scholarly journals A Laboratory Approach on the Hybrid-Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques with Different Saline Brines in Sandstone Reservoirs

Processes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 1051 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yisheng Hu ◽  
Qiurong Cheng ◽  
Jinping Yang ◽  
Lifeng Zhang ◽  
Afshin Davarpanah
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Foam Stability ◽  
Oil Production ◽  
Mobility Control ◽  
Recovery Factor ◽  
Wettability Alteration ◽  
Bulk Solution ◽  
Formation Water ◽  
Sandstone Reservoirs ◽  
Brine Injection

As foams are not thermodynamically stable and might be collapsed, foam stability is defined by interfacial properties and bulk solution. In this paper, we investigated foam injection and different salinity brines such as NaCl, CaCl2, KCl, and MgCl2 to measure cumulative oil production. According to the results of this experiment, it is concluded that sequential low-salinity water injections with KCl and foam flooding have provided the highest cumulative oil production in sandstone reservoirs. This issue is related to high wettability changes that had been caused by the KCl. As K+ is a monovalent cation, KCl has the highest wettability changes compared to other saline brines and formation water at 1000 ppm, which is due to the higher wettability changes of potassium (K+) over other saline ions. The interfacial tension for KCl at the lowest value is 1000 ppm and, for MgCl2, has the highest value in this concentration. Moreover, the formation brine, regarding its high value of salty components, had provided lower cumulative oil production before and after foam injection as it had mobilized more in the high permeable zones and, therefore, large volumes of oil would be trapped in the small permeable zones. This was caused by the low wettability alteration of the formation brine. Thereby, formation water flowed in large pores and the oil phase remained in small pores and channels. On the other hand, as foams played a significant role in the mobility control and sweep efficiency, at 2 pore volume, foam increased the pressure drop dramatically after brine injection. Consequently, foam injection after KCl brine injection had the maximum oil recovery factor of 63.14%. MgCl2 and formation brine had 41.21% and 36.51% oil recovery factor.

scholarly journals Investigating the Effect of Wettability on Sand Production in the Presence of Smart Water and Smart Nanofluid: an Experimental Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 13432-13452
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Oil Production ◽  
Wettability Alteration ◽  
Rock Surface ◽  
Sand Production ◽  
Research Activity ◽  
Smart Water ◽  
Sandstone Reservoirs

In recent years, research activity to increase oil recovery from hydrocarbon reservoirs by smart water (SW) injection has risen sharply. Smart water injection is one of the most efficient and low-cost methods in the improved and enhanced oil recovery (IOR/EOR) process. One of the active mechanisms of smart water to increase the oil production is wettability alteration of the rock surface from oil-wet to water-wet conditions. Recently smart water injection into unconsolidated sandstone reservoirs due to disturbance of the rock surface equilibrium causes instability of formation particles and sand production. One of the main factors disturbing the equilibrium and sand production is the sandstone surface's wettability alteration mechanism caused by disjoining pressure and stresses on the rock surface. Reduction of the reservoir permeability and closure of fluid flow paths and consequent reduction of oil production are among the main damages of sand production. In this study, a complete study on optimum smart water design based on the least sedimentation due to mixing has been done by formation water compatibility tests and analysis on divalent ions through the Taguchi design. Then the water wet sandstones were converted to oil-wet condition by model oil (stearic acid + normal heptane) in different concentrations. The wettability effect of water wet, neutral wet oil-wet on the amount of sand production in the presence of smart water in the reservoir conditions was fully investigated. To prevent sand production, a very effective chemical method of nanoparticles was used. By stabilizing silica nanoparticles (SiO2) with an optimum concentration of 2000 ppm in smart water (pH = 8), according to the results of the zeta potential and Dynamic light scattering (DLS) test, the effect of wettability on sand production in the presence of smart nanofluid was fully investigated. The test results show a significant reduction in sand production and a rapid wettability alteration towards smart nanofluids' water-wet conditions. This indicates the improvement of fluid for enhanced oil recovery processes in unconsolidated sandstone reservoirs.

