scholarly journals Importance of NUDT15 Polymorphisms in Thiopurine Treatments

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 778
Author(s):  
Yoichi Tanaka ◽  
Yoshiro Saito
Keyword(s):  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Drug Class ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Drugs ◽  
Nudix Hydrolase ◽  
Asian Countries ◽  
Asian Populations ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
Metabolizing Enzyme ◽  
Severe Adverse Reactions

Thiopurines, mercaptopurine, and azathioprine are used as immunosuppressants in the treatments of inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and organ transplantation and as chemotherapeutic drugs for the treatment of acute leukemia and chronic myeloid leukemia. This drug class sometimes causes severe adverse reactions, including bone marrow suppression and hair loss. Genetic polymorphisms of the metabolizing enzyme thiopurine S-methyltransferase have been used for predicting these reactions in Caucasians, but these allele frequencies are less frequently observed in Asian populations. Recently, nudix hydrolase 15 (NUDT15) polymorphisms have been shown to play an important role in thiopurine-induced adverse reactions in Asians. In this review, we summarize the NUDT15 studies, mainly in Asian countries, and their implementation in several countries.

Does Infliximab Short Infusion have a Beneficial Impact on the Quality of Life in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases? A Single Centre Prospective Evaluation

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariabeatrice Principi ◽  
Giuseppe Losurdo ◽  
Rosa Federica La Fortezza ◽  
Pasquale Lopolito ◽  
Rosa Lovero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Sexual Life ◽  
Necrosis Factor Alpha ◽  
Short Infusion ◽  
Bowel Diseases ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

Background & Aims: Infliximab (IFX) is an anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agent used in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) therapy. Usually, it is administered over a 2-hour intravenous infusion. However, shortening the infusion duration to 1 hour has proved to be feasible and safe. In the present study we evaluated whether shortening the IFX infusion could affect the patients' quality of life (QoL) compared to the standard protocol.Methods: Subjects affected by IBD receiving IFX were prospectively recruited. The main criterion to shorten the infusion was the absence of IFX-related adverse reactions during the previous three 2-h infusions. For each patient, demographic, clinical and anthropometric data were collected. A questionnaire investigating their overall/job/social/sexual QoL was administered. Ordinal regression was performed with odds ratios (OR) for significant independent variables.Results: Eighty-one patients were included (46 with ulcerative colitis - UC, 35 with Crohn's disease - CD). Sixteen received the 2-h infusion due to previous adverse reactions, and the remaining 65 underwent the 1-h schedule. Shortening the infusion to 1 hour determined a better QoL (OR=0.626). However, the QoL was negatively influenced by age (OR=1.023), female sex (OR=2.04) and severe disease activity (OR=7.242). One-hour IFX infusion induced a better outcome on work (OR=0.588) and social (OR=0.643) QoL. Long-standing disease was correlated with a slightly better sexual QoL (OR=0.93). Conversely, older age (OR=1.046), severe clinical score (OR=15.579), use of other immunomodulators (OR=3.693) and perianal CD (OR=3.265) were related to an unsatisfactory sexual life. The total number of infusions (OR=0.891), proctitis (OR=0.062) or pancolitis (OR=0.1) minimized the perception of infusion-related side effects.Conclusion: The 1-h short infusion improves overall, social and job QoL, so that, when indicated, it should be recommended.

ОЦЕНКА ЭФФЕКТИВНОСТИ И БЕЗОПАСНОСТИ 10% ВНУТРИВЕННОГО ИММУНОГЛОБУЛИНА ПРИВИДЖЕН В РЕАЛЬНОЙ КЛИНИЧЕСКОЙ ПРАКТИКЕ

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.G. Khludova ◽  
I.A. Manto ◽  
E.A. Latysheva ◽  
T.V. Latysheva ◽  
M.R. Khaitov
Keyword(s):  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Primary Immunodeficiency ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
High Efficacy ◽  
Antibody Synthesis ◽  
Human Immunoglobulins ◽  
Severe Adverse Reactions ◽  
Common Variable ◽  
Real Clinical Practice

