scholarly journals A Sound Source Identification Algorithm Based on Bayesian Compressive Sensing and Equivalent Source Method

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 865 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Zan ◽  
Zhongming Xu ◽  
Linsen Huang ◽  
Zhifei Zhang

Near-field acoustic holography (NAH) based on equivalent source method (ESM) is an effective method for identifying sound sources. Conventional ESM focuses on relatively low frequencies and cannot provide a satisfactory solution at high frequencies. So its improved method called wideband acoustic holography (WBH) has been proposed, which has high reconstruction accuracy at medium-to-high frequencies. However, it is less accurate for coherent sound sources at low frequencies. To improve the reconstruction accuracy of conventional ESM and WBH, a sound source identification algorithm based on Bayesian compressive sensing (BCS) and ESM is proposed. This method uses a hierarchical Laplace sparse prior probability distribution, and adaptively adjusts the regularization parameter, so that the energy is concentrated near the correct equivalent source. Referring to the function beamforming idea, the original algorithm with order v can improve its dynamic range, and then more accurate position information is obtained. Based on the simulation of irregular microphone array, comparisons with conventional ESM and WBH show that the proposed method is more accurate, suitable for a wider range of frequencies, and has better reconstruction performance for coherent sources. By increasing the order v, the coherent sources can be located accurately. Finally, the stability and reliability of the proposed method are verified by experiments.

2020 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-71
Author(s):  
Chen Liangsong ◽  
He Yansong ◽  
Niu Xiyuan ◽  
Bao Jian ◽  
Li Wei

Near-field acoustical holography (NAH) based on equivalent source method (ESM) is an efficient technique for sound source identification. Conventional ESM with Tikhonov regularization (TRESM), ESM based on CVX MATLAB toolbox (CVX) and wideband acoustic holography (WBH) are commonly used methods for calculating equivalent source strengths. However, all of them have their respective limitations. To address some of these, an alternating iterative algorithm for sound source identification based on equivalent source method (AIESM) is proposed in this article, which is a combination of alternating direction method and a non-monotone line search technique. The method makes use of sparse regularization under the principle of compressive sensing (CS) to calculate equivalent source strengths. Moreover, inspired by the idea of functional beamforming (FB), AIESM with order n can yield an improved dynamic range when detecting the source location. Numerical simulations are carried out at different frequencies, and the results suggest that the computational efficiency of the proposed method is close to that of TRESM. In addition, AIESM has a better reconstruction accuracy than TRESM and WBH in a relatively wide frequency range. Compared with ESM based on CVX, AIESM is slightly better in reconstruction accuracy and has a higher computational efficiency. Meanwhile, AIESM with order n can provide more accurate source position and better resolution. The validity and practicality of the proposed method are further supported by experimental results.


1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-140
Author(s):  
Vytautas Stauskis

