scholarly journals Seven Years of SMOS Sea Surface Salinity at High Latitudes: Variability in Arctic and Sub-Arctic Regions

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 1772 ◽  
Author(s):  
Estrella Olmedo ◽  
Carolina Gabarró ◽  
Verónica González-Gambau ◽  
Justino Martínez ◽  
Joaquim Ballabrera-Poy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Range ◽  
Remotely Sensed ◽  
Sea Surface ◽  
Sea Surface Salinity ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Surface Salinity ◽  
In Situ Data ◽  
Arctic Regions ◽  
The Difference

This paper aims to present and assess the quality of seven years (2011–2017) of 25 km nine-day Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) Sea Surface Salinity (SSS) objectively analyzed maps in the Arctic and sub-Arctic oceans ( 50 ∘ N– 90 ∘ N). The SMOS SSS maps presented in this work are an improved version of the preliminary three-year dataset generated and freely distributed by the Barcelona Expert Center. In this new version, a time-dependent bias correction has been applied to mitigate the seasonal bias that affected the previous SSS maps. An extensive database of in situ data (Argo floats and thermosalinograph measurements) has been used for assessing the accuracy of this product. The standard deviation of the difference between the new SMOS SSS maps and Argo SSS ranges from 0.25 and 0.35. The major features of the inter-annual SSS variations observed by the thermosalinographs are also captured by the SMOS SSS maps. However, the validation in some regions of the Arctic Ocean has not been feasible because of the lack of in situ data. In those regions, qualitative comparisons with SSS provided by models and the remotely sensed SSS provided by Aquarius and SMAP have been performed. Despite the differences between SMOS and SMAP, both datasets show consistent SSS variations with respect to the model and the river discharge in situ data, but present a larger dynamic range than that of the model. This result suggests that, in those regions, the use of the remotely sensed SSS may help to improve the models.

High-resolution sea surface salinity and temperature in coastal areas from Sentinel-2 and Copernicus Marine in situ data

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Encarni Medina-Lopez
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
High Resolution ◽  
Sea Surface ◽  
Sea Surface Salinity ◽  
Global Ocean ◽  
Surface Salinity ◽  
In Situ Data ◽  
The Neural Network ◽  
Sentinel 2

<p>The aim of this work is to obtain high-resolution values of sea surface salinity (SSS) and temperature (SST) in the global ocean by using raw satellite data (i.e., without any band data pre-processing or atmospheric correction). Sentinel-2 Level 1-C Top of Atmosphere (TOA) reflectance data is used to obtain accurate SSS and SST information. A deep neural network is built to link the band information with in situ data from different buoys, vessels, drifters, and other platforms around the world. The neural network used in this paper includes shortcuts, providing an improved performance compared with the equivalent feed-forward architecture. The in situ information used as input for the network has been obtained from the Copernicus Marine In situ Service. Sentinel-2 platform-centred band data has been processed using Google Earth Engine in areas of 100 m x 100 m. Accurate salinity values are estimated for the first time independently of temperature. Salinity results rely only on direct satellite observations, although it presented a clear dependency on temperature ranges. Results show the neural network has good interpolation and extrapolation capabilities. Test results present correlation coefficients of 82% and 84% for salinity and temperature, respectively. The most common error for both SST and SSS is 0.4 C and 0.4 PSU. The sensitivity analysis shows that outliers are present in areas where the number of observations is very low. The network is finally applied over a complete Sentinel-2 tile, presenting sensible patterns for river-sea interaction, as well as seasonal variations. The methodology presented here is relevant for detailed coastal and oceanographic applications, reducing the time for data pre-processing, and it is applicable to a wide range of satellites, as the information is directly obtained from TOA data.</p>

scholarly journals Intercomparison of Salinity Products in the Beaufort Gyre and Arctic Ocean

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 71
Author(s):  
Sarah B. Hall ◽  
Bulusu Subrahmanyam ◽  
James H. Morison
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Satellite Observations ◽  
Sea Surface ◽  
Sea Surface Salinity ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Surface Salinity ◽  
Beaufort Gyre ◽  
The Arctic Ocean

Salinity is the primary determinant of the Arctic Ocean’s density structure. Freshwater accumulation and distribution in the Arctic Ocean have varied significantly in recent decades and certainly in the Beaufort Gyre (BG). In this study, we analyze salinity variations in the BG region between 2012 and 2017. We use in situ salinity observations from the Seasonal Ice Zone Reconnaissance Surveys (SIZRS), CTD casts from the Beaufort Gyre Exploration Project (BGP), and the EN4 data to validate and compare with satellite observations from Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP), Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS), and Aquarius Optimally Interpolated Sea Surface Salinity (OISSS), and Arctic Ocean models: ECCO, MIZMAS, HYCOM, ORAS5, and GLORYS12. Overall, satellite observations are restricted to ice-free regions in the BG area, and models tend to overestimate sea surface salinity (SSS). Freshwater Content (FWC), an important component of the BG, is computed for EN4 and most models. ORAS5 provides the strongest positive SSS correlation coefficient (0.612) and lowest bias to in situ observations compared to the other products. ORAS5 subsurface salinity and FWC compare well with the EN4 data. Discrepancies between models and SIZRS data are highest in GLORYS12 and ECCO. These comparisons identify dissimilarities between salinity products and extend challenges to observations applicable to other areas of the Arctic Ocean.

