scholarly journals Evaluation of Restorative Techniques for Vertically Fractured Roots

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 2099
Author(s):  
Kota Shimizu ◽  
Tomonori Satoh ◽  
Koichi Shinkai
Keyword(s):  
Failure Modes ◽  
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid ◽  
Ferric Chloride Solution ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Tooth Surface ◽  
Phosphate Solution ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Bonding Durability

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of combining specific adhesive materials and various surface treatments on bonding durability and microleakage of vertically fractured roots. Adhesive models were prepared using bovine lower incisors. The experiment included the following five groups: SB-G group (control) (10% citric acid with 3% ferric chloride solution (10-3 solution) + an adhesive resin cement (4-META/MMA-TBB; Super-Bond®)), EC group (self-cure bonding agent (UB) + core composite resin (EC)), EC-G group (10-3 solution + UB + EC), EC-P group (40% phosphate solution + UB + EC), and EC-E group (18% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution + UB + EC). After applying a load of 50,000 cycles, microleakage, microtensile bond strength (μTBS), and failure modes were examined. Microleakage of the EC, EC-G, and EC-E groups was significantly lower than that of the EC-P group. The μTBS of the EC-G group was significantly higher than that of the other groups. All EC groups showed that mixed (cohesive and adhesive) and adhesive failures were the most prevalent types of failure modes. The EC-G group showed the highest bonding durability and the lowest microleakage results, which indicates a possible alternative to current adhesive and tooth surface treatments.

scholarly journals Impact of simplified chemical treatment of semi-direct restorations cemented with self-adhesive resin cement on dentin bond durability and nanoleakage

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. e619119525
Author(s):  
Joselúcia da Nóbrega Dias ◽  
Andressa Eveline de Lima Ribeiro ◽  
Ana Margarida dos Santos Melo ◽  
Boniek Castillo Dutra Borges ◽  
Isauremi Assunção
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Chemical Treatment ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Universal Adhesive ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Chemical Surface ◽  
Adhesive Resin Cement ◽  
Bond Durability

The present study aimed to evaluate the impact of different chemical surface treatments and aging on dentin bond strength and nanoleakage of semi-direct restorations cemented with self-adhesive resin cement. One hundred and sixty semi-direct composite restorations (4.8 x 2.8 x 4.0 mm) were produced to fill dentin preparations in bovine tooth, and the specimens were divided into 8 groups according to chemical treatment [No treatment, Silane (S), Scotchbond™ Universal adhesive (SBU), and S+SBU], and aging time in water [24 h and 6 months]. Push-out bond strength (PBS) was measured through a universal testing machine (1.0 mm/min), failure modes by a dissecting microscope, and nanoleakage by scanning electron microscopy. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc (p<0.05) test were used to analyze PBS data, whilst failure modes and nanoleakage were analyzed descriptively. The bond durability was influenced by different chemical surface treatments after 6 months of aging in distilled water, with the best performance for the group that uses silane associated with the universal adhesive. Nanoleakage was greater at the dentin-cement interface, from the base of the restorations. However, the infiltration of silver crystals at the cement-resin interface was not influenced by the different chemical treatments applied. The results of the study suggest that self-adhesive cement promotes efficient adhesion to the interface that improves over time without the need for chemical surface treatment or when using SBU, with or without silane.

scholarly journals Microtensile bond strength of restorative composite bonded with self-adhesive resin cements to enamel and dentin

2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 3
Author(s):  
Mohammed Al-Saleh ◽  
Omar El-Mowafy
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Tensile Force ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Bonding Agents ◽  
Premature Failure ◽  
Adhesive Resin Cement

PURPOSE: To determine the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of composite restorations when bonded with self-adhesive resin-cements. METHODS: Thirty caries-free extracted molars were sterilized, and divided into 5 equal groups according to adhesive used: SBMP (Scotch-Bond-Multipurpose, total-etch 3-step adhesive, 3M/ESPE), PAN (PanaviaF-2.0, resin-cement with self-etch primer, Kuraray), RXU (RelyX-Unicem, self-adhesive resin-cement, 3M/ESPE), BRZ (Breeze, self-adhesive resin-cement, Pentron) and MON (Monocem, self-adhesive resin-cement, Shofu). Each group was divided into 2 subgroups (dentin or enamel). Bonding agents, used according to manufacturers’ directions, or a thin layer of resin cement was applied onto teeth flat surfaces. Six mm-thick Filtek-Z250 (3M/ESPE) composite build up was made in three increments. Teeth were sectioned to obtain rectangular specimens which were subjected to tensile force until failure. Specimens were subjected to 1,000 thermo-cycles between 5oC-55°C. Means and standard deviation (SD) were calculated and statistically-analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey’s t-test. Specimens’ failure modes were reported. RESULTS: SBMP showed the highest µTBS results with enamel (24.6(6.1) MPa), PAN showed high µTBS with enamel (12.1(3.9)MPa) and dentin (11.6(4.7)MPa) compared to the other self-adhesive cements. Failure modes were adhesive and mixed for self-adhesive resin-cements. MON subgroups and BRZ enamel subgroup underwent premature failure. CONCLUSION: self-adhesive resin-cements showed low µTBS compared to SBMP.

