scholarly journals Cross-Validation of Observations between the GPM Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar and Ground Based Dual-Polarization Radars

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 1773 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sounak Biswas ◽  
V. Chandrasekar
Keyword(s):  
Large Data ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Dual Polarization ◽  
Precipitation Radar ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Ka Band ◽  
Radar Observations ◽  
Radar Calibration ◽  
Ku Band

The Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission Core Observatory is equipped with a dual-frequency precipitation radar (DPR) with capability of measuring precipitation simultaneously at frequencies of 13.6 GHz (Ku-band) and 35.5 GHz (Ka-band). Since the GPM-DPR cannot use information from polarization diversity, radar reflectivity factor is the most important parameter used in all retrievals. In this study, GPM’s observations of reflectivity at dual-frequency and instantaneous rainfall products are compared quantitatively against dual-polarization ground-based NEXRAD radars from the GPM Validation Network (VN). The ground radars, chosen for this study, are located in the southeastern plains of the U.S.A. with altitudes varying from 5 to 210 m. It is a challenging task to quantitatively compare measurements from space-based and ground-based platforms due to their difference in resolution volumes and viewing geometry. To perform comparisons on a point-to-point basis, radar observations need to be volume matched by averaging data in common volume or by re-sampling data to a common grid system. In this study, a 3-D volume matching technique first proposed by Bolen and Chandrasekar (2003) and later modified by Schwaller and Morris (2011) is applied to both radar data. DPR and ground radar observations and products are cross validated against each other with a large data set. Over 250 GPM overpass cases at 5 NEXRAD locations, starting from April 2014 to June 2018, have been considered. Analysis shows that DPR Ku- and Ka-Band reflectivities are well matched with ground radar with correlation coefficient as high as 0.9 for Ku-band and 0.85 for Ka-band. Ground radar calibration is also checked by observing variation in mean biases of reflectivity between DPR and GR over time. DPR rainfall products are also evaluated. Though DPR underestimates higher rainfall rates in convective cases, its overall performance is found to be satisfactory.

scholarly journals An Initial Assessment of the Surface Reference Technique Applied to Data from the Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR) on the GPM Satellite

2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (12) ◽  
pp. 2281-2296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Meneghini ◽  
Hyokyung Kim ◽  
Liang Liao ◽  
Jeffrey A. Jones ◽  
John M. Kwiatkowski
Keyword(s):  
Cross Section ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Single Frequency ◽  
Initial Assessment ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Precipitation Radar ◽  
Frequency Method ◽  
Ka Band ◽  
Spaceborne Radar ◽  
Ku Band

AbstractIt has long been recognized that path-integrated attenuation (PIA) can be used to improve precipitation estimates from high-frequency weather radar data. One approach that provides an estimate of this quantity from airborne or spaceborne radar data is the surface reference technique (SRT), which uses measurements of the surface cross section in the presence and absence of precipitation. Measurements from the dual-frequency precipitation radar (DPR) on the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) satellite afford the first opportunity to test the method for spaceborne radar data at Ka band as well as for the Ku-band–Ka-band combination.The study begins by reviewing the basis of the single- and dual-frequency SRT. As the performance of the method is closely tied to the behavior of the normalized radar cross section (NRCS or σ0) of the surface, the statistics of σ0 derived from DPR measurements are given as a function of incidence angle and frequency for ocean and land backgrounds over a 1-month period. Several independent estimates of the PIA, formed by means of different surface reference datasets, can be used to test the consistency of the method since, in the absence of error, the estimates should be identical. Along with theoretical considerations, the comparisons provide an initial assessment of the performance of the single- and dual-frequency SRT for the DPR. The study finds that the dual-frequency SRT can provide improvement in the accuracy of path attenuation estimates relative to the single-frequency method, particularly at Ku band.

scholarly journals A Robust Dual-Frequency Radar Profiling Algorithm

2011 ◽  
Vol 50 (7) ◽  
pp. 1543-1557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mircea Grecu ◽  
Lin Tian ◽  
William S. Olson ◽  
Simone Tanelli
Keyword(s):  
Synthetic Data ◽  
Optimization Procedure ◽  
Correction Method ◽  
Single Frequency ◽  
Retrieval Algorithm ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Ka Band ◽  
Radar Observations ◽  
Distribution Shape ◽  
Ku Band

