scholarly journals The Impact of Immune Checkpoint-Inhibitors Therapy in Urinary Bladder Cancer

Onco ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-22
Author(s):  
Ana Lúcia Silva ◽  
Pedro Abreu-Mendes ◽  
Diana Martins ◽  
Fernando Mendes
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Cell Death ◽  
Tumor Microenvironment ◽  
Programmed Cell Death ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Cytotoxic T Cells ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Cell Death Protein

Bladder cancer (BC) is one of the most common cancers in the world. From an early age, it was observed that chronic inflammation is associated with conditions favorable to the development of tumors, as well as the tumor microenvironment. Moreover, regulating tumor progression also interferes with the therapy’s response. The interaction between the tumor and the immune system led to the development of new immune therapies, the immune checkpoint inhibitors. Immunotherapy has shown a better safety profile, survival, and tolerance compared to standard chemotherapy. This therapy offers an effective alternative to patients who are ineligible for cisplatin and patients with advanced disease progression after platinum-based therapy. The first immunotherapy approved for BC was intravesical instillation with Bacillus Calmette–Guérin, for tumors at early stages. Later, immunotherapy focused on immune checkpoint inhibitors, namely, anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1), anti-programmed cell death protein ligand 1(PD-L1), and anti-antigen 4 associated with cytotoxic T cells (CTLA-4). Currently, five immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced BC are approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA): Atezolizumab, Durvalumab, Avelumab, Pembrolizumab, and Nivolumab. This review addresses the correlation between inflammation, tumor microenvironment, and cancer; various studies regarding immune checkpoint inhibitors, either in monotherapy or in combination therapy, are also addressed.

scholarly journals Anti–PD-L1 Treatment Induced Central Diabetes Insipidus

2017 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 365-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Zhao ◽  
Sri Harsha Tella ◽  
Jaydira Del Rivero ◽  
Anuhya Kommalapati ◽  
Ifechukwude Ebenuwa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
Programmed Cell Death ◽  
Diabetes Insipidus ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Central Diabetes Insipidus ◽  
Early Screening ◽  
Cell Death Protein

Abstract Context Immune checkpoint inhibitors, including anti–programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), anti–programmed cell death protein ligand 1 (PD-L1), and anti–cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (anti-CTLA4) monoclonal antibodies, have been widely used in cancer treatment. They are known to cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which resemble autoimmune diseases. Anterior pituitary hypophysitis with secondary hypopituitarism is a frequently reported irAE, especially in patients receiving anti–CTLA4 treatment. In contrast, posterior pituitary involvement, such as central diabetes insipidus (DI), is relatively rare and is unreported in patients undergoing PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. Case Description We describe a case of a 73-year-old man with Merkel cell carcinoma who received the anti–PD-L1 monoclonal antibody avelumab and achieved partial response. The patient developed nocturia, polydipsia, and polyuria 3 months after starting avelumab. Further laboratory testing revealed central DI. Avelumab was held and he received desmopressin for the management of central DI. Within 6 weeks after discontinuation of avelumab, the patient’s symptoms resolved and he was eventually taken off desmopressin. The patient remained off avelumab and there were no signs or symptoms of DI 2 months after the discontinuation of desmopressin. Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first report of central DI associated with anti–PD-L1 immunotherapy. The patient’s endocrinopathy was successfully managed by holding treatment with the immune checkpoint inhibitor. This case highlights the importance of early screening and appropriate management of hormonal irAEs in subjects undergoing treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors to minimize morbidity and mortality.

scholarly journals Toxicidade Cutânea dos Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico: Uma Revisão Narrativa

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 335
Author(s):  
Nuno Gomes ◽  
Vincent Sibaud ◽  
Filomena Azevedo ◽  
Sofia Magina
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
Programmed Cell Death ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
T Lymphocyte ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Cutaneous Toxicity ◽  
Cell Death Protein

