scholarly journals Bispecific Antibodies: A Review of Development, Clinical Efficacy and Toxicity in B-Cell Lymphomas

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 355
Author(s):  
Ross Salvaris ◽  
Jeremy Ong ◽  
Gareth P. Gregory

The treatment landscape of B-cell lymphomas is evolving with the advent of novel agents including immune and cellular therapies. Bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) are molecules that recognise two different antigens and are used to engage effector cells, such as T-cells, to kill malignant B-cells. Several bispecific antibodies have entered early phase clinical development since the approval of the CD19/CD3 bispecific antibody, blinatumomab, for relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Novel bsAbs include CD20/CD3 antibodies that are being investigated in both aggressive and indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma with encouraging overall response rates including complete remissions. These results are seen even in heavily pre-treated patient populations such as those who have relapsed after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. Potential toxicities include cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicity and tumour flare, with a number of strategies existing to mitigate these risks. Here, we review the development of bsAbs, their mechanism of action and the different types of bsAbs and how they differ in structure. We will present the currently available data from clinical trials regarding response rates, progression free survival and outcomes across a range of non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes. Finally, we will discuss the key toxicities of bsAbs, their rates and management of these adverse events.

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. S326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kitsada Wudhikarn ◽  
Martina Pennisi ◽  
Martha Garcia Recio ◽  
Molly A. Maloy ◽  
Gunjan L. Shah ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Philip George

<p>Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is shifting the treatment paradigm internationally for selected patients with relapsed and refractory B-cell Non- Hodgkin Lymphoma. Despite high response rates with durable responses achieved in a significant proportion of patients, over 50% of patients will have progressed at one year following treatment with the currently licensed anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapies. This modality of therapy is also associated with acute and potentially life-threatening toxicities, requiring strict risk mitigation strategies.  In this thesis, the design, preparation and implementation of a new third generation anti-CD19 CAR T-cell Phase 1 trial entitled ENABLE, for patients with relapsed and refractory B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, is described in detail. Following a literature review of CAR T-cell therapy in patients with B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, the rationale for the ENABLE trial design is discussed, along with regulatory and clinical requirements for setting up CAR T-cell therapy in New Zealand. The importance of international collaboration to inform aspects of study design, CAR T-cell product manufacturing and developing CAR T-cell toxicity management protocols, has been demonstrated.  The early clinical experience on the ENABLE trial is presented along with provisional safety, pharmacokinetic and efficacy data from the first participant treated. This is the first time that CAR T-cell therapy has been administered in New Zealand, demonstrating CAR T-cell expansion in vivo; but also highlighting the complexities of the CAR T-cell product manufacturing process and the importance of evaluating feasibility of CAR T-cell manufacturing, as a key secondary endpoint of the study. Further clinical experience on the ENABLE trial is crucial to develop the potential for CAR T-Cell therapy to be a safe, feasible and effective option for selected New Zealand patients in the future.</p>


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1279-1279
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Matasar ◽  
Coral L. Atoria ◽  
Elena B. Elkin ◽  
Chadi Nabhan

Abstract Background: The introduction of rituximab has improved outcomes in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (BCL) across all histologies. Extended use of rituximab, or maintenance rituximab, improves progression-free survival in follicular lymphoma (FL) patients who achieve a response to induction rituximab with or without chemotherapy, but there is no evidence of an overall survival benefit. There is currently little evidence to support extended use of rituximab in other histologic subgroups, and older patients in particular may be at risk of adverse events. Our objective was to characterize patterns and predictors of extended rituximab therapy in a population-based cohort of older BCL patients in the United States. Methods: In the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare dataset,we identified patients 66 years and older diagnosed with BCL in 2000-2010. Histology was classified as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), Burkitt lymphoma (BL), FL, mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), other indolent BCL, and BCL not otherwise specified (NOS). We identified Medicare claims for rituximab starting at any point following diagnosis. Extended rituximab therapy was defined as a duration of greater than 7 months with no gap in rituximab claims greater than 6 months. Demographic and clinical characteristics associated with extended rituximab were evaluated in multivariable logistic regression. Results: There were 24,232 BCL patients who received rituximab during the study period. The cohort was predominantly white (91%), half were men, 15% had a Charlson comorbidity score ≥2, and 12% were 85 years or older. DLBCL was the most common histology (44%), followed by FL (21%), other indolent BCL (17%), BCL-NOS (13%), MCL (6%), and BL (1%). Overall, most patients (85%) received rituximab for ≤7 months, but duration varied by histology (Table 1). More than a quarter of FL patients had extended therapy, including 7% who had rituximab for more than 24 months. Among patients with other histologies, receipt of extended therapy varied from 20% (other indolent BCL) to 8% (BL). Compared with FL patients and controlling for demographic and disease characteristics, patients with other histologies were less likely to receive extended rituximab therapy (p<0.0001). Adjusted odds ratios were 0.91 (95% CI 0.78-1.05) for MCL, 0.83 (0.75-0.91) for other indolent BCL, 0.67 (0.60-0.75) for BCL-NOS, 0.32 (0.29-0.36) for DLBCL, and 0.28 (0.15-0.53) for BL. However, 75% of patients who had extended rituximab, and 63% of those who had rituximab >24 months, were of non-FL histology. Controlling for histology and other characteristics, extended rituximab therapy was more likely among women (adjusted OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.18), and less likely among unmarried patients (0.92, 0.85-0.99) and those in rural areas (0.84, 0.75-0.94). There was significant regional variation (p<0.0001), with patients in the West (adjusted OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79-0.95), and Midwest (0.75, 0.66-0.86) less likely to receive extended rituximab than those in the Northeast. There was no significant relationship between extended therapy and age, race, or comorbidity. Conclusions: While FL patients were more likely than others to receive extended rituximab, the majority of patients receiving extended rituximab had other diagnoses across the entire spectrum of B-cell lymphoma, for which extended rituximab is neither indicated nor supported by guidelines or prospective data. After controlling for histology, several demographic characteristics significantly influenced the duration of therapy. Extended use of rituximab – particularly in patients for whom it is not clearly indicated – may have important implications for clinical outcomes, toxicity, and costs. Table 1 Duration of rituximab use across B-cell lymphoma histologic subgroups Histology Duration of Rituximab N ≤7 mos >7-24 mos >24 mos DLBCL 10,567 91% 7% 2% FL 5,001 76% 17% 7% BL 127 92% 6% 2% MCL 1,339 79% 16% 5% Other indolent 4,095 80% 15% 5% BCL NOS 3,103 83% 13% 4% Total 24,232 80% 15% 5% Disclosures Matasar: Merck: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria; Spectrum: Honoraria. Nabhan:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7567-7567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan Gauthier ◽  
Alexandre V. Hirayama ◽  
Kevin Anthony Hay ◽  
Daniel Li ◽  
Alyssa Sheih ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (16) ◽  
pp. 3053-3061
Author(s):  
C. Perry ◽  
E. Luttwak ◽  
R. Balaban ◽  
G. Shefer ◽  
M. M. Morales ◽  
...  

