scholarly journals Selective Detection of Target Volatile Organic Compounds in Contaminated Air Using Sensor Array with Machine Learning: Aging Notes and Mold Smells in Simulated Automobile Interior Contaminant Gases

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 2687
Author(s):  
Toshio Itoh ◽  
Yutaro Koyama ◽  
Woosuck Shin ◽  
Takafumi Akamatsu ◽  
Akihiro Tsuruta ◽  
...  

We investigated the selective detection of target volatile organic compounds (VOCs) which are age-related body odors (namely, 2-nonenal, pelargonic acid, and diacetyl) and a fungal odor (namely, acetic acid) in the presence of interference VOCs from car interiors (namely, n-decane, and butyl acetate). We used eight semiconductive gas sensors as a sensor array; analyzing their signals using machine learning; principal-component analysis (PCA), and linear-discriminant analysis (LDA) as dimensionality-reduction methods; k-nearest-neighbor (kNN) classification to evaluate the accuracy of target-gas determination; and random forest and ReliefF feature selections to choose appropriate sensors from our sensor array. PCA and LDA scores from the sensor responses to each target gas with contaminant gases were generally within the area of each target gas; hence; discrimination between each target gas was nearly achieved. Random forest and ReliefF efficiently reduced the required number of sensors, and kNN verified the quality of target-gas discrimination by each sensor set.

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (7) ◽  
pp. 2368-2379
Author(s):  
N. Lavanya ◽  
G. Veerapandi ◽  
S. G. Leonardi ◽  
N. Donato ◽  
G. Neri ◽  
...  

A novel pseudo spin-ladder CaCu2O3 compound (2-leg) based conductometric gas sensor has been proposed, for the first time, for the detection of volatile organic compounds (VOCs); (a) the proposed reaction mechanism in air, and (b) in the presence of acetone and ethanol.


Metabolites ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 317
Author(s):  
Michalis Koureas ◽  
Paraskevi Kirgou ◽  
Grigoris Amoutzias ◽  
Christos Hadjichristodoulou ◽  
Konstantinos Gourgoulianis ◽  
...  

The aim of the present study was to investigate the ability of breath analysis to distinguish lung cancer (LC) patients from patients with other respiratory diseases and healthy people. The population sample consisted of 51 patients with confirmed LC, 38 patients with pathological computed tomography (CT) findings not diagnosed with LC, and 53 healthy controls. The concentrations of 19 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were quantified in the exhaled breath of study participants by solid phase microextraction (SPME) of the VOCs and subsequent gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis. Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney tests were used to identify significant differences between subgroups. Machine learning methods were used to determine the discriminant power of the method. Several compounds were found to differ significantly between LC patients and healthy controls. Strong associations were identified for 2-propanol, 1-propanol, toluene, ethylbenzene, and styrene (p-values < 0.001–0.006). These associations remained significant when ambient air concentrations were subtracted from breath concentrations. VOC levels were found to be affected by ambient air concentrations and a few by smoking status. The random forest machine learning algorithm achieved a correct classification of patients of 88.5% (area under the curve—AUC 0.94). However, none of the methods used achieved adequate discrimination between LC patients and patients with abnormal computed tomography (CT) findings. Biomarker sets, consisting mainly of the exogenous monoaromatic compounds and 1- and 2- propanol, adequately discriminated LC patients from healthy controls. The breath concentrations of these compounds may reflect the alterations in patient’s physiological and biochemical status and perhaps can be used as probes for the investigation of these statuses or normalization of patient-related factors in breath analysis.


Talanta ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 211 ◽  
pp. 120701 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Oleneva ◽  
T. Kuchmenko ◽  
E. Drozdova ◽  
A. Legin ◽  
D. Kirsanov

2018 ◽  
Vol 159 ◽  
pp. 378-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thiti Jarangdet ◽  
Kornkanya Pratumyot ◽  
Kittiwat Srikittiwanna ◽  
Wijitar Dungchai ◽  
Withawat Mingvanish ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document