scholarly journals Spectral Heterogeneity Predicts Local-Scale Gamma and Beta Diversity of Mesic Grasslands

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 458 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Polley ◽  
Chenghai Yang ◽  
Brian Wilsey ◽  
Philip Fay

Plant species diversity is an important metric of ecosystem functioning, but field assessments of diversity are constrained in number and spatial extent by labor and other expenses. We tested the utility of using spatial heterogeneity in the remotely-sensed reflectance spectrum of grassland canopies to model both spatial turnover in species composition and abundances (β diversity) and species diversity at aggregate spatial scales (γ diversity). Shannon indices of γ and β diversity were calculated from field measurements of the number and relative abundances of plant species at each of two spatial grains (0.45 m2 and 35.2 m2) in mesic grasslands in central Texas, USA. Spectral signatures of reflected radiation at each grain were measured from ground-level or an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). Partial least squares regression (PLSR) models explained 59–85% of variance in γ diversity and 68–79% of variance in β diversity using spatial heterogeneity in canopy optical properties. Variation in both γ and β diversity were associated most strongly with heterogeneity in reflectance in blue (350–370 nm), red (660–770 nm), and near infrared (810–1050 nm) wavebands. Modeled diversity was more sensitive by a factor of three to a given level of spectral heterogeneity when derived from data collected at the small than larger spatial grain. As estimated from calibrated PLSR models, β diversity was greater, but γ diversity was smaller for restored grassland on a lowland clay than upland silty clay soil. Both γ and β diversity of grassland can be modeled by using spatial heterogeneity in vegetation optical properties provided that the grain of reflectance measurements is conserved.

Oryx ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 471-478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asuka Koyama ◽  
Tomoyo F. Koyanagi ◽  
Munemitsu Akasaka ◽  
Yoshinobu Kusumoto ◽  
Syuntaro Hiradate ◽  
...  

AbstractEffective conservation of global species diversity requires a clear understanding of spatial scales that support overall diversity across broad scales. Abandonment of semi-natural grasslands has increased their fragmentation and decreased their areal extent. We quantified diversity patterns of plant communities in Japan across hierarchical scales to facilitate the development of an effective nationwide strategy for conserving species diversity in remnant semi-natural grasslands. We applied additive partitioning of plant species diversity, using a nested hierarchical design at three spatial scales (quadrat, grassland, and western and eastern regions of Japan) for three groups of plant species (all species, grassland species and national Red Listed species). We consistently found lower proportions of among-quadrats diversity, and higher proportions of among-grasslands diversity and between-regions diversity in the overall diversity of the entire species complement than would be expected by chance. The high contribution of among-grasslands diversity to overall diversity suggests that each grassland had a unique species content. The second-ranking contributor to overall diversity differed between grassland species and Red Listed species: the second-ranking contributor for grassland species was diversity at the among-quadrats scale but the second-ranking contributor for all species and for Red Listed species was diversity at the between-regions scale. Thus, effective conservation of diversity of the entire species complement in remnant semi-natural grasslands requires preservation of beta diversity in individual grasslands. Our findings highlight the importance of strengthening local preservation and restoration activities within each grassland, and of nationwide strategies for conserving Red Listed species in remnant semi-natural grassland communities.


Author(s):  
Mark E. Ritchie ◽  
Han Olff

Arid and semiarid ecosystems (drylands) often contain a higher diversity of animals and plants than would be expected from their low productivity. High spatial heterogeneity of resources and physical habitats, exhibited at a wide range of spatial scales (Rundel 1996, Holling 1992, Peterson et al. 1998), may be a major factor explaining such high diversity. For example, at extremely small scales (<10 cm), branched plant material and various soil physical processes can create spatial niches for invertebrates, cyanobacteria, and other cryptogamic organisms (Lightfoot and Whitford 1991). At somewhat larger scales (<10 m), desert shrubs may aggregate water and organic material in “islands of fertility,” yielding a highly patchy heterogeneous distribution of resources (e.g., seeds, water) for other plants and animals (Gibbens and Beck 1988, Halvorson et al. 1997, chapter 13 this volume, chapter 11 this volume). At even larger scales (>100 m), soil erosion patterns create topographic variation that locally concentrates available water and nutrients, yielding a marked heterogeneity in the distribution of productivity across the landscape (Milne 1992). These heterogeneous distributions of physical environments, biotic material, and resources are likely to have strong effects on biodiversity. Ecologists have long associated greater spatial heterogeneity with higher species diversity (MacArthur 1964; Brown 1981; May 1988). Within a particular physical environment (habitat), this association exists presumably because collections of species that use similar resources, or “guilds,” can coexist whenever they can more finely divide up space and different-sized resource “packages” (Hutchinson and MacArthur 1959, Brown 1981, 1995, Morse et al. 1985, Peterson et al. 1998). The partitioning of space and different resource patches may be constrained by the different body sizes of species within guilds (Hutchinson and MacArthur 1959, Morse et al. 1985, Belovsky 1986, 1997, Brown 1995, Siemann et al. 1996). However, the mechanism by which body size and spatial heterogeneity of habitats and resources determine species diversity remains unclear (May 1988, Brown 1995, Siemann et al. 1996, Belovsky 1997). Resource partitioning and spatial heterogeneity therefore may strongly influence diversity in drylands, where, for example, well-known guilds of granivorous vertebrates and invertebrates are structured by competition for different sizes of seeds and seed patches (Brown et al. 1979, Davidson et al. 1980, 1985).


2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-16
Author(s):  
Caio J. R. S. Soares ◽  
Mauricio B. Sampaio ◽  
Francisco S. Santos-Filho ◽  
Fernando R. Martins ◽  
Flavio A. M. dos Santos

2020 ◽  
Vol 287 (1922) ◽  
pp. 20192520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher P. Catano ◽  
Trevor S. Fristoe ◽  
Joseph A. LaManna ◽  
Jonathan A. Myers

Biodiversity often stabilizes aggregate ecosystem properties (e.g. biomass) at small spatial scales. However, the importance of species diversity within communities and variation in species composition among communities (β-diversity) for stability at larger scales remains unclear. Using a continental-scale analysis of 1657 North American breeding-bird communities spanning 20-years and 35 ecoregions, we show local species diversity and β-diversity influence two components of regional stability: local stability (stability of bird biomass within sites) and spatial asynchrony (asynchronous fluctuations in biomass among sites). We found spatial asynchrony explained three times more variation in regional stability of bird biomass than did local stability. This result contrasts with studies at smaller spatial scales—typically plant metacommunities under 1 ha—that find local stability to be more important than spatial asynchrony. Moreover, spatial asynchrony of bird biomass increased with bird β-diversity and climate heterogeneity (temperature and precipitation), while local stability increased with species diversity. Our study reveals new insights into the scale-dependent processes regulating ecosystem stability, providing evidence that both local biodiversity loss and homogenization can destabilize ecosystem processes at biogeographic scales.


Ecosphere ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (10) ◽  
pp. art202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura A. Burkle ◽  
Jonathan A. Myers ◽  
R. Travis Belote

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document