scholarly journals De Novo Design and In Vitro Testing of Antimicrobial Peptides against Gram-Negative Bacteria

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boris Vishnepolsky ◽  
George Zaalishvili ◽  
Margarita Karapetian ◽  
Tornike Nasrashvili ◽  
Nato Kuljanishvili ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Peptides ◽  
Bacterial Resistance ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Antimicrobial Properties ◽  
Cell Penetrating Peptides ◽  
Short Peptides ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Peptide Antibiotics ◽  
Gram Negative

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) have been identified as a potentially new class of antibiotics to combat bacterial resistance to conventional drugs. The design of de novo AMPs with high therapeutic indexes, low cost of synthesis, high resistance to proteases and high bioavailability remains a challenge. Such design requires computational modeling of antimicrobial properties. Currently, most computational methods cannot accurately calculate antimicrobial potency against particular strains of bacterial pathogens. We developed a tool for AMP prediction (Special Prediction (SP) tool) and made it available on our Web site (https://dbaasp.org/prediction). Based on this tool, a simple algorithm for the design of de novo AMPs (DSP) was created. We used DSP to design short peptides with high therapeutic indexes against gram-negative bacteria. The predicted peptides have been synthesized and tested in vitro against a panel of gram-negative bacteria, including drug resistant ones. Predicted activity against Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was experimentally confirmed for 14 out of 15 peptides. Further improvements for designed peptides included the synthesis of D-enantiomers, which are traditionally used to increase resistance against proteases. One synthetic D-peptide (SP15D) possesses one of the lowest values of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) among all DBAASP database short peptides at the time of the submission of this article, while being highly stable against proteases and having a high therapeutic index. The mode of anti-bacterial action, assessed by fluorescence microscopy, shows that SP15D acts similarly to cell penetrating peptides. SP15D can be considered a promising candidate for the development of peptide antibiotics. We plan further exploratory studies with the SP tool, aiming at finding peptides which are active against other pathogenic organisms.

scholarly journals Deciphering Novel Antimicrobial Peptides from the Transcriptome of Papilio xuthus

Insects ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 776
Author(s):  
Joon Ha Lee ◽  
Hoyong Chung ◽  
Yong Pyo Shin ◽  
Mi-Ae Kim ◽  
Sathishkumar Natarajan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Peptides ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Transcriptome Assembly ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Swallowtail Butterfly ◽  
Papilio Xuthus ◽  
Antimicrobial Studies

An insect’s innate immune system is the front line of defense against many invading microorganisms. One of the important components of this defense system is antimicrobial peptides (AMPs). Papiliocin is a well-studied antimicrobial peptide (AMP) isolated from the swallowtail butterfly, Papilio xuthus, and it was previously reported to be effective against Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, and fungi, particularly in drug resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Hence, we aimed to identify novel AMPs from Papilio xuthus using its transcriptome. We immunized the swallowtail butterfly with Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Candida albicans, and the total RNA was isolated. De novo transcriptome assembly and functional annotations were conducted, and AMPs were predicted using an in-silico pipeline. The obtained 344,804,442 raw reads were then pre-processed to retrieve 312,509,806 (90.6%) total clean reads. A total of 38,272 unigenes were assembled with the average length of 1010 bp. Differential gene expression analysis identified 584 and 1409 upregulated and downregulated genes, respectively. The physicochemical, aggregation, and allergen propensity were used as filtration criteria. A total of 248 peptides were predicted using our in-house pipeline and the known AMPs were removed, resulting in 193 novel peptides. Finally, seven peptides were tested in vitro and three peptides (Px 5, 6, and 7) showed stronger antimicrobial activity against Gram-negative bacteria and yeast. All the tested peptides were non-allergens. The identified novel AMPs may serve as potential candidates for future antimicrobial studies.

