payment of land tax strengthened the community’s argument about land ownership. The land status which is the object of the dispute is based on Presidential Regulation No. 86 of 2018 concerning Agrarian Reform became the authority of Perhutani Public Corporation. Communities can get ownership rights or get land compensation if the Ministry of Forestry releases the land.

scholarly journals TINJAUAN HUKUM PELEPASAN TANAH ULAYAT

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-119
Author(s):  
Happy Trizna Wijaya
Keyword(s):  
Land Tenure ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
The Public ◽  
Personal Rights ◽  
Presidential Decree ◽  
The Government ◽  
Customary Land ◽  
Ownership Rights

Since September 24, 1960 Law No. 5/1960 was stipulated regarding Basic Regulations on Agrarian Principles or often referred to as the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA), adopting legal unification and based on customary law. Customary land law is original law, has a unique characteristic, where individual rights to land are personal rights but in it contain togetherness. Land controlled by customary law communities is known as ulayat rights. Although customary law is the basis of the LoGA, problems with ownership rights to customary land often occur due to unclear land boundaries and customary land tenure by the government without any release of land. The results of this study revealed that the procedure for controlling customary land by the local government through the mechanism of land acquisition as stipulated in Permendagri No. 15 of 1975 provides more opportunities for the Government to control land rights, while the owner / holder of land rights has a very weak position because many rights to land are neglected so that it violates the human rights of land rights holders. With the issuance of Presidential Decree No. 55 of 1993 concerning Land Procurement for the Implementation of Development for the Public Interest in lieu of Permendagri No. 15 of 1975, which provides a protection to holders of land rights to be able to defend their rights. This is also the case with Perpres No. 36 of 2005 Jo Perpres No. 65 of 2006 issued as a substitute for Presidential Decree No. 55 of 1993, far more provide protection to the community to defend their rights, while the government is increasingly limited in obtaining land. So Perpres No. 65 of 2006 provides a guarantee of legal certainty to holders of land rights to be able to defend their rights.Sejak 24 September 1960 ditetapkan Undang-undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-pokok Agraria atau sering disebut Undang-undang Pokok Agraria (UUPA), menganut unifikasi hukum dan berdasarkan hukum adat. Hukum tanah adat merupakan hukum asli, mempunyai sifat yang khas, dimana hak-hak perorangan atas tanah merupakan hak pribadi akan tetapi didalamnya mengandung unsur kebersamaan. Tanah-tanah yang dikuasai oleh masyarakat hukum adat dikenal dengan sebutan hak ulayat. Walaupun hukum adat merupakan dasar dari UUPA tetapi permasalahan terhadap hak kepemilikan atas tanah adat seringkali terjadi karena penentuan batas tanah hak ulayat yang tidak jelas, maupun karena penguasaan hak atas tanah adat oleh pemerintah tanpa ada pelepasan tanah. Hasil penelitian ini mengungkapkan bahwa Prosedur penguasaan tanah ulayat oleh Pemda melalui mekanisme pembebasan tanah yang tertuang dalam Permendagri No. 15 Tahun 1975 lebih memberikan kesempatan kepada pihak Pemerintah untuk menguasai hak atas tanah, sedangkan pemilik/pemegang hak atas tanah mempunyai kedudukan yang sangat lemah karena banyak hak atas tanah yang diabaikan sehingga sangat melanggar hak asasi pemegang hak atas tanah. Dengan diterbitkannya Kepres No. 55 Tahun 1993 mengenai Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pelaksanaan Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum sebagai pengganti Permendagri No. 15 Tahun 1975, yang memberikan suatu perlindungan kepada pemegang hak atas tanah untuk dapat mempertahankan haknya. Begitu juga halnya dengan Perpres No. 36 Tahun 2005 Jo Perpres No. 65 Tahun 2006 yang dikeluarkan sebagai pengganti Kepres No. 55 Tahun 1993, jauh lebih memberikan perlindungan kepada pihak masyarakat untuk membela haknya, sedangkan pihak pemerintah semakin terbatas dalam memperoleh tanah. Sehingga Perpres No. 65 Tahun 2006 memberikan suatu jaminan kepastian hukum kepada pemegang hak atas tanah untuk dapat mempertahankan haknya.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM HAK ATAS TANAH ULAYAT MASYARAKAT HUKUM ADAT DI KABUPATEN MALUKU TENGGARA.

