scholarly journals Assessment on IMERG V06 Precipitation Products Using Rain Gauge Data in Jinan City, Shandong Province, China

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 1241
Author(s):  
Peng Li ◽  
Zongxue Xu ◽  
Chenlei Ye ◽  
Meifang Ren ◽  
Hao Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Extreme Precipitation ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Daily Scale ◽  
Extreme Precipitation Indices ◽  
Precipitation Indices ◽  
Jinan City ◽  
Global Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Global Precipitation

In this study, a comprehensive assessment on precipitation estimation from the latest Version 06 release of the Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG) algorithm is conducted by using 24 rain gauge observations at daily scale from 2001 to 2016. The IMERG V06 dataset fuses Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) satellite data (2000–2015) and Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) satellite data (2014–present), enabling the use of IMERG data for long-term study. Correlation coefficient (CC), root mean square error (RMSE), relative bias (RB), probability of detection (POD), false alarm ratio (FAR), and critical success index (CSI) were used to assess the accuracy of satellite-derived precipitation estimation and measure the correspondence between satellite-derived and observed occurrence of precipitation events. The probability density distributions of precipitation intensity and influence of elevation on precipitation estimation were also examined. Results showed that, with high CC and low RMSE and RB, the IMERG Final Run product (IMERG-F) performs better than two other IMERG products at daily, monthly, and yearly scales. At daily scale, the ability of satellite products to detect general precipitation is clearly superior to the ability to detect heavy and extreme precipitation. In addition, CC and RMSE of IMERG products are high in Southeastern Jinan City, while RMSE is relatively low in Southwestern Jinan City. Considering the fact that the IMERG estimation of extreme precipitation indices showed an acceptable level of accuracy, IMERG products can be used to derive extreme precipitation indices in areas without gauged data. At all elevations, IMERG-F exhibits a better performance than the other two IMERG products. However, POD and FAR decrease and CSI increase with the increase of elevation, indicating the need for improvement. This study will provide valuable information for the application of IMERG products at the scale of a large city.

scholarly journals The Contribution of Rain Gauges in the Calibration of the IMERG Product: Results from the First Validation over Spain

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco J. Tapiador ◽  
Andrés Navarro ◽  
Eduardo García-Ortega ◽  
Andrés Merino ◽  
José Luis Sánchez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Surface Precipitation ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Hydrologic Impacts ◽  
A Minor ◽  
Global Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Global Precipitation

AbstractAfter 5 years in orbit, the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission has produced enough quality-controlled data to allow the first validation of their precipitation estimates over Spain. High-quality gauge data from the meteorological network of the Spanish Meteorological Agency (AEMET) are used here to validate Integrated Multisatellite Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) level 3 estimates of surface precipitation. While aggregated values compare notably well, some differences are found in specific locations. The research investigates the sources of these discrepancies, which are found to be primarily related to the underestimation of orographic precipitation in the IMERG satellite products, as well as to the number of available gauges in the GPCC gauges used for calibrating IMERG. It is shown that IMERG provides suboptimal performance in poorly instrumented areas but that the estimate improves greatly when at least one rain gauge is available for the calibration process. A main, generally applicable conclusion from this research is that the IMERG satellite-derived estimates of precipitation are more useful (r2 > 0.80) for hydrology than interpolated fields of rain gauge measurements when at least one gauge is available for calibrating the satellite product. If no rain gauges were used, the results are still useful but with decreased mean performance (r2 ≈ 0.65). Such figures, however, are greatly improved if no coastal areas are included in the comparison. Removing them is a minor issue in terms of hydrologic impacts, as most rivers in Spain have their sources far from the coast.

scholarly journals Evaluation of GPM-Era Satellite Precipitation Products on the Southern Slopes of the Central Himalayas Against Rain Gauge Data

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 1836 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shankar Sharma ◽  
Yingying Chen ◽  
Xu Zhou ◽  
Kun Yang ◽  
Xin Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Distribution ◽  
Dynamic Range ◽  
Precipitation Amount ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Central Himalayas ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
New Generation ◽  
Global Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Global Precipitation

The Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission provides high-resolution precipitation estimates globally. However, their accuracy needs to be accessed for algorithm enhancement and hydro-meteorological applications. This study applies data from 388 gauges in Nepal to evaluate the spatial-temporal patterns presented in recently-developed GPM-Era satellite-based precipitation (SBP) products, i.e., the Integrated Multi-satellite Retrievals for GPM (IMERG), satellite-only (IMERG-UC), the gauge-calibrated IMERG (IMERG-C), the Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation (GSMaP), satellite-only (GSMaP-MVK), and the gauge-calibrated GSMaP (GSMaP-Gauge). The main results are as follows: (1) GSMaP-Gauge datasets is more reasonable to represent the observed spatial distribution of precipitation, followed by IMERG-UC, GSMaP-MVK, and IMERG-C. (2) The gauge-calibrated datasets are more consistent (in terms of relative root mean square error (RRMSE) and correlation coefficient (R)) than the satellite-only datasets in representing the seasonal dynamic range of precipitation. However, all four datasets can reproduce the seasonal cycle of precipitation, which is predominately governed by the monsoon system. (3) Although all four SBP products underestimate the monsoonal precipitation, the gauge-calibrated IMERG-C yields smaller mean bias than GSMaP-Gauge, while GSMaP-Gauge shows the smaller RRMSE and higher R-value; indicating IMERG-C is more reliable to estimate precipitation amount than GSMaP-Gauge, whereas GSMaP-Gauge presents more reasonable spatial distribution than IMERG-C. Only IMERG-C moderately reproduces the evident elevation-dependent pattern of precipitation revealed by gauge observations, i.e., gradually increasing with elevation up to 2000 m and then decreasing; while GSMaP-Gauge performs much better in representing the gauge observed spatial pattern than others. (4) The GSMaP-Gauge calibrated based on the daily gauge analysis is more consistent with detecting gauge observed precipitation events among the four datasets. The high-intensity related precipitation extremes (95th percentile) are more intense in regions with an elevation below 2500 m; all four SBP datasets have low accuracy (<30%) and mostly underestimated (by >40%) the frequency of extreme events at most of the stations across the country. This work represents the quantification of the new-generation SBP products on the southern slopes of the central Himalayas in Nepal.

scholarly journals An Experimental Study of the Small-Scale Variability of Rainfall

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 351-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Tokay ◽  
Kurtuluş
Keyword(s):  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Sharp Drop ◽  
Temporal Sampling ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Variable Nature ◽  
Different Seasons ◽  
Global Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Global Precipitation

Small-scale variability of rainfall has been studied employing six dual rain gauge sites at Wallops Island, Virginia. The rain gauge sites were separated between 0.4 and 5 km, matching the beamwidth of Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) and Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) precipitation radars. During a 2-yr observational period, over 7100 rainy samples were received at 5-min integration. A single gauge did not report as high as 67% of the time when at least one of the other gauges had rainfall in one of the seasons. Since rainfall from one of the six rain gauges is sufficient for the rainy footprint from a satellite, this demonstrates the common occurrence of the partial beamfilling. For the periods where all gauges were reporting rainfall, a single gauge had at most 13% difference from the areal average rainfall in one of the seasons. This suggests that at the spatial scale of 5 km, the variability caused by the rain gradient is relatively less important than the variability arising from a partially filled footprint. During the passage of frontal systems and tropical cyclones, the beam was filled by rain most of the time and this resulted in relatively higher correlation distances. The correlation distance had a sharp drop off from 45 km in moderately variable rainfall to 3 km in highly variable rainfall and ranged from 5 to 35 km between the different seasons. This demonstrates its highly variable nature. Considering temporal sampling, the monthly rainfall error was 35% and 73% for 3-hourly and twice-daily observations, respectively.

scholarly journals Comparison of Oceanic Multisatellite Precipitation Data from Tropical Rainfall Measurement Mission and Global Precipitation Measurement Mission Datasets with Rain Gauge Data from Ocean Buoys

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 903-920 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiaoyan Wu ◽  
Yilei Wang
Keyword(s):  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Tropical Pacific ◽  
Tropical Rainfall ◽  
High Rainfall ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
The Tropics ◽  
Global Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Global Precipitation ◽  
The Tropical Pacific

