scholarly journals The Effectiveness of Nutrition Interventions Combined with Exercise in Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Systematic Review

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 2842
Author(s):  
Fatemeh Sadeghi ◽  
David Mockler ◽  
Emer M. Guinan ◽  
Juliette Hussey ◽  
Suzanne L. Doyle

Malnutrition and muscle wasting are associated with impaired physical functioning and quality of life in oncology patients. Patients diagnosed with upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are considered at high risk of malnutrition and impaired function. Due to continuous improvement in upper GI cancer survival rates, there has been an increased focus on multimodal interventions aimed at minimizing the adverse effects of cancer treatments and enhancing survivors’ quality of life. The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of combined nutritional and exercise interventions in improving muscle wasting, physical functioning, and quality of life in patients with upper GI cancer. A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and CINHAL. Of the 4780 identified articles, 148 were selected for full-text review, of which 5 studies met the inclusion criteria. Whilst reviewed studies showed promising effects of multimodal interventions on physical functioning, no significant differences in postoperative complications and hospital stay were observed. Limited available evidence showed conflicting results regarding the effectiveness of these interventions on preserving muscle mass and improving health-related quality of life. Further studies examining the impact of nutrition and exercise interventions on upper GI patient outcomes are required and would benefit from reporting a core outcome set.

Author(s):  
Edith A. Brutcher, RN, APRN-BC, AOCNP ◽  
Zhengjia Chen, PhD ◽  
Anqi Pan, MSPH Candidate ◽  
Tiffany Barrett, MS, RD, CSO, LD

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 180-180
Author(s):  
Atuhani S. Burnett ◽  
Jack Mouhanna ◽  
Jose Ramirez-Garcialuna ◽  
Emma Lee ◽  
Julie Breau ◽  
...  

180 Background: Esophago-gastric cancers are aggressive malignancies requiring numerous investigations to plan complex multi-modal therapy. The path from initial diagnosis to treatment can be associated with a long delay. This delay and complex patient trajectory may impact quality of life. Given the poor prognosis and highly symptomatic nature of upper GI cancer, a clear and timely access to treatment of crucial importance. We sought to determine the impact of a newly implemented streamlined and structure interdisciplinary pathway for newly diagnosed esophageal and gastric cancer on access times to treatment and quality of life (QoL). Methods: A streamlined pathway for patients referred to a high volume Upper GI Cancer clinic was generated with input from physicians, nutritionists, specialized nurses, and social workers. New diagnosis of esophageal or gastric cancer from 2014-16 were enrolled in this program and consenting patients completed serial QoL questionnaires (ESAS) at baseline, pre-treatment, 1 month post treatment. Dysphagia (DS) was quantified on a 5 point scale. Time intervals (days) were evaluated at various points between diagnosis and start of treatment (diagnosis, CT imaging, first visit with upper GI program, start of treatment). Data presented as median(IQR), * p < 0.05. Results: Of the 251 patients with Upper GI cancer, 153 (61%) consented to participate including 140 esophageal/EGJ and 13 gastric cancer patients. Clinical stage distribution was 17.9% I, 30.7% II, 42.6% III, 8.7% IV. Of the 82 Esoph/EGJ patients with completed QoL questionnaires, 15 (18.3%) patients had severe dysphagia (DS = 3-4) and were prioritized for treatment. Patients with severe dysphagia had reduced time from index endoscopy to treatment (29 (16.3-39.3) vs 43 (32.8-68.0)days)* and first Upper GI clinic to treatment (15 (8.0-23.0) vs 25 (21.0-36.0)*. ESAS surveys showed increased QoL for both patients with and without dysphagia from baseline to pre-treatment indicating that simply entry into the streamlined program improved QoL. Conclusions: Structured interdisciplinary investigative and treatment programs for upper GI cancers can expedite time to treatment and improve QoL.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong Liu ◽  
Yifeng Ren ◽  
Yuting Wang ◽  
Yu Yang ◽  
Chuan Zheng ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundUpper gastrointestinal syndrome including nausea, vomiting, and anorexia is a common side effect of chemotherapy, which are associated with treatment interruptions, reduced food intake, decreased functionality and a worse quality of life. Rikkunshito is a traditional herbal medicine that has gained increasing attention in recent years for its effect on relieving gastrointestinal disorders in various digestive diseases, while its efficacy for upper gastrointestinal syndrome induced by chemotherapy remains uncertain. MethodsDatabases including PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Chinese databases, and Japanese database will be systematically searched from their inception onwards. Randomized controlled trials will be assessed. The primary outcome parameters are the complete control (CC) rate, complete response (CR) rate, and complete protection (CP) rate in the overall phase (0–120 hours). The secondary outcomes include: (I) the CC rate, CR rate and CP rate during the acute phase (0–24 hours) and delayed phase (24–120 hours); (II) the score and frequency of vomiting, nausea, and anorexia occurring; (III) the daily dietary intake and body weight; (IV) plasma ghrelin level; (V) quality of life; (VI) incidence of adverse events. The overall quality of the data will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines. Risk of bias will be evaluated by the Cochrane tool. Reporting bias will be estimated using Begg and Egger tests. Heterogeneity will be evaluated by the I2 statistic and Q test. If I2 > 50%, sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis of different items will be performed. DiscussionFrom the study, we will ascertain the efficacy and safety of rikkunshito in chemotherapy-induced upper gastrointestinal syndrome. This review may provide evidence for rikkunshito as an adjuvant to treat upper gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with cancer. Systematic review registrationCRD42020214299 in PROSPERO.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Scarlet Nazarian ◽  
Ioannis Gkouzionis ◽  
Arun Anandakumar ◽  
Nisha Patel ◽  
Daniel Elson ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim Cancers of the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract remain a major contributor to the global cancer risk. Surgery aims to completely resect tumour with clear margins, whilst preserving as much surrounding tissue. Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) is a novel technique that presents a promising advancement in cancer diagnosis. We have developed a novel DRS system with tracking capability. Our aim is to classify tumour and non-tumour GI tissue in real-time using this device to aid intra-operative analysis of resection margins. Method An ex-vivo study was undertaken in which data was collected from consecutive patients undergoing upper GI cancer resection surgery between August 2020- January 2021. A hand-held DRS probe and tracking system was used on normal and cancerous tissue to obtain spectral information. After acquisition of all spectra, a classification system using histopathology results was created. A user interface was developed using Python 3.6 and Qt5. A support vector machine was used to classify the results. Results The data included 4974 normal spectra and 2108 tumour spectra. The overall accuracy of the DRS probe in differentiating normal versus tumour tissue was 88.08% for the stomach (sensitivity 84.8%, specificity 89.3%), and 91.42% for the oesophagus (sensitivity 76.3%, specificity 98.9%). Conclusion We have developed a successful DRS system with tracking capability, able to process thousands of spectra in a small timeframe, which can be used in real-time to distinguish tumour and non-tumour tissue. This can be used for intra-operative decision-making during upper GI cancer surgery to help select the best resection plane.


