scholarly journals Push-Out Bond Strength and SEM Evaluation in Roots Filled with Two Different Techniques Using New and Conventional Sealers

Materials ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 1620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pervin Dabaj ◽  
Atakan Kalender ◽  
Ayce Unverdi Eldeniz
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Delivery System ◽  
Calcium Silicate ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Group 4 ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
Push Out ◽  
Group 1

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of calcium-silicate-based sealer (Endosequence-BC-Sealer) in roots, filled with thermo-plasticized injectable technique aided by Calamus-Flow-Delivery-System, on bond strength to radicular dentin, in comparison with conventional epoxy-resin-based sealer (AH-Plus) along with cold-lateral-compaction technique. Root canals of mandibular-premolar teeth (n = 80) were instrumented using Protaper Universal rotary files and were randomly divided into four experimental groups (n = 20) as follows: (1) AH-Plus + cold-lateral-compaction technique; (2) Endosequence-BC-Sealer + cold-lateral-compaction technique; (3) AH-Plus + thermo-plasticized injectable technique; and (4) Endosequence-BC-Sealer + thermo-plasticized injectable technique. Horizontal disc shaped samples from each group (n = 60/group) were obtained and push-out bond strength testing was performed at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed statistically using nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis analysis and Mann-Whitney test (p < 0.001). The statistical analysis revealed a significant difference amongst the groups (p < 0.001). The highest bond strength values were found in group 1 compared with all the other experimental groups (p < 0.001), whereas the lowest bond strength values were found in group 4 (p < 0.001). It was concluded that thermo-plasticized injectable technique with Calamus-Flow-Delivery-System lowered the bond strengths of the sealers, especially Endosequence-BC-Sealer. Therefore, this technique is not recommended to calcium-silicate-based sealers. Further studies are needed to confirm the findings of this study.

scholarly journals EFFECTS OF COLD LATERAL VERSUS WARM VERTICAL COMPACTION OBTURATION ON THE PUSH-OUT BOND STRENGTH OF BIOROOT™, A CALCIUM SILICATE-BASED SEALER

2020 ◽  
pp. 77-79
Author(s):  
ANDARI PUTRIANTI ◽  
MUNYATI USMAN ◽  
KAMIZAR NAZAR ◽  
RATNA MEIDYAWATI ◽  
ENDANG SUPRASTIWI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Calcium Silicate ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Universal Testing ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Warm Vertical Compaction ◽  
Push Out ◽  
Group 1

Objective: BioRoot™ , which contains pure calcium silicate, is used in cold lateral compaction. However, hydroxyl ions are still released when BioRoot™is used in warm vertical compaction. This study compared the effects of cold and warm vertical compaction obturation on the push-out bond strengthof BioRoot™.Methods: Specimens from 16 root canals instrumented with ProTaper Next X5 50/06 were divided into two groups (n=16 specimens per group).Group 1 was obturated using cold lateral compaction, whereas Group 2 was obturated using warm vertical compaction. All samples were incubatedfor 48 h (37°C, 100% humidity) and embedded into an acrylic block. Starting at 7 mm from the apex, two 2-mm-thick slices of each sample were cut.Dislodgement resistance was measured using a universal testing machine, and the push-out bond strength was calculated.Results: There was a significant difference in the push-out bond strength value between cold (4.5–41.1 MPa) and warm (4.12–24.25 MPa) compactionobturation (p<0.05).Conclusion: Cold lateral compaction provides better adhesion capability than warm vertical compaction in root canal obturation.

scholarly journals Micro-push-out bond strength of Mineral—based root canal sealer in canals with different tapers.

