scholarly journals Dietary Management of Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Tailoring the Approach

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 1630
Author(s):  
Pierfrancesco Visaggi ◽  
Lucia Mariani ◽  
Veronica Pardi ◽  
Emma Maria Rosi ◽  
Camilla Pugno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Food Allergy ◽  
Eosinophilic Esophagitis ◽  
Immunoglobulin E ◽  
Wheat Gluten ◽  
Skin Tests ◽  
Dietary Therapy ◽  
Dietary Management ◽  
High Power Field ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a unique form of non-immunoglobulin E-mediated food allergy, restricted to the esophagus, characterized by esophageal eosinophil-predominant inflammation and dysfunction. The diagnosis requires an esophago-gastroduodenoscopy with esophageal biopsies demonstrating active eosinophilic inflammation with 15 or more eosinophils/high-power field, following the exclusion of alternative causes of eosinophilia. Food allergens trigger the disease, withdairy/milk, wheat/gluten, egg, soy/legumes, and seafood the most common. Therapeutic strategies comprise dietary restrictions, proton pump inhibitors, topical corticosteroids, biologic agents, and esophageal dilation when strictures are present. However, avoidance of trigger foods remains the only option targeting the cause, and not the effect, of the disease. Because EoE relapses when treatment is withdrawn, dietary therapy offers a long-term, drug-free alternative to patients who wish to remain off drugs and still be in remission. There are currently multiple dietary management strategies to choose from, each having its specific efficacy, advantages, and disadvantages that both clinicians and patients should acknowledge. In addition, dietary regimens should be tailored around each individual patient to increase the chance of tolerability and long-term adherence. In general, liquid elemental diets devoid of antigens and elimination diets restricting causative foods are valuable options. Designing diets on the basis of food allergy skin tests results is not reliable and should be avoided. This review summarizes the most recent knowledge regarding the clinical use of dietary measures in EoE. We discussed endpoints, rationale, advantages and disadvantages, and tailoring of diets, as well as currently available dietary regimens for EoE.

Idiopathic anaphylaxis: Diagnosis and management

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 481-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alyssa G. Burrows ◽  
Anne K. Ellis
Keyword(s):  
Food Allergy ◽  
Immunoglobulin E ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Serum Tryptase ◽  
Genetic Trait ◽  
Baseline Serum ◽  
Diagnostic Technologies ◽  
Term Management ◽  
Idiopathic Anaphylaxis

Introduction: Idiopathic anaphylaxis (IA) is a diagnosis of exclusion and is based on the inability to identify a causal relationship between a trigger and an anaphylactic event, despite a detailed patient history and careful diagnostic assessment. The prevalence of IA among the subset of people who experienced anaphylaxis is challenging to estimate and varies widely, from 10 to 60%; most commonly noted is ∼20% in the adult anaphylactic population. Comorbid atopic conditions, such as food allergy, allergic rhinitis, and asthma, are present in up to 48% of patients with IA. Improved diagnostic technologies and an increased understanding of conditions that manifest with symptoms associated with anaphylaxis have improved the ability to determine a more accurate diagnosis for patients who may have been initially diagnosed with IA. Methods: Literature search was conducted on PubMed, Google Scholar and Embase. Results: Galactose-α-1,3-galactose (α-gal) allergy, mast cell disorders, and hereditary a-tryptasemia are a few differential diagnoses that should be considered in patients with IA. Unlike food allergy, when anaphylaxis occurs within minutes to 2 hours after allergen consumption, α-gal allergy is a 3‐6-hour delayed immunoglobulin E‐mediated anaphylactic reaction to a carbohydrate epitope found in red meat (e.g., beef, lamb, pork). The more recently described hereditary α-tryptasemia is an inherited autosomal dominant genetic trait caused by increased germline copies of tryptase human gene alpha-beta 1 (TPSAB1), which encodes α tryptase and is associated with elevated baseline serum tryptase. Acute management of IA consists of carrying an epinephrine autoinjector to be administered immediately at the first signs of anaphylaxis. Long-term management for IA with antihistamines and other agents aims to potentially reduce the frequency and severity of the anaphylactic reactions, although the evidence is limited. Biologics are potentially steroid-sparing for patients with IA; however, more research on IA therapies is needed. Conclusion: The lack of diagnostic criteria, finite treatment options, and intricacies of making a differential diagnosis make IA challenging for patients and clinicians to manage.

