scholarly journals Analysis and Comparison of GPS Precipitable Water Estimates between Two Nearby Stations on Tahiti Island

Sensors ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (24) ◽  
pp. 5578
Author(s):  
Fangzhao Zhang ◽  
Jean-Pierre Barriot ◽  
Guochang Xu ◽  
Marania Hopuare
Keyword(s):  
Mapping Function ◽  
Precipitable Water ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Tropospheric Delay ◽  
Horizontal Distance ◽  
International Gnss Service ◽  
Weighted Mean Temperature ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite ◽  
The Impact

Since Bevis first proposed Global Positioning System (GPS) meteorology in 1992, the precipitable water (PW) estimates retrieved from Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) networks with high accuracy have been widely used in many meteorological applications. The proper estimation of GNSS PW can be affected by the GNSS processing strategy as well as the local geographical properties of GNSS sites. To better understand the impact of these factors, we compare PW estimates from two nearby permanent GPS stations (THTI and FAA1) in the tropical Tahiti Island, a basalt shield volcano located in the South Pacific, with a mean slope of 8% and a diameter of 30 km. The altitude difference between the two stations is 86.14 m, and their horizontal distance difference is 2.56 km. In this paper, Bernese GNSS Software Version 5.2 with precise point positioning (PPP) and Vienna mapping function 1 (VMF1) was applied to estimate the zenith tropospheric delay (ZTD), which was compared with the International GNSS Service (IGS) Final products. The meteorological parameters sourced from the European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) and the local weighted mean temperature ( T m ) model were used to estimate the GPS PW for three years (May 2016 to April 2019). The results show that the differences of PW between two nearby GPS stations is nearly a constant with value 1.73 mm. In our case, this difference is mainly driven by insolation differences, the difference in altitude and the wind being only second factors.

scholarly journals Comparative analysis of blind tropospheric correction models in Ghana

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-26
Author(s):  
S. Osah ◽  
A. A. Acheampong ◽  
C. Fosu ◽  
I. Dadzie
Keyword(s):  
Prediction Models ◽  
Mapping Function ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Tropospheric Delay ◽  
Model Bias ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Delay Prediction

Abstract The impact of the earth’s atmospheric layers, particularly the troposphere on Global Navigation satellite system (GNSS) signals has become a major concern in GNSS accurate positioning, navigation, surveillance and timing applications. For precise GNSS applications, tropospheric delay has to be mitigated as accurately as possible using tropospheric delay prediction models. However, the choice of a particular prediction model can signifi-cantly impair the positioning accuracy particularly when the model does not suit the user’s environment. A performance assessment of these prediction models for a suitable one is very important. In this paper, an assessment study of the performances of five blind tropospheric delay prediction models, the UNB3m, EGNOS, GTrop, GPT2w and GPT3 models was conducted in Ghana over six selected Continuously Operating Reference Stations (CORS) using the 1˚x1˚ gridded Vienna Mapping Function 3 (VMF3) zenith tropospheric delay (ZTD) product as a reference. The gridded VMF3-ZTD which is generated for every six hours on the 1˚x1˚ grids was bilinearly interpolated both space and time and transferred from the grid heights to the respective heights of the CORS locations. The results show that the GPT3 model performed better in estimating the ZTD with an overall mean (bias: 2.05 cm; RMS: 2.53 cm), followed by GPT2w model (bias: 2.32cm; RMS: 2.76cm) and GTrop model (bias: 2.41cm; 2.82cm). UNB3m model (bias: 6.23 cm; RMS: 6.43 cm) and EGNOS model (bias: 6.70 cm; RMS: 6.89 cm) performed poorly. A multiple comparison test (MCT) was further performed on the RMSE of each model to check if there is significant difference at 5% significant level. The results show that the GPT3, GPT2w and GTrop models are significantly indifferent at 5% significance level indicating that either of these models can be employed to mitigate the ZTD in the study area, nevertheless, the choice of GPT3 model will be more preferable.

