scholarly journals Fusion of Hyperspectral CASI and Airborne LiDAR Data for Ground Object Classification through Residual Network

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (14) ◽  
pp. 3961
Author(s):  
Zhanyuan Chang ◽  
Huiling Yu ◽  
Yizhuo Zhang ◽  
Keqi Wang
Keyword(s):  
Object Classification ◽  
Airborne Lidar ◽  
Lidar Data ◽  
Point Cloud Data ◽  
Residual Network ◽  
Cloud Data ◽  
Ground Object ◽  
Fusion Scheme ◽  
Airborne Lidar Data

Modern satellite and aerial imagery outcomes exhibit increasingly complex types of ground objects with continuous developments and changes in land resources. Single remote-sensing modality is not sufficient for the accurate and satisfactory extraction and classification of ground objects. Hyperspectral imaging has been widely used in the classification of ground objects because of its high resolution, multiple bands, and abundant spatial and spectral information. Moreover, the airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) point-cloud data contains unique high-precision three-dimensional (3D) spatial information, which can enrich ground object classifiers with height features that hyperspectral images do not have. Therefore, the fusion of hyperspectral image data with airborne LiDAR point-cloud data is an effective approach for ground object classification. In this paper, the effectiveness of such a fusion scheme is investigated and confirmed on an observation area in the middle parts of the Heihe River in China. By combining the characteristics of hyperspectral compact airborne spectrographic imager (CASI) data and airborne LiDAR data, we extracted a variety of features for data fusion and ground object classification. Firstly, we used the minimum noise fraction transform to reduce the dimensionality of hyperspectral CASI images. Then, spatio-spectral and textural features of these images were extracted based on the normalized vegetation index and the gray-level co-occurrence matrices. Further, canopy height features were extracted from airborne LiDAR data. Finally, a hierarchical fusion scheme was applied to the hyperspectral CASI and airborne LiDAR features, and the fused features were used to train a residual network for high-accuracy ground object classification. The experimental results showed that the overall classification accuracy was based on the proposed hierarchical-fusion multiscale dilated residual network (M-DRN), which reached an accuracy of 97.89%. This result was found to be 10.13% and 5.68% higher than those of the convolutional neural network (CNN) and the dilated residual network (DRN), respectively. Spatio-spectral and textural features of hyperspectral CASI images can complement the canopy height features of airborne LiDAR data. These complementary features can provide richer and more accurate information than individual features for ground object classification and can thus outperform features based on a single remote-sensing modality.

scholarly journals CLASSIFICATION OF LiDAR DATA WITH POINT BASED CLASSIFICATION METHODS

2016 ◽  
Vol XLI-B3 ◽  
pp. 441-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Yastikli ◽  
Z. Cetin
Keyword(s):  
Data Processing ◽  
Point Cloud ◽  
Airborne Lidar ◽  
Lidar Data ◽  
Point Cloud Data ◽  
Classification Methods ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Cloud Data ◽  
Rule Sets

LiDAR is one of the most effective systems for 3 dimensional (3D) data collection in wide areas. Nowadays, airborne LiDAR data is used frequently in various applications such as object extraction, 3D modelling, change detection and revision of maps with increasing point density and accuracy. The classification of the LiDAR points is the first step of LiDAR data processing chain and should be handled in proper way since the 3D city modelling, building extraction, DEM generation, etc. applications directly use the classified point clouds. The different classification methods can be seen in recent researches and most of researches work with the gridded LiDAR point cloud. In grid based data processing of the LiDAR data, the characteristic point loss in the LiDAR point cloud especially vegetation and buildings or losing height accuracy during the interpolation stage are inevitable. In this case, the possible solution is the use of the raw point cloud data for classification to avoid data and accuracy loss in gridding process. In this study, the point based classification possibilities of the LiDAR point cloud is investigated to obtain more accurate classes. The automatic point based approaches, which are based on hierarchical rules, have been proposed to achieve ground, building and vegetation classes using the raw LiDAR point cloud data. In proposed approaches, every single LiDAR point is analyzed according to their features such as height, multi-return, etc. then automatically assigned to the class which they belong to. The use of un-gridded point cloud in proposed point based classification process helped the determination of more realistic rule sets. The detailed parameter analyses have been performed to obtain the most appropriate parameters in the rule sets to achieve accurate classes. The hierarchical rule sets were created for proposed Approach 1 (using selected spatial-based and echo-based features) and Approach 2 (using only selected spatial-based features) and have been tested in the study area in Zekeriyaköy, Istanbul which includes the partly open areas, forest areas and many types of the buildings. The data set used in this research obtained from Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality which was collected with ‘Riegl LSM-Q680i’ full-waveform laser scanner with the density of 16 points/m2. The proposed automatic point based Approach 1 and Approach 2 classifications successfully produced the ground, building and vegetation classes which were very similar although different features were used.

scholarly journals CLASSIFICATION OF LiDAR DATA WITH POINT BASED CLASSIFICATION METHODS

2016 ◽  
Vol XLI-B3 ◽  
pp. 441-445
Author(s):  
N. Yastikli ◽  
Z. Cetin
Keyword(s):  
Data Processing ◽  
Point Cloud ◽  
Airborne Lidar ◽  
Lidar Data ◽  
Point Cloud Data ◽  
Classification Methods ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Cloud Data ◽  
Rule Sets

