scholarly journals Predicting Ground Reaction Forces in Sprint Running Using a Shank Mounted Inertial Measurement Unit

Proceedings ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 199 ◽  
Author(s):  
David V. Thiel ◽  
Jonathan Shepherd ◽  
Hugo G. Espinosa ◽  
Megan Kenny ◽  
Katrien Fischer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inertial Measurement Unit ◽  
Measurement Unit ◽  
Ground Reaction Forces ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Sprint Running ◽  
Reaction Forces

scholarly journals Real-Time Vertical Ground Reaction Force Estimation in a Unified Simulation Framework Using Inertial Measurement Unit Sensors

Robotics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 88
Author(s):  
Elliot Recinos ◽  
John Abella ◽  
Shayan Riyaz ◽  
Emel Demircan
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Inertial Measurement Unit ◽  
Human Motion ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Measurement Unit ◽  
Ground Reaction Forces ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Musculoskeletal Models ◽  
Reaction Forces ◽  
Vertical Ground

Recent advances in computational technology have enabled the use of model-based simulation with real-time motion tracking to estimate ground reaction forces during gait. We show here that a biomechanical-based model including a foot-ground contact can reproduce measured ground reaction forces using inertial measurement unit data during single-leg support, single-support jump, side to side jump, jogging, and skipping. The framework is based on our previous work on integrating the OpenSim musculoskeletal models with the Unity environment. The validation was performed on a single subject performing several tasks that involve the lower extremity. The novelty of this paper includes the integration and real-time tracking of inertial measurement unit data in the current framework, as well as the estimation of contact forces using biologically based musculoskeletal models. The RMS errors of tracking the vertical ground reaction forces are 0.027 bodyweight, 0.174 bodyweight, 0.173 bodyweight, 0.095 bodyweight, and 0.10 bodyweight for single-leg support, single-support jump, side to side jump, jogging, and skipping, respectively. The average RMS error for all tasks and trials is 0.112 bodyweight. This paper provides a computational framework for further applications in whole-body human motion analysis.

scholarly journals Portable Gait Lab: Estimating Over-Ground 3D Ground Reaction Forces Using Only a Pelvis IMU

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (21) ◽  
pp. 6363
Author(s):  
Mohamed Irfan Mohamed Refai ◽  
Bert-Jan F. van Beijnum ◽  
Jaap H. Buurke ◽  
Peter H. Veltink
Keyword(s):  
Inertial Measurement Unit ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Calibration Procedure ◽  
Measurement Unit ◽  
Average Error ◽  
Ground Reaction Forces ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Reaction Forces ◽  
Error State ◽  
Over Ground Walking

As an alternative to force plates, an inertial measurement unit (IMU) at the pelvis can offer an ambulatory method for measuring total center of mass (CoM) accelerations and, thereby, the ground reaction forces (GRF) during gait. The challenge here is to estimate the 3D components of the GRF. We employ a calibration procedure and an error state extended Kalman filter based on an earlier work to estimate the instantaneous 3D GRF for different over-ground walking patterns. The GRF were then expressed in a body-centric reference frame, to enable an ambulatory setup not related to a fixed global frame. The results were validated with ForceShoesTM, and the average error in estimating instantaneous shear GRF was 5.2 ± 0.5% of body weight across different variable over-ground walking tasks. The study shows that a single pelvis IMU can measure 3D GRF in a minimal and ambulatory manner during over-ground gait.

scholarly journals The relationship between inertial measurement unit-derived ‘force signatures’ and ground reaction forces during cricket pace bowling

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 307-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel J. Callaghan ◽  
Robert G. Lockie ◽  
Warren A. Andrews ◽  
Robert F. Chipchase ◽  
Sophia Nimphius
Keyword(s):  
Inertial Measurement Unit ◽  
Measurement Unit ◽  
Ground Reaction Forces ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Reaction Forces ◽  
The Relationship

scholarly journals Estimation of temporal parameters during sprint running using a trunk-mounted inertial measurement unit

2012 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 1123-1126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Bergamini ◽  
Pietro Picerno ◽  
Hélène Pillet ◽  
Françoise Natta ◽  
Patricia Thoreux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inertial Measurement Unit ◽  
Measurement Unit ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Temporal Parameters ◽  
Sprint Running

scholarly journals Automatically evaluating balance using machine learning and data from a single inertial measurement unit

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fahad Kamran ◽  
Kathryn Harrold ◽  
Jonathan Zwier ◽  
Wendy Carender ◽  
Tian Bao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Inertial Measurement Unit ◽  
Physical Therapists ◽  
Physical Therapist ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Machine Learning Techniques ◽  
Measurement Unit ◽  
Balance Performance ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Self Assessments

Abstract Background Recently, machine learning techniques have been applied to data collected from inertial measurement units to automatically assess balance, but rely on hand-engineered features. We explore the utility of machine learning to automatically extract important features from inertial measurement unit data for balance assessment. Findings Ten participants with balance concerns performed multiple balance exercises in a laboratory setting while wearing an inertial measurement unit on their lower back. Physical therapists watched video recordings of participants performing the exercises and rated balance on a 5-point scale. We trained machine learning models using different representations of the unprocessed inertial measurement unit data to estimate physical therapist ratings. On a held-out test set, we compared these learned models to one another, to participants’ self-assessments of balance, and to models trained using hand-engineered features. Utilizing the unprocessed kinematic data from the inertial measurement unit provided significant improvements over both self-assessments and models using hand-engineered features (AUROC of 0.806 vs. 0.768, 0.665). Conclusions Unprocessed data from an inertial measurement unit used as input to a machine learning model produced accurate estimates of balance performance. The ability to learn from unprocessed data presents a potentially generalizable approach for assessing balance without the need for labor-intensive feature engineering, while maintaining comparable model performance.

scholarly journals Inertial Measurement Unit Sensors in Assistive Technologies for Visually Impaired People, a Review

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (14) ◽  
pp. 4767
Author(s):  
Karla Miriam Reyes Leiva ◽  
Milagros Jaén-Vargas ◽  
Benito Codina ◽  
José Javier Serrano Olmedo
Keyword(s):  
Inertial Measurement Unit ◽  
Visually Impaired ◽  
Inertial Sensors ◽  
Assistive Technologies ◽  
Biomechanical Analysis ◽  
Measurement Unit ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Visually Impaired People ◽  
Impaired People ◽  
Application Fields

A diverse array of assistive technologies have been developed to help Visually Impaired People (VIP) face many basic daily autonomy challenges. Inertial measurement unit sensors, on the other hand, have been used for navigation, guidance, and localization but especially for full body motion tracking due to their low cost and miniaturization, which have allowed the estimation of kinematic parameters and biomechanical analysis for different field of applications. The aim of this work was to present a comprehensive approach of assistive technologies for VIP that include inertial sensors as input, producing results on the comprehension of technical characteristics of the inertial sensors, the methodologies applied, and their specific role in each developed system. The results show that there are just a few inertial sensor-based systems. However, these sensors provide essential information when combined with optical sensors and radio signals for navigation and special application fields. The discussion includes new avenues of research, missing elements, and usability analysis, since a limitation evidenced in the selected articles is the lack of user-centered designs. Finally, regarding application fields, it has been highlighted that a gap exists in the literature regarding aids for rehabilitation and biomechanical analysis of VIP. Most of the findings are focused on navigation and obstacle detection, and this should be considered for future applications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document