scholarly journals De Novo Design of Potent Antimicrobial Peptides

2004 ◽  
Vol 48 (9) ◽  
pp. 3349-3357 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Frecer ◽  
B. Ho ◽  
J. L. Ding
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Peptides ◽  
Rational Design ◽  
Lipid A ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Endotoxic Shock ◽  
Antimicrobial Properties ◽  
Antimicrobial Effect ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Qsar Analysis

ABSTRACT Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), shed by gram-negative bacteria during infection and antimicrobial therapy, may lead to lethal endotoxic shock syndrome. A rational design strategy based on the presumed mechanism of antibacterial effect was adopted to design cationic antimicrobial peptides capable of binding to LPS through tandemly repeated sequences of alternating cationic and nonpolar residues. The peptides were designed to achieve enhanced antimicrobial potency due to initial bacterial membrane binding with a reduced risk of endotoxic shock. The peptides designed displayed binding affinities to LPS and lipid A (LA) in the low micromolar range and by molecular modeling were predicted to form amphipathic β-hairpin-like structures when they bind to LPS or LA. They also exhibited strong effects against gram-negative bacteria, with MICs in the nanomolar range, and low cytotoxic and hemolytic activities at concentrations significantly exceeding their MICs. Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) analysis of peptide sequences and their antimicrobial, cytotoxic, and hemolytic activities revealed that site-directed substitutions of residues in the hydrophobic face of the amphipathic peptides with less lipophilic residues selectively decrease the hemolytic effect without significantly affecting the antimicrobial or cytotoxic activity. On the other hand, the antimicrobial effect can be enhanced by substitutions in the polar face with more polar residues, which increase the amphipathicity of the peptide. On the basis of the QSARs, new analogs that have strong antimicrobial effects but that lack hemolytic activity can be proposed. The findings highlight the importance of peptide amphipathicity and allow a rational method that can be used to dissociate the antimicrobial and hemolytic effects of cationic peptides, which have potent antimicrobial properties, to be proposed.

scholarly journals Synergy and remarkable specificity of antimicrobial peptides in vivo using a systematic knockout approach

eLife ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Austin Hanson ◽  
Anna Dostálová ◽  
Camilla Ceroni ◽  
Mickael Poidevin ◽  
Shu Kondo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Peptides ◽  
Fungal Pathogens ◽  
Gene Editing ◽  
Cationic Peptides ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Biological Processes ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Bacteria And Fungi

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are host-encoded antibiotics that combat invading microorganisms. These short, cationic peptides have been implicated in many biological processes, primarily involving innate immunity. In vitro studies have shown AMPs kill bacteria and fungi at physiological concentrations, but little validation has been done in vivo. We utilized CRISPR gene editing to delete most known immune-inducible AMPs of Drosophila, namely: 4 Attacins, 2 Diptericins, Drosocin, Drosomycin, Metchnikowin and Defensin. Using individual and multiple knockouts, including flies lacking these ten AMP genes, we characterize the in vivo function of individual and groups of AMPs against diverse bacterial and fungal pathogens. We found that Drosophila AMPs act primarily against Gram-negative bacteria and fungi, contributing either additively or synergistically. We also describe remarkable specificity wherein certain AMPs contribute the bulk of microbicidal activity against specific pathogens, providing functional demonstrations of highly specific AMP-pathogen interactions in an in vivo setting.

scholarly journals SPS-neutralization in tissue samples for efficacy testing of antimicrobial peptides

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabrielle Sherella Dijksteel ◽  
Peter H. Nibbering ◽  
Magda M. W. Ulrich ◽  
Esther Middelkoop ◽  
Bouke K. H. L. Boekema
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Activity ◽  
Antimicrobial Peptides ◽  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Residual Activity ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Tissue Samples ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Viable Bacteria