scholarly journals Validating HY-2A CMR precipitable water vapor using ground-based and shipborne GNSS observations

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 4963-4972
Author(s):  
Zhilu Wu ◽  
Yanxiong Liu ◽  
Yang Liu ◽  
Jungang Wang ◽  
Xiufeng He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Vapor ◽  
Microwave Radiometer ◽  
Precipitable Water ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Precipitable Water Vapor ◽  
Tropospheric Delay ◽  
High Temporal Resolution ◽  
International Gnss Service ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite ◽  
Gnss Observations

Abstract. The calibration microwave radiometer (CMR) on board the Haiyang-2A (HY-2A) satellite provides wet tropospheric delay correction for altimetry data, which can also contribute to the understanding of climate system and weather processes. The ground-based global navigation satellite system (GNSS) provides precise precipitable water vapor (PWV) with high temporal resolution and could be used for calibration and monitoring of the CMR data, and shipborne GNSS provides accurate PWV over open oceans, which can be directly compared with uncontaminated CMR data. In this study, the HY-2A CMR water vapor product is validated using ground-based GNSS observations of 100 International GNSS Service (IGS) stations along the global coastline and 56 d shipborne GNSS observations over the Indian Ocean. The processing strategy for GNSS data and CMR data is discussed in detail. Special efforts were made in the quality control and reconstruction of contaminated CMR data. The validation result shows that HY-2A CMR PWV agrees well with ground-based GNSS PWV with 2.67 mm as the root mean square (rms) within 100 km. Geographically, the rms is 1.12 mm in the polar region and 2.78 mm elsewhere. The PWV agreement between HY-2A and shipborne GNSS shows a significant correlation with the distance between the ship and the satellite footprint, with an rms of 1.57 mm for the distance threshold of 100 km. Ground-based GNSS and shipborne GNSS agree with HY-2A CMR well.

scholarly journals The Impact of Different Ocean Tide Loading Models on GNSS Estimated Zenith Tropospheric Delay Using Precise Point Positioning Technique

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (18) ◽  
pp. 3080
Author(s):  
Jinglei Zhang ◽  
Xiaoming Wang ◽  
Zishen Li ◽  
Shuhui Li ◽  
Cong Qiu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Precipitable Water ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite Systems ◽  
Ocean Tide ◽  
Tropospheric Delay ◽  
Ocean Tide Loading ◽  
Zenith Tropospheric Delay ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Impact

Global navigation satellite systems (GNSSs) have become an important tool to derive atmospheric products, such as the total zenith tropospheric delay (ZTD) and precipitable water vapor (PWV) for weather and climate studies. The ocean tide loading (OTL) effect is one of the primary errors that affects the accuracy of GNSS-derived ZTD/PWV, which means the study and choice of the OTL model is an important issue for high-accuracy ZTD estimation. In this study, GNSS data from 1 January 2019 to 31 January 2019 are processed using precise point positioning (PPP) at globally distributed stations. The performance of seven widely used global OTL models is assessed and their impact on the GNSS-derived ZTD is investigated by comparing them against the ZTD calculated from co-located radiosonde observations. The results indicate that the inclusion or exclusion of the OTL effect will lead to a difference in ZTD of up to 3–15 mm for island stations, and up to 1–2 mm for inland stations. The difference of the ZTD determined with different OTL models is quite small, with a root-mean-square (RMS) value below 1.5 mm at most stations. The comparison between the GNSS-derived ZTD and the radiosonde-derived ZTD indicates that the adoption of OTL models can improve the accuracy of GNSS-derived ZTD. The results also indicate that the adoption of a smaller cutoff elevation, e.g., 3° or 7°, can significantly reduce the difference between the ZTDs determined by GNSS and radiosonde, when compared against a 15° cutoff elevation. Compared to the radiosonde-derived ZTD, the RMS error of GNSS-derived ZTD is approximately 25–35 mm at a cutoff elevation of 15°, and 15–25 mm when the cutoff elevation is set to 3°.