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors revolutionized anti-neoplastic treatment. Recently, the European Medicines Agency and the United States Food and Drug Administration approved inhibitors of various immune checkpoints, namely the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4, programmed cell death protein 1 and its ligand. Despite the added benefits in the treatment of several neoplasms, immune checkpoint blockade may also be associated with multiple immune-related adverse events.Material and Methods: A literature review in PubMed database on the cutaneous toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors was performed until April 30, 2019.Results and Discussion: A total of 380 articles were initially screened, of which 75 are the basis of this bibliographic review. The immune checkpoint inhibitors monoclonal antibodies produce their beneficial effects by activating the patient’s immune system. This activation also results in adverse events that can affect any organ, whereas cutaneous toxicity is the most frequent and precocious. The adverse events of the programmed cell death protein 1 and its ligand and of the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 are similar (class effect), despite the apparent higher skin toxicity of inhibitors of the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (or its use in combination with inhibitors of programmed cell death protein 1 and its ligand). The most common cutaneous toxicities are maculopapular exanthema and pruritus, but other more specific adverse effects (e.g. lichenoid or psoriasiform reaction, vitiligo, sarcoidosis, among others) or located in the oral mucosa and/or adnexa are underreported.Conclusion: Given the high rate of cutaneous toxicity associated with new immune checkpoint inhibitors and their impact on quality of life, their early recognition and appropriate approach are crucial in the treatment of cancer patients. Observation by a dermatologist should be provided in patients with certain toxicities.

scholarly journals Current status of treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors for gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, and pancreatic cancers

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 175628482094877
Author(s):  
Yuji Eso ◽  
Hiroshi Seno
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Cell Death ◽  
Programmed Cell Death ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
The United States ◽  
Pancreatic Cancers ◽  
Cell Death Protein

The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), or programmed cell death protein ligand 1 (PD-L1) has revolutionized the treatment strategy in various types of cancers. In addition, recent studies have revealed that tumor microsatellite instability (MSI) status and tumor mutation burden (TMB) contribute significantly to the therapeutic response to anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody (mAb), which led to an accelerated approval to pembrolizumab for the treatment of MSI-high or mismatch-repair-deficient solid tumors after conventional chemotherapies in 2017 and for the treatment of TMB-high solid tumors in 2020 by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In the field of gastrointestinal cancers, many clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of various regimens such as ICI monotherapy, the combination of anti-CTLA-4 mAb and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 mAb, and combination of ICI and conventional chemotherapy or tyrosine kinase inhibitor have been reported or are in progress. This review summarizes MSI status and TMB in gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, and pancreatic cancers, and provides the results of most relevant clinical trials evaluating ICIs. We also discuss the development of biomarkers required for improving the selection of patients with a high probability of benefiting from treatment with ICIs, and potential therapeutic strategies that could help to enhance anticancer responses of ICIs.

scholarly journals Collagenous colitis and atezolizumab therapy: an atypical case

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonella Gallo ◽  
Rosa Talerico ◽  
Luca Novello ◽  
Maria Cristina Giustiniani ◽  
Ettore D’Argento ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
Programmed Cell Death ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Wide Spectrum ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Collagenous Colitis ◽  
Atypical Case ◽  
Cell Death Protein

Abstract Immune checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-CTLA-4 (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4), anti-PD-1 (programmed cell death protein 1), and PD-L1 (programmed cell death protein-ligand 1) are emerging drugs that have radically changed treatment and prognosis of different types of tumors. However, despite their considerable benefits, immune checkpoint inhibitors are associated with numerous side effects involving several organs. Gastrointestinal toxicities represent some of these most common adverse events. While clinical presentation usually ranges from mild diarrhea to life-threatening colitis, typical endoscopic and histologic findings of immune-mediated colitis often resemble those of inflammatory bowel diseases. However, less common patterns are lymphocytic colitis and, rarely, collagenous colitis. Physician and pathologists must be aware of the wide spectrum of clinical and histological findings that may be encountered in immune-related gastro-intestinal toxicities. We report a rare and atypical case of collagenous colitis occurred in a woman affected by stage IV lung adenocarcinoma, on atezolizumab therapy.

