scholarly journals Disinfectant, Soap or Probiotic Cleaning? Surface Microbiome Diversity and Biofilm Competitive Exclusion

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 1726
Author(s):  
Wendy Stone ◽  
Janke Tolmay ◽  
Keira Tucker ◽  
Gideon M. Wolfaardt

This study extends probiotic cleaning research to a built environment. Through an eight-month cleaning trial, we compared the effect of three cleaning products (disinfectant, plain soap, and a probiotic cleaner containing a patented Bacillus spore consortium), and tap water as the control, on the resident microbiome of three common hospital surfaces (linoleum, ceramic, and stainless steel). Pathogens, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, were deposited and desiccated, and competitive exclusion was assessed for each microbiome. Cell survival was shown to be an incomplete tool for measuring microbial competitive exclusion. Biofilm competition offered a fuller understanding of competitive dynamics. A test for culturable cell survival showed that both plain soap and probiotic cleaner regimes established a surface microbiome that outcompeted the two pathogens. A different picture emerged when observing biofilms with a deposited and desiccated GFP-labeled pathogen, Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Competitive exclusion was again demonstrated. On surfaces cleaned with disinfectant the pathogen outcompeted the microbiomes. On surfaces cleaned with plain soap, the microbiomes outcompeted the pathogen. However, on surfaces cleaned with probiotic cleaner, despite the exponentially higher surface microbial loads, the microbiome did not completely outcompete the pathogen. Thus, the standard culturable cell test for survival on a surface confirmed the competitive advantage that is typically reported for probiotic cleaners. However, observation of competition in biofilms showed that the more diverse microbiome (according to alpha and beta indices) established on a surface cleaned with plain soap had a better competitive advantage than the monoculture established by the probiotic cleaner. Therefore, microbial diversity appears to be as critical to the competitive exclusion principle as cell numbers. The study showed that both plain soap and probiotic cleaner fostered competitive exclusion far more effectively than disinfectant. Probiotic cleaners with microbial diversity could be worth considering for hospital cleaning.

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-123
Author(s):  
James Justus ◽  

Perhaps no concept has been thought more important to ecological theorizing than the niche. Without it, technically sophisticated and well-regarded accounts of character displacement, ecological equivalence, limiting similarity, and others would seemingly never have been developed. The niche is also widely considered the centerpiece of the best candidate for a distinctively ecological law, the competitive exclusion principle. But the incongruous array and imprecise character of proposed definitions of the concept square poorly with its apparent scientific centrality. I argue this definitional diversity and imprecision reflects a problematic conceptual indeterminacy that challenges its putative indispensability in ecology.


1970 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 1187-1199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald A. Smith ◽  
S. Wayne Speller

P. m. gracilis and P. l. noveboracensis are sympatric in southeastern Ontario and some adjacent areas. Similar in appearance, food and breeding habits, and frequently cohabiting certain forests, they may occupy identical niches, contrary to the competitive exclusion principle. A 12-week summer live-trapping study in a woodlot containing upland, mixed, and cedar forest associations showed that although most of their population characteristics were similar, their local distributions, densities, and certain behaviors differed. Noveboracensis inhabited upland forest but avoided mixed and cedar forest associations apparently because suitable refuges were lacking. The less dense population of gracilis was ubiquitous; gracilis and noveboracensis cohabited the upland forest. On release from traps noveboracensis sometimes 'froze' before darting in a zigzag manner to nearby cover, and ran up trees significantly more than gracilis, which usually ran instantly, rapidly, and directly to a more distant ground refuge. Low densities of both species reduced competition for available food and refuges. This may have facilitated cohabitation in the upland forest where differential use of ground- and tree-holes also contributed to reduction of competition and thus to compatibility. Coexistence may be transitory there; with denser populations, potential competition might be minimized by emigration of the more exploratory gracilis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document