Pi-MEP Salinity – an ESA-NASA Platform for sustained satellite surface salinity validation 

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Sabia ◽  
Sebastien Guimbard ◽  
Nicolas Reul ◽  
Tony Lee ◽  
Julian Schanze ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Program Planning ◽  
Sea Surface ◽  
Sea Surface Salinity ◽  
Surface Salinity ◽  
In Situ Data ◽  
Sea Level Anomalies ◽  
Ocean Salinity ◽  
Salinity Data ◽  
Planning Group

<p>The Pilot Mission Exploitation Platform (Pi-MEP) for Salinity (www.salinity-pimep.org) has been released operationally in 2019 to the broad oceanographic community, in order to foster satellite sea surface salinity validation and exploitation activities.</p><p>Specifically, the Platform aims at enhancing salinityvalidation, by allowing systematic inter-comparison of various EO datasets with a broad suite of in-situ data, and also at enabling oceanographic process studies by capitalizing on salinity data in synergy with additional spaceborne estimates.</p><p> </p><p>Despite Pi-MEP was originally conceived as an ESA initiative to widen the uptake of the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) mission data over ocean, a project partnership with NASA was devised soon after the operational deployment, and an official collaboration endorsed within the ESA-NASA Joint Program Planning Group (JPPG).</p><p> </p><p>The Salinity Pi-MEP has therefore become a reference hub for SMOS, SMAP and Aquarius satellite salinity missions, which are assessed in synergy with additional thematic datasets (e.g., precipitation, evaporation, currents, sea level anomalies, ocean color, sea surface temperature). </p><p>Match-up databases of satellite/in situ (such as Argo, TSG, moorings, drifters) data and corresponding validation reports at different spatiotemporal scales are systematically generated; furthermore, recently-developed dedicated tools allow data visualization, metrics computation and user-driven features extractions.</p><p> </p><p>The Platform is also meant to monitor salinity in selected oceanographic “case studies”, ranging from river plumes monitoring to SSS characterization in challenging regions, such as high latitudes or semi-enclosed basins.</p><p> </p><p>The two Agencies are currently collaborating to widen the Platform features on several technical aspects - ranging from a triple-collocation software implementation to a sustained exploitation of data from the SPURS-1/2 campaigns. In this context, an upgrade of the satellite/in-situ match-up methodology has been recently agreed, resulting into a redefinition of the validation criteria that will be subsequently implemented in the Platform.</p><p> </p><p>A further synthesis of the three satellites salinity algorithms, models and auxiliary data handling is at the core of the ESA Climate Change Initiative (CCI) on Salinity and of ESA-NASA further collaboration.</p>

scholarly journals Spatial Scales of Sea Surface Salinity Subfootprint Variability in the SPURS Regions

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (23) ◽  
pp. 3996
Author(s):  
Frederick M. Bingham ◽  
Zhijin Li
Keyword(s):  
North Atlantic ◽  
Spatial Scales ◽  
Remote Sensing Data ◽  
Ocean Modeling ◽  
Sea Surface ◽  
Sea Surface Salinity ◽  
Regional Ocean Modeling System ◽  
Surface Salinity ◽  
In Situ Data

Subfootprint variability (SFV), or representativeness error, is variability within the footprint of a satellite that can impact validation by comparison of in situ and remote sensing data. This study seeks to determine the size of the sea surface salinity (SSS) SFV as a function of footprint size in two regions that were heavily sampled with in situ data. The Salinity Processes in the Upper-ocean Regional Studies-1 (SPURS-1) experiment was conducted in the subtropical North Atlantic in the period 2012–2013, whereas the SPURS-2 study was conducted in the tropical eastern North Pacific in the period 2016–2017. SSS SFV was also computed using a high-resolution regional model based on the Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS). We computed SFV at footprint sizes ranging from 20 to 100 km for both regions. SFV is strongly seasonal, but for different reasons in the two regions. In the SPURS-1 region, the meso- and submesoscale variability seemed to control the size of the SFV. In the SPURS-2 region, the SFV is much larger than SPURS-1 and controlled by patchy rainfall.