AbstractThree satellite-derived precipitation datasets [the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA) dataset, the NOAA Climate Prediction Center morphing technique (CMORPH) dataset, and the newly available Integrated Multisatellite Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG) dataset] are compared with data obtained from 55 rain gauges mounted on floating buoys in the tropics for the period 1 April 2014–30 April 2017. All three satellite datasets underestimate low rainfall and overestimate high rainfall in the tropical Pacific Ocean, but the TMPA dataset does this the most. In the high-rainfall (higher than 4 mm day−1) Atlantic region, all three satellite datasets overestimate low rainfall and underestimate high rainfall, but the IMERG dataset does this the most. For the Indian Ocean, all three rainfall satellite datasets overestimate rainfall at some gauges and underestimate it at others. Of these three satellite products, IMERG is the most accurate in estimating mean precipitation over the tropical Pacific and Indian Oceans, but it is less accurate over the tropical Atlantic Ocean for regions of high rainfall. The differences between the three satellite datasets vary by region and there is a need to consider uncertainties in the data before using them for research.

scholarly journals Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Ground Validation (GV) Prototype in the Korean Peninsula

2014 ◽  
Vol 31 (9) ◽  
pp. 1902-1921 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji-Hye Kim ◽  
Mi-Lim Ou ◽  
Jun-Dong Park ◽  
Kenneth R. Morris ◽  
Mathew R. Schwaller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Korean Peninsula ◽  
Rain Rate ◽  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
International Partnerships ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Ground Validation ◽  
Microwave Imager ◽  
Global Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Global Precipitation

Abstract Since 2009, the Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA) has participated in ground validation (GV) projects through international partnerships within the framework of the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Mission. The goal of this work is to assess the reliability of ground-based measurements in the Korean Peninsula as a means for validating precipitation products retrieved from satellite microwave sensors, with an emphasis on East Asian precipitation. KMA has a well-developed operational weather service infrastructure composed of meteorological radars, a dense rain gauge network, and automated weather stations. Measurements from these systems, including data from four ground-based radars (GRs), were combined with satellite data from the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) precipitation radar (PR) and used as a proxy for GPM GV over the Korean Peninsula. A time series of mean reflectivity differences (GR − PR) for stratiform-only and above-brightband-only data showed that the time-averaged difference fell between −2.0 and +1.0 dBZ for the four GRs used in this study. Site-specific adjustments for these relative mean biases were applied to GR reflectivities, and detailed statistical comparisons of reflectivity and rain rate between PR and bias-adjusted GR were carried out. In rain-rate comparisons, surface rain from the TRMM Microwave Imager (TMI) and the rain gauges were added and the results varied according to rain type. Bias correction has had a positive effect on GR rain rate comparing with PR and gauge rain rates. This study confirmed advance preparation for GPM GV system was optimized on the Korean Peninsula using the official framework.

scholarly journals Comparison of GPM IMERG and TRMM 3B43 Products over Cyprus

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (19) ◽  
pp. 3212
Author(s):  
Adrianos Retalis ◽  
Dimitris Katsanos ◽  
Filippos Tymvios ◽  
Silas Michaelides
Keyword(s):  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Monthly Basis ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Annual Basis ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Satellite Retrievals ◽  
Gauge Station ◽  
Global Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Global Precipitation

Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) high-resolution product and Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) 3B43 product are validated against rain gauges over the island of Cyprus for the period from April 2014 to June 2018. The comparison performed is twofold: firstly, the Satellite Precipitation (SP) estimates are compared with the gauge stations’ records on a monthly basis and, secondly, on an annual basis. The validation is based on ground data from a dense and well-maintained network of rain gauges, available in high temporal (hourly) resolution. The results show high correlation coefficient values, on average reaching 0.92 and 0.91 for monthly 3B43 and IMERG estimates, respectively, although both IMERG and TRMM tend to underestimate precipitation (Bias values of −1.6 and −3.0, respectively), especially during the rainy season. On an annual basis, both SP estimates are underestimating precipitation, although IMERG estimates records (R = 0.82) are slightly closer to that of the corresponding gauge station records than those of 3B43 (R = 0.81). Finally, the influence of elevation of both SP estimates was considered by grouping rain gauge stations in three categories, with respect to their elevation. Results indicated that both SP estimates underestimate precipitation with increasing elevation and overestimate it at lower elevations.

