scholarly journals Comprehensive Comparisons of State-of-the-Art Gridded Precipitation Estimates for Hydrological Applications over Southern China

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (23) ◽  
pp. 3997
Author(s):  
Zhen Gao ◽  
Bensheng Huang ◽  
Ziqiang Ma ◽  
Xiaohong Chen ◽  
Jing Qiu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Southern China ◽  
Temporal Distribution ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Vital Role ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
Accumulated Rainfall ◽  
Daily Scale ◽  
Global Precipitation ◽  
Better Than

Satellite-based precipitation estimates with high quality and spatial-temporal resolutions play a vital role in forcing global or regional meteorological, hydrological, and agricultural models, which are especially useful over large poorly gauged regions. In this study, we apply various statistical indicators to comprehensively analyze the quality and compare the performance of five newly released satellite and reanalysis precipitation products against China Merged Precipitation Analysis (CMPA) rain gauge data, respectively, with 0.1° × 0.1° spatial resolution and two temporal scales (daily and hourly) over southern China from June to August in 2019. These include Precipitation Estimates from Remotely Sensed Information using Artificial Neural Networks Cloud Classification System (PERSIANN-CCS), European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Reanalysis v5 (ERA5-Land), Fengyun-4 (FY-4A), Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation (GSMaP), and Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG). Results indicate that: (1) all five products overestimate the accumulated rainfall in the summer, with FY-4A being the most severe; additionally, FY-4A cannot capture the spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of precipitation over southern China. (2) IMERG and GSMaP perform better than the other three datasets at both daily and hourly scales; IMERG correlates slightly better than GSMaP against CMPA data, while it performs worse than GSMaP in terms of probability of detection (POD). (3) ERA5-Land performs better than PERSIANN-CCS and FY-4A at daily scale but shows the worst correlation coefficient (CC), false alarm ratio (FAR), and equitable threat score (ETS) of all precipitation products at hourly scale. (4) The rankings of overall performance on precipitation estimations for this region are IMERG, GSMaP, ERA5-Land, PERSIANN-CCS, and FY-4A at daily scale; and IMERG, GSMaP, PERSIANN-CCS, FY-4A, and ERA5-Land at hourly scale. These findings will provide valuable feedback for improving the current satellite-based precipitation retrieval algorithms and also provide preliminary references for flood forecasting and natural disaster early warning.

Validation of GPM IMERG V05 and V06 Precipitation Products over Iran

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 1011-1037 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyed-Mohammad Hosseini-Moghari ◽  
Qiuhong Tang
Keyword(s):  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Validation Metrics ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Retrieval Algorithms ◽  
Satellite Sensors ◽  
Daily Scale ◽  
Global Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Global Precipitation ◽  
Early Late ◽  
Better Than

AbstractThis study attempts to assess the validity of the Integrated Multisatellite Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG) products across Iran. Six IMERG precipitation products (IPPs) including early, late, and final runs for versions 05 and 06 were compared with precipitation data from 76 synoptic stations on a daily scale for the period from June 2014 to June 2018. According to the results, V05 performed better than V06, particularly in early and late runs. The IPPs overestimate precipitation ranging from 5% to 32%; however, IPPs tended to underestimate (overestimate) the amount of precipitation for wet (dry) areas and precipitation classes higher than 5 mm day−1 (less than 5 mm day−1). The probability of detection (POD) in IPPs was almost similar (with a median equal to 0.60), whereas other categorical validation metrics like false alarm ratio (FAR) improved in the final run. Our assessments revealed that the dependency of IPPs to the elevation was low, while the error characteristics of IPPs were strongly dependent on the climate and precipitation intensity. For instance, the systematic error varied between less than 12% in dry regions to more than 60% in wet regions. Also, according to modified Kling–Gupta efficiency (KGE) and relative bias (RBias), the performance of IPPs in winter with the highest KGE (ranging from 0.47 to 0.63) and lowest RBias (ranging from 0% to 16%) was better than other seasons. Further improvement is recommended in the satellite sensors and the precipitation retrieval algorithms to achieve a reliable precipitation source.

scholarly journals Performance Assessment of GSMaP and GPM IMERG Products during Typhoon Mangkhut