Актуальность. Заместительная терапия иммуноглобулинами человека является ведущим патогенетическим методом лечения первичных иммунодефицитов с нарушением синтеза антител. В настоящее время в России доступно несколько препаратов иммуноглобулинов человека нормальных для внутривенного введения. Цель. Оценить эффективность и безопасность препарата Привиджен (10 раствор иммуноглобулина для внутривенного введения) в реальной клинической практике в течение 12 клинических месяцев. Материалы и методы. 20 взрослых с диагнозом общая вариабельная иммунная недостаточности и Х-сцепленная агаммаглобулинемия получали внутривенный иммуноглобулин Привиджен к интервалом 243 дня в течение 12 мес. Первичными критериями оценки была частота инфекционных осложнений и нежелательных явлений. Результаты. У большинства пациентов в ходе исследования достигнут удовлетворительный претранс-фузионный уровень IgG. Тяжелых нежелательных явлений, связанных с введением препарата, не зарегистрировано. Заключение. В ходе исследования препарат продемонстрировал высокую эффективность и безопасность у пациентов, нуждающихся в ежемесячной заместительной терапииRelevance. Replacement therapy with human immunoglobulins is the leading pathogenetic method of treatment of primary immunodeficiency with impaired antibody synthesis. Currently, several preparations of human immunoglobulins for intravenous administration are available in Russia. Purposes. Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Privigen immunoglobulin intravenous 10 liquid in real clinical practice within 12 clinical months. Methods. Twenty adults diagnosed with common variable immunodeficiency or X-linked agammaglobulinemia received intravenous Privigen infusions (0.2-0.4 mg/kg) at 243 intervals over a 12-month period. The primary endpoint was the annual rate of infections and adverse events. Results. Sufficient level of IgG was achieved in most patients during the study. Severe adverse reactions during the treatment were not registered. Conclusions. High efficacy and safety of monthly replacement therapy in patients with primary immunodeficiency with impaired antibody synthesis has been demonstrated.

Intravenous versus Oral iron for Iron-Deficiency Anemia in Pregnancy (IVIDA): A Randomized Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam K. Lewkowitz ◽  
Molly J. Stout ◽  
Emily Cooke ◽  
Seon C. Deoni ◽  
Viren D'Sa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Iron Deficiency ◽  
Iron Deficiency Anemia ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Oral Iron ◽  
Deficiency Anemia ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Iv Iron ◽  
Severe Adverse Reactions

Objective Iron-deficiency anemia (IDA) can have serious consequences for mothers and babies. Iron supplementation is recommended, but the administration route is controversial. We sought to conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) testing the effectiveness and safety of intravenous (IV) iron compared with oral iron on perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with IDA. Study Design This open-label RCT randomized patients with IDA (hemoglobin [hgb] <10 g/dL and ferritin <30 ng/mL) at 24 to 34 weeks' to oral iron or single 1,000-mg dose of IV low-molecular weight iron dextran over one hour. The primary outcome was maternal anemia at delivery (hgb < 11 g/dL). Secondary outcomes were mild/moderate or severe adverse reactions, maternal hgb and ferritin at delivery, blood transfusion, gestational age at delivery, birth weight, neonatal hgb and ferritin, and composite neonatal morbidity. Analysis was as per protocol. Results The trial was stopped early for logistical reasons, and the data analyzed as preliminary data to inform a larger, potentially externally funded, definitive trial. Of 55 patients approached, 38 consented. Of these, 15 were withdrawn: 5 received IV iron from their primary obstetrician after being randomized to oral iron and 10 declined to receive IV iron. Of the remaining 23 patients, who were included in the analytic population, 13 received oral iron and 10 received IV iron. The rate of maternal anemia at delivery (hgb < 11 g/dL) was high overall but significantly reduced with IV iron (40 vs. 85%, p = 0.039). Rates of maternal hgb < 10 g/dL were significantly lower in the IV iron group (10 vs. 54%, p = 0.029). There were no severe adverse reactions and similar rates of mild/moderate reactions between groups. Conclusion IV iron reduces rates of anemia at the time of admission for delivery, supporting a larger RCT comparing IV versus oral iron for the treatment of IDA of pregnancy powered for definitive clinical outcomes. However, issues uncovered in this RCT suggest that patient, clinician, and systems-level barriers associated with different IDA treatment modalities must be considered prior to conducting a larger RCT. This study is registered with clinicaltrials.gov with identifier no.: NCT03438227. Key Points