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-146
Author(s):  
Cornelia Junita Welerubun
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Dispute ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
Ownership Of Land ◽  
Ownership Rights ◽  
The Relationship

Unalienated land dispute resolution in a way that is custom done by indigenous chiefs to resolve the dispute relating to customs. To resolve the disputes of indigenous chiefs hold a customary or sitting often known as judicial customs. The judicial nature of the Customs mediation, there is King as a mediator in it. The important role of indigenous chiefs of in dispute resolution is needed, this is because Community law is very respectful of indigenous chiefs. Legal protection must be viewed stages namely legal protection was born from a provision of the law and the rule of law given by a society that basically is the community's agreement to regulate the relationship between the behavior members of the society and between the individuals with the Government deemed to represent the interests of the community. Legal protection is not a true picture of the work function of the law itself that its purpose is not to provide other guarantees of fairness, expediency and also legal certainty. Legal protection will be more evident in the ownership of land rights is supported by the presence of certificate of land rights, as a means of proof of land ownership rights.

scholarly journals Implementation Of The Sale And Purchase Agreement And The Status Of Ownership Of Land Rights At Apartment In Payon Amartha View Of Semarang

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 511
Author(s):  
Riska Fauziana ◽  
Anis Mashdurohatun
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Strong Evidence ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Collection Method ◽  
Data Collection Method ◽  
Ownership Status ◽  
The Status ◽  
Ownership Of Land ◽  
Ownership Rights

The study entitled "Implementation of the Sale and Purchase Agreement and the Status of Ownership of Land Rights at Apartment in Payon Amartha View of Semarang" aims to: 1) Understand the process of buying and selling apartments. 2) To know about the status of ownership of land rights of the apartment.Theresearch method in this journal uses a sociological Juridical approach with the specification of the data collection method to Obtain the data that will be used as the thesis of material through an interview with the manager and the marketing of apartment in Payon Amartha View of Semarang, or by observation in the form of roomates surveillance systematically Involved in Obtaining data. Afterwards will be conducted analysis of the data Obtained from various sources.The results of the research indicate that: 1) The process of buying and selling apartments begins with payment of the Booking Fee Followed by the signing of the Temporary Deed of Sale and Purchase (TDSP) as a legitimate and strong evidence that it has made a sale and purchase. 2) The ownership status of the buyer of the apartment is the Strata Title Certificate.Keywords: Sale And Purchase; Ownership Rights To The Apartment.

scholarly journals Land Tenure Conflicts After the End of Use Rights for Plantation Legal Entities in Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 2439-2446
Author(s):  
Alpi Sahari
Keyword(s):  
Land Tenure ◽  
Forest Products ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Community Needs ◽  
The People ◽  
The Government ◽  
Ownership Rights ◽  
Role Of The Government ◽  
Land Use Rights

