scholarly journals Proposed Mobility Assessments with Simultaneous Full-Body Inertial Measurement Units and Optical Motion Capture in Healthy Adults and Neurological Patients for Future Validation Studies: Study Protocol

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (17) ◽  
pp. 5833
Author(s):  
Elke Warmerdam ◽  
Robbin Romijnders ◽  
Johanna Geritz ◽  
Morad Elshehabi ◽  
Corina Maetzler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motion Capture ◽  
Healthy Adults ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Inertial Measurement Units ◽  
Mobility Patterns ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Neurological Patients ◽  
Optical Motion ◽  
Measurement Units ◽  
Optical Motion Capture

Healthy adults and neurological patients show unique mobility patterns over the course of their lifespan and disease. Quantifying these mobility patterns could support diagnosing, tracking disease progression and measuring response to treatment. This quantification can be done with wearable technology, such as inertial measurement units (IMUs). Before IMUs can be used to quantify mobility, algorithms need to be developed and validated with age and disease-specific datasets. This study proposes a protocol for a dataset that can be used to develop and validate IMU-based mobility algorithms for healthy adults (18–60 years), healthy older adults (>60 years), and patients with Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, a symptomatic stroke and chronic low back pain. All participants will be measured simultaneously with IMUs and a 3D optical motion capture system while performing standardized mobility tasks and non-standardized activities of daily living. Specific clinical scales and questionnaires will be collected. This study aims at building the largest dataset for the development and validation of IMU-based mobility algorithms for healthy adults and neurological patients. It is anticipated to provide this dataset for further research use and collaboration, with the ultimate goal to bring IMU-based mobility algorithms as quickly as possible into clinical trials and clinical routine.

scholarly journals Validation of Thigh Angle Estimation Using Inertial Measurement Unit Data against Optical Motion Capture Systems

Sensors ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nimsiri Abhayasinghe ◽  
Iain Murray ◽  
Shiva Sharif Bidabadi
Keyword(s):  
Motion Capture ◽  
Computation Time ◽  
Estimation Algorithm ◽  
Measurement Unit ◽  
Navigation Systems ◽  
Orientation Estimation ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Optical Motion ◽  
Measurement Units ◽  
Optical Motion Capture

Inertial measurement units are commonly used to estimate the orientation of sections of sections of human body in inertial navigation systems. Most of the algorithms used for orientation estimation are computationally expensive and it is difficult to implement them in real-time embedded systems with restricted capabilities. This paper discusses a computationally inexpensive orientation estimation algorithm (Gyro Integration-Based Orientation Filter—GIOF) that is used to estimate the forward and backward swing angle of the thigh (thigh angle) for a vision impaired navigation aid. The algorithm fuses the accelerometer and gyroscope readings to derive the single dimension orientation in such a way that the orientation is corrected using the accelerometer reading when it reads gravity only or otherwise integrate the gyro reading to estimate the orientation. This strategy was used to reduce the drift caused by the gyro integration. The thigh angle estimated by GIOF was compared against the Vicon Optical Motion Capture System and reported a mean correlation of 99.58% for 374 walking trials with a standard deviation of 0.34%. The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of the thigh angle estimated by GIOF compared with Vicon measurement was 1.8477°. The computation time on an 8-bit microcontroller running at 8 MHz for GIOF is about a half of that of Complementary Filter implementation. Although GIOF was only implemented and tested for estimating pitch of the IMU, it can be easily extended into 2D to estimate both pitch and roll.

scholarly journals Validation of 3-Space Wireless Inertial Measurement Units Using an Industrial Robot

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (20) ◽  
pp. 6858
Author(s):  
Jaime Hislop ◽  
Mats Isaksson ◽  
John McCormick ◽  
Chris Hensman
Keyword(s):  
Motion Tracking ◽  
Industrial Robot ◽  
Inertial Measurement Units ◽  
Electromagnetic Noise ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Sensor Orientation ◽  
Fusion Methods ◽  
Optical Motion ◽  
Measurement Units ◽  
Optical Motion Capture

Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) are beneficial for motion tracking as, in contrast to most optical motion capture systems, IMU systems do not require a dedicated lab. However, IMUs are affected by electromagnetic noise and may exhibit drift over time; it is therefore common practice to compare their performance to another system of high accuracy before use. The 3-Space IMUs have only been validated in two previous studies with limited testing protocols. This study utilized an IRB 2600 industrial robot to evaluate the performance of the IMUs for the three sensor fusion methods provided in the 3-Space software. Testing consisted of programmed motion sequences including 360° rotations and linear translations of 800 mm in opposite directions for each axis at three different velocities, as well as static trials. The magnetometer was disabled to assess the accuracy of the IMUs in an environment containing electromagnetic noise. The Root-Mean-Square Error (RMSE) of the sensor orientation ranged between 0.2° and 12.5° across trials; average drift was 0.4°. The performance of the three filters was determined to be comparable. This study demonstrates that the 3-Space sensors may be utilized in an environment containing metal or electromagnetic noise with a RMSE below 10° in most cases.

