scholarly journals Evaluation of Bayesian Multimodel Estimation in Surface Incident Shortwave Radiation Simulation over High Latitude Areas

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (15) ◽  
pp. 1776 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weiyu Zhang ◽  
Xiaotong Zhang ◽  
Wenhong Li ◽  
Ning Hou ◽  
Yu Wei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Latitude ◽  
General Circulation ◽  
Bayesian Model Averaging ◽  
Radiant Energy ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Model Averaging ◽  
Energy System ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Shortwave Radiation ◽  
Data Set

Surface incident shortwave radiation (SSR) is crucial for understanding the Earth’s climate change issues. Simulations from general circulation models (GCMs) are one of the most practical ways to produce long-term global SSR products. Although previous studies have comprehensively assessed the performance of the GCMs in simulating SSR globally or regionally, studies assessing the performance of these models over high-latitude areas are sparse. This study evaluated and intercompared the SSR simulations of 48 GCMs participating in the fifth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) using quality-controlled SSR surface measurements at 44 radiation sites from three observation networks (GC-NET, BSRN, and GEBA) and the SSR retrievals from the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System, Energy Balanced and Filled (CERES EBAF) data set over high-latitude areas from 2000 to 2005. Furthermore, this study evaluated the performance of the SSR estimations of two multimodel ensemble methods, i.e., the simple model averaging (SMA) and the Bayesian model averaging (BMA) methods. The seasonal performance of the SSR estimations of individual GCMs, the SMA method, and the BMA method were also intercompared. The evaluation results indicated that there were large deficiencies in the performance of the individual GCMs in simulating SSR, and these GCM SSR simulations did not show a tendency to overestimate the SSR over high-latitude areas. Moreover, the ensemble SSR estimations generated by the SMA and BMA methods were superior to all individual GCM SSR simulations over high-latitude areas, and the estimations of the BMA method were the best compared to individual GCM simulations and the SMA method-based estimations. Compared to the CERES EBAF SSR retrievals, the uncertainties of the SSR estimations of the GCMs, the SMA method, and the BMA method are relatively large during summer.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Surface Upward Longwave Radiation in the CMIP6 Models with Ground and Satellite Observations

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (21) ◽  
pp. 4464
Author(s):  
Jiawen Xu ◽  
Xiaotong Zhang ◽  
Chunjie Feng ◽  
Shuyue Yang ◽  
Shikang Guan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Circulation ◽  
Bayesian Model Averaging ◽  
Mean Squared Error ◽  
Radiant Energy ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Model Averaging ◽  
Longwave Radiation ◽  
Energy System ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
The Individual

Surface upward longwave radiation (SULR) is an indicator of thermal conditions over the Earth’s surface. In this study, we validated the simulated SULR from 51 Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) general circulation models (GCMs) through a comparison with ground measurements and satellite-retrieved SULR from the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System, Energy Balanced and Filled (CERES EBAF). Moreover, we improved the SULR estimations by a fusion of multiple CMIP6 GCMs using multimodel ensemble (MME) methods. Large variations were found in the monthly mean SULR among the 51 CMIP6 GCMs; the bias and root mean squared error (RMSE) of the individual CMIP6 GCMs at 133 sites ranged from −3 to 24 W m−2 and 22 to 38 W m−2, respectively, which were higher than those found between the CERES EBAF and GCMs. The CMIP6 GCMs did not improve the overestimation of SULR compared to the CMIP5 GCMs. The Bayesian model averaging (BMA) method showed better performance in simulating SULR than the individual GCMs and simple model averaging (SMA) method, with a bias of 0 W m−2 and an RMSE of 19.29 W m−2 for the 133 sites. In terms of the global annual mean SULR, our best estimation for the CMIP6 GCMs using the BMA method was 392 W m−2 during 2000–2014. We found that the SULR varied between 386 and 393 W m−2 from 1850 to 2014, exhibiting an increasing tendency of 0.2 W m−2 per decade (p < 0.05).

scholarly journals Global Circulation Models (GCMs) Simulate the Current Temperature Only If the Shortwave Radiation Anomaly of the 2000s Has Been Omitted

2021 ◽  
pp. 45-52
Author(s):  
Antero Ollila
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
General Circulation ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Scientific Basis ◽  
Shortwave Radiation ◽  
Global Circulation ◽  
Global Circulation Models ◽  
Paris Climate Agreement

