scholarly journals Nutritional Interventions to Improve Clinical Outcomes in Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Nutrients ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 1404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuele Rinninella ◽  
Anna Fagotti ◽  
Marco Cintoni ◽  
Pauline Raoul ◽  
Giuseppe Scaletta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Nutritional Interventions ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Nutritional Strategies

Among all gynaecological neoplasms, ovarian cancer has the highest rate of disease-related malnutrition, representing an important risk factor of postoperative mortality and morbidity. Hence, the importance of finding effective nutritional interventions is crucial to improve ovarian cancer patient’s well-being and survival. This systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aims at assessing the effects of nutritional interventions on clinical outcomes such as overall survival, progression-free survival, length of hospital stay (LOS), complications following surgery and/or chemotherapy in ovarian cancer patients. Three electronic bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were used to conduct a systematic literature search based on fixed inclusion and exclusion criteria, until December 2018. A total of 14 studies were identified. Several early postoperative feeding interventions studies (n = 8) were retrieved mainly demonstrating a reduction in LOS and an ameliorated intestinal recovery after surgery. Moreover, innovative nutritional approaches such as chewing gum intervention (n = 1), coffee consumption (n = 1), ketogenic diet intervention (n = 2) or fruit and vegetable juice concentrate supplementation diet (n = 1) and short-term fasting (n = 1) have been shown as valid and well-tolerated nutritional strategies improving clinical outcomes. However, despite an acceptable number of prospective trials, there is still a lack of homogeneous and robust endpoints. In particular, there is an urgent need of RCTs evaluating overall survival and progression-free survival during ovarian oncology treatments. Further high-quality studies are warranted, especially prospective studies and large RCTs, with more homogeneous types of intervention and clinical outcomes, including a more specific sampling of ovarian cancer women, to identify appropriate and effective nutritional strategies for this cancer, which is at high risk of malnutrition.

Clinical outcomes of postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with early-stage high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) treated at British Columbia cancer agency.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17105-e17105
Author(s):  
Joohyun Lee ◽  
Anna Tinker
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
British Columbia ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Stage I ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Free Survival

e17105 Background: Intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy has been shown to prolong overall survival in optimally debulked stage III ovarian cancer in randomized trials. In British Columbia, we extrapolated this benefit of IP chemotherapy to early stage HGSC patients for the last 10 years, as these patients are optimally debulked at surgery but still have a high rate of recurrence. We conducted a retrospective study of clinical outcomes associated with IP/IV chemotherapy compared to IV chemotherapy for optimally debulked stage I HGSC cases. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of women with stages IA-IC HGSC who had primary surgery between 2007-2015, and received either IV or IP/IV chemotherapy post-operatively. We compared progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes between these 2 groups. Kaplan-Meier method evaluated chemotherapy delivery route with progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), using the statistical program R. Results: We identified 99 patients; 80 (81%) received IV chemotherapy and 19 (19%) received IP/IV chemotherapy. Among IP/IV cohort, 2/19 (11%) discontinued IP therapy during treatment due to abdominal pain at IP port site or hypersensitivity reaction to IV paclitaxel. 5-year PFS was 88.4% (74.5-100%) and 69.7% (58.7-82.7%) among the IP/IV and IV cohorts, respectively (p = 0.549). There was a trend for higher 5-year OS for the IP/IV group; however, this did not reach statistical significance (100% vs. 71.4%; p = 0.182). Conclusions: In our study, IP/IV chemotherapy for stage I HGSC patients was associated with a trend for higher 5-year PFS and OS compared to IV chemotherapy. This observation warrants further prospective investigation.

scholarly journals Progression-free survival as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival in modern ovarian cancer trials: a meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 175883591878850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrin M. Sjoquist ◽  
Sarah J. Lord ◽  
Michael L. Friedlander ◽  
Robert John Simes ◽  
Ian C. Marschner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Surrogate Endpoint ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
The Difference

Background: Progression-free survival (PFS) has been adopted as the primary endpoint in many randomized controlled trials, and can be determined much earlier than overall survival (OS). We investigated whether PFS is a good surrogate endpoint for OS in trials of first-line treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), and whether this relationship has changed with the introduction of new treatment types. Methods: In a meta-analysis, we identified summary data [hazard ratio (HR) and median time] from published randomized controlled trials. Linear regression was used to assess the association between treatment effects on PFS and OS overall, and for subgroups defined by treatment type, postprogression survival (PPS) and established prognostic factors. Results: Correlation between HRs for PFS and OS, in 26 trials with 30 treatment comparisons comprising 24,870 patients, was modest ( r2 = 0.52, weighted by trial sample size). The correlation diminished with recency: preplatinum/paclitaxel era, r2 = 0.66; platinum/paclitaxel, r2 = 0.44; triplet combinations, r2 = 0.22; biologicals, r2 = 0.30. The median PPS increased over time for the experimental ( Ptrend = 0.03) and control arms ( Ptrend = 0.003). The difference in median PPS between treatment arms strongly correlated with the difference in median OS ( r2 = 0.83). In trials where the control therapy had median PPS of less than 18 months, correlation between PFS and OS was stronger ( r2 = 0.64) than where the median PPS was longer ( r2 = 0.48). Conclusions: In EOC, correlation in the relative treatment effect between PFS and OS in first-line platinum-based chemotherapy randomized controlled trials is moderate and has weakened with increasing availability of effective salvage therapies.

