scholarly journals Implementation of an Extended-Infusion Piperacillin-Tazobactam Dosing Protocol: Unexpected Findings when Monitoring Safety and Compliance with Smart Pump Technology

Pharmacy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 169
Author(s):  
Nathaniel J. Rhodes ◽  
Jenna Lopez ◽  
Cecilia K. Pham ◽  
Helga Brake ◽  
Michael Fotis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Center ◽  
Infusion Pump ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Potential Harm ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Protocol Compliance ◽  
Unexpected Findings ◽  
Smart Pump ◽  
Extended Infusion

Compliance with recommended infusion rates was evaluated before, during, and after the implementation of extended-infusion (EI) piperacillin-tazobactam at an academic medical center. Software-controlled infusion-pump alert data were studied for piperacillin-tazobactam administrations before and after implementation of a four-hour EI protocol. Compliance was analyzed 16 weeks before (pre-EI), two weeks after (peri-EI), and an additional 16 weeks after (post-EI) protocol implementation. We defined potential harm as a programmed infusion rate exceeding the recommended rate, possible harm as a programmed infusion aborted by the user, and compliance as reversion to recommended rates. Potential and possible harm were standardized to 1000 patient days. Overall, 3110 alerts were identified during the period. Potential harm per 1000 patient days for pre-, peri-, and post-EI were 0, 6.12, and 1.05 (p < 0.001). Possible harm per 1000 patient days for the pre-, peri-, and post-EI were 0.33, 21.9, and 5.02 (p < 0.001). Compliance after an initial potential harm alert occurred more often post-EI (0.4 per 1000 patient days vs. 0 per 1000 patient days for pre- and peri-EI; p < 0.001), while alerts remaining in non-compliance were more prevalent if they initially occurred during the peri- and post-EI vs. pre-EI (6.1 and 0.6 per 1000 patient days vs. 0 per 1000 patient days; p < 0.001) period. Piperacillin-tazobactam infusions were administered faster than recommended during implementation (i.e., peri-EI) despite standardized orders.

The Impact of Discontinuing Contact Precautions for VRE and MRSA on Device-Associated Infections

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (8) ◽  
pp. 978-980 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael B. Edmond ◽  
Nadia Masroor ◽  
Michael P. Stevens ◽  
Janis Ober ◽  
Gonzalo Bearman
Keyword(s):  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Hospital Acquired Infection ◽  
Contact Precautions ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Hospital Acquired ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Before And After Study

The impact of discontinuing contact precautions for patients with MRSA and VRE colonization/infection on device-associated hospital-acquired infection rates at an academic medical center was investigated in this before-and-after study. In the setting of a strong horizontal infection prevention platform, discontinuation of contact precautions had no impact on device-associated hospital-acquired infection rates.Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2015;36(8):978–980

scholarly journals Optimizing Inpatient Urine Culture Ordering Practices Using the Electronic Medical Record: A Pilot Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 486-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Shirley ◽  
Harry Scholtz ◽  
Kurt Osterby ◽  
Jackson Musuuza ◽  
Barry Fox ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Medical Record ◽  
Electronic Medical Record ◽  
Urine Culture ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Before And After Study

A prospective quasi-experimental before-and-after study of an electronic medical record–anchored intervention of embedded education on appropriate urine culture indications and indication selection reduced the number of urine cultures ordered for catheterized patients at an academic medical center. This intervention could be a component of CAUTI-reduction bundles.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:486–488

Implementation and Evaluation of a Smartphone Application for the Perioperative Care of Neurosurgery Patients at an Academic Medical Center: Implications for Patient Satisfaction, Surgery Cancelations, and Readmissions

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 303-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel R Felbaum ◽  
Jeffrey J Stewart ◽  
Amjad N Anaizi ◽  
Faheem A Sandhu ◽  
Mani N Nair ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Smartphone Application ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Phone Calls ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Before And After