The research article of Gillett et al. was published in Nature Climate Change (NCC) in March 2021. The objective of the NCC study was to simulate human-induced forcings to warming by applying 13 CMIP6 (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6) climate models. NCC did not accept the author’s remarks as a “Matters arising” article. The purpose of this article is to detail the original three remarks and one additional remark: 1) the discrepancy between the graphs and reported numerical values, 2) the forcings of aerosols and clouds, 3) the positive water feedback, and 4) the calculation basis of the Paris agreement. The most important finding is that General Circulation Models (GCMs) used in simulations omit the significant shortwave anomaly from 2001 to 2019, which causes a temperature error of 0.3°C according to climate change physics of Gillett et al. For the year 2019, this error is 0.8°C showing the magnitude of shortwave anomaly impact. The main reason for this error turns out to be the positive water feedback generally applied in climate models. The scientific basis of the Paris climate agreement is faulty for the same reason.

Seasonal Forecasts of Australian Rainfall through Calibration and Bridging of Coupled GCM Outputs

2014 ◽  
Vol 142 (5) ◽  
pp. 1758-1770 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Schepen ◽  
Q. J. Wang ◽  
David E. Robertson
Keyword(s):  
General Circulation ◽  
Bayesian Model Averaging ◽  
Model Averaging ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Seasonal Rainfall ◽  
Climate Indices ◽  
Seasonal Forecasts ◽  
Spatial Coverage ◽  
Validation Procedure ◽  
Systematic Biases

Abstract Coupled general circulation models (GCMs) are increasingly being used to forecast seasonal rainfall, but forecast skill is still low for many regions. GCM forecasts suffer from systematic biases, and forecast probabilities derived from ensemble members are often statistically unreliable. Hence, it is necessary to postprocess GCM forecasts to improve skill and statistical reliability. In this study, the authors compare three methods of statistically postprocessing GCM output—calibration, bridging, and a combination of calibration and bridging—as ways to treat these problems and make use of multiple GCM outputs to increase the skill of Australian seasonal rainfall forecasts. Three calibration models are established using ensemble mean rainfall from three variants of the Predictive Ocean Atmosphere Model for Australia (POAMA) version M2.4 as predictors. Six bridging models are established using POAMA forecasts of seasonal climate indices as predictors. The calibration and bridging forecasts are merged through Bayesian model averaging. Forecast attributes including skill, sharpness, and reliability are assessed through a rigorous leave-three-years-out cross-validation procedure for forecasts of 1-month lead time. While there are overlaps in skill, there are regions and seasons where the calibration or bridging forecasts are uniquely skillful. The calibration forecasts are more skillful for January–March (JFM) to June–August (JJA). The bridging forecasts are more skillful for July–September (JAS) to December–February (DJF). Merging calibration and bridging forecasts retains, and in some seasons expands, the spatial coverage of positive skill achieved by the better of the calibration forecasts and bridging forecasts individually. The statistically postprocessed forecasts show improved reliability compared to the raw forecasts.

scholarly journals An Intercomparison of Observational, Reanalysis, Satellite, and Coupled Model Data on Mean Rainfall in the Caribbean

2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 413-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark R. Jury
Keyword(s):  
General Circulation ◽  
Weather Prediction ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Passive Microwave ◽  
Annual Rainfall ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
The Caribbean ◽  
Key Features