scholarly journals Eosinofilik Esofagitis

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 183
Author(s):  
Yusri Dianne Jurnalis ◽  
Yorva Sayoeti ◽  
Widiasteti Widiasteti
Keyword(s):  
Food Allergy ◽  
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease ◽  
Gastroesophageal Reflux ◽  
Eosinophilic Esophagitis ◽  
High Power ◽  
Reflux Disease ◽  
Eosinophil Infiltration ◽  
Esophageal Mucosa ◽  
High Power Field ◽  
Histologic Diagnosis

AbstrakEosinofilik esofagitis merupakan gangguan dimana terjadi infiltrasi eosinofil pada mukosa superfisial esophagus yang berhubungan dengan alergi makanan dan kondisi atopi seperti asma, dermatitis atopi, rhinitis alergika dan sering bersamaan dengan Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD). Diperkirakan insiden tahunan 43 per 10.000 pada anak. Gejala klinis mirip dengan GERD yaitu muntah, regurgitasi, nausea, nyeri dada atau epigastrium, disfagia dan hematemesis. Sekitar 50% pasien memiliki gejala alergi dan lebih 50% pasien memiliki orang tua dengan riwayat alergi. Diagnosis dapat ditegakkan berdasarkan pemeriksaan endoskopi dan histologis. Gambaran endoskopi yang ditemukan antara lain feline esophagus, corrugated esophagus, ringed esophagus, atau concentric mucosal rings, eksudat putih, vesikel atau papul dan hilangnya pola vaskular menunjukkan area fokus infiltrasi eosinofil. Diagnosis secara histologis sangat penting dimana kriteria eosinofilik esofagitis adalah jika ditemukan eosinofil >20/HPF (High Power Field). Terapi yang diberikan adalah terapi diet, farmakologis seperti kortikosteroid sistemik atau topikal, penghambat reseptor leukotrin dan anti IL-5.Kata kunci: eosinofilik esofagitis, alergi makanan, atopiAbstractEosinophilic esophagitis is a disorder which there is eosinophil infiltration on superficial esophageal mucosa. It’s correlated with food allergy and atopy condition such as asthma, atopy dermatitis, rhinitis allergic and often in conjunction with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease ( GERD). The incidence approximately 43/10.000 in children. The symptoms are similar with GERD, which one vomit, regurgitation, nausea, chest or epigastrium pain, dysphagia and hematemesis. About 50% patient has allergic symptoms and more than 50% parent of the patient has allergic history. The diagnose can be made base on endoscopic and histological examination. Endoscopic examination shows feline esophagus, corrugated esophagus or concentric mucosal rings, white exudates, vesikel or papul and diminished of vascular pattern, showing eosinophyl infiltration focus area. Histologic diagnosis is very important where the criteria for eosinophilic esophagitis is found eosinophils > 20 / HPF (High Power Field) within the superficial esophageal mucosa. Therapy eosinophilic esophagitis are diet therapy, pharmacological therapy with systemic or topical corticosteroid, leucotriene receptor antagonist and anti IL-5.Keywords:Eosinophilic esophagitis, food allergy, atopy

scholarly journals Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Atopy Conditions of the Esophagus

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 154-166
Author(s):  
Puspa Zuleika
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Food Allergy ◽  
Eosinophilic Esophagitis ◽  
The United States ◽  
Esophageal Stenosis ◽  
Esophageal Mucosa ◽  
High Power Field ◽  
Immune Mediated ◽  
Food Antigens ◽  
Delays In Diagnosis