scholarly journals Assimilation of GNSS PWV with NCAR-RTFDDA to Improve Prediction of a Landfall Typhoon

2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 178
Author(s):  
Haishen Wang ◽  
Yubao Liu ◽  
Yuewei Liu ◽  
Yunchang Cao ◽  
Hong Liang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Vapor ◽  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Precipitable Water ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Navigation Satellite ◽  
System A ◽  
Spiral Rainbands ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite ◽  
Four Dimensional Data Assimilation ◽  
The Impact

Precipitable water vapor (PWV) retrieved from ground-based global navigation satellite system (GNSS) stations acquisition signal of a navigation satellite system provides high spatial and temporal resolution atmospheric water vapor. In this paper, an observation-nudging-based real-time four-dimensional data assimilation (RTFDDA) approach was used to assimilate the PWV estimated from GNSS observation into the WRF (Weather Research and Forecasting) modeling system. A landfall typhoon, “Mangkhut”, is chosen to evaluate the impact of GNSS PWV data assimilation on its track, intensity, and precipitation prediction. The results show that RTFDDA can assimilate GNSS PWV data into WRF to improve the water vapor distribution associated with the typhoon. Assimilating the GNSS PWV improved the typhoon track and intensity prediction when and after the typhoon made landfall, correcting a 5–10 hPa overestimation (too deep) of the central pressure of the typhoon at landfall. It also improved the occurrence and the intensity of the major typhoon spiral rainbands.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the ZWD/ZTD Values Derived from MERRA-2 Global Reanalysis Products Using GNSS Observations and Radiosonde Data

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (22) ◽  
pp. 6440
Author(s):  
Liangke Huang ◽  
Lijie Guo ◽  
Lilong Liu ◽  
Hua Chen ◽  
Jun Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Satellite System ◽  
Reanalysis Data ◽  
Radiosonde Data ◽  
Tropospheric Delay ◽  
International Gnss Service ◽  
Vapor Detection ◽  
Lower Accuracy ◽  
Temporal And Spatial Characteristics ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite ◽  
Better Than

Tropospheric delay is one of the main errors affecting high-precision positioning and navigation and is a key parameter of water vapor detection in the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS). The second Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA-2) is the latest generation of reanalysis data collected by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), which can be used to calculate tropospheric delay products with high spatial and temporal resolution. However, there is no report analyzing the accuracy of the zenith tropospheric delay (ZTD) and zenith wet delay (ZWD) calculated from MERRA-2 data. This paper evaluates the performance of the ZTD and ZWD values derived from global MERRA-2 data using global radiosonde data and International GNSS Service (IGS) precise ZTD products. The results are as follows: (1) Taking the precision ZTD products of 316 IGS stations from around the world from 2015 to 2017 as the reference, the average root mean square (RMS) of the ZTD values calculated from the MERRA-2 data is better than 1.35 cm, and the accuracy difference between different years is small. The bias and RMS of the ZTD values show certain seasonal variations, with a higher accuracy in winter and a lower accuracy in summer, and the RMS decreases from the equator to the poles. However, those of the ZTD values do not show obvious variations according to elevation. (2) Relative to the radiosonde data, the RMS of the ZWD and ZTD values calculated from the MERRA-2 data are better than 1.37 cm and 1.45 cm, respectively. Furthermore, the bias and RMS of the ZWD and ZTD values also show some temporal and spatial characteristics, which are similar to the test results of the IGS stations. It is suggested that MERRA-2 data can be used for global tropospheric vertical profile model construction because of their high accuracy and good stability in the global calculation of the ZWD and ZTD.

scholarly journals Impact of Using GPS L2 Receiver Antenna Corrections for the Galileo E5a Frequency on Position Estimates

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (19) ◽  
pp. 5536
Author(s):  
Andrzej Araszkiewicz ◽  
Damian Kiliszek
Keyword(s):  
Satellite System ◽  
Differential Analysis ◽  
International Gnss Service ◽  
Phase Center ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Anechoic Chambers ◽  
Antenna Phase ◽  
Antenna Phase Center ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite ◽  
The Impact

