scholarly journals Research Pathways of Forest Above-Ground Biomass Estimation Based on SAR Backscatter and Interferometric SAR Observations

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurizio Santoro ◽  
Oliver Cartus
Keyword(s):  
Biomass Estimation ◽  
Above Ground Biomass ◽  
Ground Biomass ◽  
Interferometric Sar

Above-ground biomass estimation of Indian tropical forests using X band Pol-InSAR and Random Forest

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 100462
Author(s):  
Sadhana Yadav ◽  
Hitendra Padalia ◽  
Sanjiv K. Sinha ◽  
Ritika Srinet ◽  
Prakash Chauhan
Keyword(s):  
Random Forest ◽  
Tropical Forests ◽  
Biomass Estimation ◽  
Above Ground Biomass ◽  
Ground Biomass ◽  
X Band

Using photography to estimate above-ground biomass of small trees

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Brandon R. Hays ◽  
Corinna Riginos ◽  
Todd M. Palmer ◽  
Benard C. Gituku ◽  
Jacob R. Goheen
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effective ◽  
Allometric Equation ◽  
Biomass Estimation ◽  
Above Ground Biomass ◽  
Tree Biomass ◽  
East African ◽  
Ground Biomass ◽  
Herbivore Exclusion ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Allometric Relation

Abstract Quantifying tree biomass is an important research and management goal across many disciplines. For species that exhibit predictable relationships between structural metrics (e.g. diameter, height, crown breadth) and total weight, allometric calculations produce accurate estimates of above-ground biomass. However, such methods may be insufficient where inter-individual variation is large relative to individual biomass and is itself of interest (for example, variation due to herbivory). In an East African savanna bushland, we analysed photographs of small (<5 m) trees from perpendicular angles and fixed distances to estimate above-ground biomass. Pixel area of trees in photos and diameter were more strongly related to measured, above-ground biomass of destructively sampled trees than biomass estimated using a published allometric relation based on diameter alone (R2 = 0.86 versus R2 = 0.68). When tested on trees in herbivore-exclusion plots versus unfenced (open) plots, our predictive equation based on photos confirmed higher above-ground biomass in the exclusion plots than in unfenced (open) plots (P < 0.001), in contrast to no significant difference based on the allometric equation (P = 0.43). As such, our new technique based on photographs offers an accurate and cost-effective complement to existing methods for tree biomass estimation at small scales with potential application across a wide variety of settings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document