scholarly journals Measuring Spinal Mobility Using an Inertial Measurement Unit System: A Validation Study in Axial Spondyloarthritis

Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 426
Author(s):  
I. Concepción Aranda-Valera ◽  
Antonio Cuesta-Vargas ◽  
Juan L. Garrido-Castro ◽  
Philip V. Gardiner ◽  
Clementina López-Medina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Motion Capture ◽  
Axial Spondyloarthritis ◽  
Human Motion ◽  
Spinal Mobility ◽  
Measurement Unit ◽  
Human Motion Analysis ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Optical Motion ◽  
Optical Motion Capture

Portable inertial measurement units (IMUs) are beginning to be used in human motion analysis. These devices can be useful for the evaluation of spinal mobility in individuals with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). The objectives of this study were to assess (a) concurrent criterion validity in individuals with axSpA by comparing spinal mobility measured by an IMU sensor-based system vs. optical motion capture as the reference standard; (b) discriminant validity comparing mobility with healthy volunteers; (c) construct validity by comparing mobility results with relevant outcome measures. A total of 70 participants with axSpA and 20 healthy controls were included. Individuals with axSpA completed function and activity questionnaires, and their mobility was measured using conventional metrology for axSpA, an optical motion capture system, and an IMU sensor-based system. The UCOASMI, a metrology index based on measures obtained by motion capture, and the IUCOASMI, the same index using IMU measures, were also calculated. Descriptive and inferential analyses were conducted to show the relationships between outcome measures. There was excellent agreement (ICC > 0.90) between both systems and a significant correlation between the IUCOASMI and conventional metrology (r = 0.91), activity (r = 0.40), function (r = 0.62), quality of life (r = 0.55) and structural change (r = 0.76). This study demonstrates the validity of an IMU system to evaluate spinal mobility in axSpA. These systems are more feasible than optical motion capture systems, and they could be useful in clinical practice.

scholarly journals IMU gyroscopes are a valid alternative to 3D optical motion capture system for angular kinematics analysis in tennis

2020 ◽  
pp. 175433712096544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Delgado-García ◽  
Jos Vanrenterghem ◽  
Emilio J Ruiz-Malagón ◽  
Pablo Molina-García ◽  
Javier Courel-Ibáñez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Angular Velocity ◽  
Motion Capture ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Strong Relationship ◽  
System Level ◽  
Optical Motion ◽  
Measurement Units ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Optical Motion Capture ◽  
Level Of Agreement

Whereas 3D optical motion capture (OMC) systems are considered the gold standard for kinematic assessment in sport science, they present some drawbacks that limit its use in the field. Inertial measurement units (IMUs) incorporating gyroscopes have been considered as a more practical alternative. Thus, the aim of the study was to evaluate the level of agreement for angular velocity between IMU gyroscopes and an OMC system for varying tennis strokes and intensities. In total, 240 signals of angular velocity from different body segments and types of strokes (forehand, backhand and service) were recorded from four players (two competition players and two beginners). The angular velocity of the IMU gyroscopes was compared to the angular velocity from the OMC system. Level of agreement was evaluated by correlation coefficients, magnitudes of errors in absolute and relative values and Bland-Altman plots. Differences between both systems were highly consistent within players’ skill (i.e. along the broad range of velocities) and axes ( x, y, z). Correlations ranged from 0.951 to 0.993, indicating a very strong relationship and concordance. The magnitude of the differences ranged from 4.4 to 35.4 deg·s−1. The difference relative to the maximum angular velocity achieved was less than 5.0%. The study concluded that IMUs and OMC systems showed comparable values. Thus, IMUs seem to be a valid alternative to detect meaningful differences in angular velocity during tennis groundstrokes in field-based experimentation.