scholarly journals Risk of Severe Adverse Reactions Related to Allopurinol and Febuxostat in Asians

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S106
Author(s):  
C Chen ◽  
W Chung ◽  
YJ Lin ◽  
C Chang ◽  
S Chang
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Severe Adverse Reactions

scholarly journals New Clinical Applications-sintilimab Combined with Albumin-bound Paclitaxel/cisplatin in Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory ES-SCLC

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Han ◽  
Li Li ◽  
Jinli Hao ◽  
Yuanli Lu ◽  
Shicheng Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Efficacy Evaluation ◽  
Peripheral Neurotoxicity ◽  
Extensive Stage ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Positive Effect ◽  
Severe Adverse Reactions

Abstract Introduction: This study is aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sintilimab combined with albumin-bound paclitaxel/ cisplatin as a second-line treatment in these patients with relapsed or refractory extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Methods and Materials: ES-SCLC patients received a second-line regimen of sintilimab combined with albumin-bound paclitaxel/cisplatin. Albumin-bound paclitaxel/cisplatin can be used for up to 6 cycles. Sintilimab use was not stopped until the disease progressed or untolerable side effects occurred. After 2 cycles of chemotherapy or when the patient's condition progressed significantly, computed tomography was rechecked to observe the clinical curative effect and adverse reactions. Results: Totally 38 patients with recurrent SCLC were included for efficacy evaluation. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 26.3% and 84.2% respectively. The median PFS and OS were 6.5 months (95% CI: 3.8-7.8) and 10.8 months (95% CI: 8.5-16.2), respectively. The main adverse reactions are bone marrow suppression, alopecia, peripheral neurotoxicity, muscle and joint pain, gastrointestinal reactions, and fatigue. The severe adverse reactions (grade 3-4) are mainly leukopenia (21.1%), neutropenia (21.1%) and decreased hemoglobin (7.9%). No significant correlation was found between PD-L1 expression and efficacy.Conclusion: Sintilimab combined with albumin-bound paclitaxel/cisplatin has a positive effect on the treatment of ES-SCLC, and the adverse reactions are tolerable.

scholarly journals Safety evaluation of SPF66 malaria vaccine in Brazil

1996 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 497-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
LM. Urdaneta ◽  
A. Prata ◽  
C.J. Struchiner ◽  
C.E. Tosta ◽  
P. Tauil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Malaria Vaccine ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Safety Evaluation ◽  
Efficacy Trial ◽  
Systemic Side Effects ◽  
Local Reactions ◽  
Severe Adverse Reactions ◽  
Local Side

The frequency and description of side effects secondaiy to the subcutaneous application of SPf66 malaria vaccine and placebo are reported for each dose of application in the participants of the vaccine efficacy trial in Brazil. Side effects evaluated two hours after each application were detected in 8.0%, 30.2% and 8.8%, for the Is', and 3"' dose, respectively, in the SPf66group, and in 7.0%, 8.5% and 2.9% in the placebo group. Local reactions such as mild inflammation, nodule and pain or erythema frequently accompanied by pruritus were the most common reactions detected in both groups (3-8%, 29.1% and 8.5% in the SPf66 group and 4.0%, 7.6% and 2.5% in the placebo group). Among vaccinees, local side effects after the 2nd dose were more frequent in females. Systemic side effects were expressed mainly through general symptoms referred by the participants and were most frequent after the 1st dose in both groups (4.3% in the SPf66 group and 3-0% in the placebo group). Muscle aches and fever were refewred by few participants. No severe adverse reactions were detected for either dose of application or group.

