scholarly journals Characteristics Regarding Lift-Off Intersection of Pulse-Modulation Eddy Current Signals for Evaluation of Hidden Thickness Loss in Cladded Conductors

Sensors ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (19) ◽  
pp. 4102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Li ◽  
Yi Wang ◽  
Zhengshuai Liu ◽  
Ilham Mukriz Zainal Abidin ◽  
Zhenmao Chen
Keyword(s):  
Eddy Current ◽  
Pulse Modulation ◽  
Thickness Loss ◽  
Clad Layer ◽  
Lift Off ◽  
Corrosive Environments ◽  
In Virtue Of ◽  
Protection Coating ◽  
Evaluation Techniques ◽  
Nondestructive Evaluation Techniques

The cladded conductor is broadly utilized in engineering fields, such as aerospace, energy, and petrochemical; however, it is vulnerable to thickness loss occurring in the clad layer and nonconductive protection coating due to abrasive and corrosive environments. Such a flaw severely undermines the integrity and safety of the mechanical structures. Therefore, evaluating the thickness loss hidden inside cladded conductors via reliable nondestructive evaluation techniques is imperative. This paper intensively investigates the pulse-modulation eddy current technique (PMEC) for the assessment of thickness loss in a cladded conductor. An analytical model of the ferrite-cored probe is established for analyzing PMEC signals and characteristics of lift-off intersection (LOI) in testing signals. Experiments are conducted for evaluation of the thickness loss in cladded conductors. An inverse scheme based on LOI for estimation of the thickness-loss depth is proposed and further verified. Through simulations and experiments, it is found that the influences of the thickness loss in the clad layer and protective coating on the PMEC signals can be decoupled in virtue of the LOI characteristics. Based on LOI, the hidden thickness loss can be efficiently evaluated without much of a reduction in accuracy by using the PMEC probe for dedicated inspection of the cladded conductor.

scholarly journals Research on Detection Mechanism of Weld Defects of Carbon Steel Plate Based on Orthogonal Axial Eddy Current Probe

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (19) ◽  
pp. 5515
Author(s):  
Linnan Huang ◽  
Chunhui Liao ◽  
Xiaochun Song ◽  
Tao Chen ◽  
Xu Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Steel ◽  
Eddy Current ◽  
Steel Plate ◽  
Difficult Problem ◽  
Eddy Current Testing ◽  
Detection Sensitivity ◽  
Detection Mechanism ◽  
Current Testing ◽  
Weld Defects ◽  
Lift Off

The uneven surface of the weld seam makes eddy current testing more susceptible to the lift-off effect of the probe. Therefore, the defect of carbon steel plate welds has always been a difficult problem in eddy current testing. This study aimed to design a new type of eddy current orthogonal axial probe and establish the finite element simulation model of the probe. The effect of the probe structure, coil turns, and coil size on the detection sensitivity was simulated. Further, a designed orthogonal axial probe was used to conduct a systematic experiment on the weld of carbon steel specimens, and the 0.2 mm width and 1 mm depth of weld defects of carbon steel plates were effectively detected. The experimental results showed that the new orthogonal axial eddy current probe effectively suppressed the unevenness effect of the weld surface on the lift-off effect during the detection process.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Coating Thickness Using Lift-Off Insensitivity of Eddy Current Sensor

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 419
Author(s):  
Xiaobai Meng ◽  
Mingyang Lu ◽  
Wuliang Yin ◽  
Abdeldjalil Bennecer ◽  
Katherine J. Kirk
Keyword(s):  
Eddy Current ◽  
Coating Thickness ◽  
Thickness Measurement ◽  
Eddy Current Testing ◽  
Thickness Variation ◽  
Testing Technique ◽  
Current Testing ◽  
Thin Skin ◽  
Embedded Algorithms ◽  
Lift Off

Defect detection in ferromagnetic substrates is often hampered by nonmagnetic coating thickness variation when using conventional eddy current testing technique. The lift-off distance between the sample and the sensor is one of the main obstacles for the thickness measurement of nonmagnetic coatings on ferromagnetic substrates when using the eddy current testing technique. Based on the eddy current thin-skin effect and the lift-off insensitive inductance (LII), a simplified iterative algorithm is proposed for reducing the lift-off variation effect using a multifrequency sensor. Compared to the previous techniques on compensating the lift-off error (e.g., the lift-off point of intersection) while retrieving the thickness, the simplified inductance algorithms avoid the computation burden of integration, which are used as embedded algorithms for the online retrieval of lift-offs via each frequency channel. The LII is determined by the dimension and geometry of the sensor, thus eliminating the need for empirical calibration. The method is validated by means of experimental measurements of the inductance of coatings with different materials and thicknesses on ferrous substrates (dual-phase alloy). The error of the calculated coating thickness has been controlled to within 3% for an extended lift-off range of up to 10 mm.

Differential coupling double-layer coil for eddy current testing with high lift-off

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Kefan Chen ◽  
Bin Gao ◽  
G.Y. Tian ◽  
Yupei Yang ◽  
Changrong Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Double Layer ◽  
Eddy Current ◽  
Eddy Current Testing ◽  
High Lift ◽  
Current Testing ◽  
Lift Off ◽  
Differential Coupling

Quality Assessment of Artocarpus heterophyllus Log Using Nondestructive Evaluation Techniques

2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanketh Tonannavar ◽  
N. D. Shivakumar ◽  
K. R. Y. Simha ◽  
Shakti Singh Chauhan ◽  
Krishnakant Bhole
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Nondestructive Evaluation ◽  
Artocarpus Heterophyllus ◽  
Evaluation Techniques ◽  
Nondestructive Evaluation Techniques

Eddy-current surface-cracking sizing in steel with high lift-off

1989 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 185
Author(s):  
J. Blitz ◽  
V.J. Willstatter ◽  
S.R. Oaten ◽  
N.T. Hajian
Keyword(s):  
Eddy Current ◽  
High Lift ◽  
Surface Cracking ◽  
Lift Off

Inversion of lift-off distance and thickness for non-magnetic metal using eddy current testing

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Xiaobai Meng ◽  
Mingyang Lu ◽  
Wuliang Yin ◽  
Abdeldjalil Bennecer ◽  
Katherine J Kirk
Keyword(s):  
Eddy Current ◽  
Eddy Current Testing ◽  
Current Testing ◽  
Magnetic Metal ◽  
Lift Off
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document