AbstractIn this study, an algorithm to retrieve precipitation from spaceborne dual-frequency (13.8 and 35.6 GHz, or Ku/Ka band) radar observations is formulated and investigated. Such algorithms will be of paramount importance in deriving radar-based and combined radar–radiometer precipitation estimates from observations provided by the forthcoming NASA Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission. In GPM, dual-frequency Ku-/Ka-band radar observations will be available only within a narrow swath (approximately one-half of the width of the Ku-band radar swath) over the earth’s surface. Therefore, a particular challenge is to develop a flexible radar retrieval algorithm that can be used to derive physically consistent precipitation profile estimates across the radar swath irrespective of the availability of Ka-band radar observations at any specific location inside that swath, in other words, an algorithm capable of exploiting the information provided by dual-frequency measurements but robust in the absence of Ka-band channel. In the present study, a unified, robust precipitation retrieval algorithm able to interpret either Ku-only or dual-frequency Ku-/Ka-band radar observations in a manner consistent with the information content of the observations is formulated. The formulation is based on 1) a generalized Hitschfeld–Bordan attenuation correction method that yields generic Ku-only precipitation profile estimates and 2) an optimization procedure that adjusts the Ku-band estimates to be physically consistent with coincident Ka-band reflectivity observations and surface reference technique–based path-integrated attenuation estimates at both Ku and Ka bands. The algorithm is investigated using synthetic and actual airborne radar observations collected in the NASA Tropical Composition, Cloud, and Climate Coupling (TC4) campaign. In the synthetic data investigation, the dual-frequency algorithm performed significantly better than a single-frequency algorithm; dual-frequency estimates, however, are still sensitive to various assumptions such as the particle size distribution shape, vertical and cloud water distributions, and scattering properties of the ice-phase precipitation.

scholarly journals Evaluation of GPM-DPR precipitation estimates with WegenerNet gauge data

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 5055-5070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Lasser ◽  
Sungmin O ◽  
Ulrich Foelsche
Keyword(s):  
Rainfall Variability ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
General Level ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Ka Band ◽  
Surface Precipitation ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
Radar Rain Rate ◽  
Rain Rates ◽  
Ku Band

Abstract. The core satellite of the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission provides precipitation observations measured with the Dual-frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR). The precipitation can only be estimated from the radar data, and therefore independent validations using direct precipitation measurements on the ground as a true reference need to be performed. Moreover, the quality and the accuracy of satellite observational data depend on various influencing factors, such as altitude, topography and rainfall type. In this way, a validation may help to minimise those uncertainties. The DPR Level 2 algorithms provide three different sets of radar rain rate estimates: Ku-band-only rain rates, Ka-band-only rain rates, and a product using both the Ku and Ka band. This study presents an evaluation of the three GPM-DPR surface precipitation estimates based on the gridded precipitation data of the WegenerNet, a local-scale terrestrial network of 153 meteorological stations in southeastern Austria. The validation is based on graphical and statistical approaches, using only data where both Ku- and Ka-band measurements are available. The focus lies on the resemblance of the rainfall variability within the whole network and the over- and underestimation of the precipitation through the GPM-DPR. The analysis rests upon 15 rainfall events observed by the GPM-DPR over the WegenerNet in the last 4 years; the meteorological winter is excluded due to technical challenges of snow measurements. The WegenerNet provides between 8 and 12 gauges within each GPM-DPR footprint. Its biases are well studied and corrected; thus, it can be taken as a robust ground reference. This work also includes considerations on the limits of such comparisons between small terrestrial networks with a high density of stations and precipitation observations from a satellite. Our results show that the GPM-DPR estimates basically match with the WegenerNet measurements, but absolute quantities are biased. The three types of radar estimates deliver similar results, where Ku-band and dual-frequency estimates are very close to each other. On a general level, Ka-band precipitation estimates deliver better results due to their greater sensitivity to low rainfall rates.

scholarly journals Evaluation of GPM-DPR precipitation estimates with WegenerNet gauge data