Knowledge of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) antenna phase center variations plays a key role in precise positioning. Proper modeling is achieved by accessing antenna phase center corrections, which are determined in the calibration process. For most receiver antenna types, the International GNSS Service provides such corrections for two GPS and GLONASS carrier signals. In the case of Galileo, access to phase center corrections is difficult; only antennas calibrated in the anechoic chambers have available corrections for Galileo frequencies. Hence, in many of the studies, GPS-dedicated corrections are used for these Galileo frequencies. Differential analysis was conducted in this study to evaluate the impact of such change. In total, 25 stations belonging to the EUREF Permanent Network and equipped with individual calibrated antennas were the subject of this research. The results for both the absolute and relative positioning methods are clear: using GPS L2 corrections for Galileo E5a frequency causes a bias in the estimated height of almost 8 mm. For the horizontal component, a significant difference can be noticed for only one type of antenna.

scholarly journals A Comprehensive Evaluation of Key Tropospheric Parameters from ERA5 and MERRA-2 Reanalysis Products Using Radiosonde Data and GNSS Measurements

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 3008
Author(s):  
Lijie Guo ◽  
Liangke Huang ◽  
Junyu Li ◽  
Lilong Liu ◽  
Ling Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comprehensive Evaluation ◽  
Spatial Scales ◽  
Precipitable Water ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Reanalysis Data ◽  
Radiosonde Data ◽  
Tropospheric Delay ◽  
Weighted Mean Temperature ◽  
Temporal And Spatial ◽  
Environmental Prediction

Tropospheric delay is a major error source in the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), and the weighted mean temperature (Tm) is a key parameter in precipitable water vapor (PWV) retrieval. Although reanalysis products like the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) and the European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Re-Analysis-Interim (ERA-Interim) data have been used to calculate and model the tropospheric delay, Tm, and PWV, the limitations of the temporal and spatial resolutions of the reanalysis data have affected their performance. The release of the fifth-generation accurate global atmospheric reanalysis (ERA5) and the second Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA-2) provide the opportunity to overcome these limitations. The performances of the zenith tropospheric delay (ZTD), zenith wet delay (ZWD), Tm, and zenith hydrostatic delay (ZHD) of ERA5 and MERRA-2 data from 2016 to 2017 were evaluated in this work using GNSS ZTD and radiosonde data over the globe. Taking GNSS ZTD as a reference, the ZTD calculated from MERRA-2 and ERA5 pressure-level data were evaluated in temporal and spatial scales, with an annual mean bias and root mean square (RMS) of 2.3 and 10.9 mm for ERA5 and 4.5 and 13.1 mm for MERRA-2, respectively. Compared to radiosonde data, the ZHD, ZWD, and Tm derived from ERA5 and MERRA-2 data were also evaluated on temporal and spatial scales, with annual mean bias values of 1.1, 1.7 mm, and 0.14 K for ERA5 and 0.5, 4.8 mm, and –0.08 K for MERRA-2, respectively. Meanwhile, the annual mean RMS was 4.5, 10.5 mm, and 1.03 K for ERA5 and 4.4, 13.6 mm, and 1.17 K for MERRA-2, respectively. Tropospheric parameters derived from MERRA-2 and ERA5, with improved temporal and spatial resolutions, can provide a reference for GNSS positioning and PWV retrieval.

scholarly journals Assessment of GNSS PPP-Based Zenith Tropospheric Delay

2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 171-184
Author(s):  
Mohamed Abdelazeem ◽  
Ahmed El-Rabbany
Keyword(s):  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Tropospheric Delay ◽  
International Gnss Service ◽  
Zenith Tropospheric Delay ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite ◽  
The University ◽  
Globally Distributed ◽  
By Products ◽  
Gnss Observations