Motion capture with inertial measurement units for hand/arm robot teleoperation

2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 931-937 ◽  
Author(s):  
Futoshi Kobayashi ◽  
Ko Hasegawa ◽  
Hiroyuki Nakamoto ◽  
Fumio Kojima
Keyword(s):  
Motion Capture ◽  
Inertial Measurement Units ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Measurement Units

Evaluation of inertial measurement units as a novel method for kinematic gait evaluation in dogs

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (06) ◽  
pp. 475-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Pauls ◽  
Chris Kawcak ◽  
Kevin Haussler ◽  
Gina Bertocci ◽  
Valerie Moorman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Acquisition ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Plane Motion ◽  
Inertial Measurement Units ◽  
Hip Joints ◽  
Kinematic Data ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Optical Motion ◽  
Measurement Units ◽  
Plane Joint

Summary Objective: To evaluate the use of inertial measurement units (IMU) for quantification of canine limb kinematics. Methods: Sixteen clinically healthy, medium-sized dogs were enrolled. Baseline kinematic data were acquired using an optical motion capture system. Following this baseline data acquisition, a harness system was used for attachment of IMU to the animals. Optical kinematic data of dogs with and without the harness were compared to evaluate the influence of the harness on gait parameters. Sagittal plane joint kinematics acquired simultaneously with IMU and the optical system were compared for the carpal, tarsal, stifle and hip joints. Comparisons of data were made using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) test and evaluation of root mean squared errors (RMSE). Results: No significant differences were demonstrated in stance duration, swing duration or stride length between dogs instrumented with or without the harness, however, mean RMSE values ranged from 4.90° to 14.10° across the various joints. When comparing simultaneously acquired optical and IMU kinematic data, strong correlations were found for all four joints evaluated (CCC: carpus = 0.98, hock = 0.95, stifle = 0.98, hip = 0.96) and median RMSE values were similar across the joints ranging from 2.51° to 3.52°. Conclusions and Clinical relevance: Canine sagittal plane motion data acquisition with IMU is feasible, and optically acquired and IMU acquired sagittal plane kinematics had good correlation. This technology allows data acquisition outside the gait laboratory and may provide an alternative to optical kinematic gait analysis for the carpal, tarsal, stifle, and hip joints in the dog. Further investigation into this technology is indicated.

scholarly journals In Vivo Measurement of Wrist Movements during the Dart-Throwing Motion Using Inertial Measurement Units

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (16) ◽  
pp. 5623
Author(s):  
Gabriella Fischer ◽  
Michael Alexander Wirth ◽  
Simone Balocco ◽  
Maurizio Calcagni
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Motion Capture ◽  
Absolute Difference ◽  
Measurement Unit ◽  
Inertial Measurement Units ◽  
Mean Absolute Difference ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Dart Throwing ◽  
Measurement Units ◽  
Throwing Motion

Background: This study investigates the dart-throwing motion (DTM) by comparing an inertial measurement unit-based system previously validated for basic motion tasks with an optoelectronic motion capture system. The DTM is interesting as wrist movement during many activities of daily living occur in this movement plane, but the complex movement is difficult to assess clinically. Methods: Ten healthy subjects were recorded while performing the DTM with their right wrist using inertial sensors and skin markers. Maximum range of motion obtained by the different systems and the mean absolute difference were calculated. Results: In the flexion–extension plane, both systems calculated a range of motion of 100° with mean absolute differences of 8°, while in the radial–ulnar deviation plane, a mean absolute difference of 17° and range of motion values of 48° for the optoelectronic system and 59° for the inertial measurement units were found. Conclusions: This study shows the challenge of comparing results of different kinematic motion capture systems for complex movements while also highlighting inertial measurement units as promising for future clinical application in dynamic and coupled wrist movements. Possible sources of error and solutions are discussed.

scholarly journals Comparison of Trotting Stance Detection Methods from an Inertial Measurement Unit Mounted on the Horse’s Limb

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 2983
Author(s):  
Marie Sapone ◽  
Pauline Martin ◽  
Khalil Ben Mansour ◽  
Henry Château ◽  
Frédéric Marin
Keyword(s):  
Motion Capture ◽  
Inertial Measurement Unit ◽  
Detection Methods ◽  
Measurement Unit ◽  
Inertial Measurement Units ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
New Methods ◽  
Measurement Units ◽  
Ground Types ◽  
Stride Duration

The development of on-board sensors, such as inertial measurement units (IMU), has made it possible to develop new methods for analyzing horse locomotion to detect lameness. The detection of spatiotemporal events is one of the keystones in the analysis of horse locomotion. This study assesses the performance of four methods for detecting Foot on and Foot off events. They were developed from an IMU positioned on the canon bone of eight horses during trotting recording on a treadmill and compared to a standard gold method based on motion capture. These methods are based on accelerometer and gyroscope data and use either thresholding or wavelets to detect stride events. The two methods developed from gyroscopic data showed more precision than those developed from accelerometric data with a bias less than 0.6% of stride duration for Foot on and 0.1% of stride duration for Foot off. The gyroscope is less impacted by the different patterns of strides, specific to each horse. To conclude, methods using the gyroscope present the potential of further developments to investigate the effects of different gait paces and ground types in the analysis of horse locomotion.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document