Abstract BACKGROUND Smartphone applications (apps) in the health care arena are being increasingly developed with the aim of benefiting both patients and their physicians. The delivery of adequate instructions both before and after a procedure or surgery is of paramount importance in ensuring the best possible outcome for patients. OBJECTIVE To demonstrate that app-based instructions with built-in reminders may improve patient understanding and compliance and contribute to reducing the number of surgery cancellations and postoperative complications and readmissions. METHODS We prospectively accrued 56 patients undergoing routine neurosurgery procedures who subsequently downloaded the app. The median age was 54 (range 27-79). Patients were followed for successful registration and use of the app, compliance with reading instructions before and after surgery, and sending pain scores and/or wound images. The number of surgeries cancelled, postoperative complications, 30-d readmissions, and phone calls for surgery-related questions were examined. RESULTS Fifty-four of the 56 patients successfully registered, downloaded, and used the app and read and complied with instructions both before and after surgery. There were no cancelled surgeries. There was 1 postoperative complication. There were no readmissions. Eight of the 54 patients (14.8%) called the office on a single occasion for a surgery related question. CONCLUSION We demonstrate the utility of a smartphone application in the perioperative neurosurgical care setting with regard to patient compliance and satisfaction as well as surgery cancellations and readmissions. Further study of a larger number of patients with a control group is warranted.

Privileging pharmacists improves time to patient notification in the microbiological test review process for patients discharged from the emergency department

2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S19-S24
Author(s):  
Steven M Loborec ◽  
Jose A Bazan ◽  
Nicole V Brown ◽  
Mary Beth Shirk ◽  
Trisha A Jordan
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Infectious Disease Physician ◽  
Microbiological Test ◽  
Test Review ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Purpose Results of a study evaluating the impact of privileging pharmacists to manage microbiologic test results for patients discharged from the emergency department (ED) are reported. Methods This was a single-center, retrospective pre-post study that was conducted at an urban academic medical center. Patients discharged from the ED with a subsequent positive microbiologic test result before and after privileging of an ED specialty practice pharmacist (ED-SPP) to manage the results independently were screened for inclusion. Time to patient notification of a required change in antimicrobial therapy was compared between groups. Numbers of erroneous interventions before and after pharmacist privileging were compared to assess the safety of implementation. Results One hundred seventy-eight positive microbiologic test results (n = 92 pre- and n = 86 postimplementation) were included. The median time to patient notification in the pre-implementation group was 23.6 hours (range, 12.4-93 hours) and in the postimplementation group was 14.9 hours (range, 2.5-27.9 hours; P = 0.0023). As determined by the board-certified infectious disease physician, 1.1% of reviewed microbiologic test results (1 of 92) was erroneous prior to implementation of pharmacist privileging compared with 2.3% (2 of 86) after implementation (P = 0.6105). Conclusion Privileging ED-SPPs to assess microbiologic test results improved the time to patient notification with no statistical difference in the number of erroneous interventions between groups. These findings demonstrate the benefit of clinical privileging and provide support for expansion of this role to other ED-SPPs.

Leveraging Structural Changes in an Electronic Health Record Tool to Standardize Written Handoff

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 354-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jillian Zavodnick ◽  
Rebecca Jaffe ◽  
Marc Altshuler ◽  
Scott Cowan ◽  
Alexis Wickersham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Structural Changes ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Patient Handoff ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Effective Training ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Electronic Health

Miscommunications during patient handoff can lead to harm. The I-PASS bundle has been shown to improve safety outcomes. Although effective training reliably improves verbal handoffs, research has demonstrated a lack of effect on written handoffs. The objective was to compare written handoff before and after integration of a standardized electronic health record (EHR) tool. Interns at a large urban academic medical center underwent I-PASS handoff training. The EHR handoff tool was then revised to prompt the I-PASS components. Handoff documents were obtained before and after the intervention. More handoffs included Illness Severity (33% to 59%, P < .001) and Action List (65% to 83%, P = .005) after the intervention. There was no change in handoffs with miscommunications (12.5% to 10%, P = .566) or omissions (8% to 11%, P = .447). Handoffs including tangential or unrelated information decreased (20% to 4%, P = .001). A written handoff tool can reinforce the effect of training and increase adherence to I-PASS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document