Skeletal muscle mass as a prognostic indicator of outcomes in ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 654-663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuele Rinninella ◽  
Anna Fagotti ◽  
Marco Cintoni ◽  
Pauline Raoul ◽  
Giuseppe Scaletta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Skeletal Muscle ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Muscle Mass ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival

BackgroundMuscle mass plays a key role in predicting clinical outcomes in cancer. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether computed tomography (CT) scan indexes of muscle mass quantity and quality could be used as prognostic factors in ovarian cancer.MethodsThree electronic bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were used to conduct a systematic literature search from inception to January 2020. The primary outcome was overall survival. Pooled analyses of hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were performed with Review Manager 5.3. Heterogeneity was assessed by measuring inconsistency (I2 based on the χ2 test). Secondary outcomes included progression free survival, disease free survival, postoperative complications, and chemotoxicity. Study quality and quality of evidence were assessed.ResultsA total of 15 studies were included in the systematic review, of which six studies (1226 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Summary unadjusted HRs (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.46, p=0.47) and adjusted HRs (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.43, p=0.49) did not show a significant association between low skeletal muscle index and overall survival (p>0.05) in ovarian cancer. Instead, although the quality of evidence was low, pooled data of three studies, comprising 679 patients, showed a significant association between low skeletal muscle radiodensity and poor overall survival (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.28 to 2.07, p<0.0001). Moreover, the heterogeneity between studies precluded the possibility of performing a meta-analysis and reaching conclusions for progression free survival, disease free survival, surgical complications, and chemotoxicity.ConclusionsThis work suggested that the measurement of skeletal muscle radiodensity by routine CT scan at diagnosis, with standardization of diagnostic criteria, could be a reliable tool to select at risk patients and to individualize effective nutritional strategies. However, prospective homogeneous studies with a larger number of patients are required to confirm these results.

scholarly journals A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Data on Efficacy of Novel Therapy Combinations in Patients with Lenalidomide Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 10-12
Author(s):  
Ghulam Rehman Mohyuddin ◽  
Jill Hampton ◽  
Muhammad Aziz ◽  
Sadik Khuder ◽  
Saad Ullah Malik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Introduction: Advancements in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) with proteasome inhibitors [bortezomib (bort), carfilzomib (carf)], monoclonal antibodies [daratumumab (dara), isatuximab (isa) and elotozumab (elo)], and immunomodulatory drugs [IMiD) [lenalidomide and pomalidomide (pom)] have improved outcomes. However, using lenalidomide as frontline treatment and maintenance therapy exposes greater numbers of patients to lenalidomide prior to relapse. Consequently, the treatment of lenalidomide-refractory (LR) disease is an increasing area of concern. Given the lack of direct comparisons of different treatment regimens for LR MM, we used a systematic review to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included subgroup analysis of LR patients. The objective of our study was to compare the efficacy of novel treatment regimens in randomized trials for patients with LR MM using a network meta-analysis. Methods: Three databases were searched: MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Registry of Controlled Trials. All studies published between January 1, 2005 and December 30, 2019 were queried using keywords "multiple myeloma" and "randomized controlled trial". Only RCT's were included. Primary outcome was progression free survival (PFS) of patients enrolled in myeloma RCT's. Two independent investigators reviewed all the studies and resolved any conflict through mutual discussion. WNetwork meta-analysis using random-effects model was performed to generate direct and indirect comparisons between various treatment groups. Frequentist method was used to rank the interventions and P-score was generated. A higher P score (close to 1.00) corresponded to superior progression free survival. A P-value of &lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. I2statistic was used to assess heterogeneity between the studies as defined by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews with a value &gt;50% considered as significant heterogeneity. We used 'R' (Bell Labs, Murray Hill, NJ, USA) for generating our statistical analysis and plots. Results: Our initial search strategy yielded 1171 results. After excluding duplicates, trials in progress, subset analysis and non-randomized studies, 123 RCTs were identified. Only 8 studies clearly reported outcomes of patients with LR myeloma and 7 studies (1698 patients) were included in final analysis of two discrete networks. Pom/bort/dex (HR: 0.65,95% CI: 0.50-0.84), dara/bort/dex (HR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.21-0.63), and dara/carf/dex (HR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.21-0.69) were all found to have improved PFS compared to bort/dex (Figure 2). These interventions were ranked as follows: Dara-bort-dex was the most efficacious with a P-score of 0.8758, followed by Dara/carf/Dex (P of 0.8514), Pom/bort/dex (P of 0.4791), Carf/dex (P of 0.2707) and Bort/dex (P of 0.0231). Within Network 2 (Figure 3), pom/dex (HR :0.50, 95% CI= 0.40-0.62), isa/pom/dex (HR: 0.30, 95% CI= 0.20-0.44) and elo/pom/dex (HR: 0.27, 95% CI=0.16-0.45), were all found to have improved PFS compared to dexamethasone (Figure 4). In Network 2, the ranking of interventions was as follows with Elo-pom-dex (P of 0.8716) the most efficacious, followed by Isa-pom-Dex (P of 0.7932) and Pom-dex (P of 0.3352). Conclusion: The results of our network meta-analysis of 1698 patients with lenalidomide refractory myeloma enrolled in seven randomized myeloma trials demonstrate that for lenalidomide refractory myeloma, triplet therapy is superior to doublet therapy. Regimens with the highest efficacy in this subset of patients were triplets containing monoclonal antibodies (such as dara/elo/isa). There is a need for further randomized data to better ascertain the best standard of care for these patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Comparison of the survival outcomes of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in treatment of early-stage ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qingduo Kong ◽  
Hongyi Wei ◽  
Jing Zhang ◽  
Yilin Li ◽  
Yongjun Wang
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Review Manager ◽  
Early Stage Ovarian Cancer

