scholarly journals Reducing Iron Content in Infant Formula from 8 to 2 mg/L Does Not Increase the Risk of Iron Deficiency at 4 or 6 Months of Age: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 3
Author(s):  
Maria Björmsjö ◽  
Olle Hernell ◽  
Bo Lönnerdal ◽  
Staffan K. Berglund
Keyword(s):  
Breast Milk ◽  
Iron Deficiency ◽  
Infant Formula ◽  
Iron Content ◽  
Iron Status ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Bovine Lactoferrin ◽  
High Concentration ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Term Infants

Many infant formulas are fortified with iron at 8–14 mg/L whereas breast milk contains about 0.3 mg/L. Another major difference between breast milk and infant formula is its high concentration of lactoferrin, a bioactive iron-binding protein. The aim of the present study was to investigate how reducing the iron content and adding bovine lactoferrin to infant formula affects iron status, health and development. Swedish healthy full-term formula-fed infants (n = 180) were randomized in a double-blind controlled trial. From 6 weeks to 6 months of age, 72 infants received low-iron formula (2 mg/L) fortified with bovine lactoferrin (1.0 g/L) (Lf+), 72 received low-iron formula un-fortified with lactoferrin (Lf−) and 36 received standard formula with 8 mg of iron/L and no lactoferrin fortification as controls (CF). Iron status and prevalence of iron deficiency (ID) were assessed at 4 and 6 months. All iron status indicators were unaffected by lactoferrin. At 4 and 6 months, the geometric means of ferritin for the combined low-iron groups compared to the CF-group were 67.7 vs. 88.7 and 39.5 vs. 50.9 µg/L, respectively (p = 0.054 and p = 0.056). No significant differences were found for other iron status indicators. In the low-iron group only one infant (0.7%) at 4 months and none at 6 months developed ID. Conclusion: Iron fortification of 2 mg/L is an adequate level during the first half of infancy for healthy term infants in a well-nourished population. Adding lactoferrin does not affect iron status.

scholarly journals Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Prebiotic Enriched Infant Formula—A Randomized Controlled Trial

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 1276
Author(s):  
Franka Neumer ◽  
Orenci Urraca ◽  
Joaquin Alonso ◽  
Jesús Palencia ◽  
Vicente Varea ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Infant Formula ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Fecal Microbiota ◽  
First Year ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Term Infants ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Prebiotic Oligosaccharides ◽  
First Year Of Life

The present study aims to evaluate the effects of an infant formula supplemented with a mixture of prebiotic short and long chain inulin-type oligosaccharides on health outcomes, safety and tolerance, as well as on fecal microbiota composition during the first year of life. In a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study, n = 160 healthy term infants under 4 months of age were randomized to receive either an infant formula enriched with 0.8 g/dL of Orafti®Synergy1 or an unsupplemented control formula until the age of 12 months. Growth, fever (>38 °C) and infections were regularly followed up by a pediatrician. Digestive symptoms, stool consistency as well as crying and sleeping patterns were recorded during one week each study month. Fecal microbiota and immunological biomarkers were determined from a subgroup of infants after 2, 6 and 12 months of life. The intention to treat (ITT) population consisted of n = 149 infants. Both formulae were well tolerated. Mean duration of infections was significantly lower in the prebiotic fed infants (p < 0.05). The prebiotic group showed higher Bifidobacterium counts at month 6 (p = 0.006), and higher proportions of Bifidobacterium in relation to total bacteria at month 2 and 6 (p = 0.042 and p = 0.013, respectively). Stools of infants receiving the prebiotic formula were softer (p < 0.05). Orafti®Synergy1 tended to beneficially impact total daily amount of crying (p = 0.0594). Supplementation with inulin-type prebiotic oligosaccharides during the first year of life beneficially modulates the infant gut microbiota towards higher Bifidobacterium levels at the first 6 months of life, and is associated with reduced duration of infections.

scholarly journals Consumption of a Double-Fortified Salt Affects Perceptual, Attentional, and Mnemonic Functioning in Women in a Randomized Controlled Trial in India