Eosinophilic esophagitis is an immune-allergic pathology of multifactorial etiology(genetic and environmental) characterized by major symptoms of esophagealdysphagia and eosinophil-predominant inflammation of the esophageal mucosathat affects both pediatric and adult patients. EoE is an immune-mediated diseaseby which environmental and food antigens stimulate the Th2 inflammatorycascade. It is correlated with food allergy and atopy condition such as asthma, atopydermatitis, rhinitis allergic and often in conjunction with Gastroesophageal RefluxDisease (GERD). Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) was first described in the 1990s,showing an increasing incidence and prevalence since then, in the United States isestimated to be approximately 57 per 100,000 persons being the leading cause offood impaction and the major cause of dysphagia. Its symptoms, which includeheartburn, regurgitation, and esophageal stenosis. This symptomps similar to thoseof gastroesophageal reflux disease, causing delays in diagnosis and treatment. Theendoscopic findings such as furrows, esophageal mucosa trachealization, andwhitish exudates, this diagnosis should be confirmed histologically confirmed bybiopsy on the presence of more than 15 eosinophils per high-power field and theexclusion of other causes of eosinophilia. Management includes medications, diet,and surgical dilatation.

Eosinophilic esophagitis

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 462-464
Author(s):  
Melissa M. Watts ◽  
Carol Saltoun ◽  
Paul A. Greenberger
Keyword(s):  
Eosinophilic Esophagitis ◽  
Cell Activation ◽  
Erosive Esophagitis ◽  
Mast Cell Activation ◽  
Dietary Therapy ◽  
Pharmacologic Therapy ◽  
Food Impaction ◽  
High Power Field ◽  
Esophageal Eosinophilia ◽  
Food Antigens

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is defined by symptoms related to esophageal dysfunction, persistent esophageal eosinophilia, and exclusion of other etiologies that may be contributing to the condition. EoE is different from erosive esophagitis. In children, symptoms vary by age groups, such as feeding disorders in 2 year olds; vomiting in 8 year olds; and abdominal pain, dysphagia, and/or food impaction in adolescents. Most adults present with dysphagia, food impaction, heartburn, or chest pain. Common endoscopic features in adults with EoE include linear furrows (creases that orient longitudinally), mucosal rings (esophageal “trachealization”), small-caliber esophagus, white plaques or exudates (which are microabscesses of eosinophils), and strictures. Children often present with similar endoscopic features, yet one-third of pediatric patients with EoE have a normal result in an endoscopic examination. Histologic features of EoE include increased intramucosal eosinophils in the esophagus (≥15 eosinophils per high power field), without similar findings in the stomach or duodenum. There also may be eosinophilic microabscesses. In addition to evidence of mast cell activation, mucosa from patients with EoE have increased levels of interleukin 5; supporting eosinophilia; and upregulation of gene expression of eotaxin-3, a chemokine important in eosinophil migration. The majority of patients have evidence of either aeroallergen and/or food sensitization. Dietary therapy is considered first-line therapy for patients with EoE because it is inexpensive and effective, without requiring pharmacologic therapy. Removal of food antigens has been shown to improve symptoms in patients with EoE. Topical corticosteroids improve esophageal eosinophilia and symptoms, and have become the criterion standard of pharmacotherapy.

scholarly journals Clinical Guidelines of the Russian Gastroenterological Association on the Diagnostics and Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 84-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. T. Ivashkin ◽  
I. V. Maev ◽  
A. S. Trukhmanov ◽  
T. L. Lapina ◽  
D. N. Andreev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Eosinophilic Esophagitis ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Eosinophilic Infiltration ◽  
Esophageal Mucosa ◽  
High Power Field ◽  
Immune Mediated ◽  
Esophageal Dysfunction ◽  
Diagnostic Criterion ◽  
Choice Of Therapy