Abstract This study examines the spatial variability of mean annual rainfall in the Caribbean in the satellite era 1979–2000. Intercomparisons of gridded rainfall fields from conventional stations, satellite estimators, reanalysis products, and coupled general circulation models (CGCMs) are made, with a focus on the Antilles island chain and their land–sea transitions. The rainfall products are rated for their ability to capture a number of key features, including (i) topographically enhanced precipitation over the larger western Antilles islands of Cuba, Jamaica, Hispanola, and Puerto Rico; (ii) the rain shadow west of Hispanola; (iii) the two dry zones where SSTs are low: north of Venezuela and north of the Lesser Antilles; and (iv) the wet axis extending north of Trinidad. The various monitoring and modeling systems produce gridded rainfall fields at resolutions from 50 to 280 km, from station reconstructions, satellite estimates, blended and reanalysis products, and CGCM climatologies with respect to surface forcing fields. Wet and dry biases were found in many of the reanalysis and satellite products, respectively—either over the whole Caribbean or in a certain sector. The intercomparison found some measure of consensus, but no single product is without discrepancy. High-resolution passive microwave satellite rainfall estimates [Climate Prediction Center’s multisaltellite passive microwave, IR morphed product (cMOR)] appear “most representative”; however, the climatology is short (2003–07) and the field is generally drier than the consensus. Of the conventional products, decadal variability of climate interpolated rain gauges (DEKL), World Climate Research Programme’s (WCRP) blended rain gauges, the Comprehensive Ocean–Atmosphere Data Set (COADS), and an operational climate anomaly monitoring system of NCEP (CAMS) perform well. Among the satellite estimators, the Global Precipitation Climatology Project’s blended gauge and IR satellite (GPCP) and outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) capture the key features and ocean–island transitions. The Center for Ocean–Land–Atmosphere Studies [COLA; the coupled model, part of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP, phase 3)] and the climate forecast system of the NCEP (CFS) models perform reasonably, but NCAR’s Parallel Climate Model (PCM; the CGCM’s historical run of CMIP3) fares poorly. The version 2 hindcast of the operational Medium-Range Forecast (MRF) weather prediction model (REAN) captures the smaller wet zones and topographically enhanced features, but it does not handle the broad oceanic dry zones well, as the input from the operational climate data assimilation system of NCEP (CDAS) has a wet bias. Of the various key rainfall features, high rainfall over southern Cuba and the rain shadow west of Hispanola are poorly handled by most products. The wet axis north of Trinidad and the dry zone north of Venezuela are well represented in many climatologies.

scholarly journals Developing a monthly radiative kernel for surface albedo change from satellite climatologies of Earth's shortwave radiation budget: CACK v1.0

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 3975-3990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan M. Bright ◽  
Thomas L. O'Halloran
Keyword(s):  
General Circulation ◽  
Surface Albedo ◽  
Radiant Energy ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Radiation Budget ◽  
Shortwave Radiation ◽  
Attractive Alternative ◽  
State Variables ◽  
Albedo Change ◽  
Science Community

Abstract. Due to the potential for land-use–land-cover change (LULCC) to alter surface albedo, there is need within the LULCC science community for simple and transparent tools for predicting radiative forcings (ΔF) from surface albedo changes (Δαs). To that end, the radiative kernel technique – developed by the climate modeling community to diagnose internal feedbacks within general circulation models (GCMs) – has been adopted by the LULCC science community as a tool to perform offline ΔF calculations for Δαs. However, the codes and data behind the GCM kernels are not readily transparent, and the climatologies of the atmospheric state variables used to derive them vary widely both in time period and duration. Observation-based kernels offer an attractive alternative to GCM-based kernels and could be updated annually at relatively low costs. Here, we present a radiative kernel for surface albedo change founded on a novel, simplified parameterization of shortwave radiative transfer driven with inputs from the Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) Energy Balance and Filled (EBAF) products. When constructed on a 16-year climatology (2001–2016), we find that the CERES-based albedo change kernel – or CACK – agrees remarkably well with the mean kernel of four GCMs (rRMSE = 14 %). When the novel parameterization underlying CACK is applied to emulate two of the GCM kernels using their own boundary fluxes as input, we find even greater agreement (mean rRMSE = 7.4 %), suggesting that this simple and transparent parameterization represents a credible candidate for a satellite-based alternative to GCM kernels. We document and compute the various sources of uncertainty underlying CACK and include them as part of a more extensive dataset (CACK v1.0) while providing examples showcasing its application.

scholarly journals Evaluation of General Circulation Models over the Upper Ouémé River Basin in the Republic of Benin

Hydrology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
André Attogouinon ◽  
Agnidé E. Lawin ◽  
Jean-François Deliège
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
River Basin ◽  
General Circulation ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Daily Rainfall ◽  
Extreme Rainfall ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Future Climate Change ◽  
Data Set

