scholarly journals A Healthy Dietary Pattern Reduces Lung Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Nutrients ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanlai Sun ◽  
Zhenxiang Li ◽  
Jianning Li ◽  
Zengjun Li ◽  
Jianjun Han
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Dietary Pattern ◽  
Lung Cancer Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Healthy Dietary Pattern

Fish Consumption and Lung Cancer Risk: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 539-549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Song ◽  
Hong Su ◽  
Bao-long Wang ◽  
Yang-yang Zhou ◽  
Liang-Liang Guo
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Fish Consumption ◽  
Lung Cancer Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis

Leisure-time physical activity and lung cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Lung Cancer ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 95 ◽  
pp. 17-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darren R. Brenner ◽  
Demetra H. Yannitsos ◽  
Megan S. Farris ◽  
Mattias Johansson ◽  
Christine M. Friedenreich
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Leisure Time ◽  
Lung Cancer Risk ◽  
Leisure Time Physical Activity ◽  
Meta Analysis

scholarly journals Previous Lung Diseases and Lung Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. e17479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darren R. Brenner ◽  
John R. McLaughlin ◽  
Rayjean J. Hung
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Lung Diseases ◽  
Lung Cancer Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis

scholarly journals Abdominal Obesity and Lung Cancer Risk: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies

Nutrients ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khemayanto Hidayat ◽  
Xuan Du ◽  
Guochong Chen ◽  
Minhua Shi ◽  
Bimin Shi
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Abdominal Obesity ◽  
Prospective Studies ◽  
Lung Cancer Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis

scholarly journals Lung cancer risk and solid fuel smoke exposure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 1228-1237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Om Prakash Kurmi ◽  
Pallavi Huma Arya ◽  
Kin-Bong Hubert Lam ◽  
Tom Sorahan ◽  
Jon G. Ayres
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Solid Fuel ◽  
Lung Cancer Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Smoke Exposure ◽  
Solid Fuel Smoke

scholarly journals Incidence of lung cancer and mortality among civil construction industry workers: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. e0250377
Author(s):  
Rita Stella Maria Cahuana Pinto ◽  
Alana Castro Panzenhagen ◽  
Luis Felipe Silva Oliveira ◽  
José Claudio Fonseca Moreira ◽  
Carlos Eduardo Schnorr
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Occupational Exposure ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Construction Industry ◽  
Lung Cancer Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Construction Workers ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Chemical Agents

Background The construction sector is one of the most stable growth industries in the world. However, many studies have suggested an association between occupational exposure in civil construction and lung cancer risk. Thus, this study aims to assess lung cancer risk in civil construction workers occupationally exposed to physical and chemical agents through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods/design Studies will be identified by searching PUBMED, Embase, SCOPUS, WEB OF SCIENCE and the reference list of included articles. Eligible study designs will be cohort, cross-sectional, and case-control studies that report occupational exposure to physical or chemical agents and lung cancer risk through mortality or incidence outcomes. A meta-analysis will be used to combine odds ratios (ORs) from case-control studies and relative risks (RR) from cohort studies. Two reviewers will independently screen articles, extract data, and assess scientific quality using standardized forms and ROBINS-E tool if available. Otherwise, the New-Castle Ottawa rating scale will be used. Any of those will also be used in combination with the GRADE approach for quality of evidence. Overall risk estimates and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) will be obtained using the random-effects model meta-analysis. This systematic review and meta-analysis will be conducted following the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. Results will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Discussion This review will identify and synthesize studies investigating the association between occupational exposure in the construction industry and lung cancer. The findings will help governmental entities and researchers with evidence-based decision-making because they will integrate and validate the evidence on construction workers’ health effects due to occupational exposure. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42020164209

scholarly journals Fruits, vegetables and lung cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.R. Vieira ◽  
L. Abar ◽  
S. Vingeliene ◽  
D.S.M. Chan ◽  
D. Aune ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Lung Cancer Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis

Cigarette Smoking Reduction and Health Risks: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanne T Chang ◽  
Gabriella M Anic ◽  
Brian L Rostron ◽  
Manju Tanwar ◽  
Cindy M Chang
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Health Risks ◽  
Lung Cancer Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Smoking Reduction ◽  
Cancer Risks ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Heavy Smokers

Abstract Introduction Studies have shown the health benefits of cigarette smoking cessation. However, the literature remains unclear about the relationship between smoking reduction and health risks. This comprehensive review and meta-analysis updates previous reviews with the newest estimates. Aims and Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the association between smoking reduction and some health risks in observational studies. We defined the following smoking categories: heavy smokers smoked ≥15–20 cigarettes per day (CPD), moderate smokers smoked 10–19 CPD, and light smokers smoked <10 CPD. The relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using random-effect models. Results We identified 19 studies including four case–control and 15 cohort studies. Compared with continuing heavy smokers, we found decreased lung cancer risk for those who reduced CPD by more than 50% (RR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.52, 0.91), from heavy to moderate (RR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.46, 0.85), and from heavy to light (RR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.49, 0.72). We also found lower risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) for those who reduced from heavy to light smoking (RR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.67, 0.89) but not those who reduced by more than 50% and reduced smoking from heavy to moderate. We did not find any significant difference in all-cause mortality, all-cancer risks, and smoking-/tobacco-related cancer risk among those who reduced. Conclusions Substantial smoking reduction may decrease lung cancer risk but results on CVD (coronary heart disease and stroke combined) risk were mixed. The relationships between smoking reduction and other endpoints examined were not significant. Implications This meta-analysis helps clarify our understanding of various smoking reduction levels on some health risks. While smoking reduction may decrease risks of lung cancer, the relationships between smoking reduction and other endpoints, including all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease, remain unclear. Although smoking reduction may decrease lung cancer risks, the magnitude of lung cancer risk remain high. Among smokers, complete cessation remains the most effective approach for cancer and CVD prevention.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document