2017 ◽  
Vol 147 (12) ◽  
pp. 2297-2308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J Wenger ◽  
Laura E Murray-Kolb ◽  
Julie EH Nevins ◽  
Sudha Venkatramanan ◽  
Gregory A Reinhart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Iron Deficiency ◽  
Iron Status ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Reproductive Age ◽  
Deficiency Anemia ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Attention And Memory ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Iron Deficient ◽  
Mnemonic Function

Abstract Background: Iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia have been shown to have negative effects on aspects of perception, attention, and memory. Objective: The purpose of this investigation was to assess the extent to which increases in dietary iron consumption are related to improvements in behavioral measures of perceptual, attentional, and mnemonic function. Methods: Women were selected from a randomized, double-blind, controlled food-fortification trial involving ad libitum consumption of either a double-fortified salt (DFS) containing 47 mg potassium iodate/kg and 3.3 mg microencapsulated ferrous fumarate/g (1.1 mg elemental Fe/g) or a control iodized salt. Participants' blood iron status (primary outcomes) and cognitive functioning (secondary outcomes) were assessed at baseline and after 10 mo at endline. The study was performed on a tea plantation in the Darjeeling district of India. Participants (n = 126; 66% iron deficient and 49% anemic at baseline) were otherwise healthy women of reproductive age, 18–55 y. Results: Significant improvements were documented for iron status and for perceptual, attentional, and mnemonic function in the DFS group (percentage of variance accounted for: 16.5%) compared with the control group. In addition, the amount of change in perceptual and cognitive performance was significantly (P < 0.05) related to the amount of change in blood iron markers (mean percentage of variance accounted for: 16.0%) and baseline concentrations of blood iron markers (mean percentage of variance accounted for: 25.0%). Overall, there was evidence that the strongest effects of change in iron status were obtained for perceptual and low-level attentional function. Conclusion: DFS produced measurable and significant improvements in the perceptual, attentional, and mnemonic performance of Indian female tea pickers of reproductive age. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01032005.

scholarly journals Safe and effective delivery of supplemental iron to healthy older adults: The double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial protocol of the Safe Iron Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 1510
Author(s):  
Erin D. Lewis ◽  
Dayong Wu ◽  
Joel B. Mason ◽  
Athar H. Chishti ◽  
John M. Leong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Iron Deficiency ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Iron Status ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Sulfate Heptahydrate ◽  
Bacterial Proliferation ◽  
Forms Of Iron

The forms of iron currently available to correct iron deficiency have adverse effects, including infectious diarrhea, increased susceptibility to malaria, inflammation and detrimental changes to the gut microbiome. These adverse effects limit their use such that the growing burden of iron deficiency has not abated in recent decades. Here, we summarize the protocol of the “Safe Iron Study”, the first clinical study examining the safety and efficacy of novel forms of iron in healthy, iron-replete adults. The Safe Iron Study is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted in Boston, MA, USA. This study compares ferrous sulfate heptahydrate (FeSO4·H2O) with two novel forms of iron supplements (iron hydroxide adipate tartrate (IHAT) and organic fungal iron metabolite (Aspiron™ Natural Koji Iron)). In Phase I, we will compare each source of iron administrated at a low dose (60 mg Fe/day). We will also determine the effect of FeSO4 co-administrated with a multiple micronutrient powder and weekly administration of FeSO4. The forms of iron found to produce no adverse effects or adverse effects no greater than FeSO4 in Phase I, Phase II will evaluate a higher, i.e., a therapeutic dose (120 mg Fe/day). The primary outcomes of this study include ex vivo malaria (Plasmodium falciparum) infectivity of host erythrocytes, ex vivo bacterial proliferation (of selected species) in presence of host plasma and intestinal inflammation assessed by fecal calprotectin. This study will test the hypotheses that the novel forms of iron, administered at equivalent doses to FeSO4, will produce similar increases in iron status in iron-replete subjects, yet lower increases in ex vivo malaria infectivity, ex vivo bacterial proliferation, gut inflammation. Ultimately, this study seeks to contribute to development of safe and effective forms of supplemental iron to address the global burden of iron deficiency and anemia. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03212677; registered: 11 July 2017.