Atmosphere ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 134
Author(s):  
Xiaoyu Li ◽  
Sheng Chen ◽  
Zhenqing Liang ◽  
Chaoying Huang ◽  
Zhi Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mean Squared Error ◽  
Southern China ◽  
Eastern China ◽  
Mainland China ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Critical Success ◽  
Rainfall Occurrence ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Global Precipitation

This paper evaluated the latest version 6.0 Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation (GSMaP) and version 6.0 Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG) products during 2018 Typhoon Mangkhut in China. The reference data is the rain gauge datasets from Gauge-Calibrated Climate Prediction Centre (CPC) Morphing Technique (CMORPHGC). The products for comparison include the GSMaP near-real-time, Microwave-IR merged, and gauge-calibrated (GSMaP_NRT, GSMaP_MVK, and GSMaP_Gauge) and the IMERG Early, Final, and Final gauge-calibrated (IMERG_ERUncal, IMERG_FRUncal, and IMERG_FRCal) products. The results show that (1) both GSMaP_Gauge and IMERG_FRCal considerably reduced the bias of their satellite-only products. GSMaP_Gauge outperforms IMERG_FRCal with higher Correlation Coefficient (CC) values of about 0.85, 0.78, and 0.50; lower Fractional Standard Error (FSE) values of about 18.00, 18.85, and 29.30; and Root-Mean-Squared Error (RMSE) values of about 12.12, 33.35, and 32.99 mm in the rainfall centers over mainland China, southern China, and eastern China, respectively. (2) GSMaP products perform better than IMERG products, with higher Probability of Detection (POD) and Critical Success Index (CSI) and lower False Alarm Ratio (FAR) in detecting rainfall occurrence, especially for high rainfall rates. (3) For area-mean rainfall, IMERG performs worse than GSMaP in the rainfall centers over mainland China and southern China but shows better performance in the rainfall center over eastern China. GSMaP_Gauge and IMERG_FRCal perform well in the three regions with a high CC (0.79 vs. 0.94, 0.81 vs. 0.96, and 0.95 vs. 0.97) and a low RMSE (0.04 vs. 0.06, 0.40 vs. 0.59, and 0.19 vs. 0.34 mm). These useful findings will help algorithm developers and data users to better understand the performance of GSMaP and IMERG products during typhoon precipitation events.

scholarly journals Spatial Pattern of Precipitation in GPM-Era Satellite Products against Rain Gauge Measurements over Nepal

Jalawaayu ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 39-56
Author(s):  
Bharat Badayar Joshi ◽  
Munawar Ali ◽  
Dibit Aryal ◽  
Laxman Paneru ◽  
Bhaskar Shrestha
Keyword(s):  
High Elevation ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Precipitation Pattern ◽  
Critical Success ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
Critical Success Index ◽  
Precipitation Events ◽  
Selection Of ◽  
Better Than

Precipitation in a mountainous region is highly variable due to the complex terrain. Satellite-based precipitation estimates are potential alternatives to gauge measurements in these regions, as these typical measurements are not available or are scarce in high elevation areas. However, the accuracy of these gridded precipitation datasets need to be addressed before further usage. In this study, an evaluation of the spatial precipitation pattern in satellite-based precipitation products is provided, including satellite-only (Integrated Multi satellite Retrievals for GPM IMERG-UCORR and Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation (GSMaP-MVK) and gauge calibrated (IMERG-CORR and GSMaP-Gauge) products, with a spatial resolution of 0.1°, which is compared to 387-gauge measurements in Nepal from April 2014 to December 2016. The major results are as follows: (1) The gauge calibrated version 5 IMERG-CORR and version 6 GSMaP-Gauge are relatively better than the satellite-only datasets, although they all underestimate the observed precipitation. (2) The daily gauge calibrated GSMaP-Gauge performs fairly well in low and mid-elevation areas, whereas the monthly gauge calibrated IMERG-C performs better in high-elevation areas. (3) For the daily time scale, IMERG-CORR shows a better ability to detect the true precipitation (higher Probability of Detection (POD)) and (lowest False Alarm Ratio (FAR)) events among all datasets. However, all four satellite-based precipitation datasets accurately detect (Critical Success Index (CSI) >40%) precipitation and no-precipitation events. The results of this work provide the systematic quantification of IMERG and GSMaP of satellite precipitation products over Nepal using station observations and delivers a helpful statistical basis for the selection of these datasets for future scientific research.