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Nunna Vasavi ◽  
◽  
Kantheti Sirisha ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Root Canal Sealer ◽  
Rotary Instruments ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Push Out

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the micro-push-out bond strength of a mineral-based root canal sealer, BioRoot RCS in canals prepared by K3XF rotary systems of two different tapers. Material and Methods: Eighty caries free maxillary central incisors were used in this study. The samples were allocated into 4 groups (n=20) according to the root canal sealer and taper of the rotary instruments. The samples were obturated using single cone obturation technique. From each root 1mm thick slices at coronal, middle and apical thirds were collected using hard tissue microtome under continuous water coolant. Push-out tests were done for these sections using a Universal testing machine (INSTRON 8801) at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the bond strengths within groups and Tukey’s multiple post hoc analysis was used for pair-wise comparison of bond strengths. Results: AH Plus exhibited higher micro-push-out bond strength than BioRootRCS though they did not differ significantly (p>0.05). Preparation of root canals with 6% taper rotary instruments showed higher bond strength than 4% though they did not differ significantly (p>0.05). Conclusion: There was no significant difference between micro-push-out bond strength values of BioRoot RCS and AH Plus. The bond strength values were high in 6% taper canals than 4% canals though the difference was not significant statistically.

Effects of Surface Texture and Etching Time on Roughness and Bond Strength to Ground Enamel

2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 17-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andre Figueiredo Reis ◽  
Flávio Henrique Baggio Aguiar ◽  
Marcelo Giannini ◽  
Patricia Nóbrega Rodrigues Pereira
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Texture ◽  
Etching Time ◽  
Ground Enamel ◽  
Group 4 ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 10 ◽  
Group 5 ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Aim The aim of this study was to assess the influence of surface texture and etching technique on surface roughness (Ra) and bond strength (BS) to enamel and to determine if a correlation exists between them. Methods and Materials Fifty enamel blocks were either roughened with 600-grit SiC paper or polished with diamond pastes. After establishing ten test groups (n=5), the initial Ra measurements, rough (R) and smooth (S) enamel surfaces were etched according to the following protocols: Group 1(R)/Group 2(S)- 35% phosphoric acid gel (H3PO4) for 15 seconds; Group 3(R)/Group 4(S)- 35% H3PO4 for 60 seconds; Group 5(R)/Group 6(S)- Clearfil SE Bond primer for 20 seconds; Group 7(R)/Group 8(S)- self-etching primer (SEP) for 60 seconds; Group 9(R)/ Group 10(S)- 35% H3PO4 for 15 seconds + SEP for 20 seconds. After treatments, a new Ra measurement was performed and enamel surfaces were bonded with either Single Bond (Group 1 to Group 4) or Clearfil SE Bond (Group 5 to Group 10). Afterwards, specimens were prepared for the microtensile test. Ra values were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the BS values were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA and Tukey test (5%). Correlation between BS and Ra values was assessed using the Pearson's test. Results The application of SEP produced the lowest Ra values. No significant difference was detected between the BS values of polished and rough surfaces. No correlation was observed between Ra and BS values. Even though etching enamel with the SEP resulted in a surface with less roughness, similar BS values were observed for both self-etching and etch-and-rinse techniques. Conclusion Within the limits of this study increasing the etching time or combining both etching techniques failed to improve the BS using SEP or etch-and-rinse systems. Clinical Significance Based on the findings of this study, there is no clinical justification for increasing the etching time or for combining the use of a SEP following the use of a 35% H3PO4 etchant to achieve a greater BS to ground enamel. Citation Reis AF, Aguiar FHB, Pereira PNR, Giannini M. Effects of Surface Texture and Etching Time on Roughness and Bond Strength to Ground Enamel. J Contemp Dent Pract 2009 July; (10)4:017-025.

scholarly journals Efficacy of ProTaper Retreatment System in Root Canals Obturated with Gutta-Percha Using Two Different Sealers and GuttaFlow

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaya Siotia ◽  
Shashi Rashmi Acharya ◽  
Sunil Kumar Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Area Ratio ◽  
Variance Test ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Silicon Based ◽  
Group 1

