scholarly journals Shear-Hosted Uranium Deposits: A Review

Minerals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 954
Author(s):  
Andy Wilde
Keyword(s):  
Uranium Deposit ◽  
Shear Zones ◽  
Ductile Deformation ◽  
Geodynamic Setting ◽  
Fluid Migration ◽  
Uranium Deposits ◽  
Uranium Mineralisation ◽  
Mineral Belt ◽  
Key Aspects ◽  
Regional Compression

A group of uranium deposits is described that is hosted within polyphase shear zones. The group is economically significant, collectively containing over 500,000 tonnes of uranium and several examples have been or are being mined. Over a hundred individual deposits are known widely spread over many countries. It is proposed that this group be assigned to a new shear-hosted uranium deposit category. Uranium deposition was superimposed upon intense and extensive feldspathic alteration formed during ductile deformation. This intense alteration has led to the alternative albitite-type or metasomatite-type nomenclature. The evidence is clear that in most cases uranium mineralization postdates regionally extensive feldspar alteration and is associated with a range of alteration assemblages which overprint early albite or K-feldspar dominant alteration. Abundance of hydrothermal zirconium and phosphate minerals is a common characteristic of this group which implies high activity of F and P during mineralisation, but the source of hydrothermal fluids remains uncertain. Also uncertain is the geodynamic setting of uranium mineralisation which is a consequence of absolute mineralisation age being poorly defined. Data from three of the four major districts are suggestive that mineralisation was a consequence of fluid migration along shears during regional compression. This paper reviews key aspects of the group in a mineral systems context, focussing on the four major districts of Kropyvnytskyi (Ukraine), Lagoa Real (Brazil), Mount Isa (Australia) and the Central Mineral Belt (Canada).

The Patterson Lake corridor of Saskatchewan, Canada: defining crystalline rocks in a deep-seated structure that hosts a giant, high-grade Proterozoic unconformity uranium system

2020 ◽  
pp. geochem2020-007
Author(s):  
Colin D. Card
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Shear Zones ◽  
Crystalline Rocks ◽  
Ductile Deformation ◽  
Uranium Deposits ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Athabasca Basin ◽  
Rock Types ◽  
Host Rocks ◽  
Basin Region

The Patterson Lake corridor in the Athabasca Basin region of Saskatchewan, Canada hosts a large-scale uranium system with two major deposits already delineated. The corridor developed in crystalline rocks of the southwest Rae Province, which host all of the known uranium endowment. Orthogneisses along with voluminous pegmatites are the hosts of the uranium mineralization. These rocks, however, underwent significant open-system metasomatic – hydrothermal modification. Principal amongst these alterations is early and pervasive quartz flooding of the host rocks that resulted in the development of widespread secondary quartzites and associated rock types. These secondary quartzites and their altered host rocks suffered ductile deformation, typically focussed at silicification fronts. Late carbonatite dykes exploited the associated shear zones. Semi-brittle deformation zones nucleated near the previously developed ductile high-strain zones. Graphite and associated iron-sulphides precipitated in a semi-brittle structural regime. These graphitized zones provided the necessary structural architecture to focus the uranium system, which developed may be hundreds of millions of years younger developing at ∼1.425 Ga.Host rocks of the Patterson Lake corridor prove that metasedimentary rocks are not a requirement for development of giant Proterozoic unconformity uranium deposits. Crustal-scale fault zones with access to the mantle (i.e. carbonatites) should be considered a key parameter in the exploration model for Proterozoic unconformity uranium deposits. Given the similarity of the mineral assemblages in the crystalline basement rocks of the main exploration corridor to eastern Athabasca Basin region, it is likely that a similar, cryptic geological boundary focussed the giant uranium system in that region.Thematic collection: This article is part of the Uranium Fluid Pathways collection available at: https://www.lyellcollection.org/cc/uranium-fluid-pathways

Stable isotope constraints on the role of graphite in the genesis of unconformity-type uranium deposits

1989 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 490-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. K. Kyser ◽  
M. R. Wilson ◽  
G. Ruhrmann
Keyword(s):  
Fluid Flow ◽  
Stable Isotope ◽  
Uranium Deposit ◽  
Shear Zones ◽  
Limited Range ◽  
Hydrothermal Fluids ◽  
Uranium Deposits ◽  
Athabasca Basin ◽  
Ore Zones

