scholarly journals Are Scientific Models of Life Testable? A Lesson from Simpson’s Paradox

Sci ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 2
Author(s):  
Prasanta S. Bandyopadhyay ◽  
Nolan Grunska ◽  
Don Dcruz ◽  
Mark C. Greenwood
Keyword(s):  
Origin Of Life ◽  
Rna World ◽  
Scientific Models ◽  
Scientific Model ◽  
Simpson’S Paradox ◽  
World Theory ◽  
Life Issues ◽  
Logical Sense ◽  
Simpson's Paradox ◽  
Emergence Of Life

We address the need for a model by considering two competing theories regarding the origin of life: (i) the Metabolism First theory, and (ii) the RNA World theory. We discuss two interrelated points, namely: (i) Models are valuable tools for understanding both the processes and intricacies of origin-of-life issues, and (ii) Insights from models also help us to evaluate the core objection to origin-of-life theories, called “the inefficiency objection”, which is commonly raised by proponents of both the Metabolism First theory and the RNA World theory against each other. We use Simpson’s Paradox (SP) as a tool for challenging this objection. We will use models in various senses, ranging from taking them as representations of reality to treating them as theories/accounts that provide heuristics for probing reality. In this paper, we will frequently use models and theories interchangeably. Additionally, we investigate Conway’s Game of Life and contrast it with our SP-based approach to emergence-of-life issues. Finally, we discuss some of the consequences of our view. A scientific model is testable in three senses: (i) a logical sense, (ii) a nomological sense, and (iii) a current technological sense. The SP-based model is testable in the first two senses but it is not feasible to test it using current technology.

scholarly journals Are Scientific Models of Life Testable? A Lesson from Simpson’s Paradox

Sci ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 73
Author(s):  
Prasanta S. Bandyopadhyay ◽  
Nolan Grunska ◽  
Don Dcruz ◽  
Mark C. Greenwood
Keyword(s):  
Origin Of Life ◽  
Rna World ◽  
Scientific Models ◽  
Scientific Model ◽  
Simpson’S Paradox ◽  
World Theory ◽  
Life Issues ◽  
The Origin Of Life ◽  
Logical Sense ◽  
Simpson's Paradox

We address the need for a model by considering two competing theories regarding the origin of life: (i) the Metabolism First theory and (ii) the RNA World theory. We discuss two inter-related points. (I) Models are valuable tools in understanding both the processes and intricacies of the origin of life issues. (II) Insights from models also help us to evaluate the core objection to origin of life theories called “the inefficiency objection” commonly raised by proponents of both the Metabolism First theory and the RNA World theory against each other. We use Simpson’s paradox as a tool for challenging this objection. We will use models in various senses ranging from taking them as representations of reality to treating them as theories/accounts that provide heuristics for probing reality. In this paper, we will frequently use models and theories interchangeably. Additionally, we investigate Conway’s Game of Life and contrast it with our Simpson’s Paradox (SP)-based approach to emergence of life issues. Finally, we discuss some of the consequences of our view. A scientific model is testable in three senses: (i) a logical sense, (ii) a nomological sense, and (iii) a current technological sense. The SP-based model is testable in the logical sense. It is also testable nomologically. However, it is not currently feasible to test it.

scholarly journals Are Scientific Models of Life Testable? A Lesson from Simpson’s Paradox

Sci ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 54
Author(s):  
Bandyopadhyay ◽  
Grunska ◽  
Dcruz ◽  
Greenwood
Keyword(s):  
Origin Of Life ◽  
Rna World ◽  
Scientific Models ◽  
Scientific Model ◽  
Simpson’S Paradox ◽  
World Theory ◽  
Life Issues ◽  
The Origin Of Life ◽  
Logical Sense ◽  
Simpson's Paradox

