scholarly journals Imaging Live Cells at the Nanometer-Scale with Single-Molecule Microscopy: Obstacles and Achievements in Experiment Optimization for Microbiology

Molecules ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 12116-12149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beth Haas ◽  
Jyl Matson ◽  
Victor DiRita ◽  
Julie Biteen
2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (12) ◽  
pp. 5550-5557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucien E. Weiss ◽  
Ljiljana Milenkovic ◽  
Joshua Yoon ◽  
Tim Stearns ◽  
W. E. Moerner

The Hedgehog-signaling pathway is an important target in cancer research and regenerative medicine; yet, on the cellular level, many steps are still poorly understood. Extensive studies of the bulk behavior of the key proteins in the pathway established that during signal transduction they dynamically localize in primary cilia, antenna-like solitary organelles present on most cells. The secreted Hedgehog ligand Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) binds to its receptor Patched1 (PTCH1) in primary cilia, causing its inactivation and delocalization from cilia. At the same time, the transmembrane protein Smoothened (SMO) is released of its inhibition by PTCH1 and accumulates in cilia. We used advanced, single molecule-based microscopy to investigate these processes in live cells. As previously observed for SMO, PTCH1 molecules in cilia predominantly move by diffusion and less frequently by directional transport, and spend a fraction of time confined. After treatment with SHH we observed two major changes in the motional dynamics of PTCH1 in cilia. First, PTCH1 molecules spend more time as confined, and less time freely diffusing. This result could be mimicked by a depletion of cholesterol from cells. Second, after treatment with SHH, but not after cholesterol depletion, the molecules that remain in the diffusive state showed a significant increase in the diffusion coefficient. Therefore, PTCH1 inactivation by SHH changes the diffusive motion of PTCH1, possibly by modifying the membrane microenvironment in which PTCH1 resides.


2008 ◽  
Vol 130 (29) ◽  
pp. 9204-9205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel J. Lord ◽  
Nicholas R. Conley ◽  
Hsiao-lu D. Lee ◽  
Reichel Samuel ◽  
Na Liu ◽  
...  

Langmuir ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 16 (14) ◽  
pp. 5993-5997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy H. Bayburt ◽  
Joseph W. Carlson ◽  
Stephen G. Sligar

2021 ◽  
Vol 120 (3) ◽  
pp. 184a
Author(s):  
Dylan George ◽  
Ashley Cadby ◽  
Timothy D. Craggs

Author(s):  
Jeongmin Kim ◽  
Michal Wojcik ◽  
Yuan Wang ◽  
Ke Xu ◽  
Xiang Zhang

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. e0188778 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuki M. Shirai ◽  
Taka A. Tsunoyama ◽  
Nao Hiramoto-Yamaki ◽  
Koichiro M. Hirosawa ◽  
Akihiro C. E. Shibata ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 192 (3) ◽  
pp. 463-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rinshi S. Kasai ◽  
Kenichi G. N. Suzuki ◽  
Eric R. Prossnitz ◽  
Ikuko Koyama-Honda ◽  
Chieko Nakada ◽  
...  

Receptor dimerization is important for many signaling pathways. However, the monomer–dimer equilibrium has never been fully characterized for any receptor with a 2D equilibrium constant as well as association/dissociation rate constants (termed super-quantification). Here, we determined the dynamic equilibrium for the N-formyl peptide receptor (FPR), a chemoattractant G protein–coupled receptor (GPCR), in live cells at 37°C by developing a single fluorescent-molecule imaging method. Both before and after liganding, the dimer–monomer 2D equilibrium is unchanged, giving an equilibrium constant of 3.6 copies/µm2, with a dissociation and 2D association rate constant of 11.0 s−1 and 3.1 copies/µm2s−1, respectively. At physiological expression levels of ∼2.1 receptor copies/µm2 (∼6,000 copies/cell), monomers continually convert into dimers every 150 ms, dimers dissociate into monomers in 91 ms, and at any moment, 2,500 and 3,500 receptor molecules participate in transient dimers and monomers, respectively. Not only do FPR dimers fall apart rapidly, but FPR monomers also convert into dimers very quickly.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document