Abstract Background Accurate determination of the efficacy of antimicrobial agents requires neutralization of residual antimicrobial activity in the samples before microbiological assessment of the number of surviving bacteria. Sodium polyanethol sulfonate (SPS) is a known neutralizer for the antimicrobial activity of aminoglycosides and polymyxins. In this study, we evaluated the ability of SPS to neutralize residual antimicrobial activity of antimicrobial peptides [SAAP-148 and pexiganan; 1% (wt/v) in PBS], antibiotics [mupirocin (Bactroban) and fusidic acid (Fucidin) in ointments; 2% (wt/wt))] and disinfectants [2% (wt/wt) silver sulfadiazine cream (SSD) and 0.5% (v/v) chlorhexidine in 70% alcohol]. Methods Homogenates of human skin models that had been exposed to various antimicrobial agents for 1 h were pipetted on top of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) on agar plates to determine whether the antimicrobial agents display residual activity. To determine the optimal concentration of SPS for neutralization, antimicrobial agents were mixed with PBS or increasing doses of SPS in PBS (0.05–1% wt/v) and then 105 colony forming units (CFU)/mL MRSA were added. After 30 min incubation, the number of viable bacteria was assessed. Next, the in vitro efficacy of SAAP-148 against various gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria was determined using PBS or 0.05% (wt/v) SPS immediately after 30 min incubation of the mixture. Additionally, ex vivo excision wound models were inoculated with 105 CFU MRSA for 1 h and exposed to SAAP-148, pexiganan, chlorhexidine or PBS for 1 h. Subsequently, samples were homogenized in PBS or 0.05% (wt/v) SPS and the number of viable bacteria was assessed. Results All tested antimicrobials displayed residual activity in tissue samples, resulting in a lower recovery of surviving bacteria on agar. SPS concentrations at ≥0.05% (wt/v) were able to neutralize the antimicrobial activity of SAAP-148, pexiganan and chlorhexidine, but not of SSD, Bactroban and Fucidin. Finally, SPS-neutralization in in vitro and ex vivo efficacy tests of SAAP-148, pexiganan and chlorhexidine against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria resulted in significantly higher numbers of CFU compared to control samples without SPS-neutralization. Conclusions SPS was successfully used to neutralize residual activity of SAAP-148, pexiganan and chlorhexidine and this prevented an overestimation of their efficacy.

scholarly journals Multiple Mechanisms of the Synthesized Antimicrobial Peptide TS against Gram-Negative Bacteria for High Efficacy Antibacterial Action In Vivo

Molecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 60
Author(s):  
Rui Zhang ◽  
Xiaobo Fan ◽  
Xinglu Jiang ◽  
Mingyuan Zou ◽  
Han Xiao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Peptide ◽  
Bacterial Infections ◽  
Bacterial Resistance ◽  
Divalent Cations ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Antibacterial Drug ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative

The emergence of drug-resistant bacteria emphasizes the urgent need for novel antibiotics. The antimicrobial peptide TS shows extensive antibacterial activity in vitro and in vivo, especially in gram-negative bacteria; however, its antibacterial mechanism is unclear. Here, we find that TS without hemolytic activity disrupts the integrity of the outer bacterial cell membrane by displacing divalent cations and competitively binding lipopolysaccharides. In addition, the antimicrobial peptide TS can inhibit and kill E. coli by disintegrating the bacteria from within by interacting with bacterial DNA. Thus, antimicrobial peptide TS’s multiple antibacterial mechanisms may not easily induce bacterial resistance, suggesting use as an antibacterial drug to be for combating bacterial infections in the future.

scholarly journals Synergy and remarkable specificity of antimicrobial peptides in vivo using a systematic knockout approach

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Austin Hanson ◽  
Anna Dostalova ◽  
Camilla Ceroni ◽  
Mickael Poidevin ◽  
Shu Kondo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Peptides ◽  
Fungal Pathogens ◽  
Gene Editing ◽  
Cationic Peptides ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Biological Processes ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Bacteria And Fungi