scholarly journals Effect of surface treatments of laboratory-fabricated composites on the microtensile bond strength to a luting resin cement

2004 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos José Soares ◽  
Marcelo Giannini ◽  
Marcelo Tavares de Oliveira ◽  
Luis Alexandre Maffei Sartini Paulillo ◽  
Luis Roberto Marcondes Martins
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Hydrofluoric Acid ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Single Bond ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Bonded Interface ◽  
Luting Composite ◽  
Effect Of Surface

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of different surface treatments on composite resin on the microtensile bond strength to a luting resin cement. Two laboratory composites for indirect restorations, Solidex and Targis, and a conventional composite, Filtek Z250, were tested. Forty-eight composite resin blocks (5.0 x 5.0 x 5.0mm) were incrementally manufactured, which were randomly divided into six groups, according to the surface treatments: 1- control, 600-grit SiC paper (C); 2- silane priming (SI); 3- sandblasting with 50 mm Al2O3 for 10s (SA); 4- etching with 10% hydrofluoric acid for 60 s (HF); 5- HF + SI; 6 - SA + SI. Composite blocks submitted to similar surface treatments were bonded together with the resin adhesive Single Bond and Rely X luting composite. A 500-g load was applied for 5 minutes and the samples were light-cured for 40s. The bonded blocks were serially sectioned into 3 slabs with 0.9mm of thickness perpendicularly to the bonded interface (n = 12). Slabs were trimmed to a dumbbell shape and tested in tension at 0.5mm/min. For all composites tested, the application of a silane primer after sandblasting provided the highest bond strength means.

scholarly journals Effect of Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength to Turkom-Cera All-ceramic Material

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. 920-925 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bandar MA Al-Makramani ◽  
Fuad A Al-Sanabani ◽  
Abdul AA Razak ◽  
Mohamed I Abu-Hassan ◽  
Ibrahim Z AL-Shami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Ceramic Material ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
All Ceramic ◽  
Effect Of Surface

ABSTRACT Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of surface treatments on shear bond strength (SBS) of Turkom-Cera (Turkom-Ceramic (M) Sdn. Bhd., Puchong, Malaysia) all-ceramic material cemented with resin cement Panavia-F (Kuraray Medical Inc., Okayama, Japan). Materials and methods Forty Turkom-Cera ceramic disks (10 mm × 3 mm) were prepared and randomly divided into four groups. The disks were wet ground to 1000-grit and subjected to four surface treatments: (1) No treatment (Control), (2) sandblasting, (3) silane application, and (4) sandblasting + silane. The four groups of 10 specimens each were bonded with Panavia-F resin cement according to manufacturer's recommendations. The SBS was determined using the universal testing machine (Instron) at 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed. Failure modes were recorded and a qualitative micromorphologic examination of different surface treatments was performed. The data were analyzed using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) tests. Results The SBS of the control, sandblasting, silane, and sandblasting + silane groups were: 10.8 ± 1.5, 16.4 ± 3.4, 16.2 ± 2.5, and 19.1 ± 2.4 MPa respectively. According to the Tukey HSD test, only the mean SBS of the control group was significantly different from the other three groups. There was no significant difference between sandblasting, silane, and sandblasting + silane groups. Conclusion In this study, the three surface treatments used improved the bond strength of resin cement to Turkom-Cera disks. Clinical significance The surface treatments used in this study appeared to be suitable methods for the cementation of glass infiltrated all-ceramic restorations. How to cite this article Razak AAA, Abu-Hassan MI, AL-Makramani BMA, AL-Sanabani FA, AL-Shami IZ, Almansour HM. Effect of Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength to Turkom-Cera All-Ceramic Material. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016;17(11):920-925.

