scholarly journals PPP and PPP-AR Kinematic Post-Processed Performance of GPS-Only, Galileo-Only and Multi-GNSS

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (21) ◽  
pp. 2477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgia Katsigianni ◽  
Sylvain Loyer ◽  
Felix Perosanz
Keyword(s):  
Ambiguity Resolution ◽  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Global Network ◽  
Phase Ambiguity ◽  
International Gnss Service ◽  
Positioning Accuracy ◽  
Ambiguity Fixing ◽  
Galileo System ◽  
Phase Ambiguity Resolution ◽  
Kinematic Ppp

Precise point positioning (PPP) has been used for decades not only for general positioning needs but also for geodetic and other scientific applications. The CNES-CLS Analysis Centre (AC) of the International GNSS Service (IGS) is performing PPP with phase ambiguity resolution (PPP-AR) using the zero-difference ambiguity fixing approach also known as “Integer PPP” (IPPP). In this paper we examine the postprocessed kinematic PPP and PPP-AR using Galileo-only, GPS-only and Multi-GNSS (GPS + Galileo) constellations. The interest is to examine the accuracy for each GNSS system individually but also of their combination to measure the current benefits of using Galileo within a Multi-GNSS PPP and PPP-AR. Results show that Galileo-only positioning is nearly at the same level as GPS-only; around 2–4 mm horizontal and aound 10 mm vertical repeatability (example station of BRUX). In addition, the use of Galileo system—even uncompleted—improves the performance of the positioning when combined with GPS giving mm level repeatability (improvement of around 30% in East, North and Up components). Repeatabilities observed for Multi-GNSS (GPS + GAL) PPP-AR, taking into account the global network statistics, are a little larger, with 8 mm in horizontal and 17 mm in vertical directions. This result shows that including Galileo ameliorates the best positioning accuracy achieved until today with GPS PPP-AR.

Combining multi-GNSS phase bias products for improved undifferenced ambiguity resolution

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianghui Geng ◽  
Yuanxin Pan ◽  
Songfeng Yang ◽  
Pan Li
Keyword(s):  
Ambiguity Resolution ◽  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Rapid Development ◽  
International Gnss Service ◽  
Positioning Precision ◽  
Satellite Attitude ◽  
East Component ◽  
Phase Bias ◽  
Kinematic Ppp ◽  
Gnss Data

<p>The rapid development of multi-GNSS constellations, e.g., Galileo and BeiDou, is catalyzing innovations in high-precision applications. Precise point positioning ambiguity resolution (PPP-AR) has been essential to achieving the highest positioning precision using multi-GNSS data in wide areas. In recent years, several International GNSS Service analysis centers (IGS ACs such as CNES, CODE, WHU) have been providing phase bias products to enable PPP-AR, but whether these AC-specific multi-GNSS (e.g., GPS/Galileo/BeiDou-2/3) products are compatible with each other and whether they can be reconciled for an IGS combination product are pending. In this study, we combined phase bias products from four organizations for GPS/Galileo/BeiDou-2/3 in 2020. All phase bias products are first converted to observable-specific representation and then reconciled with satellite clocks before the combination; their capability of recovering integer undifferenced ambiguities has been always kept after properly addressing inter-system biases and satellite attitude discrepancies. It is found that the RMS of clock alignment residuals are around 6.8, 7.1, 14.9 and 14.6 ps for GPS, Galileo BeiDou-2 and BeiDou-3, respectively. BeiDou products perform worse due largely to sparse tracking networks and deficient orbit models. In a kinematic PPP experiment with 151 global MGEX (Multi-GNSS Experiment) stations, the combined phase bias products provide better or at least equivalent positioning results as opposed to AC specific products. Compared with ambiguity-float solutions, ambiguity-fixed PPP solutions can improve the positioning precision by 29-50% in the east component. With combined phase bias products, the positioning precision of GPS/Galileo/BDS-2/3 PPP-AR solutions can achieve 0.62, 0.64 and 1.90 cm in the east, north and up components, respectively, in contrast to 0.87, 0.88 and 2.60 cm for GPS only PPP-AR solutions.</p>

scholarly journals Performance Analysis of Static Precise Point Positioning Using Open-Source GAMP

2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 41-60
Author(s):  
Jabir Shabbir Malik
Keyword(s):  
Performance Analysis ◽  
Open Source ◽  
Observational Data ◽  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
International Gnss Service ◽  
Positioning Accuracy ◽  
Position Accuracy ◽  
Point Positioning

AbstractIn addition to Global Positioning System (GPS) constellation, the number of Global Navigation Satellite System (GLONASS) satellites is increasing; it is now possible to evaluate and analyze the position accuracy with both the GPS and GLONASS constellation. In this article, statistical analysis of static precise point positioning (PPP) using GPS-only, GLONASS-only, and combined GPS/GLONASS modes is evaluated. Observational data of 10 whole days from 10 International GNSS Service (IGS) stations are used for analysis. Position accuracy in east, north, up components, and carrier phase/code residuals is analyzed. Multi-GNSS PPP open-source package is used for the PPP performance analysis. The analysis also provides the GNSS researchers the understanding of the observational data processing algorithm. Calculation statistics reveal that standard deviation (STD) of horizontal component is 3.83, 13.80, and 3.33 cm for GPS-only, GLONASS-only, and combined GPS/GLONASS PPP solutions, respectively. Combined GPS/GLONASS PPP achieves better positioning accuracy in horizontal and three-dimensional (3D) accuracy compared with GPS-only and GLONASS-only PPP solutions. The results of the calculation show that combined GPS/GLONASS PPP improves, on an average, horizontal accuracy by 12.11% and 60.33% and 3D positioning accuracy by 10.39% and 66.78% compared with GPS-only and GLONASS-only solutions, respectively. In addition, the results also demonstrate that GPS-only solutions show an improvement of 54.23% and 62.54% compared with GLONASS-only PPP mode in horizontal and 3D components, respectively. Moreover, residuals of GLONASS ionosphere-free code observations are larger than the GPS code residuals. However, phase residuals of GPS and GLONASS phase observations are of the same magnitude.

Single receiver phase ambiguity resolution with GPS data

2010 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
pp. 327-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Willy Bertiger ◽  
Shailen D. Desai ◽  
Bruce Haines ◽  
Nate Harvey ◽  
Angelyn W. Moore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ambiguity Resolution ◽  
Gps Data ◽  
Phase Ambiguity ◽  
Phase Ambiguity Resolution ◽  
Single Receiver
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document