scholarly journals An Immunotherapy Strategy Targeting Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 and CD73 with Macrophage-Derived Mimetic Nanovesicles to Treat Bladder Cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qidong Zhou ◽  
Weihong Ding ◽  
Zhiyu Qian ◽  
Quangang Zhu ◽  
Chuanyu Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Cell Death ◽  
Programmed Cell Death ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Inhibitory Effect ◽  
Immunotherapy Strategy ◽  
Multiple Drugs

Abstract BackgroundThe tumor microenvironment in bladder cancer exerts an inhibitory effect on immune effector cells. Thus, removing this inhibitory effect could help improve the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors, and combination immunotherapy is a promising strategy for increasing the proportion of patients with bladder cancer who benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, it is difficult to effectively and simultaneously deliver multiple drugs to the tumor tissue. In this study, we describe the design and in vivo validation of macrophage-derived exosome-mimetic nanovesicles (EMVs) as a nanoplatform for coloading and targeted delivery of a CD73 inhibitor (AB680) and monoclonal antibodies targeting programmed cell death ligand 1 (aPDL1). ResultsOur results indicated that these nanocomplexes (AB680@EMVs-aPDL1) were highly stable, provided adequate biosafety in vivo, and exhibited enhanced targeting in a mouse model of bladder cancer. Moreover, the CD73 inhibitor reduced extracellular adenosine production, and the combination therapy significantly promoted activation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes, resulting in suppression of tumor growth in vivo. ConclusionsTherefore, using EMVs to deliver a combination of aPDL1 and a CD73 inhibitor may be an effective combined immunotherapy strategy for treating bladder cancer.

284 Real World Data of Sequencing Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) after Initial ICI

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A310-A310
Author(s):  
Krishna Gunturu ◽  
Muhammad Awidi ◽  
Rojer Ranjit ◽  
Brendan Connell ◽  
Rachel Carrasquillo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
Programmed Cell Death ◽  
Real World ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Clear Understanding ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
World Data

BackgroundICI revolutionized modern Oncology landscape and being utilized in metastatic to adjuvant and neo-adjuvant settings. As Oncologists, we are treating cancer patients with ICI every day, yet there is still a lot that is unknown about these drugs. We don’t have clear understanding of the efficacy and toxicity when sequencing one ICI for another. We conducted a retrospective review of real world data at Lahey Hospital and Medical Center to understand further and to pave path for prospective studies to understand this issue further to improve patient care.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed Oncology patient charts who received ICI between January1, 2014 to December 18, 2018. Total 483 patients received ICI during this time frame and 22 of these patients received a second ICI either as monotherapy or in combination with other ICI or chemotherapy.ResultsA total of 22 patients received subsequent ICI after the initial ICI as showed in table 1. 15 of the 22 (68%) patients were transitioned from one ICI to another monotherapy. 11 of these patients were transitioned secondary to disease progression (73%), three had immune related adverse events and one was switched per standard of care. One patient had ICI re-challenge. Three patients had a transition from ICI monotherapy to combination ICI therapy. One patient went onto chemo-immunotherapy and 2 patients transitioned from combination ICI to chemo-immunotherapy.Abstract 284 Table 1Real world data of sequencing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) after initial ICIConclusionsICI therapy is evolving and patients are being treated with multiple lines of ICI. In current practices, ICI is frequently being transitioned from cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) or its ligand, programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) classes or combined with chemotherapy or targeted therapy. It would be prudent to explore the effects of sequencing these medications either as a monotherapy or in combination with other therapies to better serve our patients and to prevent financial toxicity.