Land problems almost occur throughout Indonesia, without exception in Medan, North Sumatra Province. In Medan there is PTPN II land which, due to community needs, the government chose not to extend the HGU (Hak Guna Usaha) for the benefit of the community. The government considers that the people need this land more in order to meet the needs of life and the welfare of the entire community. The method used in this paper is juridical normative by adopting a legal synchronization approach, both vertically and horizontally, on land tenure conflicts after the expiration of the Legal Entity for Plantation Companies in Indonesia. Data obtained through literature search. The results show that the provisions regarding land tenure have been regulated in Law number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Principles or often referred to as UUPA. In article 16 paragraph 1 of Law Number 5 of 1960 UUPA, it is stated that land rights include ownership rights, land use rights, building use rights, usage rights, lease rights, land opening rights, rights to collect forest products, other rights that are not included in the rights mentioned above which will be stipulated by law as well as rights which are temporary as mentioned in Article 53 of Law Number 5 concerning UUPA. The existence of land rights that have been regulated in law often creates confusion and overlaps in the control of the land object. There is still a lack of and low understanding of the law by the majority of the community, are often used by irresponsible individuals with the intention of obtaining benefits in the form of land rights through control of the land. Then the role of the government has not run optimally in protecting the rights of land controlled by the community. The government has not been able to collect data and make complete registrations of land tenure in Indonesia. This is the cause of the frequent occurrence of land tenure conflicts so that the participation of all levels of society as well as the government is urgently needed..  

Analisis Penguasaan, Pemilikan, Penggunaan dan Pemanfaatan Tanah di Sempadan Pantai di Kelurahan Bintarore

Tunas Agraria ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 122-139
Author(s):  
Irsal Marsudi Sam ◽  
Setiowati Setiowati ◽  
Rakhmat Riyadi
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Land Tenure ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Land Utilization ◽  
Open Land ◽  
Housing Services ◽  
The Government ◽  
Land Utilization Type ◽  
Ownership Rights

Abstract: Most of the land beach border Village Bintarore has been controlled and owned by the community. The purpose of this research are (1) to know the kind of land tenure, land ownership, land use and land utilization; (2) Land Office Policy in Bulukumba Regency granting land rights; (3) the suitability of the land use and land utilization with RTRW. The research was conducted using qualitative methods for data analysis, survey and interview methods for data collection and the use of the census method. Based on the results of the study are known: (1) land on the beach border Village Bintarore is controlled by the Government, the public and legal entities. Types of landholdings consists of State land and land ownership rights. Type of land use consists of the use of the open land for housing, services, government agencies, religious services, rental services, workshop, warehousing, graves, sports field, industry, trade and services mix. Land utilization type consists of utilization as a place of residence, mix, economic, social, agricultural and not utilized; (2) Bulukumba District Land Office do policies to keep providing land rights in the area of the border of the Bintarore Village beach, (3) there are 87,19% mismatch between the use and utilization of land at Bintarore Village beach border with RTRW.Keywords: IP4T, RTRW, beach border. Intisari: Sebagian besar tanah sempadan pantai Kelurahan Bintarore telah dikuasai dan dimiliki oleh masyarakat. Tujuan penelitian untuk mengetahui (1) Jenis penguasaan, pemilikan, penggunaan dan pemanfaatan tanah; (2) Kebijakan Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Bulukumba dalam pemberian hak atas tanah; (3) Kesesuaian penggunaan dan pemanfaatan tanah dengan RTRW. Penelitian dilakukan menggunakan metode kualitatif, teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui survei dan wawancara serta menggunakan metode sensus. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diketahui: (1) Tanah di sempadan pantai Kelurahan Bintarore dikuasai oleh pemerintah, masyarakat dan badan hukum. Jenis pemilikan tanah terdiri dari tanah negara dan tanah hak milik. Jenis penggunaan tanah terdiri dari penggunaan untuk perumahan, tanah terbuka, jasa instansi pemerintah, jasa peribadatan, jasa sewa, perbengkelan, pergudangan, kuburan, lapangan olahraga, industri, jasa perdagangan dan kebun campuran. Jenis pemanfaatan tanah terdiri dari pemanfaatan sebagai tempat tinggal, campuran, ekonomi, sosial, pertanian dan tidak dimanfaatkan; (2) Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Bulukumba melakukan kebijakan untuk tetap memberikan hak atas tanah di kawasan sempadan pantai Kelurahan Bintarore (3) Terdapat 87,19% ketidaksesuaian antara penggunaan dan pemanfaatan tanah di sempadan pantai kelurahan Bintarore dengan RTRW.Kata Kunci: IP4T, RTRW, sempadan pantai. 