Objective. To compare the efficacy of ProTaper retreatment files in removing three different obturating materials.Study Design. Forty-five human, single-rooted premolars were divided into three experimental groups. Group 1 was obturated with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer, Group 2 was obturated with gutta-percha and zinc oxide eugenol sealer, and Group 3 was obturated with GuttaFlow. Retreatment was done using the ProTaper universal rotary retreatment files. Root halves were visualized using magnifying loops at 3X magnification and optical stereomicroscope at 10X magnification. Images were analyzed using AutoCAD 2004 software to calculate area of the remaining debris in the canal. For statistical analysis were used variance test and ANOVA.Results. Total debris/canal area ratio between the three groups showed a statistically significant difference (P<0.001).Conclusion. ProTaper retreatment system did not produce completely clean canals in any of the groups. However, it had the best efficacy towards removing silicon based obturating material GuttaFlow.

scholarly journals Adhesion of real seal to human root dentin treated with different solutions

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 521-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renata Baldissera ◽  
Ricardo Abreu da Rosa ◽  
Márcia Helena Wagner ◽  
Milton Carlos Kuga ◽  
Fabiana Soares Grecca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Chlorhexidine Gluconate ◽  
The Other ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Root Dentin ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Push Out

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different irrigants on sealer-dentin bond strength when using Real Seal. Thirty single-rooted teeth were divided into 3 groups. In one group, the teeth were irrigated with 3 mL of 2.5% NaOCl after each file change, flushed with 17% EDTA for 3 min and finally rinsed with 3 mL of 2.5% NaOCl. In the other two groups, rinse with NaOCl was replaced with 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) and 0.9% saline, respectively. Each root was sectioned transversally into apical, middle and coronal thirds to obtain 2-mm-thick slices. Each slice was filled with Real Seal and Resilon. Push-out test was used to analyze bond strength and failure modes were classified as adhesive, cohesive or mixed, according to SEM observations. The push-out test did not reveal any statistically significant difference (p>0.05) between the irrigants. However, the groups exhibited significantly different (p<0.05) bond strengths in terms of the root canal third. Higher bond strength was observed at the apical third when compared with coronal third, while middle third presented intermediary values. Fifteen specimens were analyzed by SEM (5 per group). Eleven specimens exhibited adhesive failures (5 in saline, 4 in NaOCl and 2 in CHX group); 2 cohesive failures were observed in the CHX group, and 1 mixed failure each was observed in the CHX and NaOCl groups. The tested irrigants did not influence the bond strength of Resilon and Real Seal to dentin. The apical third exhibited higher mean bond strengths and adhesive failures were predominant.

scholarly journals Effect of Calcium Hypochlorite and Sodium Hypochlorite as Root Canal Irrigants on Push-Out Bond Strength of Fiber Post Cemented with Etch-and-Rinse Resin Cement: An In Vitro Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahdiyeh Sheikh Ghahderijani ◽  
Maryam Khoroushi ◽  
Atiyeh Feiz
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Calcium Hypochlorite ◽  
Root Canal Irrigants ◽  
Fiber Posts ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Push Out ◽  
Group 1

Objectives: Calcium hypochlorite (CH) has been recently used as a root canal irrigant. The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of CH and sodium hypochlorite (SH), as root canal irrigants, on the push-out bond strength of fiber posts cemented with an etch-and-rinse resin cement.  Materials and Methods: In this experimental in-vitro study, 40 human anterior teeth with similar root lengths were randomly divided into five groups (N=8) according to the protocol of root canal irrigation as follows: group 1: saline (control); group 2: 2.5% SH; group 3: 5.25% SH; group 4: 2.5% CH; group 5: 5% CH. Before post placement, the post space was irrigated using the same irrigation protocol, and after that, they were irrigated by distilled water. Fiber posts were cemented with All-Bond 3 bonding and Dou-Link Universal cement. After thermocycling (1000 cycles, 5- 55°C), a push-out test was performed, and data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's post-hoc test with SPSS version 23 (α=0.05). Results: The highest and lowest mean bond strengths were detected in groups 2 and 5, respectively. There was no significant difference between group 1 and the SH groups (P>0.05), but the difference between group 1 and the CH groups was significant (P<0.001). There was a significant difference between SH groups and CH groups (P<0.001). Conclusion: Compared to SH, as a root canal irrigant, CH decreased the push-out bond strength of fiber posts cemented with an etch-and-rinse resin cement.  