The Global Precipitation Climatology Project Version 3 Products

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
George J. Huffman ◽  
Ali Behrangi ◽  
Robert F. Adler ◽  
David T. Bolvin ◽  
Eric J. Nelkin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Global Precipitation Climatology Project ◽  
Climate Data ◽  
Precipitation Climatology ◽  
Global Precipitation Climatology Centre ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Key Points ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Global Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Global Precipitation

&lt;p&gt;The Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) is currently providing a next-generation Version 3.1 Monthly product, which covers the period 1983-2019.&amp;#160; This modernized product includes higher spatial resolution (0.5&amp;#176;x0.5&amp;#176;); a wider coverage (60&amp;#176;N-S) by geosynchronous IR estimates, now based on the Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information using Artificial Neural Networks-Climate Data Record (PERSIANN-CDR) algorithm, with monthly recalibration using Goddard Profiling (GPROF) algorithm retrievals from selected passive microwave sensors; and improved calibrations of Television-Infrared Operational Satellite (TIROS) Operational Vertical Sounder (TOVS) and Advanced Infrared Sounder (AIRS) precipitation, used outside 60&amp;#186;N-S.&amp;#160; The merged satellite estimate is adjusted to the Tropical Combined Climatology (TCC) at lower latitudes, and the Merged CloudSat, TRMM, and GPM (MCTG) climatology at higher latitudes.&amp;#160; Finally, V3.1 provides a merger of the satellite-only estimates with the Global Precipitation Climatology Centre (GPCC) monthly 1&amp;#176;x1&amp;#176; gauge analyses.&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As well, the GPCP team is advancing a companion global Version 3 Daily product, in which the Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission (IMERG) Final Run V06 estimates are used where available (initially restricted to 60&amp;#176;N-S), and rescaled TOVS/AIRS data in high-latitude areas, all calibrated to the GPCP V3.1 Monthly estimate.&amp;#160; Since IMERG currently extends back to June 2000, daily PERSIANN-CDR data will be used for the period January 1983&amp;#8211;May 2000 to complete the record.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This presentation will provide early results for, and the latest status of, the Monthly and Daily GPCP products as a function of time and region.&amp;#160; Key points include examining homogeneity over time and across time and space boundaries between input datasets.&amp;#160; One key activity is to refine the V3 products while we continue to produce the Version 2 GPCP products for on-going use.&lt;/p&gt;

scholarly journals Evaluation and Application of Satellite Precipitation Products in Studying the Summer Precipitation Variations over Taiwan

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wan-Ru Huang ◽  
Pin-Yi Liu ◽  
Ya-Hui Chang ◽  
Chian-Yi Liu
Keyword(s):  
Summer Precipitation ◽  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Temporal Variations ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Satellite Precipitation ◽  
Reference Base ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
June July ◽  
Global Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Global Precipitation

In March 2019, Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG)-Final v6 (hereafter IMERG6) was released, with data concerning precipitation dating back to June 2000. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has suggested that researchers use IMERG6 to replace the frequently used Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM)-3B42 v7 (hereafter TRMM7), which is expected to cease operation in December 2019. This study aims to evaluate the performance of IMERG6 and TRMM7 in depicting the variations of summer (June, July, and August) precipitation over Taiwan during the period 2000–2017. Data used for the comparison also includes IMERG-Final v5 (hereafter IMERG5) and Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation for Global Precipitation Measurement (GSMaP)-Gauge v7 (hereafter GSMaP7) during the summers of 2014–2017. Capabilities to apply the four satellite precipitation products (SPPs) in studying summer connective afternoon rainfall (CAR) events, which are the most frequently observed weather patterns in Taiwan, are also examined. Our analyses show that when using more than 400 local rain-gauge observations as a reference base for comparison, IMERG6 outperforms TRMM7 quantitatively and qualitatively, more accurately depicting the variations of the summer precipitation over Taiwan at multiple timescales (including mean status, daily, interannual, and diurnal). IMERG6 also performs better than TRMM7 in capturing the characteristics of CAR activities in Taiwan. These findings highlight that using IMERG6 to replace TRMM7 adds value in studying the spatial-temporal variations of summer precipitation over Taiwan. Furthermore, the analyses also indicated that IMERG6 outperforms IMERG5 and GSMaP7 in the examination of most of the features of summer precipitation over Taiwan during 2014–2017.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document