scholarly journals Safe and effective delivery of supplemental iron to healthy older adults: The double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial protocol of the Safe Iron Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 1510
Author(s):  
Erin D. Lewis ◽  
Dayong Wu ◽  
Joel B. Mason ◽  
Athar H. Chishti ◽  
John M. Leong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Iron Deficiency ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Iron Status ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Sulfate Heptahydrate ◽  
Bacterial Proliferation ◽  
Forms Of Iron

The forms of iron currently available to correct iron deficiency have adverse effects, including infectious diarrhea, increased susceptibility to malaria, inflammation and detrimental changes to the gut microbiome. These adverse effects limit their use such that the growing burden of iron deficiency has not abated in recent decades. Here, we summarize the protocol of the “Safe Iron Study”, the first clinical study examining the safety and efficacy of novel forms of iron in healthy, iron-replete adults. The Safe Iron Study is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted in Boston, MA, USA. This study compares ferrous sulfate heptahydrate (FeSO4·H2O) with two novel forms of iron supplements (iron hydroxide adipate tartrate (IHAT) and organic fungal iron metabolite (Aspiron™ Natural Koji Iron)). In Phase I, we will compare each source of iron administrated at a low dose (60 mg Fe/day). We will also determine the effect of FeSO4 co-administrated with a multiple micronutrient powder and weekly administration of FeSO4. The forms of iron found to produce no adverse effects, or adverse effects no greater than FeSO4 in Phase I, Phase II will evaluate a higher, i.e., a therapeutic dose (120 mg Fe/day). The primary outcomes of this study include ex vivo malaria (Plasmodium falciparum) infectivity of host erythrocytes, ex vivo bacterial proliferation (of selected species) in presence of host plasma and intestinal inflammation assessed by fecal calprotectin. This study will test the hypotheses that the novel forms of iron, administered at equivalent doses to FeSO4, will produce similar increases in iron status in iron-replete subjects, yet lower increases in ex vivo malaria infectivity, ex vivo bacterial proliferation, gut inflammation. Ultimately, this study seeks to contribute to development of safe and effective forms of supplemental iron to address the global burden of iron deficiency and anemia. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03212677; registered: 11 July 2017.

scholarly journals A Partly Fermented Infant Formula with Postbiotics Including 3′-GL, Specific Oligosaccharides, 2′-FL, and Milk Fat Supports Adequate Growth, Is Safe and Well-Tolerated in Healthy Term Infants: A Double-Blind, Randomised, Controlled, Multi-Country Trial

Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 3560
Author(s):  
Yvan Vandenplas ◽  
Virginie de Halleux ◽  
Małgorzata Arciszewska ◽  
Piotr Lach ◽  
Valeriy Pokhylko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weight Gain ◽  
Infant Formula ◽  
Milk Fat ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Gastrointestinal Symptoms ◽  
Test Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Anthropometric Measures ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Term Infants

This study investigated growth, safety, and tolerance in healthy infants consuming a partly fermented infant formula (IF) with postbiotics, 2′-linked fucosyllactose (2′-FL), a specific prebiotic mixture of short-chain galacto-oligosaccharides (scGOS) and long-chain fructo-oligosaccharides (lcFOS), and milk fat. This double-blind, controlled trial randomised 215 fully IF-fed infants ≤ 14 days of age to either: Test Group (IF) containing 26% fermented formula with postbiotics derived from Lactofidus fermentation process (including 3′-Galactosyllactose; 3′-GL), 0.8 g/100 mL scGOS/lcFOS (9:1), 0.1 g/100 mL 2′-FL, and milk fat), or Control group (IF with 0.8 g/100 mL scGOS/lcFOS (9:1)) until 17 weeks of age. Fully breastfed infants were included as a reference. Anthropometric measures, gastrointestinal symptoms, and safety were assessed monthly. Equivalence in weight gain (primary outcome) between the Test and Control groups was confirmed (difference in means −0.08 g/day; 90% CI (−1.47;1.31)) with estimated mean weight gain (SE) of 31.00 (0.59) g/day and 31.08 (0.60) g/day, respectively, (PP population, n = 196). Equivalence in length and head circumference gain between the randomised groups was also confirmed. No statistically significant differences were observed in adverse events or gastrointestinal tolerance between randomised IF groups. A partly fermented IF with postbiotics, specific oligosaccharides, 2′-FL, and milk fat supports adequate infant growth and is safe and well-tolerated in healthy term infants.

