scholarly journals Land-Use and Land-Cover Mapping Using a Gradable Classification Method

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 1544-1558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keigo Kitada ◽  
Kaoru Fukuyama
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Land Cover ◽  
Classification Method ◽  
Land Cover Mapping

scholarly journals Assessment of land-use and land-cover changes in Pangari watershed area (MS), India, based on the remote sensing and GIS techniques

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaitanya B. Pande ◽  
Kanak N. Moharir ◽  
S. F. R. Khadri
Keyword(s):  
Remote Sensing ◽  
Land Use ◽  
Land Cover ◽  
Satellite Data ◽  
Supervised Classification ◽  
Remote Sensing And Gis ◽  
Land Use Policy ◽  
Classification Method ◽  
Land Cover Mapping ◽  
Planning And Management

AbstractIn this paper, we focus on the assessment of land-use and land-cover change detection mapping to the effective planning and management policies of environment, land-use policy and hydrological system in the study area. In this study the soil and water conservation project has been applied during the five years and after five years what changes have been found in the land-use and land-cover classes and vegetation. In this view, this land-use and land-cover mapping is a more important role to decide the policy for watershed planning and management project in the semiarid region. In an emerging countries, fast industrialization and urbanization impose a significant threat to the natural atmosphere. The remote sensing and GIS techniques are crucial roles in the study of land-use and land-cover mapping during the years of 2007, 2014, and 2017. The main objective of this is to prepare the land-use and NDVI maps in the years of 2008, 2014 and 2017; these maps have prepared from satellite data using the supervised classification method. A normalized difference vegetation index map (NDVI) was done by using Landsat 8 and LISS-III satellite data. NDVI values play a major role in monitoring the vegetation and variation in land-use and land-cover classes. In these maps, four types of land are divided into four classes as agriculture, built-up, wasteland, and water body. The results of study show that agriculture land of 18.71% (158.24 Ha), built-up land of 0.62% (5.31 Ha), wasteland of 40.33% (341.02 Ha), and water body land of 17.39% (147 Ha) are increased. Land-use and land-cover maps and NDVI values show that agriculture land of 22.97% (194.29 Ha), 5.46% (14.59 Ha), and 0.08% (0.22 Ha) decreases during the years of 2008, 2014, and 2017. The results directly indicate that the supervised classification method has been the accurate identified feature in the land-use map classes. This classification method has been given the better accuracy (95%) from spatiotemporal satellite data. The accuracy was also tally with ground-truth and Google earth information. These results can be a very useful for the land-use policy, watershed planning, and management with natural resources, animals, and ecological systems.

Optical and Radar Data Analysis for Land Use Land Cover Mapping in Peru

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-27
Author(s):  
Barry Haack ◽  
Ron Mahabir
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Land Cover ◽  
Window Size ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Optical Data ◽  
Land Cover Mapping ◽  
Land Use Land Cover ◽  
Texture Image ◽  
Site Class ◽  
Spectral Signatures

This analysis determined the best individual band and combinations of various numbers of bands for land use land cover mapping for three sites in Peru. The data included Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) optical data, PALSAR L-band dual-polarized radar, and derived radar texture images. Spectral signatures were first obtained for each site class and separability between classes determined using divergence measures. Results show that the best single band for analysis was a TM band, which was different for each site. For two of the three sites, the second best band was a radar texture image from a large window size. For all sites the best three bands included two TM bands and a radar texture image. The original PALSAR bands were of limited value. Finally upon further analysis it was determined that no more than six bands were needed for viable classification at each study site.