scholarly journals First-Time Registration of Ownership of Land Obtained Through Sale and Purchase under the Hand Whose Proof of Ownership Is Lost

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 671
Author(s):  
Bintang Uswatun Hasanah ◽  
Any Suryani ◽  
Widodo Dwi Putro
Keyword(s):  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Land Title ◽  
Proof Of Ownership ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
Sociological Approaches ◽  
Ownership Of Land ◽  
Ownership Rights ◽  
First Time

In practice, people who experience loss of proof of ownership rights over land where in the land title application must provide evidence of information about the land which includes data on physical and physical data. As stipulated in Law No. 5/1960 concerning Regulation on Basic Agrarian Principles article 19 that To ensure legal certainty by the Government registration of land throughout the territory of the Republic of Indonesia according to the provisions regulated by Government Regulations, registration includes one of giving letters - proof of rights, which applies as a strong evidence tool. The problem in this study is how is the validity of buying and selling rights to land carried out under the hands? and how is the registration process the first application for ownership of land to land whose proof of ownership is lost? The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of the sale and purchase of land rights carried out under the hand, and to find out the process of registering the transfer of land rights at the Bima City Land Office whose proof of ownership was lost. This research has benefits both academically and practically. The research used in this study is Empirical Law research and the approach in this study is the Legislative, Conceptual, and Sociological approaches. The process of buying and selling land under the hands carried out before the Head of Village / Lurah and witnesses is valid because the buying and selling conditions have been fulfilled according to Law Number 5 Year 1960 concerning Agrarian Principal Regulations. The first application for land registration in Bima City whose proof of ownership is lost in practice can still be registered.

scholarly journals Limitations of Public Interest Clause in Land Acquisition So That Land Rights Holders Can Retain Their Rights

NORMA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 58
Author(s):  
Rias Frihandini
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
National Development ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
The State ◽  
Public Interests ◽  
The Public ◽  
The People ◽  
The Government ◽  
Ownership Rights

This research aims to see and analyze legal protection for land rights holders who lost their land rights due to public interest clause, whether for the benefit of the state or the private sector. Based on the 1945 Constitution, it can be seen that the use of the earth (land), water, and natural resources contained therein by the state is required to be used for the greatest prosperity of the people, and not for certain elites from government agencies who need land. Limitations must be applied to this clause so that the use is not arbitrary because even though the land rights are ownership rights, it can lose since the Government carries it out. The public interest clause is always the way and the Government answer for those who refuse their land to be acquired. Research results are that public interests, which are the needs of many people or broad goals, must pay attention to social, political, psychological, vindication and security aspects based on the National development principle.Keywords: Land, Public Interest, Acquisition

scholarly journals Problematic Issuance of Land Rights Certificate

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Moh Ali Wafa
Keyword(s):  
Community Psychology ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Land Dispute ◽  
Land Disputes ◽  
Proof Of Ownership ◽  
The Government ◽  
Ownership Rights ◽  
The Village

Many people who have not registered ownership rights so that they have no protection andlegal certainty due to several factors: First, factor of land ownership history. Second,community psychology. Third, weakness of land registration rules. Fourth, executorimplementation, intervention BPHTB legislation and other fees. Fifth, the mechanism ofregistration of land is too expensive for the community both procedure and registration fee.The Solution and effort to minimize the occurrence of land disputes society are: first, bypreventing the land dispute case is not repeated. Second, the government immediatelysocialize what and how the issuance of land certificates and the purpose of certificates. Third,If there is dispute in the court that the object is not certified land, the court notifies the urbanvillage and local BPN to block the transaction or the transition of the land immediately. Fourth,each transaction or transition of land with proof of ownership in the form of girik, the witness inthe transaction should be the Village Head and the BPN officer, and fifth, it is better if there island dispute in the court, at least one judge from land law expert, such as non-academicjudges (academics). DOI: 10.15408/jch.v5i2.7089

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document