scholarly journals Healing of Post-Extraction Sockets Filled with Anorganic Bovine Bone and Covered with a Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix. Radiological 2D and 3D Results of a Pilot Study to Assess Dimensional Stability

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 2473
Author(s):  
Tiziano Testori ◽  
Matteo Antonio Deflorian ◽  
Federico Mandelli ◽  
Giulia Attardo ◽  
Carlo Maiorana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Dimensional Stability ◽  
Bone Matrix ◽  
Collagen Matrix ◽  
Volumetric Analysis ◽  
Bovine Bone ◽  
Socket Preservation ◽  
Dimensional Changes ◽  
2D And 3D ◽  
Positive Effect

Analysis of short-term results regarding dimensional stability of post-extraction sockets managed via a preservation protocol using deproteinized bovine bone matrix and a xenogeneic collagen matrix. Materials and methods Fifteen patients needing extraction of one single-rooted premolar tooth were treated in a pilot study. Five patients were treated in each centre. After tooth extraction, sockets were filled with anorganic bovine bone matrix and covered with a xenogeneic collagen matrix. Six months later, implants were placed. Dimensional changes in the treated sites were digitally evaluated using the best-fit superimposition of pre-and post-socket preservation models. Results After six months of healing, the vertical reduction of the grafted sites was 0.31 ± 0.24 mm (p < 0.001). Volumetric analysis of superimposed models showed an average palatal-lingual contraction of 0.33 ± 0.51 mm3 (p = 0.02). At the vestibular level, the average contraction was found to be 0.8 ± 0.3 mm3 (p < 0.001). Finally, the analysis of linear variations in the treated sites on a single sagittal section at the crystal level, and at 3 and 7 mm apically respect to the crest, both towards the vestibule and palate, generally showed more marked resorption at the crestal level compared to apical measurements. Conclusion: The clinical protocol herein employed for socket preservation showed a positive effect in preventing the physiological post-extraction remodeling.

Induction in Vivo of Cartilage Grafts for Craniofacial Reconstruction

1998 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henriette L. Verwoerd-Verhoef ◽  
Jim K. Bean ◽  
Gerjo J.V.M. Van Osch ◽  
Paul G.J. Ten Koppel ◽  
Jaap A. Meeuwis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Donor Site ◽  
Bone Matrix ◽  
Collagen Matrix ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Pedicled Flap ◽  
Growth Potential ◽  
Polymorphonuclear Cells ◽  
Bovine Bone ◽  
Intercellular Substance

In the craniofacial region, defects of cartilage structures are preferably reconstructed with autologous cartilage. Donor-site morbidity related to the creation of a new defect elsewhere, and a lack of growth potential of the graft—mandatory in children—have stimulated investigators to find other ways to generate new “extra” cartilage. Several biomaterials have been tested as a matrix for the ingrowth of (peri)chondroblasts in experimental animals. In young (growing) rabbits we have developed a process of heterotopic cartilage induction with the use of a demineralized (bovine) bone matrix which is enfolded in a pedicled flap of ear perichondrium for at least three weeks. During this period the demineralized matrix is colonized by macrophages and polymorphonuclear cells which start a process of complete biodegradation of the material. Simultaneously, the collagen matrix is invaded by mesenchymal cells, originating from the perichondrium and differentiating into chondroblasts and later, into chondrocytes forming the intercellular substance. The developing, very young cartilage could be demonstrated as collagen type II, thus, hyaline cartilage. When applied with its adherent perichondrium as a graft, it merges easily with the more matured host cartilage and even appears to be capable of further growth. Therefore, it seems suitable for the reconstruction of a cartilaginous defect in growing cartilaginous structures like the nasal septum or the larynx.

scholarly journals Alveolar socket preservation with demineralised bovine bone mineral and a collagen matrix

2017 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo Maiorana ◽  
Pier Paolo Poli ◽  
Matteo Deflorian ◽  
Tiziano Testori ◽  
Federico Mandelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Mineral ◽  
Collagen Matrix ◽  
Bovine Bone ◽  
Socket Preservation ◽  
Bovine Bone Mineral

scholarly journals Impact of soft tissue graft on the preservation of compromised sockets: a randomized controlled clinical pilot study

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-126
Author(s):  
Bruno Segnini ◽  
Fausto Borges-Filho ◽  
Lélis Nicoli ◽  
Marcelo Gonçalves ◽  
Cláudio Marcantonio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Collagen Membrane ◽  
Bovine Bone ◽  
Facial Bone ◽  
Socket Preservation ◽  
Free Gingival Graft ◽  
Tissue Graft ◽  
Soft Tissue Graft ◽  
The Impact

The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the impact of the association of free gingival graft (FGG) or collagen-matrix xenograft (CMX) to deproteinized bovine bone graft (DBBG) on the preservation of post-extraction sockets with facial-wall defects. Sixteen patients who presented a maxillary tooth with a facial bone defect and indication of extraction were selected. After the surgical procedure, all the post-extraction sockets were filled with DBBG and covered with a collagen membrane. The cervical part of the socket was then sealed with either FGG or CMX. Clinical and tomographic analyses were performed at baseline and 4 months after the grafting procedure. The FGG sockets showed higher values for the width of the bone ridge than the CMX sockets at 4 months. There was no difference regarding biopsy composition. In conclusion, regardless of the type of soft tissue graft used, socket preservation with DBBG at sites presenting facial bone defects enabled implant placement without further guided bone regeneration, whether the sockets were sealed with FGG or CMX.