Pilot Project Evaluating WAG Efficiency for Carbonate Reservoir in Eastern Siberia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentina Zharko ◽  
Dmitriy Burdakov
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Gas Injection ◽  
Oil Production ◽  
Pilot Project ◽  
Carbonate Reservoir ◽  
Recovery Factor ◽  
Eastern Siberia ◽  
Water Cut ◽  
Wag Injection ◽  
Injection Rates

Abstract The paper presents the results of a pilot project implementing WAG injection at the oilfield with carbonate reservoir, characterized by low efficiency of traditional waterflooding. The objective of the pilot project was to evaluate the efficiency of this enhanced oil recovery method for conditions of the specific oil field. For the initial introduction of WAG, an area of the reservoir with minimal potential risks has been identified. During the test injections of water and gas, production parameters were monitored, including the oil production rates of the reacting wells and the water and gas injection rates of injection wells, the change in the density and composition of the produced fluids. With first positive results, the pilot area of the reservoir was expanded. In accordance with the responses of the producing wells to the injection of displacing agents, the injection rates were adjusted, and the production intensified, with the aim of maximizing the effect of WAG. The results obtained in practice were reproduced in the simulation model sector in order to obtain a project curve characterizing an increase in oil recovery due to water-alternating gas injection. Practical results obtained during pilot testing of the technology show that the injection of gas and water alternately can reduce the water cut of the reacting wells and increase overall oil production, providing more efficient displacement compared to traditional waterflooding. The use of WAG after the waterflooding provides an increase in oil recovery and a decrease in residual oil saturation. The water cut of the produced liquid decreased from 98% to 80%, an increase in oil production rate of 100 tons/day was obtained. The increase in the oil recovery factor is estimated at approximately 7.5% at gas injection of 1.5 hydrocarbon pore volumes. Based on the received results, the displacement characteristic was constructed. Methods for monitoring the effectiveness of WAG have been determined, and studies are planned to be carried out when designing a full-scale WAG project at the field. This project is the first pilot project in Russia implementing WAG injection in a field with a carbonate reservoir. During the pilot project, the technical feasibility of implementing this EOR method was confirmed, as well as its efficiency in terms of increasing the oil recovery factor for the conditions of the carbonate reservoir of Eastern Siberia, characterized by high water cut and low values of oil displacement coefficients during waterflooding.

Improvement of oil recovery factor from geological perspectives

2021 ◽  
pp. 17-25
Author(s):  
D.Yu. Chudinova ◽  
◽  
D.S. Urakov ◽  
Sh.Kh. Sultanov ◽  
Yu.A. Kotenev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Late Stage ◽  
Field Data ◽  
Recovery Factor ◽  
Wettability Alteration ◽  
Stage Of Development ◽  
Number Of Factors ◽  
Enhance Oil Recovery ◽  
The Given ◽  
Selection Of

At a late stage of development of any oilfield, there are big number of factors that affect recovery factor. One of them is related to presence of isolated zones, that were caused by combination of poor reservoir and oil properties of a rock. To solve the given problem variety of workover operations and enhance oil recovery (EOR) methods can be appled for the complex reservoirs such as Tevlinsko-Russinskoe oilfield. The number of particular studies were presented by reviewing of field data, construction of heterogeneity zones, revision of workover operations and selection of EOR methods. It has obtained that the reservoir has the lenticular structure, consists from 9 different facies and presented by 4 classes of heterogeneity. The immiscible gas injections of Nitrogen were selected as the most suitable EOR method for the given oilfield. Application of different composition of brine water was reccomended for wettability alteration.