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are host-encoded antibiotics that combat invading microorganisms. These short, cationic peptides have been implicated in many biological processes, primarily involving innate immunity. In vitro studies have shown AMPs kill bacteria and fungi at physiological concentrations, but little validation has been done in vivo. We utilised CRISPR gene editing to delete all known immune inducible AMPs of Drosophila, namely: 4 Attacins, 4 Cecropins, 2 Diptericins, Drosocin, Drosomycin, Metchnikowin and Defensin. Using individual and multiple knockouts, including flies lacking all 14 AMP genes, we characterize the in vivo function of individual and groups of AMPs against diverse bacterial and fungal pathogens. We found that Drosophila AMPs act primarily against Gram-negative bacteria and fungi, acting either additively or synergistically. We also describe remarkable specificity wherein certain AMPs contribute the bulk of microbicidal activity against specific pathogens, providing functional demonstrations of highly specific AMP-pathogen interactions in an in vivo setting.

scholarly journals Antimicrobial Peptides: Virulence and Resistance Modulation in Gram-Negative Bacteria

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marylise Duperthuy
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Peptides ◽  
Bacterial Resistance ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Low Concentrations ◽  
Resistance Modulation ◽  
Subinhibitory Concentrations ◽  
The Impact

Growing resistance to antibiotics is one of the biggest threats to human health. One of the possibilities to overcome this resistance is to use and develop alternative molecules such as antimicrobial peptides (AMPs). However, an increasing number of studies have shown that bacterial resistance to AMPs does exist. Since AMPs are immunity molecules, it is important to ensure that their potential therapeutic use is not harmful in the long term. Recently, several studies have focused on the adaptation of Gram-negative bacteria to subinhibitory concentrations of AMPs. Such concentrations are commonly found in vivo and in the environment. It is therefore necessary to understand how bacteria detect and respond to low concentrations of AMPs. This review focuses on recent findings regarding the impact of subinhibitory concentrations of AMPs on the modulation of virulence and resistance in Gram-negative bacteria.

scholarly journals A-Ring-Modified Triterpenoids and Their Spermidine–Aldimines with Strong Antibacterial Activity

Molbank ◽  
10.3390/m1078 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (3) ◽  
pp. M1078 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazakova ◽  
Brunel ◽  
Khusnutdinova ◽  
Negrel ◽  
Giniyatullina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Antimicrobial Properties ◽  
Antimicrobial Activities ◽  
Amide Bond ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Human Pathogens ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Weak Minimum

Synthesis of A-ring-modified lupane, oleanane and ursane type triterpenoid conjugates with spermidine through an aldimine linkage or diethylentriamine via an amide bond is described. These derivatives were evaluated for their in vitro antimicrobial properties against human pathogens. Except for derivatives 1 and 7, all compounds have moderate to weak minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) against Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus bacteria, with MICs varying from 3.125 to 200 µM. Compound 11 is efficient against Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, with MICs of 25 and 50 µM, respectively, while all other derivatives do not possess important antimicrobial activities against these Gram-negative bacteria.

scholarly journals Antimicrobial Peptide Resistance Genes in the Plant Pathogen Dickeya dadantii

2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (21) ◽  
pp. 6423-6430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Pandin ◽  
Martine Caroff ◽  
Guy Condemine
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Peptides ◽  
Bacterial Resistance ◽  
Soft Rot ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Dickeya Dadantii ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Gram Positive Bacteria ◽  
New Genes

