scholarly journals The Pharmaceutical Industry in 2018. An Analysis of FDA Drug Approvals from the Perspective of Molecules

Molecules ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beatriz G. de la Torre ◽  
Fernando Albericio
Keyword(s):  
Natural Products ◽  
Pharmaceutical Industry ◽  
Small Molecules ◽  
Drug Administration ◽  
Chemical Structure ◽  
Food And Drug Administration ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Previous Record ◽  
New Chemical Entities ◽  
Important Milestone

The Food and Drug Administration approved 59 new drugs (42 New Chemical Entities and 17 Biologics) during 2018. This number breaks the previous record of 53 approved by the same organization in 1996. The 17 new biologics approved in 2018 also represent an important milestone for this kind of drug and they clearly exceed the 12 approved in 2015 and 2017. Herein, the 59 new drugs of the class of 2018 are analyzed from a strictly chemical perspective. The classification has been carried out on the basis of the chemical structure and includes the following: Biologics (antibodies and enzymes); TIDES (peptides and oligonucleotides) and natural products; drug combinations; and small molecules.

scholarly journals The Pharmaceutical Industry in 2019. An Analysis of FDA Drug Approvals from the Perspective of Molecules

Molecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 745 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beatriz G. de la Torre ◽  
Fernando Albericio
Keyword(s):  
Natural Products ◽  
Pharmaceutical Industry ◽  
Small Molecules ◽  
Chemical Structure ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Antibody Drug Conjugates ◽  
Drug Conjugates ◽  
The Us ◽  
New Chemical Entities ◽  
Antibody Drug

During 2019, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved 48 new drugs (38 New Chemical Entities and 10 Biologics). Although this figure is slightly lower than that registered in 2018 (59 divided between 42 New Chemical Entities and 17 Biologics), a year that broke a record with respect to new drugs approved by this agency, it builds on the trend initiated in 2017, when 46 drugs were approved. Of note, three antibody drug conjugates, three peptides, and two oligonucleotides were approved in 2019. This report analyzes the 48 new drugs of the class of 2019 from a strictly chemical perspective. The classification, which was carried out on the basis of chemical structure, includes the following: Biologics (antibody drug conjugates, antibodies, and proteins); TIDES (peptide and oligonucleotides); drug combinations; natural products; and small molecules.

scholarly journals A year in pharmacology: new drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2020

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gizem Kayki-Mutlu ◽  
Martin C. Michel
Keyword(s):  
Small Molecules ◽  
Drug Administration ◽  
Antisense Oligonucleotides ◽  
Food And Drug Administration ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Small Interfering Rnas ◽  
Drug Discovery And Development ◽  
The Past ◽  
The Us ◽  
Approved Drugs

AbstractWhile the COVID-19 pandemic also affected the work of regulatory authorities, the US Food and Drug Administration approved a total of 53 new drugs in 2020, one of the highest numbers in the past decades. Most newly approved drugs related to oncology (34%) and neurology (15%). We discuss these new drugs by level of innovation they provide, i.e., first to treat a condition, first using a novel mechanisms of action, and “others.” Six drugs were first in indication, 15 first using a novel mechanism of action, and 32 other. This includes many drugs for the treatment of orphan indications and some for the treatment of tropical diseases previously neglected for commercial reasons. Small molecules continue to dominate new drug approvals, followed by antibodies. Of note, newly approved drugs also included small-interfering RNAs and antisense oligonucleotides. These data show that the trend for declines in drug discovery and development has clearly been broken.

scholarly journals The Pharmaceutical Industry in 2020. An Analysis of FDA Drug Approvals from the Perspective of Molecules

Molecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beatriz G. de la Torre ◽  
Fernando Albericio
Keyword(s):  
Pharmaceutical Industry ◽  
Small Molecules ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Biologic Drugs ◽  
Antibody Drug Conjugates ◽  
Aromatic Heterocycles ◽  
Drug Conjugates ◽  
New Chemical Entities ◽  
Pharmaceutical Agents ◽  
Antibody Drug

Although the pharmaceutical industry will remember 2020 as the year of COVID-19, it is important to highlight that this year has been the second-best—together with 1996—in terms of the number of drugs accepted by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Each of these two years witnessed the authorization of 53 drugs—a number surpassed only in 2018 with 59 pharmaceutical agents. The 53 approvals in 2020 are divided between 40 new chemical entities and 13 biologic drugs (biologics). Of note, ten monoclonal antibodies, two antibody–drug conjugates, three peptides, and two oligonucleotides have been approved in 2020. Close inspection of the so-called small molecules reveals the significant presence of fluorine atoms and/or nitrogen aromatic heterocycles. This report analyzes the 53 new drugs of the 2020 harvest from a strictly chemical perspective, as it did for those authorized in the previous four years. On the basis of chemical structure alone, the drugs that received approval in 2020 are classified as the following: biologics (antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, and proteins); TIDES (peptide and oligonucleotides); natural products; fluorine-containing molecules; nitrogen aromatic heterocycles; and other small molecules.

scholarly journals 2018 FDA Tides Harvest

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danah Al Shaer ◽  
Othman Al Musaimi ◽  
Fernando Albericio ◽  
Beatriz de la Torre
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Drug Administration ◽  
Mode Of Action ◽  
Chemical Structure ◽  
Food And Drug Administration ◽  
The United States ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Target Mode ◽  
United States Food ◽  
States Food