Aim.This paper presents guidelines on the diagnostics and treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis, which can be used by practitioners in their everyday practice.Summary.Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune-mediated disease of the esophagus characterized by the symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and a pronounced eosinophilic infiltration of the esophageal mucosa. The EoE diagnostics is based on the clinical manifestations of the disease (dysphagia, food impaction, chest pain regardless of swallowing), as well as on the combination of endoscopic and histological signs. The diagnostic criterion is the eosinophilic infiltration of the esophageal mucosa with an eosinophil density of ≥ 15 per high power field (×400) in at least one of the biopsy specimens (about 60 eosinophils in 1 mm2). Total IgE levels, peripheral blood eosinophilia and skin allergy tests are considered to be additional diagnostic means. Several approaches are used for the treatment of EoE, including proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and topical glucocorticosteroids (GCS), as well as elimination diets. The choice of therapy should be individualized, with the mandatory assessment of the treatment efficacy after 6–12 weeks using esophagogastroduodenoscopy with biopsy sampling. Endoscopic dilatation should be considered in patients suffering from severe dysphagia due to esophagus stricture.Conclusion.Increased incidence of EoE predominantly among children and young people, as well as its chronic character requiring long-term maintenance therapy, make EoE a significant issue to the practice of gastroenterology.

scholarly journals Eosinophilic esophagitis in children: Updates and practical aspects of management for allergists in a non‐tertiary care private practice setup

2022 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ejaz Yousef ◽  
Yelena Korotkaya ◽  
Alyson B. Simpson
Keyword(s):  
Eosinophilic Esophagitis ◽  
Private Practice ◽  
Immunoglobulin E ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Elemental Diet ◽  
Dietary Therapy ◽  
Steady Increase ◽  
Esophageal Mucosa

Background: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune and/or antigen-mediated disease characterized by eosinophilic infiltration of mucosa (≥15 eosinophils per high power field) without any secondary etiology. Non‐immunoglobulin E mediated mechanisms predominate in EoE. Objective: This review concentrated on a stepwise approach for the allergist working in non‐tertiary care private practice. Methods: A medical literature search that focused on several areas of the latest developments in the diagnosis and management of EoE was conducted. Results: There has been a steady increase in the prevalence and incidence of EoE. Clinical symptoms can vary from dysphagia to failure to thrive, depending on the age at presentation; some children develop adaptive behaviors to compensate for dysphagia, such as food preferences and slow eating. The diagnosis is based on a high index of clinical suspicion and is confirmed with endoscopy with biopsies after ruling out other causes of esophageal eosinophilia. Treatment options may include dietary therapy, pharmacologic therapies, or combination therapy. Therapeutic options may also include endoscopic dilation for stricturing disease. Conclusion: Providers should be aware of recent recommendation changes in the diagnostic workup, the role of skin-prick testing, and role of the proton-pump inhibitor as first-line therapy for EoE. Also, clinicians should be aware of the emerging role of empiric dietary therapy as a preferable therapeutic option when compared with the testing-directed diet and the elemental diet. Furthermore, topical glucocorticoid therapies are available, and new developing therapies are being investigated. Reevaluation of esophageal mucosa with biopsies is required approximately 2 months after therapy for a response and after a change in therapies to confirm continued resolution.

scholarly journals Updates on Food Allergy, Increasingly Prevalent Challenge

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 152
Author(s):  
Tonny Tanus ◽  
Sunny Wangko
Keyword(s):  
Atopic Dermatitis ◽  
Food Allergy ◽  
Eosinophilic Esophagitis ◽  
Immunoglobulin E ◽  
Pediatric Population ◽  
Food Allergies ◽  
Food Protein ◽  
Safety Issues ◽  
Ige Mediated ◽  
Allergic Disorders

