scholarly journals Estimation of Leaf Area Index Using DEIMOS-1 Data: Application and Transferability of a Semi-Empirical Relationship between two Agricultural Areas

2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 1274-1291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Vuolo ◽  
Nikolaus Neugebauer ◽  
Salvatore Bolognesi ◽  
Clement Atzberger ◽  
Guido D'Urso
Keyword(s):  
Leaf Area Index ◽  
Leaf Area ◽  
Empirical Relationship ◽  
Area Index ◽  
Data Application ◽  
Agricultural Areas ◽  
Semi Empirical

scholarly journals A Comparison of Leaf Area Index Maps Derived from Multi-Sensor Optical Data Acquired over Agricultural Areas

2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Satalino ◽  
Francesco Mattia ◽  
Anna Balenzano ◽  
Michele Rinaldi ◽  
Sergio Ruggieri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Leaf Area Index ◽  
Leaf Area ◽  
Optical Data ◽  
Area Index ◽  
Agricultural Areas ◽  
Index Maps

Evaluation of understory LAI estimation methodologies over forest ecosystem ICOS sites across Europe

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan-Peter George ◽  
Jan Pisek ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Remote Sensing ◽  
Leaf Area Index ◽  
Leaf Area ◽  
Forest Ecosystem ◽  
Remote Sensing Data ◽  
Ecosystem Functions ◽  
Area Index ◽  
Fractional Cover ◽  
Semi Empirical

<p>Leaf area index (i.e. one-half the total green leaf area per unit of horizontal ground surface area) is a crucial parameter in carbon balancing and modeling. Forest overstory and understory layers differ in carbon and water cycle regimes and phenology, as well as in ecosystem functions. Separate retrievals of leaf area index (LAI) for these two layers would help to improve modeling forest biogeochemical cycles, evaluating forest ecosystem functions and also remote sensing of forest canopies by inversion of canopy reflectance models. The aim of this study is to compare currently available understory LAI assessment methodologies over a diverse set of greenhouse gas measurement sites distributed along a wide latitudinal and elevational gradient across Europe. This will help to quantify  the fraction of the canopy LAI which is represented by understory, since this is still the major source of uncertainty in global LAI products derived from remote sensing data. For this, we took ground photos as well as in-situ reflectance measurements of the understory vegetation at 30 ICOS (Integration Carbon Observation System) sites distributed across 10 countries in Europe. The data were analyzed by means of three conceptually different methods for LAI estimation and comprised purely empirical (fractional cover), semi-empirical (in-situ NDVI linked to the radiative transfer model FLiES), and purely deterministic (Four-scale geometrical optical model) approaches. Finally, our results are compared with global forest understory LAI maps derived from remote sensing data at 1 km resolution (Liu et al. 2017). While we found some agreement among the three methods (e.g. Pearson-correlation between empirical and semi-empirical = 0.63), we also identified sources that are particularly prone to error inclusion such as inaccurate assessment of fractional cover from ground photos. Relationships between understory LAI and long-term climate variables were weak and suggested that understory LAI at the ICOS sites is probably more strongly determined by microclimatic conditions.</p><p><strong>Liu Y. et al. (2017):</strong> Separating overstory and understory leaf area indices for global needleleaf and deciduous broadleaf forests by fusion of MODIS and MISR data. Biogeosciences 14: 1093-1110.</p>

scholarly journals Estimating the Seasonal Dynamics of the Leaf Area Index Using Piecewise LAI-VI Relationships Based on Phenophases

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 689 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kun Qiao ◽  
Wenquan Zhu ◽  
Zhiying Xie ◽  
Peixian Li
Keyword(s):  
Leaf Area Index ◽  
Leaf Area ◽  
Vegetation Index ◽  
Near Infrared ◽  
Empirical Relationship ◽  
The Other ◽  
Active Period ◽  
Near Infrared Reflectance ◽  
Area Index ◽  
The Mean

The leaf area index (LAI) is not only an important parameter used to describe the geometry of vegetation canopy but also a key input variable for ecological models. One of the most commonly used methods for LAI estimation is to establish an empirical relationship between the LAI and the vegetation index (VI). However, the LAI-VI relationships had high seasonal variability, and they differed among phenophases and VIs. In this study, the LAI-VI relationships in different phenophases and for different VIs (i.e., the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), enhanced vegetation index (EVI) and near-infrared reflectance of vegetation (NIRv)) were investigated based on 82 site-years of LAI observed data and the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) VI products. Significant LAI-VI relationships were observed during the vegetation growing and declining periods. There were weak LAI-VI relationships (p > 0.05) during the flourishing period. The accuracies for the LAIs estimated with the piecewise LAI-VI relationships based on different phenophases were significantly higher than those estimated based on a single LAI-VI relationship for the entire vegetation active period. The average root mean square error (RMSE) ± standard deviation (SD) value for the LAIs estimated with the piecewise LAI-VI relationships was 0.38 ± 0.13 (based on the NDVI), 0.41 ± 0.13 (based on the EVI) and 0.41 ± 0.14 (based on the NIRv), respectively. In comparison, it was 0.46 ± 0.13 (based on the NDVI), 0.55 ± 0.15 (based on the EVI) and 0.55 ± 0.15 (based on the NIRv) for those estimated with a single LAI-VI relationship. The performance of the three VIs in estimating the LAI also varied among phenophases. During the growing period, the mean RMSE ± SD value for the estimated LAIs was 0.30 ± 0.11 (LAI-NDVI relationships), 0.37 ± 0.11 (LAI-EVI relationships) and 0.36 ± 0.13 (LAI-NIRv relationships), respectively, indicating the NDVI produced significantly better LAI estimations than those from the other two VIs. In contrast, the EVI produced slightly better LAI estimations than those from the other two VIs during the declining period (p > 0.05), and the mean RMSE ± SD value for the estimated LAIs was 0.45 ± 0.16 (LAI-NDVI relationships), 0.43 ± 0.23 (LAI-EVI relationships) and 0.45 ± 0.25 (LAI-NIRv relationships), respectively. Hence, the piecewise LAI-VI relationships based on different phenophases were recommended for the estimations of the LAI instead of a single LAI-VI relationship for the entire vegetation active period. Furthermore, the optimal VI in each phenophase should be selected for the estimations of the LAI according to the characteristics of vegetation growth.

Leaf area index estimation of lowland rice using semi-empirical backscattering model

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 073474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vineet Kumar ◽  
Mamta Kumari ◽  
Sudip Kumar Saha
Keyword(s):  
Leaf Area Index ◽  
Leaf Area ◽  
Lowland Rice ◽  
Area Index ◽  
Index Estimation ◽  
Semi Empirical
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document