LiDAR is one of the most effective systems for 3 dimensional (3D) data collection in wide areas. Nowadays, airborne LiDAR data is used frequently in various applications such as object extraction, 3D modelling, change detection and revision of maps with increasing point density and accuracy. The classification of the LiDAR points is the first step of LiDAR data processing chain and should be handled in proper way since the 3D city modelling, building extraction, DEM generation, etc. applications directly use the classified point clouds. The different classification methods can be seen in recent researches and most of researches work with the gridded LiDAR point cloud. In grid based data processing of the LiDAR data, the characteristic point loss in the LiDAR point cloud especially vegetation and buildings or losing height accuracy during the interpolation stage are inevitable. In this case, the possible solution is the use of the raw point cloud data for classification to avoid data and accuracy loss in gridding process. In this study, the point based classification possibilities of the LiDAR point cloud is investigated to obtain more accurate classes. The automatic point based approaches, which are based on hierarchical rules, have been proposed to achieve ground, building and vegetation classes using the raw LiDAR point cloud data. In proposed approaches, every single LiDAR point is analyzed according to their features such as height, multi-return, etc. then automatically assigned to the class which they belong to. The use of un-gridded point cloud in proposed point based classification process helped the determination of more realistic rule sets. The detailed parameter analyses have been performed to obtain the most appropriate parameters in the rule sets to achieve accurate classes. The hierarchical rule sets were created for proposed Approach 1 (using selected spatial-based and echo-based features) and Approach 2 (using only selected spatial-based features) and have been tested in the study area in Zekeriyaköy, Istanbul which includes the partly open areas, forest areas and many types of the buildings. The data set used in this research obtained from Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality which was collected with ‘Riegl LSM-Q680i’ full-waveform laser scanner with the density of 16 points/m2. The proposed automatic point based Approach 1 and Approach 2 classifications successfully produced the ground, building and vegetation classes which were very similar although different features were used.

scholarly journals Supervised Classification of Power Lines from Airborne LiDAR Data in Urban Areas

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 771 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanjun Wang ◽  
Qi Chen ◽  
Lin Liu ◽  
Dunyong Zheng ◽  
Chaokui Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urban Areas ◽  
Supervised Classification ◽  
Airborne Lidar ◽  
Power Lines ◽  
Lidar Data ◽  
Airborne Lidar Data

scholarly journals General External Uncertainty Models of Three-Plane Intersection Point for 3D Absolute Accuracy Assessment of Lidar Point Cloud

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (23) ◽  
pp. 2737 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minsu Kim ◽  
Seonkyung Park ◽  
Jeffrey Danielson ◽  
Jeffrey Irwin ◽  
Gregory Stensaas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Point Cloud ◽  
Accuracy Assessment ◽  
Conjugate Point ◽  
Airborne Lidar ◽  
Lidar Data ◽  
General Function ◽  
Point Cloud Data ◽  
Cloud Data ◽  
Uncertainty Model ◽  
External Uncertainty

The traditional practice to assess accuracy in lidar data involves calculating RMSEz (root mean square error of the vertical component). Accuracy assessment of lidar point clouds in full 3D (three dimension) is not routinely performed. The main challenge in assessing accuracy in full 3D is how to identify a conjugate point of a ground-surveyed checkpoint in the lidar point cloud with the smallest possible uncertainty value. Relatively coarse point-spacing in airborne lidar data makes it challenging to determine a conjugate point accurately. As a result, a substantial unwanted error is added to the inherent positional uncertainty of the lidar data. Unless we keep this additional error small enough, the 3D accuracy assessment result will not properly represent the inherent uncertainty. We call this added error “external uncertainty,” which is associated with conjugate point identification. This research developed a general external uncertainty model using three-plane intersections and accounts for several factors (sensor precision, feature dimension, and point density). This method can be used for lidar point cloud data from a wide range of sensor qualities, point densities, and sizes of the features of interest. The external uncertainty model was derived as a semi-analytical function that takes the number of points on a plane as an input. It is a normalized general function that can be scaled by smooth surface precision (SSP) of a lidar system. This general uncertainty model provides a quantitative guideline on the required conditions for the conjugate point based on the geometric features. Applications of the external uncertainty model were demonstrated using various lidar point cloud data from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 3D Elevation Program (3DEP) library to determine the valid conditions for a conjugate point from three-plane modeling.

Classification of Airborne Lidar Data by Echo

2012 ◽  
Vol 500 ◽  
pp. 696-700 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheng Yao Wang ◽  
Xi Min Cui ◽  
De Bao Yuan ◽  
Jing Jing Jin ◽  
Qiang Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Current Data ◽  
Airborne Lidar ◽  
Classification Method ◽  
Lidar Data ◽  
Collection System ◽  
Continuous Development ◽  
Data Collection System ◽  
Airborne Lidar Data

With the continuous development of Airborne Lidar hardware, the current data collection system will not only collect information on a single echo, multiple echo information also can be available. Through the analysis and discussion of echo principle, this paper compares and elaborates the characteristics of single-echo and multiple echo information, and introduces a filter classification method based on echo information, and illustrates that the method is simple and effective according to an example.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document