scholarly journals The Unified Creep-Fatigue Equation for Stainless Steel 316

Metals ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Liu ◽  
Dirk Pons ◽  
Ee-hua Wong
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Creep Fatigue ◽  
Stainless Steel 316 ◽  
Fatigue Equation

scholarly journals Analysis of Corrosion of Hastelloy-N, Alloy X750, SS316 and SS304 in Molten Salt High-Temperature Environment

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 543
Author(s):  
Ketan Kumar Sandhi ◽  
Jerzy Szpunar
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Corrosion Resistance ◽  
Molten Salt ◽  
Corrosion Damage ◽  
Nickel Superalloy ◽  
Triple Junctions ◽  
Salt Corrosion ◽  
Molten Fluoride ◽  
Stainless Steel 316

Nickel superalloy Hastelloy-N, alloy X-750, stainless steel 316 (SS316), and stainless steel 304 (SS304) are among the alloys used in the construction of molten salt reactor (MSR). These alloys were analyzed for their corrosion resistance behavior in molten fluoride salt, a coolant used in MSR reactors with 46.5% LiF+ 11.5% NaF+ 42% KF. The corrosion tests were run at 700 °C for 100 h under the Ar cover gas. After corrosion, significant weight loss was observed in the alloy X750. Weight loss registered in SS316 and SS304 was also high. However, Hastelloy-N gained weight after exposure to molten salt corrosion. This could be attributed to electrochemical plating of corrosion products from other alloys on Hastelloy-N surface. SEM–energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDXS) scans of cross-section of alloys revealed maximum corrosion damage to the depth of 250 µm in X750, in contrast to only 20 µm on Hastelloy-N. XPS wide survey scans revealed the presence of Fe, Cr, and Ni elements on the surface of all corroded alloys. In addition, Cr clusters were formed at the triple junctions of grains, as confirmed by SEM–EBSD (Electron Back Scattered Diffraction) analysis. The order of corrosion resistance in FLiNaK environment was X750 < SS316 < SS304 < Hastelloy-N.

Crack Growth in Stainless Steel 304 under Creep-Fatigue Loading

2007 ◽  
Vol 353-358 ◽  
pp. 485-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y.M. Baik ◽  
K.S. Kim
Keyword(s):  
Stress Intensity Factor ◽  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Stress Intensity ◽  
Intensity Factor ◽  
Crack Growth ◽  
Growth Rates ◽  
Static Loading ◽  
Fatigue Loading ◽  
Creep Fatigue ◽  
Crack Growth Rates

Crack growth in compact specimens of type 304 stainless steel is studied at 538oC. Loading conditions include pure fatigue loading, static loading and fatigue loading with hold time. Crack growth rates are correlated with the stress intensity factor. A finite element analysis is performed to understand the crack tip field under creep-fatigue loading. It is found that fatigue loading interrupts stress relaxation around the crack tip and cause stress reinstatement, thereby accelerating crack growth compared with pure static loading. An effort is made to model crack growth rates under combined influence of creep and fatigue loading. The correlation with the stress intensity factor is found better when da/dt is used instead of da/dN. Both the linear summation rule and the dominant damage rule overestimate crack growth rates under creep-fatigue loading. A model is proposed to better correlate crack growth rates under creep-fatigue loading: 1 c f da da da dt dt dt Ψ −Ψ     =         , where Ψ is an exponent determined from damage under pure fatigue loading and pure creep loading. This model correlates crack growth rates for relatively small loads and low stress intensity factors. However, correlation becomes poor as the crack growth rate becomes large under a high level of load.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document