scholarly journals P60 Efficacy of switching to infliximab biosimilar (Remsima®) in paediatric inflammatory bowel disease (PIBD): a 2-Year retrospective evaluation

2020 ◽  
Vol 105 (9) ◽  
pp. e37.2-e38
Author(s):  
Fatima Yaqub ◽  
Joanne Crook ◽  
John Fell
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Parallel Group ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

AimTo evaluate patient outcomes 2 years post switching Infliximab therapy from Infliximab originator molecule Remicade® to biosimilar Remsima®.MethodsPatients with PIBD who experienced induction with Remicade® therapy, were <18 years old at last follow-up and were receiving active treatment with Remsima® 2 years post switching were selected to be included for evaluation. Outcome measures included monitoring disease activity and treatment failure at baseline (before switching) and at selected time points up to 2 years post-switch. Disease activity was assessed looking at a range of parameters: disease activity scores; trough infliximab levels; haematological markers (HGB, platelets, WBC); LFTs (bilirubin, ALT, ALP); inflammatory markers (ESR, CRP) and faecal calprotectin levels. Patients who failed therapy were assessed for adverse reactions and infliximab antibody formation. Data was analysed with the Cochran Q test, repeated measures ANOVA test and Friedman test; with post-hoc Bonferroni and Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks tests if appropriate.ResultsData was available for 18 patients after exclusion criteria were applied. There was a significant increase in trough infliximab levels by the end of the period from an average of 5 ug/L to 12 ug/L at 2 years. The average dose/kg increased over 2 years by 1.5 mg/kg. Disease activity markers showed no changes between time points except a decrease in ALP levels from baseline to 1 year, but values remained within normal ranges. Four patients were discontinued from Remsima® due to side effects or loss of efficacy. The average time to treatment failure on Remsima® was 38 months (~19/20 doses). Three out of four patients developed infliximab antibodies, 2 of these patients went on to suffer adverse reactions; 1 exhibited joint pain which settled weeks after each infusion and the other developed an immediate infusion reaction in the form of a rash with urticaria on the 3rd infusion of Remsima®.ConclusionInfliximab biosimilars, such as Remsima®, were approved for use in PIBD by the EMA after studies in adult populations with rheumatic diseases.1 2 Induction studies have shown efficacy in PIBD but data on switching is limited and short-term.3 4 Our data shows no significant differences in clinical patient outcomes over a 2-year period in a cohort switched from Remicade® to Remsima®. In fact, a significant increase in trough infliximab levels in patients remaining on Remsima® suggests efficacy in producing therapeutic levels in PIBD patients. Increased levels may be explained by dose intensification used by the PIBD multi-disciplinary team (MDT), reflecting careful dose optimisation strategies used at this trust throughout the time period. Patients losing response were not unexpected and are likely not due to the biosimilar switch but rather due to the length of time the patients were on treatment. The small sample size and retrospective nature of this study mean larger cohort studies are required over prolonged time periods to confirm these findings. PIBD MDTs should continue to monitor patients for adverse reactions, particularly in those who develop infliximab antibodies.ReferencesPark W, Hrycaj P, Jeka S, et al. A randomised, double-blind, multicentre, parallel-group, prospective study comparing the pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of CT-P13 and innovator infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: the PLANETAS study. Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72:1605–1612.Yoo DH, Hrycaj P, Miranda P, et al. Extended report: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study to demonstrate equivalence in efficacy and safety of CT-P13 compared with innovator infliximab when co-administered with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: the PLANETRA study. Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72:1613.Sieczkowska J, Jarzębicka D, Banaszkiewicz A, et al. Switching Between Infliximab Originator and Biosimilar in Paediatric Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Preliminary Observations. J Crohn’s Colitis 2016;10:127–132.Sieczkowska J, Jarzębicka D, Meglicka M, et al. Experience with biosimilar infliximab (CT-P13) in paediatric patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2016;9:729–735.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document