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Lasser ◽  
Sungmin O ◽  
Ulrich Foelsche
Keyword(s):  
Radar Data ◽  
General Level ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Rainfall Events ◽  
Ka Band ◽  
Surface Precipitation ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
Radar Rain Rate ◽  
Rain Rates ◽  
Ku Band

Abstract. The core satellite of the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission provides precipitation observations measured with the Dual frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR). The precipitation can only be estimated from the radar data, and therefore, independent validations using direct precipitation observation on the ground as a true reference need to be performed. Moreover, the quality and the accuracy of the measurements depend on various influencing factors. In this way, a validation may help to minimise those uncertainties. The DPR provides three different radar rain rate estimates for the GPM core satellite: Ku-band-only rain rates, Ka-band-only rain rates and a product combining the two frequencies. This study presents an evaluation of the three GPM-DPR surface precipitation estimates based on the gridded precipitation data of the WegenerNet, a local scale terrestrial network of 153 meteorological stations in southeast Austria. The validation is based on a graphical and a statistical approach using only data where both Ku- and Ka-band measurements are available. The data delivered from the WegenerNet are gauge-based gridded rainfall observations; the meteorological winter is excluded due to technical reasons. The focus lies on the resemblance of the variability within the whole network and the over- and underestimation of the precipitation through the GPM-DPR. During the last four years 22 rainfall events were observed by the GPM-DPR over the WegenerNet and the analysis rests upon these rainfall events. The WegenerNet provides a large number of gauges within each GPM-DPR footprint. Its biases are well studied and corrected, thus, it can be taken as a robust ground reference. This work also includes considerations on the limits of such comparisons between small terrestrial networks with a high density of stations and precipitation observations from a satellite. Our results show that the GPM-DPR estimates basically match with the WegenerNet measurements, but absolute quantities are biased. The three types of radar estimates deliver similar results, where Ku-band and dual frequency estimates are very close to each other. On a general level, Ka-band precipitation estimates deliver the best results due to the high number of light rainfall events.

Comparison of rainfall estimates from GPM dual-frequency precipitation radar and ground dual-polarization radar

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leilei Kou ◽  
Ying Mao ◽  
Zhixuan Wang ◽  
Yao Chen ◽  
Zhigang Chu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Dual Polarization ◽  
Precipitation Radar ◽  
Rainfall Estimates

scholarly journals Experimental Assimilation of the GPM Core Observatory DPR Reflectivity Profiles for Typhoon Halong (2014)

2016 ◽  
Vol 144 (6) ◽  
pp. 2307-2326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kozo Okamoto ◽  
Kazumasa Aonashi ◽  
Takuji Kubota ◽  
Tomoko Tashima
Keyword(s):  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Large Diameter ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Precipitation Radar ◽  
Accurate Analysis ◽  
Background Error ◽  
Position Errors ◽  
Cloud Resolving Model ◽  
Microwave Imager

Abstract Space-based precipitation radar data have been underused in data assimilation studies and operations despite their valuable information on vertically resolved hydrometeor profiles around the globe. The authors developed direct assimilation of reflectivities (Ze) from the Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR) on board the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Core Observatory to improve mesoscale predictions. Based on comparisons with Ze observations, this cloud resolving model mostly reproduced Ze but produced overestimations of Ze induced by excessive snow with large diameter particles. With an ensemble-based variational scheme and preprocessing steps to properly treat reflectivity observations including conservative quality control and superobbing procedures, the authors assimilated DPR Ze and/or rain-affected radiances of GPM Microwave Imager (GMI) for the case of Typhoon Halong in July 2014. With the vertically resolving capability of DPR, the authors effectively selected Ze observations most suited to data assimilation, for example, by removing Ze above the melting layer to avoid contamination due to model bias. While the GMI radiance had large impacts on various control variables, the DPR made a fine delicate analysis of the rain mixing ratio and updraft. This difference arose from the observation characteristics (coverage width and spatial resolution), sensitivities represented in the observation operators, and structures of the background error covariance. Because the DPR assimilation corrected excessive increases in rain and clouds due to the radiance assimilation, the combined use of DPR and GMI generated more accurate analysis and forecast than separate use of them with respect to the agreement of observations and tropical cyclone position errors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document