The Key Lake unconformity-type uranium deposit occurs in a shear zone where it intersects the unconformity between Archean and Aphebian gneisses and the overlying Proterozoic Athabasca Group sandstones. The roots of the Key Lake and many other unconformity-type uranium deposits in the Athabasca basin are close to gneisses rich in graphite and most deposits have small amounts of carbonaceous materials (bitumen and hydrocarbon buttons) within and around altered basement and sandstone ore zones. In many Athabasca uranium deposits, hydrothermal fluids have destroyed graphite disseminated in the strongly altered gneisses in the vicinity of the deposits, prompting some to suggest that graphite was converted to CH4, which reduced and precipitated the uranium and partially condensed to form bitumen. The δ13C values of graphite collected from unaltered and altered gneisses around the Key Lake deposit have a limited range (−25 ± 5) and are not a function of distance from the mineralization or the intensity of alteration or deformation. The uniformity of these δ13C values suggests that the destruction of graphite was due predominantly to oxidation by basinal fluids from the sandstone and that the graphite near the deposits did not react to form substantial amounts of 12C-rich phases such as CH4. Most of the bitumen samples, which have higher H/C ratios than the graphite, have δ13C values identical to those of the graphite (−25 ± 5). The similarity in the isotopic compositions of carbon in the bitumen and in the graphite indicates that the bitumen formed from degradation of graphite as a result of reactions with no significant isotopic fractionations, such as ones involving radiolysis of graphite. The hydrocarbon buttons and a few samples of bitumen have petrographic relations and 13C/12C ratios (δ13C values less than −30) that are indicative of reduction of graphite by H2 produced from water by radiolysis. Graphite in these deposits did not play a central role as a reducing agent for uranium, rather it represents a critical structural factor by providing shear zones along which fluid flow can be focussed.

scholarly journals Paragenetic and petrographic study of uranium mineralization along the Midwest Trend, Northeastern Athabasca Basin

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Peter Ferguson ◽  
Guoxiang Chi ◽  
Charles Normand ◽  
Patrick Ledru ◽  
Odile Maufrais-Smith
Keyword(s):  
Mineral Resource ◽  
Genetic Model ◽  
Uranium Deposit ◽  
Current Model ◽  
Uranium Mineralization ◽  
Mining District ◽  
Uranium Deposits ◽  
Athabasca Basin ◽  
Technical Report ◽  
Petrographic Study

The Athabasca Basin in northern Saskatchewan is host to many world-class uranium deposits associated with the unconformity between the Paleoproterozoic sandstone of the basin and the underlying crystalline basement (Jefferson et al., 2007).  While the style and tonnage of these deposits vary, the current genetic model for unconformity-related uranium deposits has been a practical tool for exploration in the Athabasca Basin. However, the factors which control the location and formation of these deposits is still not fully understood. A paragenetic and petrographic study of mineralization along the Midwest Trend, located on the northeastern margin of the Athabasca Basin, aims to refine the current model and to address the general problem: What are the factors which control mineralization and non-mineralization? The Midwest Trend will be used as a "modèle réduit" for uranium mineralization, as it displays many features characteristic of unconformity type deposits. The Midwest Trend comprises three mineral leases that encompass two uranium deposits, the Midwest Main and Midwest A (Allen et al., 2017a, b). Mineralization occurs along a NE-trending graphitic structure, and is hosted by the sandstone, at the unconformity, and in much lesser amounts in the underlying basement rocks. Petrographic observations aided by the use of RAMAN spectroscopy and SEM-EDS, have been used to create a paragenetic sequence of mineralization (Fig.1). Future work will focus on fluid inclusion studies using microthermometry, LA-ICP-MS, and mass spectrometry of contained gases. References:Allen, T., Quirt, D., Masset, O. (2017a). Midwest A Uranium Deposit, Midwest Property, Northern Mining District, Saskatchewan, NTS Map Area 741/8: 2017 Mineral Resource Technical Report. AREVA Resources Canada Inc. Internal Report No. 17-CND-33-01. Allen, T., Quirt, D., Masset, O. (2017b). Midwest Main Uranium Deposit, Midwest Property, Northern Mining District, Saskatchewan, NTS Map Area 741/8: 2017 Mineral Resource Technical Report. AREVA Resources Canada Inc. Internal Report No. 17-CND-33-01. Jefferson, C.W., Thomas, D.J., Gandhi, S.S., Ramaekers, P., Delaney, G., Brisbin, D., Cutts, C., Portella, P., and Olson, R.A., 2007: Unconformity-associated uranium deposits of the Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan and Alberta. Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin 588, p. 23–67.