Transport Modelling of Multi-Phase Fluid Flow in Porous Media for Enhanced Oil Recovery

2020 ◽  
Vol 400 ◽  
pp. 38-44
Author(s):  
Hassan Soleimani ◽  
Hassan Ali ◽  
Noorhana Yahya ◽  
Beh Hoe Guan ◽  
Maziyar Sabet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Porous Media ◽  
Fluid Flow ◽  
Capillary Pressure ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Constitutive Relations ◽  
Mobility Control ◽  
Flow In Porous Media ◽  
Wettability Alteration ◽  
Adsorption Effect ◽  
Phase Fluid

This article studies the combined effect of spatial heterogeneity and capillary pressure on the saturation of two fluids during the injection of immiscible nanoparticles. Various literature review exhibited that the nanoparticles are helpful in enhancing the oil recovery by varying several mechanisms, like wettability alteration, interfacial tension, disjoining pressure and mobility control. Multiphase modelling of fluids in porous media comprise balance equation formulation, and constitutive relations for both interphase mass transfer and pressure saturation curves. A classical equation of advection-dispersion is normally used to simulate the fluid flow in porous media, but this equation is unable to simulate nanoparticles flow due to the adsorption effect which happens. Several modifications on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) have been made to increase the number of unknown variables. The simulation results indicated the successful transportation of nanoparticles in two phase fluid flow in porous medium which helps in decreasing the wettability of rocks and hence increasing the oil recovery. The saturation, permeability and capillary pressure curves show that the wettability of the rocks increases with the increasing saturation of wetting phase (brine).

scholarly journals Synthesis and Characterization of Polymeric Surfactant from Palm Oil Methyl Ester and Vinyl Acetate for Chemical Flooding

REAKTOR ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 65-73
Author(s):  
Agam Duma Kalista Wibowo ◽  
Pina Tiani ◽  
Lisa Aditya ◽  
Aniek Sri Handayani ◽  
Marcelinus Christwardana
Keyword(s):  
Methyl Ester ◽  
Interfacial Tension ◽  
Vinyl Acetate ◽  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Mobility Control ◽  
Wettability Alteration ◽  
Polymeric Surfactant ◽  
Chemical Flooding

Surfactants for enhanced oil recovery are generally made from non-renewable petroleum sulfonates and their prices are relatively expensive, so it is necessary to synthesis the bio-based surfactants that are renewable and ecofriendly. The surfactant solution can reduce the interfacial tension (IFT) between oil and water while vinyl acetate monomer has an ability to increase the viscosity as a mobility control. Therefore, polymeric surfactant has both combination properties in reducing the oil/water IFT and increasing the viscosity of the aqueous solution simultaneously. Based on the study, the Critical Micelle Concentration (CMC) of Polymeric Surfactant was at 0.5% concentration with an IFT of 7.72x10-2 mN/m. The best mole ratio of methyl ester sulfonate to vinyl acetate for polymeric surfactant synthesis was 1:0.5 with an IFT of 6.7x10-3 mN/m. Characterization of the product using FTIR and HNMR has proven the creation of polymeric surfactant. Based on the wettability alteration study, it confirmed that the product has an ability to alter from the initial oil-wet to water-wet quartz surface. In conclusion, the polymeric surfactant has ultralow IFT and could be an alternative surfactant for chemical flooding because the IFT value met with the required standard for chemical flooding ranges from 10-2 to 10-3 mN/m.Keywords: Enhanced Oil recovery, Interfacial Tension, Methyl Ester Sulfonate, Polymeric surfactant, vinyl acetate

scholarly journals The efficiency of gas injection into low-permeability multilayer hydrocarbon reservoirs

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (10) ◽  
pp. 100-108
Author(s):  
Sudad H AL-Obaidi ◽  
Miel Hofmann ◽  
Falah H. Khalaf ◽  
Hiba H. Alwan
Keyword(s):  
Hydraulic Fracturing ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Gas Injection ◽  
Oil Production ◽  
Recovery Factor ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Compositional Model ◽  
Multistage Hydraulic Fracturing ◽  
Low Permeability Reservoirs ◽  
Working Agent