The paper deals with the differences between the energy created by four different pulsed sound sources, ie a sound gun, a start gun, a toy gun, and a hunting gun. A knowledge of the differences between the maximum energy and the minimum energy, or the signal-noise ratio, is necessary to correctly calculate the frequency dependence of reverberation time. It has been established by investigations that the maximum energy excited by the sound gun is within the frequency range of 250 to 2000 Hz. It decreases by about 28 dB at the low frequencies. The character of change in the energy created by the hunting gun differs from that of the sound gun. There is no change in the maximum energy within the frequency range of 63–100 Hz, whereas afterwards it increases with the increase in frequency but only to the limit of 2000 Hz. In the frequency range of 63–500 Hz, the energy excited by the hunting gun is lower by 15–30 dB than that of the sound gun. As frequency increases the difference is reduced and amounts to 5–10 dB. The maximum energy of the start gun is lower by 4–5 dB than that of the hunting gun in the frequency range of up to 1000 Hz, while afterwards the difference is insignificant. In the frequency range of 125–250 Hz, the maximum energy generated by the sound gun exceeds that generated by the hunting gun by 20 dB, that by the start gun by 25 dB, and that by the toy gun—by as much as 35 dB. The maximum energy emitted by it occupies a wide frequency range of 250 to 2000 Hz. Thus, the sound gun has an advantage over the other three sound sources from the point of view of maximum energy. Up until 500 Hz the character of change in the direct sound energy is similar for all types of sources. The maximum energy of direct sound is also created by the sound gun and it increases along with frequency, the maximum values being reached at 500 Hz and 1000 Hz. The maximum energy of the hunting gun in the frequency range of 125—500 Hz is lower by about 20 dB than that of the sound gun, while the maximum energy of the toy gun is lower by about 25 dB. The maximum of the direct sound energy generated by the hunting gun, the start gun and the toy gun is found at high frequencies, ie at 1000 Hz and 2000 Hz, while the sound gun generates the maximum energy at 500 Hz and 1000 Hz. Thus, the best results are obtained when the energy is emitted by the sound gun. When the sound field is generated by the sound gun, the difference between the maximum energy and the noise level is about 35 dB at 63 Hz, while the use of the hunting gun reduces the difference to about 20–22 dB. The start gun emits only small quantities of low frequencies and is not suitable for room's acoustical analysis at 63 Hz. At the frequency of 80 Hz, the difference between the maximum energy and the noise level makes up about 50 dB, when the sound field is generated by the sound gun, and about 27 dB, when it is generated by the hunting gun. When the start gun is used, the difference between the maximum signal and the noise level is as small as 20 dB, which is not sufficient to make a reverberation time analysis correctly. At the frequency of 100 Hz, the difference of about 55 dB between the maximum energy and the noise level is only achieved by the sound gun. The hunting gun, the start gun and the toy gun create the decrease of about 25 dB, which is not sufficient for the calculation of the reverberation time. At the frequency of 125 Hz, a sufficiently large difference in the sound field decay amounting to about 40 dB is created by the sound gun, the hunting gun and the start gun, though the character of the sound field curve decay of the latter is different from the former two. At 250 Hz, the sound gun produces a field decay difference of almost 60 dB, the hunting gun almost 50 dB, the start gun almost 40 dB, and the toy gun about 45 dB. At 500 Hz, the sound field decay is sufficient when any of the four sound sources is used. The energy difference created by the sound gun is as large as 70 dB, by the hunting gun 50 dB, by the start gun 52 dB, and by the toy gun 48 dB. Such energy differences are sufficient for the analysis of acoustic indicators. At the high frequencies of 1000 to 4000 Hz, all the four sound sources used, even the toy gun, produce a good difference of the sound field decay and in all cases it is possible to analyse the reverberation process at varied intervals of the sound level decay.


2021 ◽  
pp. 107754632110564
Author(s):  
Ming Zan ◽  
Zhongming Xu ◽  
Linsen Huang ◽  
Zhonghua Tang ◽  
Zhifei Zhang ◽  
...  

The conventional equivalent source method for near-field acoustic holography is an effective noise diagnosis method using microphone array. However, its performance is limited by microphone spacing, so the effect is unsatisfied when the wave number is high. In this paper, to broaden the frequency suitability and improve the performance of sound source reconstruction with low signal-to-noise ratios, a block Bayesian compressive sensing method based on the equivalent source method is proposed. Numerical results show that this proposed method has a good reconstruction performance and makes wideband reconstruction possible. By changing the frequency, location, and signal-to-noise ratio of the sound source, the reconstruction performance of the proposed method can remain stable. Finally, the validity and practicability of the proposed method are verified by experiments.


2013 ◽  
Vol 546 ◽  
pp. 156-163
Author(s):  
Xin Guo Qiu ◽  
Ming Zong Li ◽  
Huan Cai Lu ◽  
Wei Jiang

The aim of this paper is to investigate the impacts of various parameters of rigid spherical microphone array in detecting and locating interior sound source. Helmholtz Equations are adopted to express the sound field produced by the incident field and scattered field. The gradient of the pressure is zero at the surface for the sphere is rigid. Both the incident and scattered coefficient could be obtained by solving the Helmholtz Equation using the boundary condition. Then the interior sound field could be detected and located on with the methodology of spherical near-field acoustic holography (SNAH). This study is developed in two aspects,one is configuring the microphone in various distribution in the same sphere radius, and the other one is changing the radius of sphere array. Numerical simulations are carried out to determine the optimum microphone array configuration and structure parameters. One, two, and three sound sources are arranged respectively in different displacement to the sphere center and in different angle direction to simulate the real situation. During the experiments, Omni-directional speakers and beeps are adopted as sound sources. The result shows that the method to detect and locate sound source in interior sound field is valid.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document