scholarly journals Safety of supplementing infant formula with long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids and Bifidobacterium lactis in term infants: a randomised controlled trial

2009 ◽  
Vol 101 (11) ◽  
pp. 1706-1713 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. Gibson ◽  
Denis Barclay ◽  
Helen Marshall ◽  
Julie Moulin ◽  
Jean-Claude Maire ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weight Gain ◽  
Infant Formula ◽  
Head Circumference ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Term Infants ◽  
Bifidobacterium Lactis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Formula Group ◽  
Long Chain

Probiotics and long-chain PUFA (LC-PUFA) may be beneficial supplements for infants who are not breast-fed. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the safety of an infant formula containing the LC-PUFA DHA and arachidonic acid (AA) and the probiotic Bifidobacterium lactis by comparing the growth rate of infants fed the supplemented and unsupplemented formulas. One hundred and forty-two healthy, term infants were enrolled in a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, controlled, parallel-group trial, and allocated to receive either standard or probiotic and LC-PUFA-containing experimental formulas. The infants were fed with their assigned formulas for 7 months. The primary outcome (weight gain) and the secondary outcomes (length, head circumference and formula tolerance) were measured throughout the study. LC-PUFA status was assessed at 4 months of age and immune response to childhood vaccines was measured at 7 months of age. There was no significant difference in growth between the two groups. The 90 % CI for the difference in mean weight gain was − 0·08, 3·1 g in the intention-to-treat population and 0·1–3·8 g in the per protocol population, which lay within the predefined boundaries of equivalence, − 3·9–3·9. There were no significant differences in mean length and head circumference. DHA and AA concentrations were higher in infants in the experimental formula group compared with the control formula group. No influence of the supplements on the response to vaccines was observed. Growth characteristics of term infants fed the starter formula containing a probiotic and LC-PUFA were similar to standard formula-fed infants.

scholarly journals A Community Trial Examining the Effectiveness of Iron-fortified Lentils to Improve Iron Status Among Bangladeshi Adolescent Girls: Results from a Baseline Survey (P10-099-19)

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fakir Yunus ◽  
Anupom Das ◽  
Chowdhury Jalal ◽  
Kaosar Afsana ◽  
Rajib Podder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Iron Deficiency ◽  
Serum Ferritin ◽  
Adolescent Girls ◽  
Iron Status ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Baseline Data ◽  
Health Concern ◽  
Baseline Survey ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Status Survey