scholarly journals Subfootprint Variability of Sea Surface Salinity Observed during the SPURS-1 and SPURS-2 Field Campaigns

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (22) ◽  
pp. 2689 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick M. Bingham
Keyword(s):  
Absolute Error ◽  
Sea Surface ◽  
Sea Surface Salinity ◽  
Satellite Measurement ◽  
Surface Salinity ◽  
Passive Measurement ◽  
In Situ Data ◽  
Field Campaigns ◽  
Comparison Of The Results

Subfootprint variability (SFV), variability within the footprint of a satellite measurement, is a source of error associated with the validation process, especially for a satellite measurement with a large footprint such as those measuring sea surface salinity (SSS). This type of error has not been adequately quantified in the past. In this study, I have examined SFV using in situ ocean data from the SPURS-1 (Salinity Processes in the Upper ocean Regional Studies-1) and SPURS-2 field campaigns in the subtropical North Atlantic and eastern tropical North Pacific respectively. I computed SFV from these data over two one-year periods of intense sampling. The results show that SFV is highly seasonal. I have computed SFV errors in several different forms, a median value of the weekly snapshot error, a total snapshot error, an absolute error of the Aquarius and SMAP (Soil Moisture Active Passive) measurement, a part of that error associated with SFV and a bias due to the skewness of the distribution of SSS. These results are characteristic only of the particular regions studied. However, comparison of the results with high resolution models, and in situ data from moorings gives the possibility of getting global estimates of SFV from these other more common sources of SSS data.

scholarly journals Sea Surface Salinity Seasonal Variability in the Tropics from Satellites, Gridded In Situ Products and Mooring Observations

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 110
Author(s):  
Frederick M. Bingham ◽  
Susannah Brodnitz ◽  
Lisan Yu
Keyword(s):  
Seasonal Variability ◽  
Ground Truth ◽  
Sea Surface ◽  
Sea Surface Salinity ◽  
Surface Salinity ◽  
Zero Bias ◽  
In Situ Data ◽  
The Tropics ◽  
Good Agreement

Satellite observations of sea surface salinity (SSS) have been validated in a number of instances using different forms of in situ data, including Argo floats, moorings and gridded in situ products. Since one of the most energetic time scales of variability of SSS is seasonal, it is important to know if satellites and gridded in situ products are observing the seasonal variability correctly. In this study we validate the seasonal SSS from satellite and gridded in situ products using observations from moorings in the global tropical moored buoy array. We utilize six different satellite products, and two different gridded in situ products. For each product we have computed seasonal harmonics, including amplitude, phase and fraction of variance (R2). These quantities are mapped for each product and for the moorings. We also do comparisons of amplitude, phase and R2 between moorings and all the satellite and gridded in situ products. Taking the mooring observations as ground truth, we find general good agreement between them and the satellite and gridded in situ products, with near zero bias in phase and amplitude and small root mean square differences. Tables are presented with these quantities for each product quantifying the degree of agreement.

scholarly journals New insights into SMOS Sea Surface Salinity retrievals in the Arctic Ocean.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Supply ◽  
Jacqueline Boutin ◽  
Jean-Luc Vergely ◽  
Nicolas Kolodziejczyk ◽  
Gilles Reverdin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dielectric Constant ◽  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Sea Surface ◽  
Sea Surface Salinity ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Surface Salinity ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
The Arctic Ocean ◽  
L Band

<p>Since 2010, the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) satellite mission monitors the earth emission at L-Band, providing the longest time series of Sea Surface Salinity (SSS) from space over the global ocean. However, retrieving SSS at high latitudes with a reasonable accuracy remains challenging, in particular due to the low sensitivity of L-Band radiometric measurements to SSS in cold waters and to the contamination of SMOS measurements by the vicinity of continents and sea ice as well as the presence of Radio Frequency Interferences. In this paper, we assess the quality of weekly SSS fields derived from swath-ordered instantaneous SMOS SSS (so called Level 2) distributed by the European Space Agency. These products are filtered according to new criteria. We use the pseudo-dielectric constant retrieved from SMOS brightness temperatures to filter SSS pixels polluted by sea ice. We identify that the dielectric constant model and the sea surface temperature auxiliary parameter used as prior information in the SMOS SSS retrieval are significant sources of uncertainty. We develop a novel correction methodology accordingly.</p><p>SSS Standard deviation of differences (STDD) between weekly SMOS SSS and in-situ near surface salinity significantly decrease after applying the SSS correction, from 1.46 pss to 1.26 pss. The correlation between new SMOS SSS and in-situ near surface salinity reaches 0.94. SMOS estimates better capture SSS variability in the Arctic Ocean in comparison to TOPAZ reanalysis (STDD = 1.86 pss), particularly in river plumes fresher by about 10 pss than surrounding waters. Furthermore, comparisons with in-situ measurements ranging from 1 to 11 m depths identify huge vertical stratification in fresh regions. This emphasizes the need to consider in-situ salinity as close as possible to the sea surface when validating L-band radiometric SSS which are representative of the first top centimeter.</p>

scholarly journals Objective analysis of SMOS and SMAP Sea Surface Salinity to reduce large scale and time dependent biases from low to high latitudes