scholarly journals Validation of CHIRPS Precipitation Estimates over Taiwan at Multiple Timescales

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Hsu ◽  
Wan-Ru Huang ◽  
Pin-Yi Liu ◽  
Xiuzhen Li
Keyword(s):  
Annual Cycle ◽  
Interannual Variation ◽  
Winter Precipitation ◽  
Monthly Precipitation ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
Precipitation Variation ◽  
Global Precipitation ◽  
Multiple Timescale ◽  
Better Than

The Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station data (CHIRPS), which incorporates satellite imagery and in situ station information, is a new high-resolution long-term precipitation dataset available since 1981. This study aims to understand the performance of the latest version of CHIRPS in depicting the multiple timescale precipitation variation over Taiwan. The analysis is focused on examining whether CHIRPS is better than another satellite precipitation product—the Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for Global Precipitation Mission (GPM) final run (hereafter IMERG)—which is known to effectively capture the precipitation variation over Taiwan. We carried out the evaluations made for annual cycle, seasonal cycle, interannual variation, and daily variation during 2001–2019. Our results show that IMERG is slightly better than CHIRPS considering most of the features examined; however, CHIRPS performs better than that of IMERG in representing the (1) magnitude of the annual cycle of monthly precipitation climatology, (2) spatial distribution of the seasonal mean precipitation for all four seasons, (3) quantitative precipitation estimation of the interannual variation of area-averaged winter precipitation in Taiwan, and (4) occurrence frequency of the non-rainy grids in winter. Notably, despite the fact that CHIRPS is not better than IMERG for many examined features, CHIRPS can depict the temporal variation in precipitation over Taiwan on annual, seasonal, and interannual timescales with 95% significance. This highlights the potential use of CHIRPS in studying the multiple timescale variation in precipitation over Taiwan during the years 1981–2000, for which there are no data available in the IMERG database.

scholarly journals The Contribution of Rain Gauges in the Calibration of the IMERG Product: Results from the First Validation over Spain

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco J. Tapiador ◽  
Andrés Navarro ◽  
Eduardo García-Ortega ◽  
Andrés Merino ◽  
José Luis Sánchez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Surface Precipitation ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Hydrologic Impacts ◽  
A Minor ◽  
Global Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Global Precipitation

AbstractAfter 5 years in orbit, the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission has produced enough quality-controlled data to allow the first validation of their precipitation estimates over Spain. High-quality gauge data from the meteorological network of the Spanish Meteorological Agency (AEMET) are used here to validate Integrated Multisatellite Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) level 3 estimates of surface precipitation. While aggregated values compare notably well, some differences are found in specific locations. The research investigates the sources of these discrepancies, which are found to be primarily related to the underestimation of orographic precipitation in the IMERG satellite products, as well as to the number of available gauges in the GPCC gauges used for calibrating IMERG. It is shown that IMERG provides suboptimal performance in poorly instrumented areas but that the estimate improves greatly when at least one rain gauge is available for the calibration process. A main, generally applicable conclusion from this research is that the IMERG satellite-derived estimates of precipitation are more useful (r2 > 0.80) for hydrology than interpolated fields of rain gauge measurements when at least one gauge is available for calibrating the satellite product. If no rain gauges were used, the results are still useful but with decreased mean performance (r2 ≈ 0.65). Such figures, however, are greatly improved if no coastal areas are included in the comparison. Removing them is a minor issue in terms of hydrologic impacts, as most rivers in Spain have their sources far from the coast.

scholarly journals First-Year Evaluation of GPM Rainfall over the Netherlands: IMERG Day 1 Final Run (V03D)

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. 2799-2814 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. F. Rios Gaona ◽  
A. Overeem ◽  
H. Leijnse ◽  
R. Uijlenhoet
Keyword(s):  
The Netherlands ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Ground Truth ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
First Year ◽  
Radar Rainfall ◽  
High Resolution Data ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
Global Precipitation

