scholarly journals Tunable Metal–Organic Frameworks for Heat Transformation Applications

Nanomaterials ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Somboon Chaemchuen ◽  
Xuan Xiao ◽  
Nikom Klomkliang ◽  
Mekhman Yusubov ◽  
Francis Verpoort

Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs) are a subclass of porous materials that have unique properties, such as varieties of structures from different metals and organic linkers and tunable porosity from a structure or framework design. Moreover, modification/functionalization of the material structure could optimize the material properties and demonstrate high potential for a selected application. MOF materials exhibit exceptional properties that make these materials widely applicable in energy storage and heat transformation applications. This review aims to give a broad overview of MOFs and their development as adsorbent materials with potential for heat transformation applications. We have briefly overviewed current explorations, developments, and the potential of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), especially the tuning of the porosity and the hydrophobic/hydrophilic design required for this specific application. These materials applied as adsorbents are promising in thermal-driven adsorption for heat transformation using water as a working fluid and related applications.

Author(s):  
Somboon Chaemchuen ◽  
Xuan Xiao ◽  
Nikom Klomkliang ◽  
Mekhman S. Yusubov ◽  
Francis Verpoort

Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) are a subclass of porous materials that have unique properties such as varieties of structures from different metals and organic linkers, tunable porosity from a structure or framework design, etc. Moreover, modification/functionalization of the material structure could optimize the material properties and demonstrate high potential for a selected application. MOF materials exhibit exceptional properties and make these materials widely applicable including in energy storage and heat transformation applications. This review aims to give a broad overview of MOFs and their development as adsorbent materials having the potential for heat transformation applications. We summarize current investigations, developments, and possibilities of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) especially the tuning of the porosity and hydrophobic/hydrophilic design required for this specific application. These materials applied as adsorbent are promising in the thermal driven adsorption for heat transformation using water as working fluid and related application.


2021 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. 102179
Author(s):  
Nokubonga Makhanya ◽  
Bilainu Oboirien ◽  
Jianwei Ren ◽  
Nicholas Musyoka ◽  
Adriano Sciacovelli

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xu Zhang ◽  
An Chen ◽  
Ming Zhong ◽  
Zihe Zhang ◽  
Xin Zhang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mahmoud Yosry Zorainy ◽  
Mohamed Ibrahim Garalalm Alkalla ◽  
Serge Kaliaguine ◽  
Daria Camilla Camilla Boffito

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have expanded into a burgeoning topic in materials science and engineering. Their success mostly stems from the versatility of their structure that can be diversely designed by...


Nanoscale ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (34) ◽  
pp. 17649-17662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jayesh Cherusseri ◽  
Deepak Pandey ◽  
Kowsik Sambath Kumar ◽  
Jayan Thomas ◽  
Lei Zhai

Metal–organic frameworks are emerging players in the fabrication of flexible energy storage devices to power flexible and wearable electronics.


2016 ◽  
Vol 307 ◽  
pp. 361-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lu Wang ◽  
Yuzhen Han ◽  
Xiao Feng ◽  
Junwen Zhou ◽  
Pengfei Qi ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (18) ◽  
pp. 1950196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiang Wang ◽  
Shengli Tang

Adding porous nanoparticles into fluid can modify the energy storage properties of working fluid in the thermodynamic cycles. The adsorption capacity and thermal energy storage of CO2 in MOF-74 and UIO-66 at different temperatures and pressures are investigated in this paper via molecular simulations. The results denote that the adsorption of CO2 in the two studied metal organic frameworks (MOFs) differ from each other due to the different structures. The adsorption capacity of CO2 in MOF-74 is larger than that in UIO-66. However, the desorption heat of CO2 in MOF-74 is lower than that in UIO-66. Also, UIO-66 impacts more than MOF-74 on the thermal energy storage property of CO2.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document