scholarly journals d-Path Laplacians and Quantum Transport on Graphs

Mathematics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernesto Estrada

We generalize the Schrödinger equation on graphs to include long-range interactions (LRI) by means of the Mellin-transformed d-path Laplacian operators. We find analytical expressions for the transition and return probabilities of a quantum particle at the nodes of a ring graph. We show that the average return probability in ring graphs decays as a power law with time when LRI is present. In contrast, we prove analytically that the transition and return probabilities on a complete and start graphs oscillate around a constant value. This allowed us to infer that in a barbell graph—a graph consisting of two cliques separated by a path—the quantum particle get trapped and oscillates across the nodes of the path without visiting the nodes of the cliques. We then compare the use of the Mellin-transformed d-path Laplacian operators versus the use of fractional powers of the combinatorial Laplacian to account for LRI. Apart from some important differences observed at the limit of the strongest LRI, the d-path Laplacian operators produces the emergence of new phenomena related to the location of the wave packet in graphs with barriers, which are not observed neither for the Schrödinger equation without LRI nor for the one using fractional powers of the Laplacian.

Author(s):  
Rupert L. Frank ◽  
David Gontier ◽  
Mathieu Lewin

AbstractIn this paper we disprove part of a conjecture of Lieb and Thirring concerning the best constant in their eponymous inequality. We prove that the best Lieb–Thirring constant when the eigenvalues of a Schrödinger operator $$-\Delta +V(x)$$ - Δ + V ( x ) are raised to the power $$\kappa $$ κ is never given by the one-bound state case when $$\kappa >\max (0,2-d/2)$$ κ > max ( 0 , 2 - d / 2 ) in space dimension $$d\ge 1$$ d ≥ 1 . When in addition $$\kappa \ge 1$$ κ ≥ 1 we prove that this best constant is never attained for a potential having finitely many eigenvalues. The method to obtain the first result is to carefully compute the exponentially small interaction between two Gagliardo–Nirenberg optimisers placed far away. For the second result, we study the dual version of the Lieb–Thirring inequality, in the same spirit as in Part I of this work Gontier et al. (The nonlinear Schrödinger equation for orthonormal functions I. Existence of ground states. Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-021-01634-7). In a different but related direction, we also show that the cubic nonlinear Schrödinger equation admits no orthonormal ground state in 1D, for more than one function.


2003 ◽  
Vol 14 (08) ◽  
pp. 1087-1105 ◽  
Author(s):  
ZHONGCHENG WANG ◽  
YONGMING DAI

A new twelfth-order four-step formula containing fourth derivatives for the numerical integration of the one-dimensional Schrödinger equation has been developed. It was found that by adding multi-derivative terms, the stability of a linear multi-step method can be improved and the interval of periodicity of this new method is larger than that of the Numerov's method. The numerical test shows that the new method is superior to the previous lower orders in both accuracy and efficiency and it is specially applied to the problem when an increasing accuracy is requested.


2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo M. Cavalcanti ◽  
Valéria N. Domingos Cavalcanti

Abstract In this paper we study the existence as well as uniform decay rates of the energy associated with the nonlinear damped Schrödinger equation, i ⁢ u t + Δ ⁢ u + | u | α ⁢ u - g ⁢ ( u t ) = 0   in  ⁢ Ω × ( 0 , ∞ ) , iu_{t}+\Delta u+|u|^{\alpha}u-g(u_{t})=0\quad\text{in }\Omega\times(0,\infty), subject to Dirichlet boundary conditions, where Ω ⊂ ℝ n {\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^{n}} , n ≤ 3 {n\leq 3} , is a bounded domain with smooth boundary ∂ ⁡ Ω = Γ {\partial\Omega=\Gamma} and α = 2 , 3 {\alpha=2,3} . Our goal is to consider a different approach than the one used in [B. Dehman, P. Gérard and G. Lebeau, Stabilization and control for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation on a compact surface, Math. Z. 254 2006, 4, 729–749], so instead than using the properties of pseudo-differential operators introduced by cited authors, we consider a nonlinear damping, so that we remark that no growth assumptions on g ⁢ ( z ) {g(z)} are made near the origin.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document