RNF43 mutations to predict survival from treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors and are associated with a high tumor mutation burden in bladder cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16528-e16528
Author(s):  
Liping Li ◽  
Mengmei Yang ◽  
Mengli Huang
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Negative Regulator ◽  
Wilcoxon Test ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Tumor Mutation Burden ◽  
Mutation Burden ◽  
The Impact

e16528 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting PD-1/L1 have been approved as first-line treatment for cisplatin-ineligible patients and as second-line therapy for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Biomarkers can help select patients who are more likely to response to ICIs. RNF43 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase that acts as a negative regulator of Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. In colorectal cancer (CRC) patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), RNF43 mutations predicted longer overall survival (OS). The impact of RNF43 mutations on the efficiency of ICIs in bladder cancer(BLC) remains to be explored. Methods: We downloaded the mutation and clinical data of 211 BLC patients treated with ICIs from the immunotherapeutic cohort published by Samstein et al. (2019). OS analyses were conducted using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. Wilcoxon test was used for the comparison of TMB. We also downloaded a TCGA cohort for prognostic analysis. The correlations between RNF43 and immune infiltrates were analyzed in the TIMER2.0 database. Statistical significance was set at p = 0.05. Results: RNF43 mutations were identified in 4.3%(9/211) and 3%(13/438) BLC patients in the immunotherapeutic and TCGA cohort, respectively. In the immunotherapeutic cohort, patients with RNF43 mutations had significantly longer OS (25 months vs 8 months; p = 0.015) and higher tumor mutation burden(TMB, 42.3 vs 7.9; p = 3.15E-06) than RNF43-wild-type patients. Different from this, no significant difference was found in OS between RNF43-mutant and RNF43-wild-type BLC patients with standard treatment in the TCGA cohort (p = 0.696). These results indicated that RNF43 was not a prognostic factor but a predictive biomarker of survival in BLC treated with ICIs. No difference was observed in subsets of immune cells between RNF43-mutant and the RNF43-wide-type BLC patients, including neutrophils, macrophages, CD8+ T cells, Tregs, B cells and NK cells. Conclusions: RNF43 mutations may be a predictor of survival benefit from ICIs in bladder cancer and correlated with higher TMB. Further studies in other ICI-treated cohorts are needed to confirm these results.

scholarly journals Management of Hematologic Adverse Events Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Barnes Rogers, CRNP, MN, AOCN, ANP-BC ◽  
Carolyn Zawislak, MPAS, PA-C ◽  
Victoria Wong, PA-C
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
Programmed Cell Death ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Blood Cells ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
White Blood Cells ◽  
Activated T Cells

Immune checkpoint inhibitors target suppressor receptors, including cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1). The activated T cells are not antigen specific; therefore, the blockade of the immune checkpoint may result in the development of autoimmune adverse events. The most common immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are rash, colitis, and endocrinopathies. However, irAEs that affect the hematologic system are rare and can affect red blood cells (e.g., autoimmune hemolytic anemia), white blood cells, and platelets (e.g., immune thrombocytopenia). Usually one cell line is affected; however, in some cases, multiple cell lines can be affected. Other changes in the hematologic system can also be affected (e.g., cryoglobulinemia, cytokine release syndrome). Due to the rarity and lack of recognition of these AEs, the timing, spectrum of events, and clinical presentation are poorly understood. Management of hematologic irAEs usually involves the use of steroids; however, other agents (e.g., IVIG, cyclosporine, rituximab) or procedures (e.g., plasma exchange, transfusions) can also be used.

Cancer Immunotherapy-Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Bai ◽  
Ping Liang ◽  
Qian Li ◽  
Rui Feng ◽  
Jiang Liu
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Death ◽  
Programmed Cell Death ◽  
Cancer Immunotherapy ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Locoregional Therapy ◽  
Incidence And Mortality

: Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignancies, the incidence and mortality of which are increasing worldwide. Cancer immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment in recent years. In particular, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) as new therapeutic tools have demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity and manageable tolerability in HCC. Immunologic checkpoint blockade with antibodies targeting Programmed cell Death-1 (PD-1), Programmed cell Death Ligand-1 (PD-L1), and Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte-Associated protein-4 (CTLA-4) strengthens tumor immunity by restoring exhausted T cells. Although the efficacy of combination treatment strategies using ICIs combined with other ICIs, molecular targeted agents, systemic therapy, or locoregional therapy has been well documented in numerous preclinical and clinical studies on several types of cancers, most HCC patients do not benefit from ICI treatment. This review highlights recent developments and potential opportunities related to ICIs and their combination in the management of HCC. The present article also includes recent patent review coverage on this topic.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document