The efficiency of gas injection for developing terrigenous deposits within a multilayer producing object is investigated in this article. According to the results of measurements of the 3D hydrodynamic compositional model, an assessment of the oil recovery factor was made. In the studied conditions, re-injection of the associated gas was found to be the most technologically efficient working agent. The factors contributing to the inefficacy of traditional methods of stimulating oil production such as multistage hydraulic fracturing when used to develop low-permeability reservoirs have been analyzed. The factors contributing to the inefficiency of traditional oil-production stimulation methods, such as multistage hydraulic fracturing, have been analysed when they are applied to low-permeability reservoirs. The use of a gas of various compositions is found to be more effective as a working agent for reservoirs with permeability less than 0.005 µm2. Ultimately, the selection of an agent for injection into the reservoir should be driven by the criteria that allow assessing the applicability of the method under specific geological and physical conditions. In multilayer production objects, gas injection efficiency is influenced by a number of factors, in addition to displacement, including the ratio of gas volumes, the degree to which pressure is maintained in each reservoir, as well as how the well is operated. With the increase in production rate from 60 to 90 m3 / day during the re-injection of produced hydrocarbon gas, this study found that the oil recovery factor increased from 0.190 to 0.229. The further increase in flow rate to 150 m3 / day, however, led to a faster gas breakthrough, a decrease in the amount of oil produced, and a decrease in the oil recovery factor to 0.19 Based on the results of the research, methods for stimulating the formation of low-permeability reservoirs were ranked based on their efficacy.

Enhanced Oil Recovery using Smart Water Injection

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 40
Author(s):  
Hussain Ali Baker ◽  
Kareem A. Alwan ◽  
Saher Faris Fadhil
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Deionized Water ◽  
Water Flooding ◽  
Wettability Alteration ◽  
Formation Water ◽  
Low Salinity ◽  
Smart Water ◽  
Low Salinity Water ◽  
Salinity Water

Smart water flooding (low salinity water flooding) was mainly invested in a sandstone reservoir. The main reasons for using low salinity water flooding are; to improve oil recovery and to give a support for the reservoir pressure. In this study, two core plugs of sandstone were used with different permeability from south of Iraq to explain the effect of water injection with different ions concentration on the oil recovery. Water types that have been used are formation water, seawater, modified low salinity water, and deionized water. The effects of water salinity, the flow rate of water injected, and the permeability of core plugs have been studied in order to summarize the best conditions of low salinity water flooding. The result of this experimental work shows that the water without any free ions (deionized water) and modified low salinity water have improved better oil recovery than the formation water and seawater as a secondary oil process. The increase in oil recovery factor related to the wettability alteration during low salinity water flooding which causes a decrease in the interfacial tension between the crude oil in porous media and the surface of reservoir rocks. As well as the dissolution of minerals such as calcite Ca+2 was observed in this work, which causes an increase in the pH value. All these factors led to change the wettability of rock to be more water-wet, so the oil recovery can be increased.  

Wettability Alteration and Foam Mobility Control in a Layered, 2D Heterogeneous Sandpack

SPE Journal ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (04) ◽  
pp. 1207-1220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert F. Li ◽  
George J. Hirasaki ◽  
Clarence A. Miller ◽  
Shehadeh K. Masalmeh
Keyword(s):  
Crude Oil ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Weight Ratio ◽  
Mobility Control ◽  
Wettability Alteration ◽  
Viscous Force ◽  
Layered System ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Foaming Agent ◽  
Original Oil In Place

Summary In a layered, 2D heterogeneous sandpack with a 19:1 permeability contrast that was preferentially oil-wet, the recovery by waterflood was only 49.1% of original oil in place (OOIP) because of injected water flowing through the high-permeability zone, leaving the low-permeability zone unswept. To enhance oil recovery, an anionic surfactant blend (NI) was injected that altered the wettability and lowered the interfacial tension (IFT). Once IFT was reduced to ultralow values, the adverse effect of capillarity retaining oil was eliminated. Gravity-driven vertical countercurrent flow then exchanged fluids between high- and low-permeability zones during a 42-day system shut-in. Cumulative recovery after a subsequent foam flood was 94.6% OOIP, even though foam strength was weak. Recovery with chemical flood (incremental recovered oil/waterflood remaining oil) was 89.4%. An alternative method is to apply foam mobility control as a robust viscous-force-dominant process with no initial surfactant injection and shut-in. The light crude oil studied in this paper was extremely detrimental to foam generation. However, the addition of lauryl betaine to NI (NIB) at a weight ratio of 1:2 (NI:lauryl betaine) made the new blend a good foaming agent with and without the presence of the crude oil. NIB by itself as an IFT-reducing and foaming agent is shown to be effective in various secondary and tertiary alkaline/surfactant/foam (ASF) processes in water-wet 1D homogeneous sandpacks and in an oil-wet heterogeneous layered system with a 34:1 permeability ratio.