Abstract Background Laparoscopy has been widely used for patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (eEOC). However, there is limited evidence regarding whether survival outcomes of laparoscopy are equivalent to those of laparotomy among patients with eEOC. The result of survival outcomes of laparoscopy is still controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis is to analyze the survival outcomes of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in the treatment of eEOC. Methods According to the keywords, Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched for studies from January 1994 to January 2021. Studies comparing the efficacy and safety of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for patients with eEOC were assessed for eligibility. Only studies including outcomes of overall survival (OS) were enrolled. The meta-analysis was performed using Stata software (Version 12.0) and Review Manager (Version 5.2). Results A total of 6 retrospective non-random studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results indicated that there was no difference between two approaches for patients with eEOC in OS (HR = 0.6, P = 0.446), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.6, P = 0.137) and upstaging rate (OR = 1.18, P = 0.54). But the recurrence rate of laparoscopic surgery was lower than that of laparotomic surgery (OR = 0.48, P = 0.008). Conclusions Laparoscopy and laparotomy appear to provide comparable overall survival and progression-free survival outcomes for patients with eEOC. Further high-quality studies are needed to enhance this statement.

scholarly journals Impact of icodextrin on clinical outcomes in peritoneal dialysis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 1899-1907 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeoungjee Cho ◽  
David W. Johnson ◽  
Sunil Badve ◽  
Jonathan C. Craig ◽  
Giovanni F.K. Strippoli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Prognostic Relevance of Celiac Lymph Node Involvement in Ovarian Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandra Martínez ◽  
Cristophe Pomel ◽  
Thomas Filleron ◽  
Marjolein De Cuypere ◽  
Eliane Mery ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Oncologic Outcome ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Disease Spread ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Increased Risk

ObjectiveThe aim of the study was to report on the oncologic outcome of the disease spread to celiac lymph nodes (CLNs) in advanced-stage ovarian cancer patients.MethodsAll patients who had CLN resection as part of their cytoreductive surgery for epithelial ovarian, fallopian, or primary peritoneal cancer were identified. Patient demographic data with particular emphasis on operative records to detail the extent and distribution of the disease spread, lymphadenectomy procedures, pathologic data, and follow-up data were included.ResultsThe median follow-up was 26.3 months. The median overall survival values in the group with positive CLNs and in the group with negative CLNs were 26.9 months and 40.04 months, respectively. The median progression-free survival values in the group with metastatic CLNs and in the group with negative CLNs were 8.8 months and 20.24 months, respectively (P = 0.053). Positive CLNs were associated with progression during or within 6 months after the completion of chemotherapy (P = 0.0044). Tumor burden and extensive disease distribution were significantly associated with poor progression-free survival, short-term progression, and overall survival. In multivariate analysis, only the CLN status was independently associated with short-term progression.ConclusionsDisease in the CLN is a marker of disease severity, which is associated to a high-risk group of patients with presumed adverse tumor biology, increased risk of lymph node progression, and worst oncologic outcome.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document