Abstract The Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission is the successor to the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM), which orbited Earth for ~17 years. With Core Observatory launched on 27 February 2014, GPM offers global precipitation estimates between 60°N and 60°S at 0.1° × 0.1° resolution every 30 min. Unlike during the TRMM era, the Netherlands is now within the coverage provided by GPM. Here the first year of GPM rainfall retrievals from the 30-min gridded Integrated Multisatellite Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) product Day 1 Final Run (V03D) is assessed. This product is compared against gauge-adjusted radar rainfall maps over the land surface of the Netherlands at 30-min, 24-h, monthly, and yearly scales. These radar rainfall maps are considered to be ground truth. The evaluation of the first year of IMERG operations is done through time series, scatterplots, empirical exceedance probabilities, and various statistical indicators. In general, there is a tendency for IMERG to slightly underestimate (2%) countrywide rainfall depths. Nevertheless, the relative underestimation is small enough to propose IMERG as a reliable source of precipitation data, especially for areas where rain gauge networks or ground-based radars do not offer these types of high-resolution data and availability. The potential of GPM for rainfall estimation in a midlatitude country is confirmed.

scholarly journals Comparison of Global Precipitation Estimates across a Range of Temporal and Spatial Scales

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (21) ◽  
pp. 7773-7795 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Gehne ◽  
Thomas M. Hamill ◽  
George N. Kiladis ◽  
Kevin E. Trenberth
Keyword(s):  
Time Scales ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Spatial Scales ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Random Errors ◽  
Climate Data ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
Global Precipitation ◽  
Daily Time

Abstract Characteristics of precipitation estimates for rate and amount from three global high-resolution precipitation products (HRPPs), four global climate data records (CDRs), and four reanalyses are compared. All datasets considered have at least daily temporal resolution. Estimates of global precipitation differ widely from one product to the next, with some differences likely due to differing goals in producing the estimates. HRPPs are intended to produce the best snapshot of the precipitation estimate locally. CDRs of precipitation emphasize homogeneity over instantaneous accuracy. Precipitation estimates from global reanalyses are dynamically consistent with the large-scale circulation but tend to compare poorly to rain gauge estimates since they are forecast by the reanalysis system and precipitation is not assimilated. Regional differences among the estimates in the means and variances are as large as the means and variances, respectively. Even with similar monthly totals, precipitation rates vary significantly among the estimates. Temporal correlations among datasets are large at annual and daily time scales, suggesting that compensating bias errors at annual and random errors at daily time scales dominate the differences. However, the signal-to-noise ratio at intermediate (monthly) time scales can be large enough to result in high correlations overall. It is shown that differences on annual time scales and continental regions are around 0.8 mm day−1, which corresponds to 23 W m−2. These wide variations in the estimates, even for global averages, highlight the need for better constrained precipitation products in the future.

scholarly journals Assessment of Level-3 Gridded Global Precipitation Mission (GPM) Products Over Oceans

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sana Khan ◽  
Viviana Maggioni
Keyword(s):  
Performance Metrics ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
The Other ◽  
Coefficient Of Determination ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
The Times ◽  
Global Precipitation Mission ◽  
Global Precipitation ◽  
Better Than

The performance of Level-3 gridded Global Precipitation Mission (GPM)-based precipitation products (IMERG, Integrated Multi-satellite Retrievals for GPM) is assessed against two references over oceans: the OceanRAIN dataset, derived from oceanic shipboard disdrometers, and a satellite-based radar product (the Level-3 Dual-frequency Precipitation Radar, 3DPRD). Daily IMERG products (early, late, final) and microwave-only (MW) and Infrared-only (IR) precipitation components are evaluated at four different spatial resolutions (0.5°, 1°, 2°, and 3°) during a 3-year study period (March 2014–February 2017). Their performance is assessed based on both categorical and continuous performance metrics, including correlation coefficient, probability of detection, success ratio, bias, and root mean square error (RMSE). A triple collocation analysis (TCA) is also presented to further investigate the performance of these satellite-based products. Overall, the IMERG products show an underestimation with respect to OceanRAIN. Rain events in OceanRAIN are correctly detected by all IMERG products ~80% of the times. IR estimates show relatively large errors and low correlations with OceanRAIN compared to the other products. On the other hand, the MW component performs better than other products in terms of both categorical and continuous statistics. TCA reveals that 3DPRD performs consistently better than OceanRAIN in terms of RMSE and coefficient of determination at all spatial resolutions. This work is part of a larger effort to validate GPM products over nontraditional regions such as oceans.

scholarly journals Evaluation of GPM-Era Satellite Precipitation Products on the Southern Slopes of the Central Himalayas Against Rain Gauge Data