scholarly journals Core-scale sensitivity study of CO2 foam injection strategies for mobility control, enhanced oil recovery, and CO2 storage

2020 ◽  
Vol 146 ◽  
pp. 02002
Author(s):  
Zachary Paul Alcorn ◽  
Sunniva B. Fredriksen ◽  
Mohan Sharma ◽  
Tore Føyen ◽  
Connie Wergeland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Co2 Storage ◽  
Sensitivity Study ◽  
Mobility Control ◽  
Wettability Alteration ◽  
Injection Strategy ◽  
Gravity Effects

This paper presents experimental and numerical sensitivity studies to assist injection strategy design for an ongoing CO2 foam field pilot. The aim is to increase the success of in-situ CO2 foam generation and propagation into the reservoir for CO2 mobility control, enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and CO2 storage. Un-steady state in-situ CO2 foam behavior, representative of the near wellbore region, and steady-state foam behavior was evaluated. Multi-cycle surfactant-alternating gas (SAG) provided the highest apparent viscosity foam of 120.2 cP, compared to co-injection (56.0 cP) and single-cycle SAG (18.2 cP) in 100% brine saturated porous media. CO2 foam EOR corefloods at first-contact miscible (FCM) conditions showed that multi-cycle SAG generated the highest apparent foam viscosity in the presence of refined oil (n-Decane). Multi-cycle SAG demonstrated high viscous displacement forces critical in field implementation where gravity effects and reservoir heterogeneities dominate. At multiple-contact miscible (MCM) conditions, no foam was generated with either injection strategy as a result of wettability alteration and foam destabilization in presence of crude oil. In both FCM and MCM corefloods, incremental oil recoveries were on average 30.6% OOIP regardless of injection strategy for CO2 foam and base cases (i.e. no surfactant). CO2 diffusion and miscibility dominated oil recovery at the core-scale resulting in high microscopic CO2 displacement. CO2 storage potential was 9.0% greater for multi-cycle SAGs compared to co-injections at MCM. A validated core-scale simulation model was used for a sensitivity analysis of grid resolution and foam quality. The model was robust in representing the observed foam behavior and will be extended to use in field scale simulations.

scholarly journals Simulation of two-phase flow by injecting water and surfactant into porous media containing oil and investigation of trapped oil areas

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 1353-1362
Author(s):  
Seyed Mousa Sajadi ◽  
Saeid Jamshidi ◽  
Meisam Kamalipoor
Keyword(s):  
Porous Media ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Sodium Dodecyl ◽  
Recovery Factor ◽  
Wettability Alteration ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Synthetic Process ◽  
Narrow Channels ◽  
Dynamics Method

AbstractNowadays, as the oil reservoirs reaching their half-life, using enhanced oil recovery methods is more necessary and more common. Simulations are the synthetic process of real systems. In this study, simulation of water and surfactant injection into a porous media containing oil (two-phase) was performed using the computational fluid dynamics method on the image of a real micro-model. Also, the selected anionic surfactant is sodium dodecyl sulfate, which is more effective in sand reservoirs. The effect of using surfactant depends on its concentration. This dependence on concentration in using injection compounds is referred to as critical micelle concentration (CMC). In this study, an injection concentration (inlet boundary) of 1000 ppm was considered as a concentration less than the CMC point (2365 ppm). This range of surfactant concentrations after 4.5 ms increased the porous media recovery factor by 2.21%. Surfactant injection results showed the wettability alteration and IFT finally increases the recovery factor in comparison with water injection. Also, in wide channels, saturation front, and narrow channels, the concentration front has a great effect on the main flowing.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document