In 2018, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a total of 59 new drugs, three of them (5%) are TIDES (or also, -tides), two oligonucleotides and one peptide. Herein, the three TIDES approved are analyzed in terms of medical target, mode of action, chemical structure, and economics.

scholarly journals 2020 FDA TIDES (Peptides and Oligonucleotides) Harvest

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 145
Author(s):  
Othman Al Musaimi ◽  
Danah Al Shaer ◽  
Fernando Albericio ◽  
Beatriz de la Torre
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Global Health ◽  
Drug Administration ◽  
Mode Of Action ◽  
Chemical Structure ◽  
Food And Drug Administration ◽  
Health Crisis ◽  
New Drug ◽  
Target Mode ◽  
The Us

2020 has been an extremely difficult and challenging year as a result of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and one in which most efforts have been channeled into tackling the global health crisis. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved 53 new drug entities, six of which fall in the peptides and oligonucleotides (TIDES) category. The number of authorizations for these kinds of drugs has been similar to that of previous years, thereby reflecting the consolidation of the TIDES market. Here, the TIDES approved in 2020 are analyzed in terms of chemical structure, medical target, mode of action, and adverse effects.

Multicenter Analysis of Genomically Targeted Single Patient Use Requests for Pediatric Neoplasms

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Himalee S. Sabnis ◽  
David S. Shulman ◽  
Benjamin Mizukawa ◽  
Nancy Bouvier ◽  
Ahmet Zehir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Drug Administration ◽  
Pediatric Cancer ◽  
Drug Targets ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Food And Drug Administration ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Single Patient ◽  
Patient Use

PURPOSE The US Food and Drug Administration–expanded access program (EAP) uses a single patient use (SPU) mechanism to provide patient access to investigational agents in situations where no satisfactory or comparable therapy is available. Genomic profiling of de novo and relapsed or refractory childhood cancer has led to increased identification of new drug targets in the last decade. The aim of this study is to examine the SPU experience for genomically targeted therapies in patients with pediatric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS All genomically targeted therapeutic SPUs obtained over a 5-year period were evaluated at four large pediatric cancer programs. Data were collected on the type of neoplasm, agents requested, corresponding molecularly informed targets, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS A total of 45 SPUs in 44 patients were identified. Requests were predominantly made for CNS and solid tumors (84.4%) compared with hematologic malignancies (15.6%). Lack of an available clinical trial was the main reason for SPU initiation (64.4%). The median time from US Food and Drug Administration submission to approval was 3 days (range, 0-12 days) and from Institutional Review Board submission to approval was 5 days (range, 0-50 days). Objective tumor response was seen in 39.5% (15 of 38) of all evaluable SPUs. Disease progression was the primary reason for discontinuation of drug (66.7%) followed by toxicity (13.3%). CONCLUSION SPU requests remain an important mechanism for pediatric access to genomically targeted agents given the limited availability of targeted clinical trials for children with high-risk neoplasms. Furthermore, this subset of SPUs resulted in a substantial number of objective tumor responses. The development of a multi-institutional data registry of SPUs may enable systematic review of toxicity and clinical outcomes and provide evidence-based access to new drugs in rare pediatric cancers.

Regulatory Perspectives: One Academic Viewpoint From the United States

2003 ◽  
Vol 15 (S1) ◽  
pp. 277-281
Author(s):  
Peter Whitehouse
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Vascular Dementia ◽  
Drug Administration ◽  
Food And Drug Administration ◽  
The United States ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Vascular Pathology ◽  
Vascular Burden ◽  
The Brain

The development of new drugs to treat vascular dementia and other conditions in which cognitive impairment is due at least in part to vascular pathology will require future interaction among academic, industry, and government regulatory clinicians and scientists. This article offers the author's perspective on the positive involvement of the Food and Drug Administration in development of conceptual frameworks and practical approaches to treatment of conditions characterized by vascular burden of the brain.

Enrollment of Elderly Patients in Clinical Trials for Cancer Drug Registration: A 7-Year Experience by the US Food and Drug Administration

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (22) ◽  
pp. 4626-4631 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lilia Talarico ◽  
Gang Chen ◽  
Richard Pazdur
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Drug Administration ◽  
Food And Drug Administration ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Cancer Drug ◽  
Cancer Therapies ◽  
Age Related ◽  
The Us

Purpose To analyze the age-related enrollment of cancer patients onto registration trials of new drugs or new indications approved by the US Food and Drug Administration from 1995 to 2002. Patients and Methods This study involved retrospective analyses of demographic data of cancer patients enrolled onto registration trials. The data on 28,766 cancer patients from 55 registration trials were analyzed according to age distributions of ≥ 65, ≥ 70, and ≥ 75 years. The rates of enrollment in each age group for each cancer were compared with the corresponding rates in the US cancer population. The age distributions of the US cancer population were derived from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program of the National Cancer Institute for the period 1995 to 1999 based on the 2000 US Census. Results The proportions of the overall patient populations aged ≥ 65, ≥ 70, and ≥ 75 years were 36%, 20%, and 9% compared with 60%, 46%, and 31%, respectively, in the US cancer population. Statistically significant under-representation of the elderly (P < .001) was noted in registration trials for all cancer treatment except for breast cancer hormonal therapies. Patients aged ≥ 70 years accounted for most of the under-representation. Conclusion Elderly were under-represented in the registration trials of new cancer therapies. Various strategies may be needed to evaluate cancer therapies for the elderly in prospective clinical trials and to improve cancer care in the elderly population.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document