This study assessed the performance of eight general circulation models (GCMs) implemented in the upper Ouémé River basin in Benin Republic (West Africa) during the Fifth Assessment Report on Climate Change. Historical rainfall simulations of the climate model of Rossby Regional Centre (RCA4) driven by eight Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) GCMs over a 55-year period (1951 to 2005) are evaluated using the observational data set. Apart from daily rainfall, other rainfall parameters calculated from observed and simulated rainfall were compared. U-test and other statistical criteria (R2, MBE, MAE, RMSE and standard of standard deviations) were used. According to the results, the simulations correctly reproduce the interannual variability of precipitation in the upper Ouémé River basin. However, the models tend to produce drizzle. Especially, the overestimation of April, May and November rains not only explains the overestimation of seasonal and annual cumulative rainfall but also the early onset of the rainy season and its late withdrawal. However, we noted that this overestimation magnitude varies from one model to another. As for extreme rainfall indices, the models reproduced them poorly. The CanESM2, CNRM-CM5 and EC-EARTH models perform well for daily rainfall. A trade-off is formulated to select the common MPI-ESM-LR, GFDL-ESM2M, NorESM1-M and CanESM2 models for different rainfall parameters for the reliable projection of rainfall in the area. However, the MPI-ESM-LR model is a valuable tool for studying future climate change.

Evaluation of net shortwave radiation over China with a regional climate model

2020 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-163
Author(s):  
X Liu ◽  
Y Kang ◽  
Q Liu ◽  
Z Guo ◽  
Y Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Regional Climate Model ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Radiant Energy ◽  
Energy System ◽  
Radiation Budget ◽  
Shortwave Radiation ◽  
Monsoon Region ◽  
Clear Sky ◽  
Sky Conditions

The regional climate model RegCM version 4.6, developed by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Reanalysis, was used to simulate the radiation budget over China. Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) satellite data were utilized to evaluate the simulation results based on 4 radiative components: net shortwave (NSW) radiation at the surface of the earth and top of the atmosphere (TOA) under all-sky and clear-sky conditions. The performance of the model for low-value areas of NSW was superior to that for high-value areas. NSW at the surface and TOA under all-sky conditions was significantly underestimated; the spatial distribution of the bias was negative in the north and positive in the south, bounded by 25°N for the annual and seasonal averaged difference maps. Compared with the all-sky condition, the simulation effect under clear-sky conditions was significantly better, which indicates that the cloud fraction is the key factor affecting the accuracy of the simulation. In particular, the bias of the TOA NSW under the clear-sky condition was <±10 W m-2 in the eastern areas. The performance of the model was better over the eastern monsoon region in winter and autumn for surface NSW under clear-sky conditions, which may be related to different levels of air pollution during each season. Among the 3 areas, the regional average biases overall were largest (negative) over the Qinghai-Tibet alpine region and smallest over the eastern monsoon region.

scholarly journals Precipitation in the Amazon and its relationship with moisture transport and tropical Pacific and Atlantic SST from the CMIP5 simulation

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 671-704 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Martins ◽  
C. von Randow ◽  
G. Sampaio ◽  
A. J. Dolman
Keyword(s):  
Moisture Transport ◽  
General Circulation ◽  
Regional Analysis ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Moisture Convergence ◽  
Cmip5 Models ◽  
Wet Season ◽  
The Pacific ◽  
Eastern Edge

Abstract. Studies on numerical modeling in Amazonia show that the models fail to capture important aspects of climate variability in this region and it is important to understand the reasons that cause this drawback. Here, we study how the general circulation models of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) simulate the inter-relations between regional precipitation, moisture convergence and Sea Surface Temperature (SST) in the adjacent oceans, to assess how flaws in the representation of these processes can translate into biases in simulated rainfall in Amazonia. Using observational data (GPCP, CMAP, ERSST.v3, ERAI and evapotranspiration) and 21 numerical simulations from CMIP5 during the present climate (1979–2005) in June, July and August (JJA) and December, January and February (DJF), respectively, to represent dry and wet season characteristics, we evaluate how the models simulate precipitation, moisture transport and convergence, and pressure velocity (omega) in different regions of Amazonia. Thus, it is possible to identify areas of Amazonia that are more or less influenced by adjacent ocean SSTs. Our results showed that most of the CMIP5 models have poor skill in adequately representing the observed data. The regional analysis of the variables used showed that the underestimation in the dry season (JJA) was twice in relation to rainy season as quantified by the Standard Error of the Mean (SEM). It was found that Atlantic and Pacific SSTs modulate the northern sector of Amazonia during JJA, while in DJF Pacific SST only influences the eastern sector of the region. The analysis of moisture transport in JJA showed that moisture preferentially enters Amazonia via its eastern edge. In DJF this occurs both via its northern and eastern edge. The moisture balance is always positive, which indicates that Amazonia is a source of moisture to the atmosphere. Additionally, our results showed that during DJF the simulations in northeast sector of Amazonia have a strong bias in precipitation and an underestimation of moisture convergence due to the higher influence of biases in the Pacific SST. During JJA, a strong precipitation bias was observed in the southwest sector associated, also with a negative bias of moisture convergence, but with weaker influence of SSTs of adjacent oceans. The poor representation of precipitation-producing systems in Amazonia by the models and the difficulty of adequately representing the variability of SSTs in the Pacific and Atlantic oceans may be responsible for these underestimates in Amazonia.