Geological environment of the Cigar Lake uranium deposit

1993 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 653-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Bruneton
Keyword(s):  
Uranium Deposit ◽  
Transitional Zone ◽  
Uranium Deposits ◽  
Athabasca Basin ◽  
Structural Framework ◽  
Basement Rocks ◽  
Metamorphic Basement ◽  
Basement Ridge ◽  
Archean Basement ◽  
East West

The Cigar Lake uranium deposit occurs within the Athabasca Basin of northern Saskatchewan, Canada. Like other major uranium deposits of the basin, it is located at the unconformity separating Helikian sandstones of the Athabasca Group from Aphebian metasediments and plutonic rocks of the Wollaston Group. The Athabasca Group was deposited in an intra-continental sedimentary basin that was filled by fluviatile terrestrial quartz sandstones and conglomerates. The group appears undeformed and its actual maximum thickness is about 1500 m. On the eastern side of the basin, the detrital units correspond to the Manitou Falls Formations where most of the uranium deposits are located. The Lower Pelitic unit of the Wollaston Group, which lies directly on the Archean basement, is considered to be the most favourable horizon for uranium mineralization. During the Hudsonian orogeny (1800–1900 Ma), the group underwent polyphase deformation and upper amphibolite facies metamorphism. The Hudsonian orogeny was followed by a long period of erosion and weathering and the development of a paleoweathering profile.On the Waterbury Lake property, the Manitou Falls Formation is 250–500 m thick and corresponds to units MFd, MFc, and MFb. The conglomeratic MFb unit hosts the Cigar Lake deposit. However, the basal conglomerate is absent at the deposit, wedging out against an east–west, 20 m high, pre-Athabasca basement ridge, on top of which is located the orebody.Two major lithostructural domains are present in the metamorphic basement of the property: (1) a southern area composed mainly of pelitic metasediments (Wollaston Domain) and (2) a northern area with large lensoid granitic domes (Mudjatik Domain). The Cigar Lake east–west pelitic basin, which contains the deposit, is located in the transitional zone between the two domains. The metamorphic basement rocks in the basin consist mainly of graphitic metapelitic gneisses and calcsilicate gneisses, which are inferred to be part of the Lower Pelitic unit. Graphite- and pyrite-rich "augen gneisses," an unusual facies within the graphitic metapelitic gneisses, occur primarily below the Cigar Lake orebody.The mineralogy and geochemistry of the graphitic metapelitic gneisses suggest that they were originally shales. The abundance of magnesium in the intercalated carbonates layers indicates an evaporitic origin.The structural framework is dominated by large northeast–southwest lineaments and wide east–west mylonitic corridors. These mylonites, which contain the augen gneisses, are considered to be the most favourable features for the concentration of uranium mineralization.Despite the presence of the orebody, large areas of the Waterbury Lake property remain totally unexplored and open for new discoveries.

Deformation mechanisms in naturally-deformed blueschist facies metabasalts: constraints from exhumed subduction complexes in Greece and California

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn Tewksbury-Christle ◽  
Alissa Kotowski ◽  
Whitney Behr
Keyword(s):  
Electron Backscatter Diffraction ◽  
Shear Zones ◽  
Ductile Deformation ◽  
Interface Shear ◽  
Dislocation Glide ◽  
Dislocation Activity ◽  
Metasedimentary Rocks ◽  
Temperature Conditions ◽  
Low Viscosity ◽  
Lower Temperature