ABSTRACTModification of teichoic acid through the incorporation ofd-alanine confers resistance in Gram-positive bacteria to antimicrobial peptides (AMPs). This process involves the products of thedltXABCDgenes. These genes are widespread in Gram-positive bacteria, and they are also found in a few Gram-negative bacteria. Notably, these genes are present in all soft-rot enterobacteria (PectobacteriumandDickeya) whosedltDXBACoperons have been sequenced. We studied the function and regulation of these genes inDickeya dadantii.dltBexpression was induced in the presence of the AMP polymyxin. It was not regulated by PhoP, which controls the expression of some genes involved in AMP resistance, but was regulated by ArcA, which has been identified as an activator of genes involved in AMP resistance. However,arcAwas not the regulator responsible for polymyxin induction of these genes in this bacterium, which underlines the complexity of the mechanisms controlling AMP resistance inD. dadantii. Two other genes involved in resistance to AMPs have also been characterized,phoSandphoH.dltB,phoS,phoH, andarcAbut notdltDmutants were more sensitive to polymyxin than the wild-type strain. Decreased fitness of thedltB,phoS, andphoHmutants in chicory leaves indicates that their products are important for resistance to plant AMPs.IMPORTANCEGram-negative bacteria can modify their lipopolysaccharides (LPSs) to resist antimicrobial peptides (AMPs). Soft-rot enterobacteria (DickeyaandPectobacteriumspp.) possess homologues of thedltgenes in their genomes which, in Gram-positive bacteria, are involved in resistance to AMPs. In this study, we show that these genes confer resistance to AMPs, probably by modifying LPSs, and that they are required for the fitness of the bacteria during plant infection. Two other new genes involved in resistance were also analyzed. These results show that bacterial resistance to AMPs can occur in bacteria through many different mechanisms that need to be characterized.

scholarly journals SPS-neutralization in tissue samples for efficacy testing of antimicrobial peptides

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabrielle Dijksteel ◽  
Peter Nibbering ◽  
Magda Ulrich ◽  
Esther Middelkoop ◽  
Bouke Boekema
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Activity ◽  
Antimicrobial Peptides ◽  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Residual Activity ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Tissue Samples ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Viable Bacteria

Abstract Background Accurate determination of the efficacy of antimicrobial agents requires neutralization of residual antimicrobial activity in the samples before microbiological assessment of the number of surviving bacteria. Sodium polyanethol sulfonate (SPS) is a known neutralizer for the antimicrobial activity of aminoglycosides and polymyxins. In this study, we evaluated the ability of SPS to neutralize residual antimicrobial activity of antimicrobial peptides [SAAP-148 and pexiganan; 1% (wt/v) in PBS], antibiotics [mupirocin (Bactroban) and fusidic acid (Fucidin) in ointments; 2% (wt/wt))] and disinfectants [2% (wt/wt) silver sulfadiazine cream (SSD) and 0.5% (v/v) chlorhexidine in 70% alcohol]. Methods Homogenates of human skin models that had been exposed to various antimicrobial agents for 1 h were pipetted on top of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) on agar plates to determine whether the antimicrobial agents display residual activity. To determine the optimal concentration of SPS for neutralization, antimicrobial agents were mixed with PBS or increasing doses of SPS in PBS (0.05-1% wt/v) and then 10^5 colony forming units (CFU)/mL MRSA were added. After 30 min incubation, the number of viable bacteria was assessed. Next, the in vitro efficacy of SAAP-148 against various gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria was determined using PBS or 0.05% (wt/v) SPS immediately after 30 min incubation of the mixture. Additionally, ex vivo excision wound models were inoculated with 10^5 CFU MRSA for 1 h and exposed to SAAP-148, pexiganan, chlorhexidine or PBS for 1 h. Subsequently, samples were homogenized in PBS or 0.05% (wt/v) SPS and the number of viable bacteria was assessed. Results All tested antimicrobials displayed residual activity in tissue samples, resulting in a lower recovery of surviving bacteria on agar. SPS concentrations at ≥0.05% (wt/v) were able to neutralize the antimicrobial activity of SAAP-148, pexiganan and chlorhexidine, but not of SSD, Bactroban and Fucidin. Finally, SPS-neutralization in in vitro and ex vivo efficacy tests of SAAP-148, pexiganan and chlorhexidine against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria resulted in significantly higher numbers of CFU compared to control samples without SPS-neutralization. Conclusion SPS was successfully used to neutralize residual activity of SAAP-148, pexiganan and chlorhexidine and this prevented an overestimation of their efficacy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document