scholarly journals Impact of Tacrolimus Daily Dose Limitation in Renal Transplant Recipients Expressing CYP3A5: A Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1002
Author(s):  
Rémi Lenain ◽  
Mehdi Maanaoui ◽  
Aghilès Hamroun ◽  
Romain Larrue ◽  
Cynthia Van Der Van Der Hauwaert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Target Range ◽  
Renal Transplant Recipients ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Graft Outcome ◽  
Daily Dose ◽  
Gfr Decline ◽  
Set Up ◽  
One Year

The pharmacokinetic variability of tacrolimus can be partly explained by CYP3A5 activity. Our objective was to evaluate a tacrolimus sparing policy on renal graft outcome according to CYP3A5 6986A>G genetic polymorphism. This retrospective study included 1114 recipients with a median follow-up of 6.3 years. Genotyping of the 6986A>G allelic variant corresponding to CYP3A5*3 was systematically performed. One year after transplantation, tacrolimus blood trough concentration (C0) target range was 5–7 ng/mL. However, daily dose was capped to 0.10 mg/kg/day regardless of the CYP3A5 genotype. A total 208 CYP3A5*1/- patients were included. Despite a higher daily dose, CYP3A5*1/- recipients exhibited lower C0 during follow-up (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis did not show any significant influence of CYP3A5*1/- genotype (HR = 0.70, 0.46–1.07, p = 0.10) on patient-graft survival. Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) decline was significantly lower for the CYP3A5*1/- group (p = 0.02). The CYP3A5*1/- genotype did not significantly impact the risk of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) (HR = 1.01, 0.68–1.49, p = 0.97) despite significantly lower C0. Based on our experience, a strategy of tacrolimus capping is associated with a better GFR evolution in CYP3A5*1/- recipients without any significant increase of BPAR incidence. Our study raised some issues about specific therapeutic tacrolimus C0 targets for CYP3A5*1/- patients and suggests to set up randomized control studies in this specific population.

Adiponectin is unrelated to kidney function or injury markers in renal transplant recipients: A one-year follow-up study

2022 ◽  
pp. 106618
Author(s):  
Natalia Serwin ◽  
Daria Adamiak ◽  
Magda Wiśniewska ◽  
Małgorzata Marchelek-Myśliwiec ◽  
Karol Serwin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Transplant ◽  
Kidney Function ◽  
Renal Transplant Recipients ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Follow Up Study ◽  
One Year

Vascular access types in patients starting hemodialysis after failed kidney transplant: does close nephrology follow-up matter?

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naveed Ul Haq ◽  
Mohamed Said Abdelsalam ◽  
Mohammed Mahdi Althaf ◽  
Abdulrahman Ali Khormi ◽  
Hassan Al Harbi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Access ◽  
Clinic Visit ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Renal Transplant Recipients ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Early Referral ◽  
Period Data ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage

Background Native arteriovenous fistulae (AVFs) are preferred while central venous catheters (CVCs) are least suitable vascular access (VA) in patients requiring hemodialysis (HD). Unfortunately, around 80% of patients start HD with CVCs. Late referral to nephrologist is thought to be a factor responsible for this. We retrospectively analyzed the types of VA at HD initiation in renal transplant recipients followed by nephrologists with failed transplant. If early referral to nephrologist improves AVF use, these patients should have higher prevalence of AVF at HD initiation. Methods All patients who failed their kidney transplants from January 2002 to April 2013 were included in the study. Data regarding planning of VA by nephrologist, documented discussion about renal replacement therapy (RRT), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 6 months and last clinic visit before HD initiation, time of VA referral, and subsequent VA at dialysis initiation were gathered and analyzed. Results Eighty-three patients failed their transplants during study period. Data were inaccessible in six patients. Eleven patients started peritoneal dialysis (PD) while 66 started HD. Thirty-two had previous functioning VA while 34 needed VA. There were 11/34 patients (32%) with eGFR <15 mL/min at six months while 21/34 (61%) had eGFR <15 mL/min at last clinic visit before HD initiation. Only 11/34 (32%) had documented RRT discussion, 8/34 (24%) had VA referral, and 7/34 (21%) had vein mapping. A total of 30/34 (88.3%) started HD with CVC while 4/34 (11.3%) started HD with AVF (p<0.0001). Conclusions Early referral to nephrologist by itself may not improve VA care amongst patient with end-stage renal disease.

Venous Thromboembolism and the Risk of Death and Graft Loss in Kidney Transplant Recipients

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 343-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ngan N. Lam ◽  
Amit X. Garg ◽  
Greg A. Knoll ◽  
S. Joseph Kim ◽  
Krista L. Lentine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
General Population ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Graft Loss ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Increased Risk

Background: The implications of venous thromboembolism (VTE) for morbidity and mortality in kidney transplant recipients are not well described. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study using linked healthcare databases in Ontario, Canada to determine the risk and complications of VTE in kidney transplant recipients from 2003 to 2013. We compared the incidence rate of VTE in recipients (n = 4,343) and a matched (1:4) sample of the general population (n = 17,372). For recipients with evidence of a VTE posttransplant, we compared adverse clinical outcomes (death, graft loss) to matched (1:2) recipients without evidence of a VTE posttransplant. Results: During a median follow-up of 5.2 years, 388 (8.9%) recipients developed a VTE compared to 254 (1.5%) in the matched general population (16.3 vs. 2.4 events per 1,000 person-years; hazard ratio [HR] 7.1, 95% CI 6.0-8.4; p < 0.0001). Recipients who experienced a posttransplant VTE had a higher risk of death (28.5 vs. 11.2%; HR 4.1, 95% CI 2.9-5.8; p < 0.0001) and death-censored graft loss (13.1 vs. 7.5%; HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.4-3.6; p = 0.0006) compared to matched recipients who did not experience a posttransplant VTE. Conclusions: Kidney transplant recipients have a sevenfold higher risk of VTE compared to the general population with VTE conferring an increased risk of death and graft loss.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document