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 1836 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shankar Sharma ◽  
Yingying Chen ◽  
Xu Zhou ◽  
Kun Yang ◽  
Xin Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Distribution ◽  
Dynamic Range ◽  
Precipitation Amount ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Central Himalayas ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
New Generation ◽  
Global Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Global Precipitation

The Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission provides high-resolution precipitation estimates globally. However, their accuracy needs to be accessed for algorithm enhancement and hydro-meteorological applications. This study applies data from 388 gauges in Nepal to evaluate the spatial-temporal patterns presented in recently-developed GPM-Era satellite-based precipitation (SBP) products, i.e., the Integrated Multi-satellite Retrievals for GPM (IMERG), satellite-only (IMERG-UC), the gauge-calibrated IMERG (IMERG-C), the Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation (GSMaP), satellite-only (GSMaP-MVK), and the gauge-calibrated GSMaP (GSMaP-Gauge). The main results are as follows: (1) GSMaP-Gauge datasets is more reasonable to represent the observed spatial distribution of precipitation, followed by IMERG-UC, GSMaP-MVK, and IMERG-C. (2) The gauge-calibrated datasets are more consistent (in terms of relative root mean square error (RRMSE) and correlation coefficient (R)) than the satellite-only datasets in representing the seasonal dynamic range of precipitation. However, all four datasets can reproduce the seasonal cycle of precipitation, which is predominately governed by the monsoon system. (3) Although all four SBP products underestimate the monsoonal precipitation, the gauge-calibrated IMERG-C yields smaller mean bias than GSMaP-Gauge, while GSMaP-Gauge shows the smaller RRMSE and higher R-value; indicating IMERG-C is more reliable to estimate precipitation amount than GSMaP-Gauge, whereas GSMaP-Gauge presents more reasonable spatial distribution than IMERG-C. Only IMERG-C moderately reproduces the evident elevation-dependent pattern of precipitation revealed by gauge observations, i.e., gradually increasing with elevation up to 2000 m and then decreasing; while GSMaP-Gauge performs much better in representing the gauge observed spatial pattern than others. (4) The GSMaP-Gauge calibrated based on the daily gauge analysis is more consistent with detecting gauge observed precipitation events among the four datasets. The high-intensity related precipitation extremes (95th percentile) are more intense in regions with an elevation below 2500 m; all four SBP datasets have low accuracy (<30%) and mostly underestimated (by >40%) the frequency of extreme events at most of the stations across the country. This work represents the quantification of the new-generation SBP products on the southern slopes of the central Himalayas in Nepal.

scholarly journals Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks (cGANs) for Near Real-Time Precipitation Estimation from Multispectral GOES-16 Satellite Imageries—PERSIANN-cGAN

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (19) ◽  
pp. 2193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Negin Hayatbini ◽  
Bailey Kong ◽  
Kuo-lin Hsu ◽  
Phu Nguyen ◽  
Soroosh Sorooshian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mean Squared Error ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Generative Adversarial Networks ◽  
Generative Adversarial Network ◽  
Convolutional Network ◽  
Critical Success ◽  
Adversarial Network ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
Global Precipitation

In this paper, we present a state-of-the-art precipitation estimation framework which leverages advances in satellite remote sensing as well as Deep Learning (DL). The framework takes advantage of the improvements in spatial, spectral and temporal resolutions of the Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) onboard the GOES-16 platform along with elevation information to improve the precipitation estimates. The procedure begins by first deriving a Rain/No Rain (R/NR) binary mask through classification of the pixels and then applying regression to estimate the amount of rainfall for rainy pixels. A Fully Convolutional Network is used as a regressor to predict precipitation estimates. The network is trained using the non-saturating conditional Generative Adversarial Network (cGAN) and Mean Squared Error (MSE) loss terms to generate results that better learn the complex distribution of precipitation in the observed data. Common verification metrics such as Probability Of Detection (POD), False Alarm Ratio (FAR), Critical Success Index (CSI), Bias, Correlation and MSE are used to evaluate the accuracy of both R/NR classification and real-valued precipitation estimates. Statistics and visualizations of the evaluation measures show improvements in the precipitation retrieval accuracy in the proposed framework compared to the baseline models trained using conventional MSE loss terms. This framework is proposed as an augmentation for PERSIANN-CCS (Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information using Artificial Neural Network- Cloud Classification System) algorithm for estimating global precipitation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document