We address the need for a model by considering two competing theories regarding the origin of life: (i) the Metabolism First theory and (ii) the RNA World theory. We discuss two inter-related points. (I) Models are valuable tools in understanding both the processes and intricacies of the origin of life issues. (II) Insights from models also help us to evaluate the core objection to origin of life theories called “the inefficiency objection” commonly raised by proponents of both the Metabolism First theory and the RNA World theory against each other. We use Simpson’s paradox as a tool for challenging this objection. We will use models in various senses ranging from taking them as representations of reality to treating them as theories/accounts that provide heuristics for probing reality. In this paper, we will frequently use models and theories interchangeably. Additionally, we investigate Conway’s Game of Life and contrast it with our Simpson’s Paradox (SP)-based approach to emergence of life issues. Finally, we discuss some of the consequences of our view. A scientific model is testable in three senses: (i) a logical sense, (ii) a nomological sense, and (iii) a current technological sense. The SP-based model is testable in the logical sense. It is also testable nomologically. However, it is not currently feasible to test it.

scholarly journals Prebiotic chemistry: a new modus operandi

2011 ◽  
Vol 366 (1580) ◽  
pp. 2870-2877 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew W. Powner ◽  
John D. Sutherland
Keyword(s):  
Origin Of Life ◽  
Early Life ◽  
Rna World ◽  
Origins Of Life ◽  
Geochemical Conditions ◽  
Systems Chemistry ◽  
Novel Approach ◽  
Sequential Addition ◽  
World Hypothesis ◽  
Emergence Of Life

A variety of macromolecules and small molecules—(oligo)nucleotides, proteins, lipids and metabolites—are collectively considered essential to early life. However, previous schemes for the origin of life—e.g. the ‘RNA world’ hypothesis—have tended to assume the initial emergence of life based on one such molecular class followed by the sequential addition of the others, rather than the emergence of life based on a mixture of all the classes of molecules. This view is in part due to the perceived implausibility of multi-component reaction chemistry producing such a mixture. The concept of systems chemistry challenges such preconceptions by suggesting the possibility of molecular synergism in complex mixtures. If a systems chemistry method to make mixtures of all the classes of molecules considered essential for early life were to be discovered, the significant conceptual difficulties associated with pure RNA, protein, lipid or metabolism ‘worlds’ would be alleviated. Knowledge of the geochemical conditions conducive to the chemical origins of life is crucial, but cannot be inferred from a planetary sciences approach alone. Instead, insights from the organic reactivity of analytically accessible chemical subsystems can inform the search for the relevant geochemical conditions. If the common set of conditions under which these subsystems work productively, and compatibly, matches plausible geochemistry, an origins of life scenario can be inferred. Using chemical clues from multiple subsystems in this way is akin to triangulation, and constitutes a novel approach to discover the circumstances surrounding the transition from chemistry to biology. Here, we exemplify this strategy by finding common conditions under which chemical subsystems generate nucleotides and lipids in a compatible and potentially synergistic way. The conditions hint at a post-meteoritic impact origin of life scenario.

scholarly journals The difficult case of an RNA-only origin of life

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 469-475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristian Le Vay ◽  
Hannes Mutschler
Keyword(s):  
Origin Of Life ◽  
Rna World ◽  
Large Body ◽  
Difficult Case ◽  
Experimental Approaches ◽  
World Hypothesis ◽  
Life On Earth ◽  
Self Replication ◽  
Emergence Of Life ◽  
Rna World Hypothesis

The RNA world hypothesis is probably the most extensively studied model for the emergence of life on Earth. Despite a large body of evidence supporting the idea that RNA is capable of kick-starting autocatalytic self-replication and thus initiating the emergence of life, seemingly insurmountable weaknesses in the theory have also been highlighted. These problems could be overcome by novel experimental approaches, including out-of-equilibrium environments, and the exploration of an early co-evolution of RNA and other key biomolecules such as peptides and DNA, which might be necessary to mitigate the shortcomings of RNA-only systems.

Achievement data in IEA studies and Simpson's Paradox

2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 144-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth Zuzovsky ◽  
David M. Steinberg ◽  
Zipi Libman
Keyword(s):  
Simpson’S Paradox ◽  
Achievement Data ◽  
Simpson's Paradox
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document