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Kolodziejczyk ◽  
Mathieu Hamon ◽  
Jacqueline Boutin ◽  
Jean-Luc Vergely ◽  
Gilles Reverdin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
High Latitude ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Sea Surface ◽  
Sea Surface Salinity ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Surface Salinity ◽  
Radiometric Measurements ◽  
L Band

AbstractTen years of L-Band radiometric measurements have proven the capability of satellite Sea Surface Salinity (SSS) to resolve large scale to mesoscale SSS features in tropical to subtropical ocean. In mid to high latitude, L-Band measurements still suffer from large scale and time systematic errors. Here, a simple method is proposed to mitigate the large scale and seasonal varying biases. First, an Optimal Interpolation (OI) using a large correlation scale (~500 km) is used to map independently Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) and Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) Level 3 data. The mapping is compared to the equivalent mapping of in situ observations to estimate the large scale and seasonal biases. A second mapping is performed on adjusted SSS at the scale of SMOS/SMAP spatial resolution (~45 km). This procedure merges both products, and increases the signal to noise ratio of the absolute SSS estimates, reducing the RMSD of in situ-satellite products by about 26-32% from mid to high latitude, respectively, in comparison to the existing SMOS and SMAP L3 products. However, in the Arctic Ocean, some issues on satellite retrieved SSS related to e.g. radio frequency interferences, land-sea contamination, ice-sea contamination remain challenging to reduce given the low sensitivity of L-Band radiometric measurements to SSS in cold water. Using the thermodynamic equation of state (TEOS-10), the resulting L4 SSS satellite product is combined with satellite-microwave SST products to estimate sea surface density, spiciness, haline contraction and thermal expansion coefficients. For the first time, we illustrate how useful are these satellite derived parameters to fully characterize the surface ocean water masses at large mesoscale.

scholarly journals Impacts of assimilating Arctic surface sea salinities from SMOS in a coupled ocean and sea ice reanalysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiping Xie ◽  
Roshin P. Raj ◽  
Laurent Bertino ◽  
Justino Martínez ◽  
Carolina Gabarró ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
European Space Agency ◽  
Sea Surface ◽  
Sea Surface Salinity ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Altimeter Data ◽  
Surface Salinity ◽  
Nordic Seas

<p>In the Arctic, the sea surface salinity (SSS) has a key role in processes related to mixing, sea ice melt and freeze. However, due to insufficient salinity observations, uncertainties in present Arctic ocean forecasts and reanalysis are still large. Thanks to the European Space Agency’s (ESA) Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) mission, two successive versions of regional gridded SSS products for the Arctic Ocean have been developed by the Barcelona Expert Centre (BEC). These two SSS products (V2 and V3) are available from the BEC (http://bec.icm.csic.es/) and the Arctic+Salinity project funded by the ESA (https://arcticsalinity.argans.co.uk).<br>In this study, we show the impacts of assimilating the SMOS SSS  in a coupled ocean and sea ice forecasting system.</p><p>TOPAZ4, the Arctic component of the Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Services (CMEMS), is a coupled ice-ocean data assimilative system, using the Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) to assimilate jointly all available ocean and sea ice observations over the whole Arctic. Via the CMEMS portal, TOPAZ4 provides the products of both reanalysis and operational forecasts. Two parallel runs of TOPAZ4 are integrated from July to December in 2016, during which either the V2 or V3 SSS data product is assimilated in addition to other available data sources (altimeter data, SST, sea ice concentration, sea ice drift, T/S profiles, sea ice thickness). Independent in situ salinity profiles are used for validation of the model runs in three regions: 1) in the Beaufort Sea; 2) around Greenland; 3) in the Nordic Seas. Compared to the runs without SSS assimilation, the results show the reduction of a severe saline bias in the Beaufort Sea: 15.9% (V2) and 28.6% (V3), also the Root Mean Squared differences (RMSD) decreased by 10.8% (V2) and 16.2% (V3). Around Greenland, the SSS bias is decreased by 17.3% and the RMSD by 8.2% (V3 only). There are neither degradations or improvements for V2 both around Greenland and in the Nordic Seas. These basic statistics suggest the benefits of assimilating SMOS data on the TOPAZ4 outputs and the advantages from the V3 SSS product especially compared to the V2 product.</p><p><strong>Keywords</strong>: Arctic Ocean; Sea Surface Salinity; TOPAZ4; In situ; RMSD;</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document