scholarly journals PLASIM-ENTSem: a spatio-temporal emulator of future climate change for impacts assessment

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 3349-3380 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. B. Holden ◽  
N. R. Edwards ◽  
P. H. Garthwaite ◽  
K. Fraedrich ◽  
F. Lunkeit ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
General Circulation ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Co2 Concentration ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Climate Impacts ◽  
Future Climate ◽  
Future Climate Change ◽  
Climate Data ◽  
Spatio Temporal

Abstract. Many applications in the evaluation of climate impacts and environmental policy require detailed spatio-temporal projections of future climate. To capture feedbacks from impacted natural or socio-economic systems requires interactive two-way coupling but this is generally computationally infeasible with even moderately complex general circulation models (GCMs). Dimension reduction using emulation is one solution to this problem, demonstrated here with the GCM PLASIM-ENTS. Our approach generates temporally evolving spatial patterns of climate variables, considering multiple modes of variability in order to capture non-linear feedbacks. The emulator provides a 188-member ensemble of decadally and spatially resolved (~ 5° resolution) seasonal climate data in response to an arbitrary future CO2 concentration and radiative forcing scenario. We present the PLASIM-ENTS coupled model, the construction of its emulator from an ensemble of transient future simulations, an application of the emulator methodology to produce heating and cooling degree-day projections, and the validation of the results against empirical data and higher-complexity models. We also demonstrate the application to estimates of sea-level rise and associated uncertainty.

Evaluation of the tail of the probability distribution of daily and sub-daily precipitation in CMIP6 models

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-61
Author(s):  
Jesse Norris ◽  
Alex Hall ◽  
J. David Neelin ◽  
Chad W. Thackeray ◽  
Di Chen
Keyword(s):  
General Circulation ◽  
Daily Precipitation ◽  
Precipitation Amount ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Lower Troposphere ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Cloud Tops ◽  
The Tropics ◽  
Fraction Models

AbstractDaily and sub-daily precipitation extremes in historical Coupled-Model-Intercomparison-Project-Phase-6 (CMIP6) simulations are evaluated against satellite-based observational estimates. Extremes are defined as the precipitation amount exceeded every x years, ranging from 0.01–10, encompassing the rarest events that are detectable in the observational record without noisy results. With increasing temporal resolution there is an increased discrepancy between models and observations: for daily extremes the multi-model median underestimates the highest percentiles by about a third, and for 3-hourly extremes by about 75% in the tropics. The novelty of the current study is that, to understand the model spread, we evaluate the 3-D structure of the atmosphere when extremes occur. In midlatitudes, where extremes are simulated predominantly explicitly, the intuitive relationship exists whereby higher-resolution models produce larger extremes (r=–0.49), via greater vertical velocity. In the tropics, the convective fraction (the fraction of precipitation simulated directly from the convective scheme) is more relevant. For models below 60% convective fraction, precipitation amount decreases with convective fraction (r=–0.63), but above 75% convective fraction, this relationship breaks down. In the lower-convective-fraction models, there is more moisture in the lower troposphere, closer to saturation. In the higher-convective-fraction models, there is deeper convection and higher cloud tops, which appears to be more physical. Thus, the low-convective models are mostly closer to the observations of extreme precipitation in the tropics, but likely for the wrong reasons. These inter-model differences in the environment in which extremes are simulated hold clues into how parameterizations could be modified in general circulation models to produce more credible 21st-Century projections.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document