scholarly journals Development of a System of Compatible Individual Tree Diameter and Aboveground Biomass Prediction Models Using Error-In-Variable Regression and Airborne LiDAR Data

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liyong Fu ◽  
Qingwang Liu ◽  
Hua Sun ◽  
Qiuyan Wang ◽  
Zengyuan Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aboveground Biomass ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Airborne Lidar ◽  
Lidar Data ◽  
Individual Tree ◽  
Tree Diameter ◽  
Airborne Lidar Data

scholarly journals Individual Tree Position Extraction and Structural Parameter Retrieval Based on Airborne LiDAR Data: Performance Evaluation and Comparison of Four Algorithms

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen ◽  
Xiang ◽  
Moriya
Keyword(s):  
Template Matching ◽  
Local Maximum ◽  
Airborne Lidar ◽  
Forest Monitoring ◽  
Lidar Data ◽  
Individual Tree ◽  
Matching Algorithm ◽  
Crown Width ◽  
Individual Trees ◽  
Airborne Lidar Data

Information for individual trees (e.g., position, treetop, height, crown width, and crown edge) is beneficial for forest monitoring and management. Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data have been widely used to retrieve these individual tree parameters from different algorithms, with varying successes. In this study, we used an iterative Triangulated Irregular Network (TIN) algorithm to separate ground and canopy points in airborne LiDAR data, and generated Digital Elevation Models (DEM) by Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW) interpolation, thin spline interpolation, and trend surface interpolation, as well as by using the Kriging algorithm. The height of the point cloud was assigned to a Digital Surface Model (DSM), and a Canopy Height Model (CHM) was acquired. Then, four algorithms (point-cloud-based local maximum algorithm, CHM-based local maximum algorithm, watershed algorithm, and template-matching algorithm) were comparatively used to extract the structural parameters of individual trees. The results indicated that the two local maximum algorithms can effectively detect the treetop; the watershed algorithm can accurately extract individual tree height and determine the tree crown edge; and the template-matching algorithm works well to extract accurate crown width. This study provides a reference for the selection of algorithms in individual tree parameter inversion based on airborne LiDAR data and is of great significance for LiDAR-based forest monitoring and management.

scholarly journals Estimating Tree Volume Distributions in Subtropical Forests Using Airborne LiDAR Data

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin Cao ◽  
Zhengnan Zhang ◽  
Ting Yun ◽  
Guibin Wang ◽  
Honghua Ruan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Airborne Lidar ◽  
Lidar Data ◽  
Stem Density ◽  
Shape Parameters ◽  
Individual Tree ◽  
Subtropical Forests ◽  
Weibull Parameters ◽  
Error Index ◽  
Airborne Lidar Data ◽  
Parameter Prediction

Accurate and reliable information on tree volume distributions, which describe tree frequencies in volume classes, plays a key role in guiding timber harvest, managing carbon budgets, and supplying ecosystem services. Airborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) has the capability of offering reliable estimates of the distributions of structure attributes in forests. In this study, we predicted individual tree volume distributions over a subtropical forest of southeast China using airborne LiDAR data and field measurements. We first estimated the plot-level total volume by LiDAR-derived standard and canopy metrics. Then the performances of three Weibull parameter prediction methods, i.e., parameter prediction method (PPM), percentile-based parameter recover method (PPRM), and moment-based parameter recover method (MPRM) were assessed to estimate the Weibull scale and shape parameters. Stem density for each plot was calculated by dividing the estimated plot total volume using mean tree volume (i.e., mean value of distributions) derived from the LiDAR-estimated Weibull parameters. Finally, the individual tree volume distributions were generated by the predicted scale and shape parameters, and then scaled by the predicted stem density. The results demonstrated that, compared with the general models, the forest type-specific (i.e., coniferous forests, broadleaved forests, and mixed forests) models had relatively higher accuracies for estimating total volume and stem density, as well as predicting Weibull parameters, percentiles, and raw moments. The relationship between the predicted and reference volume distributions showed a relatively high agreement when the predicted frequencies were scaled to the LiDAR-predicted stem density (mean Reynolds error index eR = 31.47–54.07, mean Packalén error index eP = 0.14–0.21). In addition, the predicted individual tree volume distributions predicted by PPRM of (average mean eR = 37.75) performed the best, followed by MPRM (average mean eR = 40.43) and PPM (average mean eR = 41.22). This study demonstrated that the LiDAR can potentially offer improved estimates of the distributions of tree volume in subtropical forests.

scholarly journals Regional Tropical Aboveground Biomass Mapping with L-Band Repeat-Pass Interferometric Radar, Sparse Lidar, and Multiscale Superpixels