Abstract Objectives Despite all efforts, iron deficiency (ID) and iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) among adolescent girls remains a public health concern for Bangladesh. The objective of the current analysis was to examine baseline data from an effectiveness trial with the aim to compare prevalence of anemia, ID and IDA with Bangladesh's National Micronutrients Status Survey 2011–12. Methods A community-based, double-blind, cluster randomized controlled trial is being conducted among n = 1260 Bangladeshi adolescent girls (10–17 years). Treatment groups include: 1) Fe-fortified lentils; 2) unfortified lentils and 3) usual intake (no intervention). Within the lentil groups, participants are being served 250 g cooked lentils with half a cup of cooked rice 5 days/week for 85 feeding days. All Fe-fortification and processing of lentils were carried out at the University of Saskatchewan. Anemia, ID and IDA were defined according to WHO (2011) cut-off values. Results At baseline, age of participants was 13.5 ± 2.0 years; BMI 18.2 ± 3.0 kg/m2 (or 38th percentile BMI-for-age); hemoglobin 12.4 ± 1.1 g/dL, serum ferritin 54.2 ± 36.3 ng/mL, sTfR 3.7 ± 2.6 µg/mL, and CRP 1.2 ± 3.9 mg/L. 26.6% girls were clinically anemic (non-pregnant-Hb <12 g/dl), 19.9% of those were mildly anemic (non-pregnant-Hb: 11–11.9 g/dl), 5.9% were moderately anemic (non-pregnant-Hb: 8.0–10.9 g/dl) anemic, and 0.8% were severely anemic (<8.0 g/dL). We found 9.2% of girls were ID (serum ferritin <15 µg/l). Conclusions One-fourth of rural Bangladeshi adolescent girls were anemic, and one-tenth were ID. This shows that rural anemia prevalence has increased ∼8.5% (26.6% vs 18.1%), ID has slightly increased (9.2% vs 10.0%) and IDA has increased (6.1% vs 1.8%) over the 7 years since the Bangladesh National Micronutrients Status Survey 2011–12. We can conclude from these baseline data that Bangladesh has made poor progress in reducing adolescent girls’ anemia with public policy efforts. Funding Sources Global Institute for Food Security; Nutrition International.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the safety, tolerance and efficacy of 1-year consumption of infant formula supplemented with Lactobacillus fermentum CECT5716 Lc40 or Bifidobacterium breve CECT7263: a randomized controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Maldonado ◽  
M. Gil-Campos ◽  
J. A. Maldonado-Lobón ◽  
M. R. Benavides ◽  
K. Flores-Rojas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Milk ◽  
Infant Formula ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Milk Formula ◽  
Powdered Infant Formula ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Bifidobacterium Breve ◽  
Link Type

Abstract Background The microorganism present in breast milk, added to other factors, determine the colonization of infants. The objective of the present study is to evaluate the safety, tolerance and effects of the consumption of a milk formula during the first year of life that is supplemented with L. fermentum CECT5716 or Bifidobacterium breve CECT7263, two strains originally isolated from breast milk. Methods A randomized, double blind, controlled, parallel group study including healthy, formula-fed infants was conducted. Two hundred and thirty-six 1-month-old infants were selected and randomly divided into three study groups according to a randomization list. Infants in the control group received a standard powdered infant formula until 12 months of age. Infants in the probiotic groups received the same infant formula but supplemented with L. fermentum CECT5716 Lc40 or B. breve CECT7263. Main outcome was weigh-gain of infants as safety marker. Results One hundred and eighty-nine infants completed the eleven months of intervention (61 in control group, 65 in Lf group and 63 in Bb group). The growth of infants in the three groups was consistent with standards. No significant differences were observed in the main outcome, weight-gain (Control group: 5.77 Kg ± 0.95, Lf group: 5.77 Kg ± 1.31, Bb group: 5.58 Kg ± 1.10; p = 0.527). The three milk formulae were well tolerated, and no adverse effects were related to the consumption of any of the formula. Infants receiving B. breve CECT7263 had a 1.7 times lower risk of crying than the control group (OR = 0.569, CI 95% 0.568–0.571; p = 0.001). On the other hand, the incidence of diarrhoea in infants receiving the formula supplemented with L. fermentum CECT5716 was a 44% lower than in infants receiving the control formula (p = 0.014). The consumption of this Lactobacillus strain also reduced the duration of diarrhoea by 2.5 days versus control group (p = 0.044). Conclusions The addition of L. fermentum CECT5716 Lc40 or B. breve CECT7263, two probiotic strains naturally found in breast milk, to infant formulae is safe and induces beneficial effects on the health of infants. Trial registration The trial was retrospectively registered in the US Library of Medicine (www.clinicaltrial.gov) with the number NCT03204630. Registered 11 August 2016.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document