Comparative Assessment of Autogenous Cancellous Bone Graft and Bovine-Derived Demineralized Bone Matrix for Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

2021 ◽  
pp. 105566562110251
Author(s):  
Vijay Kumar ◽  
Vidya Rattan ◽  
Sachin Rai ◽  
Satinder Pal Singh ◽  
Jai Kumar Mahajan
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Iliac Crest ◽  
Demineralized Bone Matrix ◽  
Bone Matrix ◽  
Volumetric Analysis ◽  
Group I ◽  
Alveolar Bone Grafting ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
Demineralized Bone

Objective: Comparison between bovine-derived demineralized bone matrix (DMBM) and iliac crest graft over long term for secondary alveolar bone grafting (SABG) in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) in terms of radiological and clinical outcomes. Design: Prospective, randomized, parallel groups, double-blind, controlled trial. Setting: Unit of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral Health Science Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh. Participants: Twenty patients with UCLP. Interventions: Patients were allocated into group I (Iliac crest bone graft) and group II (DMBM) for SABG. Outcomes were assessed at 2 weeks, 6 months, and then after mean follow-up period of 63 months. Outcomes Measures: Volumetric analysis of the grafted bone in the alveolar cleft site was done through cone beam computed tomography using Cavalieri principle and modified assessment tool. Clinical assessment was performed in terms of pain, swelling, duration of hospital stay, cost of surgery, alar base symmetry, and donor site morbidity associated with iliac crest harvesting. Results: Volumetric analysis through Cavalieri principle revealed comparable bone uptake at follow-up of 6 months between group I (70%) and group II (69%). Modified assessment tool showed no significant difference between horizontal and vertical bone scores over short- and long-term follow-up. In group II, there was higher cost of surgery, but no donor site morbidity unlike group I. Conclusions: Demineralized bone matrix proved analogous to iliac crest bone graft as per volumetric analysis over shorter period. However, although statistically insignificant, net bone volume achieved was lower than the iliac crest graft at longer follow-up.

scholarly journals The use of solvent-preserved human and bovine cancellous bone blocks for lateral defect augmentation - an experimental controlled study in vivo

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lara Schorn ◽  
Tim Fienitz ◽  
Kathrin Berndsen ◽  
Norbert R. Kübler ◽  
Henrik Holtmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Formation ◽  
Cancellous Bone ◽  
Bone Substitute ◽  
Bone Matrix ◽  
Human Bone ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Bovine Bone ◽  
New Bone Formation ◽  
Bone Substitute Material ◽  
Substitute Material

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to compare new bone formation, resorbed bone matrix, and fibrous enclosed residual bone substitute material in laterally augmented alveolar bone defects using allogeneic, pre-treated and cleaned human bone blocks (tested in dogs, therefore considered to be xenogeneic), and pre-treated and cleaned bovine cancellous bone blocks, both with and without a collagen membrane in order to evaluate their augmentative potential. Methods Thirty-two critical size horizontal defects were prepared in the mandible of 4 adult foxhound dogs (8 per dog, 4 on each side). After 3 months of healing, the defects were laterally augmented in a split-mouth-design with either human (HXB) or bovine solvent-preserved bone blocks (BXB). Afterwards, defects were randomly covered with a bovine collagenous membrane (HXB + M, BXB + M). After a healing interval of 6 months, percentages of new bone formation, resorbed bone matrix, and fibrous enclosed residual bone substitute material were compared. Results Results showed little new bone formation of up to 3.7 % in human bone blocks (HXB 3.7 % ± 10.2, HXB + M 0.3 %± 0.4, BXB, 0.1 % ± 0.8, BXB + M 2.6 % ± 3.2, p = > 0.05). Percentages of fibrous encapsulation were higher in human bone blocks than in bovine bone blocks (HXB 71.2 % ± 8.6, HXB + M 73.71 % ± 10.6, BXB, 60.5 % ± 27.4, BXB + M 52.5 % ± 28.4, p = > 0.05). Resorption rates differed from 44.8 % in bovine bone blocks covered with a membrane to 17.4 % in human bone blocks (HXB 17.4 % ± 7.4, HXB + M 25.9 % ± 10.7, BXB, 38.4 % ± 27.2, BXB + M 44.8 % ± 29.6, p = > 0.05). The use of additional membranes did not significantly affect results. Conclusions Within its limitations, results of this study suggest that solvent-preserved xenogenic human and bovine bone blocks are not suitable for lateral bone augmentation in dogs. Furthermore, defect coverage with a membrane does not positively affect the outcome.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document