Land Use and Land Cover Mapping in the Brazilian Amazon Using Polarimetric Airborne P-Band SAR Data

2008 ◽  
Vol 46 (10) ◽  
pp. 2956-2970 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corina da Costa Freitas ◽  
Luciana de Souza Soler ◽  
Sidnei JoÃo Siqueira Sant'Anna ◽  
Luciano Vieira Dutra ◽  
JoÃo Roberto dos Santos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Land Cover ◽  
Brazilian Amazon ◽  
Land Cover Mapping ◽  
Sar Data

scholarly journals Land Use/Land Cover Mapping of Sambar Watershed by Using Remote Sensing and GIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 578-585
Author(s):  
B. Varpe Shriniwas D. Payal Sandip
Keyword(s):  
Remote Sensing ◽  
Land Use ◽  
Land Cover ◽  
Remote Sensing And Gis ◽  
Rapid Expansion ◽  
Water Bodies ◽  
Land Cover Mapping ◽  
Fallow Land ◽  
Land Use Land Cover ◽  
Barren Land

In the present study, an effort has been made to study in detail of Land Use/Land Cover Mapping for Sambar watershed by using Remote Sensing and GIS technique was carried out during the year of 2020-2021 in Parbhani district. In this research the Remote Sensing and Geographical Information system technique was used for identifying the land use/land cover classes with the help of ArcGIS 10.8 software. The Sambar watershed is located in 19º35ʹ78.78˝ N and 76º87ʹ88.44˝ E in the Parbhani district of Marathwada region in Maharashtra. It is covered a total area 97.01 km2. The land use/land cover map and its classes were identified by the Supervised Classification Method in ArcGIS 10.8 software by using the Landsat 8 satellite image. Total six classes are identified namely as Agricultural area, Forest area, Urban area, Barren land, Water bodies and Fallow land. The Agricultural lands are well distributed throughout the watershed area and it covers 4135 ha. (43 per cent). Forest occupies 502 ha area and sharing about 5 per cent of the total land use land cover of the study area. The Urban land occupies 390 ha. area (4 per cent) and there was a rapid expansion of settlement area. Barren land occupies 3392 ha. area (35 per cent). A water bodies occupy 630 ha. area (6 per cent) and the Fallow land occupies 650 ha (7 per cent) but well-developed dendritic drainage pattern and good water availability is in the Sambar watershed.

Measuring and monitoring land cover, land use, and vegetation characteristics

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ned Horning ◽  
Julie A. Robinson ◽  
Eleanor J. Sterling ◽  
Woody Turner ◽  
Sacha Spector
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Land Cover ◽  
Deciduous Forest ◽  
Land Cover Classification ◽  
Remotely Sensed ◽  
Land Cover Mapping ◽  
Remotely Sensed Data ◽  
Soil P ◽  
Vegetation Characteristics ◽  
Classification Project

In terrestrial biomes, ecologists and conservation biologists commonly need to understand vegetation characteristics such as structure, primary productivity, and spatial distribution and extent. Fortunately, there are a number of airborne and satellite sensors capable of providing data from which you can derive this information. We will begin this chapter with a discussion on mapping land cover and land use. This is followed by text on monitoring changes in land cover and concludes with a section on vegetation characteristics and how we can measure these using remotely sensed data. We provide a detailed example to illustrate the process of creating a land cover map from remotely sensed data to make management decisions for a protected area. This section provides an overview of land cover classification using remotely sensed data. We will describe different options for conducting land cover classification, including types of imagery, methods and algorithms, and classification schemes. Land cover mapping is not as difficult as it may appear, but you will need to make several decisions, choices, and compromises regarding image selection and analysis methods. Although it is beyond the scope of this chapter to provide details for all situations, after reading it you will be able to better assess your own needs and requirements. You will also learn the steps to carry out a land cover classification project while gaining an appreciation for the image classification process. That said, if you lack experience with land cover mapping, it always wise to seek appropriate training and, if possible, collaborate with someone who has land cover mapping experience (Section 2.3). Although the terms “land cover” and “land use” are sometimes used interchangeably they are different in important ways. Simply put, land cover is what covers the surface of the Earth and land use describes how people use the land (or water). Examples of land cover classes are: water, snow, grassland, deciduous forest, or bare soil.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document