2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 395-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ewout B Smit ◽  
Hylco Bouwstra ◽  
Cees MPM Hertogh ◽  
Elizabeth M Wattel ◽  
Johannes C van der Wouden

Objective: To explore the effect of goal-setting on physical functioning, quality of life and duration of rehabilitation in geriatric rehabilitation compared to care as usual. Data sources: Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library were searched from initiation to October 2018. Methods: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), controlled before–after studies and studies using historic controls of older patients (mean age ⩾55 years) receiving rehabilitation for acquired disabilities. Our primary outcome was physical functioning; secondary outcomes were quality of life and rehabilitation duration. Cochrane guidelines were used to assess the risk of bias of the studies and extract data. Only RCT data were pooled using standardized mean difference (SMD). Results: We included 14 studies consisting of a total of 1915 participants with a mean age ranging from 55 to 83 years. Ten out of the 14 studies had a randomized controlled design, 7 of which could be pooled for the primary outcome. The risk of bias was judged high in several domains in all included studies. The meta-analysis showed no statistically significant differences between goal-setting and care as usual for physical functioning (SMD −0.11 (−0.32 to 0.10)), quality of life (SMD 0.09 (−0.56 to 0.75)) and rehabilitation duration (MD 13.46 days (−2.46 to 29.38)). Conclusion: We found low-quality evidence that goal-setting does not result in better physical functioning compared to care as usual in geriatric rehabilitation. For quality of life and duration of rehabilitation, we could not exclude a clinically relevant effect.


Endoscopy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhen Li ◽  
Jing Liu ◽  
Chao-Ran Ji ◽  
Fei-Xue Chen ◽  
Fu-Guo Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The medical consortium is an intensive and disease-specific association that integrates tertiary public hospitals and medical examination centers in China. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of the medical consortium for screening upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancers (MCSC) by magnetically controlled capsule gastroscopy (MCCG). Methods 6627 asymptomatic subjects underwent MCCG as part of health check-ups in the MCSC between March and November 2018. Relevant clinical data were collected and analyzed. Results The MCSC detected 32 patients with upper GI cancer (0.48 %) confirmed by pathology. The detection rate of early gastric cancer was 16.67 % (4 /24). Gastric polyps, ulcers, and submucosal tumors were found in 15.54 %, 3.76 %, and 3.17 % of subjects, respectively. The whole GI preparation and operation process were well tolerated. Conclusions The MCSC was a feasible model for upper GI cancer screening, especially for asymptomatic subjects. Further prospective studies with better operational quality control are warranted.


Endoscopy ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Leigh ◽  
J Seagroatt ◽  
S Cole ◽  
M Goldacre ◽  
P McCulloch

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 2354
Author(s):  
Francesca J. New ◽  
Sally J. Deverill ◽  
Bhaskar K. Somani

Background: Malignant ureteric obstruction occurs in a variety of cancers and has been typically associated with a poor prognosis. Percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) can potentially help increase patient longevity by establishing urinary drainage and treating renal failure. Our aim was to look at the outcomes of PCN in patients with advanced cancer and the impact on the patients’ lifespan and quality of life. Materials and Methods: A literature review was carried out for articles from 2000 to 2020 on PCN in patients with advanced malignancies, using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, clinicaltrials.gov, and Google Scholar. All English-language articles reporting on a minimum of 20 patients who underwent PCN for malignancy-associated ureteric obstruction were included. Results: A total of 21 articles (1674 patients) met the inclusion criteria with a mean of 60.2 years (range: 21–102 years). PCN was performed for ureteric obstruction secondary to urological malignancies (n = −633, 37.8%), gynaecological malignancies (n = 437, 26.1%), colorectal and GI malignancies (n = 216, 12.9%), and other specified malignancies (n = 205, 12.2%). The reported mean survival times varied from 2 to 8.5 months post PCN insertion, with an average survival time of 5.6 months, which depended on the cancer type, stage, and previous treatment. Conclusions: Patients with advanced malignancies who need PCN tend to have a survival rate under 12 months and spend a large proportion of this time in the hospital. Although the advent of newer chemotherapy and immunotherapy options has changed the landscape of managing advanced cancer, decisions on nephrostomy must be balanced with their survival and quality of life, which must be discussed with the patient.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document