<p>The strength, or viscosity, of the subduction interface is a key parameter in subduction dynamics, influencing both long-term subduction plate speeds and short-term transient deformation styles. Fossil subduction interfaces exhumed from downdip of the megathrust record ductile deformation accommodated by diverse lithologies, including metasedimentary and metamafic rocks. Existing flow laws for quartz-rich rocks predict relatively low viscosities, in contrast to high viscosities predicted for basalt and eclogite, but the rheological properties of blueschists representative of metamorphosed oceanic crust of the down-going slab are poorly constrained. Two key questions remain: 1) are there significant viscosity contrasts between blueschists and quartz- or mica-rich metasedimentary rocks, and 2) what are the microscale mechanisms for creep in naturally deformed blueschists and how do they vary with pressure and temperature? To address these questions, we characterized deformation in natural samples from the Condrey Mountain Schist (CMS) in northern California, USA, and the Cycladic Blueschist Unit (CBU) on Syros Island, Cyclades, Greece, using outcrop-scale structural observations, optical microscopy, and Electron Backscatter Diffraction. The CMS and CBU record pressure-temperature conditions of 0.8-1.1 GPa, 350-450°C and 1.4-1.8 GPa, 450-550°C, respectively. </p><p>In the field, blueschists form m- to km-scale lenses that are interfolded with quartz schists, ultramafics, and, in the CBU, eclogites and marbles. At the outcrop scale in both localities, quartz-rich schists and blueschists each exhibit strong foliations and lineations and planar contacts at lithological boundaries. At the thin section scale, the prograde foliation and mineral lineation in blueschists are commonly defined by Na-amphiboles elongated in the lineation direction. Crystallographic preferred orientations in Na-amphibole in all samples have c-axes parallel to lineation and a-axes predominantly defining point-maxima perpendicular to the foliation, suggesting some component of dislocation activity for all temperature conditions in our sample suite. Microtextures in lower temperature CMS samples suggest strain accommodation primarily by dislocation glide and kinking in Na-amphibole, with extremely high-aspect-ratio grains and limited evidence for climb-controlled dynamic recrystallization. Some higher temperature CBU samples show large porphyroclasts with apparent ‘core-and-mantle’-type recrystallization textures and subgrain orientation analyses consistent with the (hk0)[001] slip systems. In contrast, epidote grains accommodate less strain than Na-amphibole, via some combination of rigid rotation, brittle boudinage, and minor intracrystalline plasticity.</p><p>Observations of evenly-distributed strain, despite lithological heterogeneity, suggest low viscosity contrasts and comparable bulk strengths of quartz schists and blueschists. Our microstructural observations suggest that Na-amphibole was the weakest phase and accommodated the majority of strain in mafic blueschists. Dislocation activity, and not just rigid-body-rotation or diffusional processes, accommodated some component of strain and possibly transitioned with increasing temperature from glide- to climb-controlled. Although effective viscosities appear to be similar, subduction interface shear zones dominated by blueschists may exhibit a power-law rheology consistent with dislocation activity, in contrast to the common inference of Newtonian creep in metasediments. Complementary experimental work on CMS and CBU rocks will also be presented at this meeting (see Tokle et al. and Hufford et al.).</p>

Ductile deformation and microstructures

2021 ◽  
pp. 58-85
Author(s):  
Jean-Luc Bouchez ◽  
Adolphe Nicolas
Keyword(s):  
Plastic Deformation ◽  
Grain Size ◽  
Elastic Deformation ◽  
Applied Stress ◽  
Deformation Mechanism ◽  
Chemical Elements ◽  
Shear Zones ◽  
Ductile Deformation ◽  
Deformation Mechanisms ◽  
Solid Materials

In contrast to the elastic deformation, which is reversible, usually neglected by field geologists but important for geophysicists working in seismology, ductile deformation is irreversible. This chapter is restricted to solid materials. Materials containing a melt fraction will be examined in Chapter 7. In the geological literature, ‘ductile’ is often used as a synonym for ‘plastic’. The latter is rather used, and will be used to specify deformation mechanisms that dominantly involve the action of dislocations. In contrast to brittle deformation, which by essence is discontinuous and highly localized (see Chapter 3), ductile deformation is generally continuous and affects large volumes of rock. However, ductile deformation may be concentrated into restricted rock volumes (or domains). Such localization is common in shear zones and/or when superplastic deformation mechanism is involved. Plastic deformation mechanisms naturally depend on temperature, magnitude of the applied stress, mineral nature and grain-size of the rocks. In upper parts of the crust, fluids are able to carry chemical elements over large distances and influence the deformation mechanisms. Micrographs of several microstructural types as well as deformation maps for olivine and calcite are given at the end of this chapter.