Tensile bond strength of an adhesive resin cement to different alloys having various surface treatments

2009 ◽  
Vol 101 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amara Abreu ◽  
Maria A. Loza ◽  
Augusto Elias ◽  
Siuli Mukhopadhyay ◽  
Stephen Looney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Adhesive Resin Cement

scholarly journals Bond Durability of Different Resin Cements to Caries-Affected Dentin Under Simulated Intrapulpal Pressure

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 293-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
MF Mohamed ◽  
HA El Deeb ◽  
IE Gomaa ◽  
EH Mobarak
Keyword(s):  
Failure Modes ◽  
Storage Conditions ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Dihydrogen Phosphate ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Machine Failure ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Adhesive Resin Cement ◽  
Self Etch

SUMMARY Objective: To evaluate the durability of the bond of different resin cement systems to normal dentin (ND) and caries-affected dentin (CAD) with and without simulated intrapulpal pressure (IPP). Methods and Materials Molars with midcoronal caries were used. Occlusal enamel was cut to expose both dentin substrates (ND and CAD). Dentin substrates were differentiated using visual, tactile, caries-detecting dye, and dye-permeability methods. Prepared crown segments were equally divided according to the tested resin cement systems: etch-and-rinse resin cement, self-etch resin cement containing methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP), and self-adhesive resin cement. In addition to the dentin substrates and the resin cement types, the effect of application/storage conditions (with or without simulated IPP and with or without thermocycling) were tested. A microtensile bond strength test was done using a universal testing machine. Failure modes were determined using a scanning electron microscope. Results Etch-and-rinse resin cement strength values were significantly affected by the difference in the dentin substrates as well as the different application/storage conditions. Self-etch adhesive containing MDP bonded equally to ND and CAD and remained stable under all tested conditions. Self-adhesive resin cement revealed a similar bond to ND and CAD; however, its values were the lowest, especially when IPP and thermocycling were combined. Mixed failure was the predominant failure mode. Conclusions Etch-and-rinse resin cement was sensitive to dentin substrate and application/storage conditions. Resin cement with self-etch adhesive containing MDP revealed more reliable bonding to ND/CAD even when IPP and thermocycling were combined. The bonding of the self-adhesive resin cement could not compete with other resin cements.

Effect of temporary cements on the microtensile bond strength of self-etching and self-adhesive resin cement

2014 ◽  
Vol 72 (8) ◽  
pp. 762-769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edilausson Moreno Carvalho ◽  
Ceci Nunes Carvalho ◽  
Alessandro Dourado Loguercio ◽  
Darlon Martins Lima ◽  
José Bauer
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Adhesive Resin Cement

scholarly journals Long-term bond strength of a self-adhesive resin cement to intraradicular dentin pretreated with chlorhexidine and ethanol

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-103
Author(s):  
Mariah Carvalho Guimarães dos SANTOS ◽  
Flávia Lucisano Botelho AMARAL ◽  
Cecília Pedroso TURSSI ◽  
Roberta Tarkany BASTING ◽  
Fabiana Mantovani Gomes FRANÇA
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Group ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Tooth Surface ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Group 4 ◽  
Adhesive Resin Cement ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Push Out

Abstract Introduction Self-adhesive resin cements do not require prior preparation of the tooth surface, therefore dentin pretreatments may influence long-term bond strength. Objective To evaluate the influence of 100% ethanol (ET) and 2% chlorhexidine (CL) treatment of intraradicular dentin on the long-term bond strength (BS) of a self-adhesive resin cement (SRC). Material and method 80 bovine roots were restored with fiber posts and SRC (U200 3M/ESPE) and distributed into 4 groups according to dentin treatment: Group 1 – without treatment; Group 2 – 2% CL for 1 minute; Group 3 – 100% ET for 1 minute; Group 4 – 2% CL, followed by 100% ET. The samples were cross-sectioned to obtain two sections (0.7 mm) thick for each root third: coronal, middle and apical. The immediate push-out test was carried out after 48 hours, and the long-term push-out test, after 180 days. Result The three-way ANOVA test for randomized blocks showed no difference between the BS values at 48 hours and 80 days, irrespective of the treatment and the third (p>0.05). The interaction of the treatment/third pairing was significant (p = 0.041) since the treatment with CL promoted lower BS in the coronal third, while treatment with ET promoted better BS in the apical third. Conclusion Treatment with CL and ET, separately or combined, promoted no differences between the BS values of the SRC to root dentin over time.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document