AbstractThis study assesses the precision of zenith tropospheric delay (ZTD) obtained through triple-constellation global navigation satellite system (GNSS) precise point positioning (PPP). Various ZTD estimates are obtained as by-products from GPS-only, GPS/Galileo, GPS/BeiDou, and triple-constellation GPS/Galileo/BeiDou PPP solutions. Triple-constellation GNSS observations from a number of globally distributed reference stations are processed over a period of seven days in order to investigate the daily performance of the ZTD estimates. The estimated ZTDs are then validated by comparing them with the International GNSS Service (IGS) tropospheric products and the University of New Brunswick (UNB3m) model counterparts. It is shown that the ZTD estimates agree with the IGS counterparts with a maximum standard deviation (STD) of 2.4 cm. It is also shown that the precision of estimated ZTD from the GPS/Galileo and GPS/Galileo/BeiDou PPP solutions is improved by about 4.5 and 14%, respectively, with respect to the GPS-only PPP solution. Moreover, it is found that the estimated ZTD agrees with the UNB3m model with a maximum STD of 3.1 cm. Furthermore, the GPS/Galileo and GPS/Galileo/BeiDou PPP enhance the precision of the ZTD estimates by about 6.5 and 10%, respectively, in comparison with the GPS-only PPP solution.

scholarly journals Height Variation Depending on the Source of Antenna Phase Centre Corrections: LEIAR25.R3 Case Study

Sensors ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (18) ◽  
pp. 4010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrzej Araszkiewicz ◽  
Damian Kiliszek ◽  
Anna Podkowa
Keyword(s):  
Satellite System ◽  
International Gnss Service ◽  
Phase Center ◽  
Antenna Phase ◽  
Antenna Phase Center ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite ◽  
Antenna Phase Centre ◽  
The Impact

In this study, we compared two sets of antenna phase center corrections for groups of the same type of antenna mounted at the continuously operating global navigation satellite system (GNSS) reference stations. The first set involved type mean models provided by the International GNSS Service (release igs08), while the second set involved individual models developed by Geo++. Our goal was to check which set gave better results in the case of height estimation. The paper presents the differences between models and their impact on resulting height. Analyses showed that, in terms of the stability of the determined height, as well as its variability caused by increasing the facade mask, both models gave very similar results. Finally, we present a method for how to estimate the impact of differences in phase center corrections on height changes.

scholarly journals Development and evaluation of the refined zenith tropospheric delay (ZTD) models

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fei Yang ◽  
Xiaolin Meng ◽  
Jiming Guo ◽  
Debao Yuan ◽  
Ming Chen
Keyword(s):  
Back Propagation ◽  
Mapping Function ◽  
Temporal Analysis ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Tropospheric Delay ◽  
Distribution Analysis ◽  
Residual Distribution ◽  
Zenith Tropospheric Delay ◽  
Accuracy Difference ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite

AbstractThe tropospheric delay is a significant error source in Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) positioning and navigation. It is usually projected into zenith direction by using a mapping function. It is particularly important to establish a model that can provide stable and accurate Zenith Tropospheric Delay (ZTD). Because of the regional accuracy difference and poor stability of the traditional ZTD models, this paper proposed two methods to refine the Hopfield and Saastamoinen ZTD models. One is by adding annual and semi-annual periodic terms and the other is based on Back-Propagation Artificial Neutral Network (BP-ANN). Using 5-year data from 2011 to 2015 collected at 67 GNSS reference stations in China and its surrounding regions, the four refined models were constructed. The tropospheric products at these GNSS stations were derived from the site-wise Vienna Mapping Function 1 (VMP1). The spatial analysis, temporal analysis, and residual distribution analysis for all the six models were conducted using the data from 2016 to 2017. The results show that the refined models can effectively improve the accuracy compared with the traditional models. For the Hopfield model, the improvement for the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and bias reached 24.5/49.7 and 34.0/52.8 mm, respectively. These values became 8.8/26.7 and 14.7/28.8 mm when the Saastamoinen model was refined using the two methods. This exploration is conducive to GNSS navigation and positioning and GNSS meteorology by providing more accurate tropospheric prior information.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document