scholarly journals Correlation between Bond Strength to Dentin and Sealers Penetration by Push-Out Test and CLSM Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 555-562
Author(s):  
Maybell Tedesco ◽  
Marcelo Carvalho Chain ◽  
Wilson Tadeu Felippe ◽  
Ana Maria Hecke Alves ◽  
Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Laser Scanning ◽  
Regional Analysis ◽  
Kendall Test ◽  
Laser Scanning Microscopy ◽  
Confocal Laser ◽  
Dentinal Tubules ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Push Out

Abstract This study correlated the bond strength (BS) and dentin penetration of different sealers by push-out test and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) analysis. Forty-five root canals were prepared according to the crown-down technique and filled with gutta-percha associated to the following sealers (n=15): Endofill, AH Plus and MTA Fillapex. Five canals of each group were filled with the sealers added with 0.1% Rhodamine B dye. Next, the specimens were transversely sectioned and submitted to the push-out test (n=10) and CLSM analysis (n=5). The BS data showed the following means (MPa) and standard deviation: AH Plus (4.17±1.86); MTA Fillapex (3.13±1.96) and Endofill (2.10±1.03). Statistical analysis (two-way ANOVA, α=0.05) showed significant difference among sealers (p<0.001) and root canal thirds (p<0.001). The BS results of Endofill and MTA Fillapex were statistically similar (p>0.05), however, they were statistically different from AH Plus (p<0.001). The regional analysis of BS showed similarity between middle and apical thirds (p>0.05), and both were different from coronal portion (p<0.001). CLSM analysis verified tags formation in all groups and higher penetration of the specimens filled with AH Plus (p<0.05). The Kendall test (correlation between BS to dentin and sealer penetration into dentinal tubules) and the Pearson test (between failures pattern and sealer penetration into dentinal tubules) did not show correlation between the variables evaluated for all the tested sealers (p>0.05). AH Plus group had higher BS to dentin, and deeper tags formation than the other sealers. There was no significant correlation between BS and intratubular penetration of the tested sealers.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Apical Filling after Warm Vertical Compaction using Two Different Endodontic Materials: Resilon® and Gutta-Percha

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 166-170
Author(s):  
Carla Zogheib ◽  
Etienne Medioni
Keyword(s):  
Group 4 ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 5 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Warm Vertical Compaction ◽  
Group 1

ABSTRACT Forty-eight extracted maxillary anterior teeth instrumented with ProTaper system to apical preparations 0.25, 0.40 and 0.60 mm (n = 16 each) were divided into six groups for filling as following: Group 1: Apical preparation 25/100 + gutta-percha/AH Plus sealer, group 2: Apical preparation 25/100 + Resilon/Real Seal, group 3: Apical preparation 40/100 + gutta-percha/AH plus sealer, group 4: Apical preparation 40/100 + Resilon/Real Seal, group 5: Apical preparation 60/100 + gutta-percha/AH plus, group 6: Apical preparation 60/100 + Resilon/Real Seal. All teeth were filled using the warm vertical technique. Horizontal sections at 1, 2 and 3 mm from the apex were observed by SEM under 200 × magnification. Sections were digitally photographed under a stereomicroscope and the images were transferred to a compatible PC for image analysis. The surface area of voids were calculated and compared at all levels; using the Kruskal-Wallis test with Sidak correction and Mann-Whitney U test (p > 0.05). Comparisons within each group (gutta-percha/AH plus and Resilon/Real Seal) showed the presence of voids but there was no significant difference between any level of sectioning for apical preparations of 25 and 40 (p > 0.05). The only difference was in the groups prepared to size 60 and filled with Resilon/ Real Seal which showed significantly more voids than the group filled with gutta-percha/AH plus and especially at the 3 mm level. Conclusion The system Resilon/Real Seal did not achieve better results in terms of sealing ability in the apical third when compared to the conventional gutta-percha/AH plus sealing system. How to cite this article Zogheib C, Naaman A, Medioni E. Evaluation of Apical Filling after Warm Vertical Compaction using Two Different Endodontic Materials: Resilon® and Gutta-Percha. World J Dent 2012;3(2):166-170.