Abstrak: Prevalensi alergi makanan makin meningkat di seluruh dunia dan mengenai semua usia. Keparahan dan kompleksitas penyakit juga meningkat terlebih pada populasi anak. Terdapat beberapa jenis reaksi alergi yang dibahas: immunoglobulin E (IgE) mediated allergies and anaphylaxis, food triggered atopic dermatitis, eosinophilic esophagitis, dan non IgE mediated gastrointestinal food allergic disorders seperti food protein induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIEs). Tes alergi, baik melalui kulit maupun IgE yang telah dikerjakan sekian lama masih dibebani dengan hasil positif palsu dan negatif palsu yang bermakna dengan manfaat terbatas pada beberapa alergi makanan. Selain menghindari, tidak terdapat terapi yang ampuh untuk alergi makanan. Berbagai imunoterapi telah dipelajari melalui jalur, subkutan, epikutan, oral dan sublingual yang hanya menghasilkan desensitisasi sementara dan dibebani dengan berbagai isu mengenai keamanannya. Agen biologik yang menghambat sitokin/interleukin (IL) dan molekul pada reaksi alergi makanan tampaknya merupakan pilihan yang menjanjikan. Anti IgE telah dipergunakan pada asma dan urtikaria kronis. Anti IL-4 dan IL-13 yang menghambat produksi IgE diindikasikan untuk dermatitis atopik. Anti eosinofil anti IL-5 berhasil menurunkan eksaserbasi asma. Berbagai agen biologik telah dipelajari untuk berbagai kondisi alergik dan imunologik, tetapi efektivitas dan kepraktisan terapi yang mahal ini untuk alergi makanan masih menjadi tanda tanya.Kata kunci: alergi makanan, reaksi alergi, terapi alergi makananAbstract: Food allergies have been increasing in prevalence for years affecting all ages. Disease severity and complexity have also increased, especially in the pediatric population. There are several types of reactions including: immunoglobulin-E (IgE) mediated allergies and anaphylaxis, food-triggered atopic dermatitis, eosinophilic esophagitis, and non IgE mediated gastrointestinal food allergic disorders such as FPIEs. Though allergy testing has been around for years, both skin and IgE testing are burdened by significant false positives and negatives, and are only useful in some food allergies. Avoidance is the sole therapy for food allergy. A variety of immunotherapies have been studied; subcutaneous, epicutaneous, oral, and sublingual. At best they only produce a temporary state of desensitization and have many safety issues. Examples of biologicals which block critical cytokines/interleukins (IL) in allergic conditions are Anti IgE, anti IL-4 and IL-13, and Anti eosinophils, Anti IL-5. Other biologicals are being studied for allergic conditions, but whether these expensive future treatments will be proven effective and practical in food allergy is unknown.Keywords: food allergy, allergic reaction, food allergy therapy

Clinical Characteristics of Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Children

2005 ◽  
Vol 114 (11) ◽  
pp. 827-833 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eileen H. Dauer ◽  
Deborah K. Freese ◽  
Mounif El-Youssef ◽  
Dana M. Thompson
Keyword(s):  
Food Allergy ◽  
Eosinophilic Esophagitis ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Clinical Presentation ◽  
Immunoglobulin E ◽  
Clinical Suspicion ◽  
Aerodigestive Tract ◽  
Food Impaction ◽  
Laboratory Findings

Objectives: The role of eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) in aerodigestive tract disorders in children is underestimated and overlooked, primarily because of a lack of understanding of this disorder by otolaryngologists. We sought to better characterize the clinical presentation of EE in order to increase awareness among otolaryngologists. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 71 children with biopsy-proven EE to determine the most common symptoms and laboratory findings that should increase the clinical suspicion of EE. Results: Dysphagia, food impaction, and emesis were the most common symptoms in children with EE. Asthma was the most common airway diagnosis. Rhinosinusitis was the most common otolaryngological diagnosis. Food allergy was present in 60% of the children tested. Eighty-three percent of the children with elevated immunoglobulin E levels had thick linear streaking or patchy white exudate of the esophagus seen on esophagoscopy. Other major medical comorbidities existed in more than half of the children with EE, of which psychiatric disorders and other disorders of the aerodigestive tract were the most common. Conclusions: Eosinophilic esophagitis may contribute to treatment failure in patients with common and complicated aerodigestive tract disorders. To encourage clinicians to avoid overlooking the diagnosis, we present an evaluative algorithm to increase the suspicion of this entity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document