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 2048
Author(s):  
Charlie Marshak ◽  
Marc Simard ◽  
Laura Duncanson ◽  
Carlos Alberto Silva ◽  
Michael Denbina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aboveground Biomass ◽  
Airborne Lidar ◽  
Lidar Data ◽  
Single Model ◽  
Tropical Regions ◽  
Full Waveform ◽  
Applicable Range ◽  
L Band ◽  
Airborne Lidar Data ◽  
Synergistic Relationships

We introduce a multiscale superpixel approach that leverages repeat-pass interferometric coherence and sparse AGB estimates from a simulated spaceborne lidar in order to extend the NISAR mission’s applicable range of aboveground biomass (AGB) in tropical forests. Airborne and spaceborne L-band radar and full-waveform airborne lidar data are used to simulate the NISAR and GEDI mission, respectively. In addition to UAVSAR data, we use spaceborne ALOS-2/PALSAR-2 imagery with 14-day temporal baseline, which is comparable to NISAR’s 12-day baseline. Our reference AGB maps are derived from the airborne LVIS data during the AfriSAR campaign for three sites (Mondah, Ogooue, and Lope). Each tropical site has mean AGB of at least 125 Mg/ha in addition to areas with AGB exceeding 700 Mg/ha. Spatially sampling from these LVIS-derived AGB reference maps, we approximate GEDI AGB estimates. To evaluate our methodology, we perform several different analyses. First, we partition each study site into low (≤100 Mg/ha) and high (>100 Mg/ha) AGB areas, in conformity with the NISAR mission requirement to provide AGB estimates for forests between 0 and 100 Mg/ha with a RMSE below 20 Mg/ha. In the low AGB areas, this RMSE requirement is satisfied in Lope and Mondah and it fell short of the requirement in Ogooue by less 3 Mg/ha with UAVSAR and 6 Mg/ha with PALSAR-2. We note that our maps have finer spatial resolution (50 m) than NISAR requires (1 hectare). In the high AGB areas, the normalized RMSE increases to 51% (i.e., <90 Mg/ha), but with negligible bias for all three sites. Second, we train a single model to estimate AGB across both high and low AGB regimes simultaneously and obtain a normalized RMSE that is <60% (or <100 Mg/ha). Lastly, we show the use of both (a) multiscale superpixels and (b) interferometric coherence significantly improves the accuracy of the AGB estimates. The InSAR coherence improved the RMSE by approximately 8% at Mondah with both sensors, lowering the RMSE from 59 Mg/ha to 47.4 Mg/h with UAVSAR and from 57.1 Mg/ha to 46 Mg/ha. This work illustrates one of the numerous synergistic relationships between the spaceborne lidars, such as GEDI, with L-band SAR, such as PALSAR-2 and NISAR, in order to produce robust regional AGB in high biomass tropical regions.

Aboveground Biomass Estimates of Sagebrush Using Terrestrial and Airborne LiDAR Data in a Dryland Ecosystem (Dataset)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aihua Li ◽  
Nancy F. Glenn ◽  
Peter J. Olsoy ◽  
Jessica J. Mitchell ◽  
Rupesh Shrestha
Keyword(s):  
Aboveground Biomass ◽  
Airborne Lidar ◽  
Lidar Data ◽  
Airborne Lidar Data

scholarly journals Airborne LIDAR-Derived Aboveground Biomass Estimates Using a Hierarchical Bayesian Approach

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 1050
Author(s):  
Mengxi Wang ◽  
Qingwang Liu ◽  
Liyong Fu ◽  
Guangxing Wang ◽  
Xiongqing Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Aboveground Biomass ◽  
Bayesian Model ◽  
Bayesian Method ◽  
Airborne Lidar ◽  
Projection Area ◽  
Lidar Data ◽  
Hierarchical Bayesian ◽  
Hierarchical Bayesian Model ◽  
Hierarchical Bayesian Method ◽  
Airborne Lidar Data

Conventional ground survey data are very accurate, but expensive. Airborne lidar data can reduce the costs and effort required to conduct large-scale forest surveys. It is critical to improve biomass estimation and evaluate carbon stock when we use lidar data. Bayesian methods integrate prior information about unknown parameters, reduce the parameter estimation uncertainty, and improve model performance. This study focused on predicting the independent tree aboveground biomass (AGB) with a hierarchical Bayesian model using airborne LIDAR data and comparing the hierarchical Bayesian model with classical methods (nonlinear mixed effect model, NLME). Firstly, we chose the best diameter at breast height (DBH) model from several widely used models through a hierarchical Bayesian method. Secondly, we used the DBH predictions together with the tree height (LH) and canopy projection area (CPA) derived by airborne lidar as independent variables to develop the AGB model through a hierarchical Bayesian method with parameter priors from the NLME method. We then compared the hierarchical Bayesian method with the NLME method. The results showed that the two methods performed similarly when pooling the data, while for small sample sizes, the Bayesian method was much better than the classical method. The results of this study imply that the Bayesian method has the potential to improve the estimations of both DBH and AGB using LIDAR data, which reduces costs compared with conventional measurements.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document