The Efficacy of Different Sealer Removal Protocols on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Adhesives to a Bioceramic Sealer-Contaminated Dentin

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeliha Gonca Bek Kürklü ◽  
Oğuz Yoldaş
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Calcium Silicate ◽  
Single Step ◽  
Cavity Surface ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Root Canal Sealer ◽  
Universal Adhesive ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Bond Strengths

Abstract Background: The optimal bonding of adhesives to dentin requires the sealer to be completely removed from dentinal walls. This study compared the efficacy of different sealer removal protocols on the microtensile bond strengths (MTBS) of single step adhesives to a calcium silicate-based bioceramic root canal sealer contaminated dentin. Methods: Standardized box-shaped Class I cavities were prepared in human lower third molars (N=50). All cavities were contaminated with a bioceramic root canal sealer (Endosequence BC Sealer, Brasseler, Savannah, USA), except the control group cavities. For the experimental groups, dentin surfaces were wiped with dry cotton pellets, cotton pellets saturated with water or rinsed with an air water syringe for 5 seconds, or applied aqueous ultrasonic scaler for 5 seconds prior to restoration procedure. All the cavity surface was restored with a one-bottle universal adhesive and composite resin. All the specimens were subjected to both thermocycling and mechanical loading. The restored specimens were sectioned into resin-dentin beams for mictotensile bond strength (Mtbs) evaluation. Additional specimens were prepared for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to examination of dentin-adhesive interface (N=10).Results: The Mtbs for the 5 groups, the control, dry cotton, wet cotton, water rinse, and ultrasonic rinse group, were 13.42 ± 4.68, 11.96 ± 5.26, 13.03±6.07, 12.73±3.68, and 14.39±4.22 MPa, respectively. No significant difference was found between the mean bond strengths of the groups (p=0.725). In SEM examination no residual sealer was found in any group. Conclusions: Calcium silicate-based bioceramic sealer was removed from the dentin surface with all removal protocols when evaluated with Mtbs after thermal and mechanical cycle tests.

Deproteinizing Agents as an Effective Enamel Bond Enhancer-An in Vitro Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 280-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pallavi Hasija ◽  
Vinod Sachdev ◽  
Shivani Mathur ◽  
Rishi Rath
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Sodium Hypochlorite ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Acid Etching ◽  
Control Group ◽  
P Value ◽  
Group 4 ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 1

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of different deproteinizing agents on shear bond strength of composite to primary teeth enamel. Study Design: Forty sound primary molars divided in 4 groups of 10 teeth each. In control group 1, enamel was etched for 60 seconds with 37% phosphoric acid and rinsed with water. Group 2: after acid etching deproteinizing agent 5 % sodium hypochlorite was applied for 60 seconds and rinsed. Group 3: after acid etching deproteinizing agent papain gel was applied for 60 seconds and rinsed. Group 4: after acid etching deproteinizing agent bromelain gel applied for 60 seconds and rinsed. Following this, bonding agent was applied to treated enamel surface and composite resin disc were build. Samples were then tested for shear bond strength using Universal Testing Machine. Results: Mean SBS was highest for group 4 and lowest for group 1. No statistically significant difference (p value &gt;0.05) was found between all the four groups. Conclusion: Among deproteinizing agents, deproteinization when carried out with bromelain gel and sodium hypochlorite showed effective bond strength as compared to papain.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document