Abstract Patients diagnosed with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL), particularly if recently treated with anti-CD20 antibodies, are at risk of severe COVID-19 disease. Because studies evaluating humoral response to COVID-19 vaccine in these patients are lacking, recommendations regarding vaccination strategy remain unclear. The humoral immune response to BNT162b2 messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccine was evaluated in patients with B-NHL who received 2 vaccine doses 21 days apart and compared with the response in healthy controls. Antibody titer, measured by the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2S assay, was evaluated 2 to 3 weeks after the second vaccine dose. Patients with B-NHL (n = 149), aggressive B-NHL (a-B-NHL; 47%), or indolent B-NHL (i-B-NHL; 53%) were evaluated. Twenty-eight (19%) were treatment naïve, 37% were actively treated with a rituximab/obinutuzumab (R/Obi)–based induction regimen or R/Obi maintenance, and 44% had last been treated with R/Obi &gt;6 months before vaccination. A seropositive response was achieved in 89%, 7.3%, and 66.7%, respectively, with response rates of 49% in patients with B-NHL vs 98.5% in 65 healthy controls (P &lt; .001). Multivariate analysis revealed that longer time since exposure to R/Obi and absolute lymphocyte count ≥0.9 × 103/μL predicted a positive serological response. Median time to achieve positive serology among anti-CD20 antibody-treated patients was longer in i-B-NHL vs a-B-NHL. The humoral response to BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine is impaired in patients with B-NHL who are undergoing R/Obi treatment. Longer time since exposure to R/Obi is associated with improved response rates to the COVID-19 vaccine. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04746092.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 573-583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Fayad ◽  
Fritz Offner ◽  
Mitchell R. Smith ◽  
Gregor Verhoef ◽  
Peter Johnson ◽  
...  

Purpose Inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO) is an antibody-targeted chemotherapy agent composed of a humanized anti-CD22 antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, a potent cytotoxic agent. We performed a phase I/II study to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of INO plus rituximab (R-INO) for treatment of relapsed/refractory CD20+/CD22+ B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Patients and Methods A dose-escalation phase to determine the MTD of R-INO was followed by an expanded cohort to further evaluate the efficacy and safety at the MTD. Patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma (FL), relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), or refractory aggressive NHL received R-INO every 4 weeks for up to eight cycles. Results In all, 118 patients received one or more cycles of R-INO (median, four cycles). Most common grade 3 to 4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (31%) and neutropenia (22%). Common low-grade toxicities included hyperbilirubinemia (25%) and increased AST (36%). The MTD of INO in combination with rituximab (375 mg/m2) was confirmed to be the same as that for single-agent INO (1.8 mg/m2). Treatment at the MTD yielded objective response rates of 87%, 74%, and 20% for relapsed FL (n = 39), relapsed DLBCL (n = 42), and refractory aggressive NHL (n = 30), respectively. The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 68% (median, not reached) for FL and 42% (median, 17.1 months) for relapsed DLBCL. Conclusion R-INO demonstrated high response rates and long PFS in patients with relapsed FL or DLBCL. This and the manageable toxicity profile suggest that R-INO may be a promising option for CD20+/CD22+ B-cell NHL.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinichi Makita ◽  
Katsuaki Imaizumi ◽  
Saiko Kurosawa ◽  
Kensei Tobinai

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document