Deformation textures in pyrite from the Vangorda Pb-Zn-Ag deposit, Yukon, Canada

1993 ◽  
Vol 57 (386) ◽  
pp. 55-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Brown ◽  
K. R. McClay
Keyword(s):  
Grain Boundary ◽  
Boundary Migration ◽  
Shear Zones ◽  
Grain Boundary Sliding ◽  
Ductile Deformation ◽  
Mining District ◽  
Strain Partitioning ◽  
Triple Junctions ◽  
Brittle Deformation ◽  
Deformation Textures

AbstractThe Vangorda Pb-Zn-Ag orebody is a 7.1 M tonne, polydeformed stratiform massive sulphide deposit in the Anvil mining district, Yukon, Canada. Five sulphide lithofacies have been identified within the desposit with a typical mineralogy of pyrite, sphalerite, galena, and barite. Pyrrhotite-sphaleritemagnetite assembalges are locally developed. Etched polished sections of massive pyrite ores display relict primary depositional pyrite textures such as colloform growth zoning and spheroidal/framboidal features. A wide variety of brittle deformation, ductile deformation, and annealing textures have been identified. Brittle deformation textures include thin zones of intense cataclasis, grain indentation and axial cracking, and grain boundary sliding features. Ductile deformation textures include strong preferred grain shape orientations, dislocation textures, grain boundary migration, dynamic recrystallisation and pressure solution textures. Post deformational annealing has produced grain growth with lobate grain boundaries, 120° triple junctions and idioblastic pyrite porphyroblasts. The distribution of deformation textures within the Vangorda orebody suggests strong strain partitioning along fold limbs and fault/shear zones, it is postulated that focussed fluid flow in these zones had significant effects on the deformation of these pyritic ores.

Chapter 3 Archean (>2.6 Ga) and Paleoproterozoic (2.5–1.8 Ga), pre- and syn-orogenic magmatism, sedimentation and mineralization in the Norrbotten and Överkalix lithotectonic units, Svecokarelian orogen

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Bergman ◽  
Pär Weihed
Keyword(s):  
Variable Temperature ◽  
Tectonic Setting ◽  
Active Continental Margin ◽  
Volcanic Rocks ◽  
Shear Zones ◽  
Ductile Deformation ◽  
Fe Oxide ◽  
Ductile Shear Zones ◽  
Three Stages ◽  
Felsic Volcanic

AbstractTwo lithotectonic units (the Norrbotten and Överkalix units) occur inside the Paleoproterozoic (2.0–1.8 Ga) Svecokarelian orogen in northernmost Sweden. Archean (2.8–2.6 Ga and possibly older) basement, affected by a relict Neoarchean tectonometamorphic event, and early Paleoproterozoic (2.5–2.0 Ga) cover rocks constitute the pre-orogenic components in the orogen that are unique in Sweden. Siliciclastic sedimentary rocks, predominantly felsic volcanic rocks, and both spatially and temporally linked intrusive rock suites, deposited and emplaced at 1.9–1.8 Ga, form the syn-orogenic component. These magmatic suites evolved from magnesian and calc-alkaline to alkali–calcic compositions to ferroan and alkali–calcic varieties in a subduction-related tectonic setting. Apatite–Fe oxide, including the world's two largest underground Fe ore mines (Kiruna and Malmberget), skarn-related Fe oxide, base metal sulphide, and epigenetic Cu–Au and Au deposits occur in the Norrbotten lithotectonic unit. Low- to medium-pressure and variable temperature metamorphic conditions and polyphase Svecokarelian ductile deformation prevailed. The general northwesterly or north-northeasterly structural grain is controlled by ductile shear zones. The Paleotectonic evolution after the Neoarchean involved three stages: (1) intracratonic rifting prior to 2.0 Ga; (2) tectonic juxtaposition of the lithotectonic units during crustal shortening prior to 1.89 Ga; and (3) accretionary tectonic evolution along an active continental margin at 1.9–1.8 Ga.

Deep-penetrating geochemistry for concealed sandstone-type uranium deposits: A case study of Hadatu uranium deposit in the Erenhot Basin, North China

2020 ◽  
Vol 211 ◽  
pp. 106464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huan Kang ◽  
Yue-long Chen ◽  
Da-peng Li ◽  
Jun-xiang Zhao ◽  
Fu-rong Cui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
North China ◽  
Uranium Deposit ◽  
Uranium Deposits
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document